Jeff,
There seem to be quite a few people who are interested in discussing
applications of Peirce's logic and philosophy to current issues. That was
certainly a hot topic in the various Peirce -ennials.
I believe that it would be a topic of general interest.
John
Hello Michael and John,
Nice to hear from you on the List, Michael.
I agree with your suggestions in (1) and (2). How might we further draw out
some of Peirce’s suggestions for explaining the evolution of cooperation in a
wide variety of systems, ranging from ecosystems to human economic and
Jerry
This section is, I believe,from 1868 - and there are more descriptions of the
categories elsewhere., eg. 8/328 1904.
The three terms you reference - quality, relation, representation] can be
understood to refer to Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness.The categories, are
‘modes of being’,
Dear Edwinia, List
> On Apr 7, 2024, at 1:09 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
>
> And I also am a strong supporter of Peirce’s three categories, with the
> interplay between Firstnerss [ randomnness, chance, freedom]; steady-state
> interaction [Secondness] and the development of new habits of
Michale
Thank you for this excellent post. You are exactly right
Peirce's agapastic semiosis is a dynamic and generative process- and it
explains not merely the increasing complexity of the physicochemical and
biological realms [which are, indeed, complex adaptive systems,] but also,
John, List:
I agree with John regarding the urgent relevance of Peirce to this century.
I have been a subscriber to this list for 17 years (since I was 26). In
that time, among other things, I co-founded a billion dollar cybersecurity
company (HUMAN Security, also one of the TIME100 Most
Following is an offline note endorsing my note that endorses Jerry's note
about the upcoming talk on Friday, which emphasizes the importance of Peirce's
writings for our time (the 21st C).
Basic point: Peirce was writing for the future. Those of us who value his
contributions should
Jerry,
Thanks for that note. The following sentence shows why we need to relate
Peirce's writings to the latest and greatest work that is being done today:
>From the abstract: "C.S. Peirce, however, is not generally considered a
>canonical figure in the history of philosophy of science."
I
FYI
JLRC
Friday, April 12th @ 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm EDT
This talk will also be available live streamed on: Zoom at
https://pitt.zoom.us/j/94576817686
Title: Peirce Disappears: C.S. Peirce and Early Logical Empiricism
Abstract: Scholars of the history of philosophy of science read and hear a
