mailto:kirst...@saunalahti.fi]
Sent: 14-Feb-18 14:23
To: PEIRCE L <PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu>
Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Maxims and mediation (Was Lowell
Lectures)
Gary f., list,
Your response presented as full an understanding of essential points
in my post as I could ever hope. Even
:23
To: PEIRCE L <PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu>
Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Maxims and mediation (Was Lowell Lectures)
Gary f., list,
Your response presented as full an understanding of essential points in my post
as I could ever hope. Even more, I was greatly and happily sur
y of
>>> using the language. Both of us have “recreated” the symbol by
>>> reformulating it, “replicating” it in different ways, and thus
>>> taken its expression a step or two further. That’s part of what I
>>> call a genuine _argument_ (as opposed to a debate, which is a ki
; said that the Universe is “an argument”, “a vast representamen
>> … working out its conclusions in living realities” (EP2:193-4, CP
>> 5.119).
>>
>> I hope you don’t find this presumptuous. At least I can assure you
>> that it’s been formulated with some ca
] }{ _Turning Signs_ gateway
-Original Message-
From: kirst...@saunalahti.fi [mailto:kirst...@saunalahti.fi]
Sent: 14-Feb-18 08:14
To: PEIRCE L <PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu>
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Maxims and mediation (Was Lowell
Lectures)
List,
First I wish to express my apprec
[mailto:kirst...@saunalahti.fi]
Sent: 14-Feb-18 08:14
To: PEIRCE L <PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu>
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Maxims and mediation (Was Lowell Lectures)
List,
First I wish to express my appreciation to Gary f., to his lead and his
commentaries on LL. - However, it seem
List,
First I wish to express my appreciation to Gary f., to his lead and his
commentaries on LL. - However, it seem to me that the discussions tend
to get muddled on certain very, very basic respects.
Peirce's first formulation of the Pragmatic Maxims was about "practical
bearings". So it
