Heh. Sorry, not interested. Maybe someone else is. Good luck.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/29/2014 2:06:52 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
miser...@gmail.com writes:
Marine,
I should add, in case it's important to you, that the X-E2 has an
onboard flash while the X-T1 doesn't.
If I
The mirrorless seem to be getting CLOSE to what I want. Sort of like,
I'll know it when I see it.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/31/2014 4:46:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
godfreydigio...@me.com writes:
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
.. I am still sort of
On January 31, 2014 7:45:17 PM EST, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com
wrote:
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
.. I am still sort of the opinion that *my* perfect camera hasn't
been made yet. ..
It's probably a fact that no camera can ever truly be perfect.
I've
On February 1, 2014 9:37:58 PM EST, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com
wrote:
On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years
(aside from
On 3 February 2014 08:18, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
If camera makers opened up their firmware, then I'd probably be able to end
up with a 98% perfect camera for no extra money, but nobody listens to Thom
Hogan, let alone to me :-/
Cheers,
Amen, the Sony RX100.. could benefit
On Feb 2, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I've thought about that for the last 5 years or so. Shame there are no custom
camera builders, like there are tailors, architects or carpinters; at this
point I get so worked up by imperfect cameras that I'd be willing to pay a
On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy
maybe but he's not 100% on it. Interesting take.
On Feb 1, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy
maybe but he's not 100% on it.
Hmmm. Interesting! Thanks, Cotty.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy
On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years
(aside from the weird processing required for the X sensors), and with
the Sony A7, it's the placement of the EV Compensation dial. The right-
rear corner is just wrong--I
On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years
(aside from the weird processing required for the X sensors), and with
the Sony A7, it's the
Heh. I thought saw a X-M2 at CES. No longer sure, maybe it was the X-T1.
Or the X-E2. Whatever it was, it was brand, brand new.
MarnieHuh, probably not. I have conflicting desires to dump my Canon
equipment and get the K-3 or a Fujifilm or something similar that is
smaller. But the
On 31/1/14, eactiv...@aol.com, discombobulated, unleashed:
*my* perfect camera hasn't been made
yet.
Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Heh. I thought saw a X-M2 at CES. No longer sure, maybe it was the X-T1.
Or the X-E2. Whatever it was, it was brand, brand new.
Marnie Huh, probably not. I have conflicting desires to dump my
Canon equipment and get the K-3 or a Fujifilm
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
.. I am still sort of the opinion that *my* perfect camera hasn't been made
yet. ..
It's probably a fact that no camera can ever truly be perfect.
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 29/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Give me a bag of cormorants any day.
MARK!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It's a very nice body, similar to OM-D E-M1. I don't mind EVF, the
latest iterations are quite good. Magnification could be better
though. I'm not planning to get a mirrorless system, but now it would
be a tough choice between this and the Olympus.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The Olympus looks really good, but I'd be leaning towards the SONY a7,
despite it's now documented shortcomings, with an adapter it would make
my full frame K and M lenses their proper focal lengths again. I really
don't like the fly by wire focusing that seems to be the new normal for
most
I am interested in the X-M2, not sure of the differences between it and
this one. (It has a viewfinder also, saw it at CES).
Marnie
In a message dated 1/28/2014 3:40:28 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
co...@seeingeye.tv writes:
On 28/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I'm really not
Marine,
I should add, in case it's important to you, that the X-E2 has an
onboard flash while the X-T1 doesn't.
If I come across as a Fuji salesperson, I'm not. I'll happily let you
know all the things that annoy the hell out of me on the X-E2 :-)
Cheers,
--M.
\/\/o/\/\ --
On 29/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
If I come across as a Fuji salesperson, I'm not. I'll happily let you
know all the things that annoy the hell out of me on the X-E2 :-)
My X-E1 I got used will eventually go - but it's a capable little camera.
Wish list:
X-T1 and X100s black.
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
[...]
X-T1 and X100s black.
The 56/1.2 looks pretty cool:
http://cdn0.mos.techradar.futurecdn.net//art/cameras/Fujifilm
/Fuji%20X-
T1/Product%20Shots/Fuji_X-T1_34-580-90.jpg
or
Marnie,
You mean the X-E2? There is an X-M1 (not X-M2) but it doesn't have a viewfinder.
The guts of the X-E2 and X-T1 are very similar: Same sensor and image
processing engine, and probably same AF algorithms (at least once they
release new firmware for the X-E2). The EVF on the X-T1 is larger
Good point, Bob! Though 80 cormorants would make for a spikey camera...
Cheers,
--M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 29 January 2014 17:26, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
-Original
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:00:04PM +0200, Attila Boros wrote:
It's a very nice body, similar to OM-D E-M1. I don't mind EVF, the
latest iterations are quite good. Magnification could be better
though. I'm not planning to get a mirrorless system, but now it would
be a tough choice between this
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
http://www.fujirumors.com/wake-up-its-real-x-t1-announced-live-blogging-
press-realease-pre-orders-and-more/
A digital LX? (Yeah, I know it's only APS-C, but this is a legitimate
question.)
Yes it
Well, but arguably, sir, you get to keep your hat uneaten...
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
Well, but arguably, sir, you get to keep your hat uneaten...
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
Looks like a nicely designed body, similar aesthetic to the Nikon Df with many
discrete dials, buttons and knobs. I hope it has an up to date EVF (on par with
the Sony A7/A7r or Olympus E-M1) and feels good in the hand. I know Fuji's
lenses are generally quite good; they're building up a decent
Nice, but I won't buy one until they come out with a Full Frame model.
Wah, wah, wah!
;-)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
Kind of looks like someone took parts of Sony's new FF mirrorless, and
the Olympus OM-D, (doesn't matter which one really), and built a new
camera out of the parts around an APS-C sensor. From the front it looks
a lot like a nice compact film SLR from the late 80's before AutoFocus
took
For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3:
http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k
Pretty similar from the front, but take a look from the top; big
difference there.
And Cotty, I assume you saw the EVF size comparison on the DPR preview:
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Miserere
Sent: 28 January 2014 20:34
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!
For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3:
http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3:
http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k
Pretty similar from the front, but take a look from the top; big
difference there.
And Cotty, I assume you saw the EVF size comparison on the DPR preview:
On 28/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
I am, slowly being won around. This one is OLED and supposedly one-tenth
of the lag rate of previous incarnations...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||
On 28/01/2014 2:33 PM, Miserere wrote:
http://4.static.img-dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-t1/images/vf-sizes.jpg?v=2721
Fuji is trying really hard to make me part with my hard-earned money...
Not having seen an EVF that doesn't make me hurl, I will probably like
this camera from afar.
On 28/01/2014 3:29 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
If you prefer an SLR you've got to put the mirror box somewhere.
The 17.7 registration distance of the X-mount keeps the camera thinner
as well.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
Same for me. For now.
But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders
and will replace them the elimination of the moving mirror, prism,
etc. will make the cost reduction irresistible
On 28/01/2014 6:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
Same for me. For now.
But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders
and will replace them – the elimination of the moving mirror, prism,
etc.
Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/01/2014 6:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
Same for me. For now.
But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders
and will replace them – the
Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice, but I won't buy one until they come out with a Full Frame model.
Wah, wah, wah!
;-)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
We haven't seen a lot of cost reduction so far from using EVFs. Take for
example two roughly equivalent cameras an EVF Olympus OM-D EM-1 at 16mp
and the K-5II. The cameras spec sheets are very similar, weather sealed,
Magnesium alloy bodies, With really about equal IQ, both have weather
Since the Fuji cameras were designed from the beginning with an APS-C
sensor and a whole new lens mount so there is no existing base of lenses
designed with a big enough image circle to cover a 24x36mm sensor,
Demanding a FF solution is worse than silly. It would be like demanding
that
I don't believe in the notion that EVFs are primarily intended to be cost
reduction. At the present time, they represent the second most expensive single
component in these cameras, the primary imager sensor itself being the first
most expensive. Inexpensive pentaprism viewfinder technology is
Just another argument in favor of a FF DSLR from Pentax. bigger and
brighter viewfinder.
On 1/29/2014 1:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't believe in the notion that EVFs are primarily intended to be cost
reduction. At the present time, they represent the second most expensive single
On 27/12/13, CollinB, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://oklahomacity.craigslist.org/ele/4238293683.html
Wretched things
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML
Oh, the pain!
So much needless surgery! So much suffering!
Rick
On Dec 27, 2013, at 18:38 , CollinB wrote:
http://oklahomacity.craigslist.org/ele/4238293683.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
From: Steve Cottrell
On 14/5/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
couldn't resist this - I had taken a walk downdown to the south street
seaport, which is still pretty much not in operation.
Not exactly the first peso after surgery I imagined I'd show but...
On 14/5/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
couldn't resist this - I had taken a walk downdown to the south street
seaport, which is still pretty much not in operation.
Not exactly the first peso after surgery I imagined I'd show but...
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I would love to have lunch with you on the premises!
Paul
I'd love to have lunch anywhere.
Dave
On May 15, 2013, at 9:29 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvelous image, really carries the
Appealing somehow. The contrast between the 2 styles of doors are part of
the appeal but so is the missing-teeth smile.
Hope they open soon, seems like it is worth the walk?
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ann Sanfedele
Sent: Tuesday, May
Nice image, Ann. Well rendered as well.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:27 PM
Subject: Peso - Cotty, the model
couldn't resist this - I had taken a walk downdown to the south
On 5/15/2013 06:54, Gerrit Visser wrote:
Appealing somehow. The contrast between the 2 styles of doors are part of
the appeal but so is the missing-teeth smile.
oops I didn't notice missing teeth - ( sorry, Cotters! Guess I haven't
quite got my eyes back.)
Hope they open soon, seems like
Marvelous image, really carries the flavor of that locale.
Glad to see you are up and about.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
couldn't resist this - I had taken a walk downdown to the south
I would love to have lunch with you on the premises!
Paul
On May 15, 2013, at 9:29 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvelous image, really carries the flavor of that locale.
Glad to see you are up and about.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
.
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ann Sanfedele
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:57 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso - Cotty, the model
On 5/15/2013 06:54, Gerrit Visser wrote:
Appealing somehow. The contrast between the 2
Looking good. The eye is working as well as the eye.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 23:27:37 -0400
From: Ann Sanfedeleann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Peso - Cotty, the model
Message-ID:519300a9.2080...@nyc.rr.com
Content-Type:
: Re: Peso - Cotty, the model
On 5/15/2013 06:54, Gerrit Visser wrote:
Appealing somehow. The contrast between the 2 styles of doors are part
of the appeal but so is the missing-teeth smile.
oops I didn't notice missing teeth - ( sorry, Cotters! Guess I haven't quite
got my eyes back.)
Hope
On Mar 22, 2013, at 04:17 , Igor Roshchin wrote:
Heh!..
The trend of the last 5-7 years (at least in the US) is to stretch
4:3 TV programs to the widescreen 16:9 TV sets.
It's done at the bars, airports, hotels (and fixed, so that you cannot
change it back to how it should be.
I think
On 21/3/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://xkcd.com/1187/
LOL!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Heh!..
The trend of the last 5-7 years (at least in the US) is to stretch
4:3 TV programs to the widescreen 16:9 TV sets.
It's done at the bars, airports, hotels (and fixed, so that you cannot
change it back to how it should be.
I think thee is a conspiracy out there: if you see all people
On 2/8/2013 5:48 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 7/2/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://solsticevisuals.com/post/41297830142/the-opposite-of-go-pro
Like the duct tape.
Gaffer's tape would seem more appropriate, wouldn't it?
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 7/2/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://solsticevisuals.com/post/41297830142/the-opposite-of-go-pro
Like the duct tape.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
Looks legit.
Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
http://solsticevisuals.com/post/41297830142/the-opposite-of-go-pro
https://www.facebook.com/zosxaviusphotography
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Nice
Dave
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Postmaster postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Warning: Cat photo
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dc01535.jpg
The man and his dear, now-departed cat Duki.
From our visit to chez Cotty last month.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Looks comfy.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:13 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice
Dave
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Postmaster postmas...@robertstech.com
wrote:
Warning: Cat photo
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dc01535.jpg
The man and his dear, now-departed cat Duki.
Yes, Cotty forced his cat to SLEEP ON THE COMFY CHAIR! Oh,
Felinedom.
Cheers
Mike
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Looks comfy.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:13 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice
Dave
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM,
Why are they both turning their backs on us?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Postmaster postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Warning: Cat photo
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dc01535.jpg
The man and his dear, now-departed cat
oooh so sad...
ann
On 2/25/2012 12:55, Postmaster wrote:
Warning: Cat photo
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dc01535.jpg
The man and his dear, now-departed cat Duki.
From our visit to chez Cotty last month.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 25/2/12, Postmaster, discombobulated, unleashed:
Warning: Cat photo
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dc01535.jpg
The man and his dear, now-departed cat Duki.
From our visit to chez Cotty last month.
Thanks mate - I enjoyed that.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Why are they both turning their backs on us?
I'm showing his best side. rimshot
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Wonderful photo. Sorry to hear of your loss, Cotty.
Love the pdml sticker...
:-)
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Postmaster postmas...@robertstech.com
Sent: February 25, 2012 2/25/12
To:
But now they only block the sun
They rain and snow on everyone
So many things I would have done
But clouds got in my way
From: P. J. Alling
Everybody want's me to put my faith it the cloud. I want to build my
own server farm.
On 7/31/2011 10:24 AM, David Parsons wrote:
Microsoft online apps,
On 29/7/11, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
No comment necessary
http://youtu.be/OrkAuwaoFGg
Only just seen this (been busy).
Superb.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Microsoft online apps, they've only been trying to get that up for the
last 15 years.
I wouldn't necessarily trust MS with hosted data any more than Google.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
No comment necessary
http://youtu.be/OrkAuwaoFGg
--
Mark
Everybody want's me to put my faith it the cloud. I want to build my
own server farm.
On 7/31/2011 10:24 AM, David Parsons wrote:
Microsoft online apps, they've only been trying to get that up for the
last 15 years.
I wouldn't necessarily trust MS with hosted data any more than Google.
On
Just imagine being a server-poke, riding around the great open spaces in
Montana, herding and roping those servers. Ah, server-farming would be
the life.
On 11-07-31 1:16 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Everybody want's me to put my faith it the cloud. I want to build
my own server farm.
On
Oh, I'd trust MS *far* less than Google.
I'm sure Google data-mine everything I search for, follow links to, etc.
But I'm equally sure that they take very serious precautions to prevent
that data leaking outside the Googleplex; using that data to target ads
for their Google ad service is what
On 2011-07-31 14:42, Bruce Walker wrote:
Just imagine being a server-poke, riding around the great open spaces in
Montana, herding and roping those servers.
Servers don't crap on the floor, but cows don't start fires as often. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2011-07-31 14:42, Bruce Walker wrote:
Just imagine being a server-poke, riding around the great open spaces in
Montana, herding and roping those servers.
Servers don't crap on the floor, but cows don't start fires as often.
On Jul 31, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Just imagine being a server-poke, riding around the great open spaces in
Montana, herding and roping those servers. Ah, server-farming would be the
life.
Everybody want's me to put my faith it the cloud. I want to build my own
On 7/31/2011 19:19, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2011-07-31 14:42, Bruce Walker wrote:
Just imagine being a server-poke, riding around the great open spaces in
Montana, herding and roping those servers.
Servers don't crap on the
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 07:50:19PM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/31/2011 19:19, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2011-07-31 14:42, Bruce Walker wrote:
Just imagine being a server-poke, riding around the great open spaces in
Montana,
Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/9/09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
that's another great looking bike. There is a bit of a fashion at the moment
Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
that's another great looking bike. There is a bit of a
fashion at the moment
for retro cyclewear. I saw a chap last
On 9/5/09, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
And surviving another week the garden weed.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Thanks, Bob. Here's some more tweedy goodness:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roxysreal/sets/72157612934832373/
Excellent. Further proof that cycling helmets are only
meant for children
and Tour de France riders.
Found that one guy who didn't get the memo.
Thanks, Bob. Here's some more tweedy goodness:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roxysreal/sets/72157612934832373/
Excellent. Further proof that cycling helmets are only
meant for children
and Tour de France riders.
Found that one guy who didn't get the memo.
On 5/10/09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
this chap appears to be enjoying himself, but one of his chums really needs
to give him the name of a decent barber.
And yet, for some reason I find myself strangely drawn to him...
On 5/10/09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
this chap appears to be enjoying himself, but one of his chums really needs
to give him the name of a decent barber.
And yet, for some reason I find myself strangely drawn to him...
this chap appears to be enjoying himself, but one of his
chums really needs
to give him the name of a decent barber.
And yet, for some reason I find myself strangely drawn to him...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roxysreal/3225420577/in/set-72157
612934832373/
Here are two
On 10/5/09, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here are two more of that same fellow.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roxysreal/3226277168/in/set-72157612934832373/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roxysreal/3226277660/in/set-72157612934832373/
You goddam prevert Loveless!!!
Thanks.
--
You supposed to have a gear shift on that?
Looks like a hanger on the frame for a shift.
Pretty bike...
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
that's another great looking bike. There is a bit of a fashion at the moment
for retro cyclewear. I saw a chap last week on a beautiful old English
3-speed who was dressed in tweeds and wool.
On 5/9/09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
that's another great looking bike. There is a bit of a fashion at the moment
for retro cyclewear. I saw a chap last week on a beautiful
On 5/9/09, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
You supposed to have a gear shift on that?
Looks like a hanger on the frame for a shift.
Pretty bike...
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks, Bob. There are some cable guides, but it's a single speed at
the moment.
--
Scott Loveless
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
that's another great looking bike. There is a bit of a
fashion at the moment
for retro cyclewear. I saw a chap last week on a beautiful
old English
3-speed who was
On May 9, 2009, at 17:07, Bob W wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/1939?feat=directlink
I feel the need, the need for tweed.
that's another great looking bike. There is a bit of a fashion at
the moment
for retro cyclewear. I saw a chap last week on a beautiful old English
On 5/9/09, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
Some people in Minnesota go completely retro every Spring.
http://www.3speedtour.com/
No lycra allowed! :-)
Lycra should never be allowed. Ever. On anyone. Except for that
lady a few doors down who never wears lycra. She should be
On 5/9/09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Thanks, Bob. Here's some more tweedy goodness:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roxysreal/sets/72157612934832373/
Excellent. Further proof that cycling helmets are only meant for children
and Tour de France riders.
Found that one guy who
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
