Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Jeff, List: In your example, *semiosis *does not occur unless and until the Sign *actually *determines an Interpretant. Suppose that a human sees the ripples on the water and thinks, "The wind is blowing from the north." How can an Index (Existent) produce such a thought-Sign (Necessitant) as it

Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread Gary Richmond
ant to see if this is a plausible > interpretation of the relevant texts. > > > --Jeff > > > Jeffrey Downard > Associate Professor > Department of Philosophy > Northern Arizona University > (o) 928 523-8354 > > > -- > *From:*

Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread Helmut Raulien
Gary, Jeffrey, list,   Uh, that is very complicated. Thank you. So I reduce what I was saying as follows:   In both the relations sign-object and sign-interpretant I have observed, that determination goes in the opposite direction than something else, respectively: Between sign and object it i

RE: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread EDWINA
interaction. Edwina Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jeffrey Brian Downard Sent: April 4, 2018 5:04 PM To: Peirce-L Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination Gary R, Helmut, List, What Gary says certainly holds for the relation of determination between dynamical objects and

Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread Gary Richmond
Helmut, list, Well, there's been a great deal of discussion among semioticians over the years as to what exactly Peirce meant by "determines" in his saying that the object determines the sign which in turn determines the interpretant sign. When I say "discussion" I mean at times downright disagree

Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread Jeffrey Brian Downard
Peirce-L Subject: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination Helmut, list, Peirce's term "determination" as used in his semeiotics does not concern any causal or generative interaction, certainly no push/pull sort of thing. As the second quotation below puts it: "this dete

Aw: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread Helmut Raulien
Gary, list, "Push-pull" is quite a crude metaphor, ok. But I don´t understand how "placing of constraints or conditions" and "using certain features (...) to generate and shape our understanding" is not causal. Best, Helmut   04. April 2018 um 22:14 Uhr "Gary Richmond"   Helmut, list,  

Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Order of Determination

2018-04-04 Thread Gary Richmond
Helmut, list, Peirce's term "determination" as used in his semeiotics does not concern any causal or generative interaction, certainly no push/pull sort of thing. As the second quotation below puts it: "this determination is not determination in any causal sense." Here *determination* is consider