Glenn Linderman wrote:
Peter Scott wrote:
I have often wished that digraphs were not bundled with variables in this
respect, i.e., I wanted to put a string containing \n inside single quotes
just 'cuz it didn't contain variables to be interpolated. Whether there's
a way of improving
"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
What would be NICE is to treat @stonehenge here as *always* a variable
So, I'd support a modification to the RFC that does what Larry intended
here:
array interpolation should work exactly like scalar interpolation
That was actually the intent of the
This has already been done for Perl 5.6.1. Here is what perldelta.pod
has to say.
=head2 Arrays now Always Interpolate Into Double-Quoted Strings
In double-quoted strings, arrays now interpolate, no matter what. The
behavior in perl 5 was that arrays would interpolate into strings if
the
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 04:09:51PM -0400, Ted Ashton wrote:
Better yet, DWIM. If I write
print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as
it
Ted Ashton wrote:
Better yet, DWIM. If I write
print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as
it stands.
Um, no. Something about the relaxation of
Better yet, DWIM. If I write
print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as
it stands.
I initially was thinking this too, but there's a major
"Jonathan" == Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jonathan Isn't that the way perl4 did it? I don't know what agony lwall and
Jonathan friends went through that made them change this behaviour though. It
Jonathan would be good for someone who does to speak up about it.
It permits
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 04:09:51PM -0400, Ted Ashton wrote:
Better yet, DWIM. If I write
print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as
it
At 02:44 PM 8/15/00 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
Better yet, DWIM. If I write
print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as
it stands.
Peter Scott wrote:
I have often wished that digraphs were not bundled with variables in this
respect, i.e., I wanted to put a string containing \n inside single quotes
just 'cuz it didn't contain variables to be interpolated. Whether there's
a way of improving this behavior or not I don't
"PS" == Peter Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want this to *always* print out the _value_ of @stuff, even if it's
unititalized.
PS Arrays aren't uninitialized. They contain zero or more scalars, some of
PS which may be uninitialized.
I don't know if it is still true. But at one point in
Peter Scott wrote:
I have often wished that digraphs were not bundled with variables in this
respect, i.e., I wanted to put a string containing \n inside single quotes
just 'cuz it didn't contain variables to be interpolated. Whether there's
a way of improving this behavior or not I don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
