Conrad Schneiker skribis 2006-06-10 15:37 (-0700):
> target spec. (2) Would Juerd be willing to serve as the judge of who
> sufficiently fulfilled the specs?
I would, but perhaps my personal opinions would matter too much to be an
objective judge.
Regards,
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_j
Hello,
> From: Michael Mathews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
> On 08/06/06, Matt Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe this would be a good time to (semi-)formalize some form of
> > recommendations for the project?
>
> Agreed. (We're talking about the minimal requirements to get the
> thous
[Sorry Michael, I didn't mean to send it you twice. :) ]
I like the RFC idea. I will read up on them and see, if it is a
particular format, how to simplify it. But, most definitely, the
community must have dialog about the requests. For each request
really.
On the architecture note, I've written
On 08/06/06, Matt Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Honestly, I'm not familiar with the Perl way of doing things, but I'm
open to learn especially because I see the Perl community going
through a (much-needed) reform. Thusly, I'm not familiar with the RFCs
(Request For Change?) but I do see the mer
Honestly, I'm not familiar with the Perl way of doing things, but I'm
open to learn especially because I see the Perl community going
through a (much-needed) reform. Thusly, I'm not familiar with the RFCs
(Request For Change?) but I do see the merit for something similar.
However, as far as the j
On 08/06/06, Matt Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this would be a good time to (semi-)formalize some form of
recommendations for the project?
Agreed. (We're talking about the minimal requirements to get the
thousand for a pswiki, right?) Will this work like the Perl 6
RFC-Roundup, where t
I was just reading the AES referenced above and I can say now that I'm
really happy about some changes to Regexes, and that a grammar may
well be what we're looking for. However, even with this great tool, we
still have to handle the implementation. Though I can see the benefit
of using the gramma
[...]
Also, what is the best place to begin learning the Perl6 syntax? A
tutorial would be great, as a dry technical specification of the
language doesn't teach very well.
IMHO examples teach the best. A table with "Perl5 version" versus "Perl6
version" examples - even one-liners - would be
To bring this back around to the implementation portion in an effort
to get back on topic..
There are also sample grammars (for those who like samples in
addition to docs) available in the parrot source tree, e.g.:
http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk/compilers/tge/TGE/Parser.pg
http://svn.perl
I would recommend using a templating system as opposed to having calls
to include files in numerous pages. Even though it's minimal, it's
still duplication, and it can get rather messy.
I know that some people don't know about or don't like it, but I would
recommend setting things up in a Model-V
* Michael Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-08 13:15]:
> This is the smartest suggestion I've yet seen on the subject,
> but, not being all *that* familiar with Perl6 Grammars (aren't
> they something like contextually-smart regexes?), can anyone
> give an example of Perl 6 code that uses gramma
Michael Mathews wrote:
> This is the smartest suggestion I've yet seen on the subject, but, not
> being all *that* familiar with Perl6 Grammars (aren't they something
> like contextually-smart regexes?), can anyone give an example of Perl
> 6 code that uses grammars and can express some wiki-forma
On 07/06/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's use Perl 6 Grammars to define syntaxes. We are just about
to get this mindblowingly awesome tool for parsing; why insist on
tieing our feet together and having to hop around like that?
This is the smartest suggestion I've yet seen on th
13 matches
Mail list logo
