On 2020-01-15 21:43, Aureliano Guedes wrote:
Thanks ToddAndMargo
Perhaps I have some questions to help improve the docs (I think):
1- You told about arrays of hashes, in Perl5 the opposite (hashes of
arrays) is quite fuzzy. Then, in Raku, how do I deal with hashes of arrays?
2 - "[...]say
> my Int $oK = 2**1024
Thanks ToddAndMargo
Perhaps I have some questions to help improve the docs (I think):
1- You told about arrays of hashes, in Perl5 the opposite (hashes of
arrays) is quite fuzzy. Then, in Raku, how do I deal with hashes of arrays?
2 - "[...]say %h:p; # note: no comma between the a and the
Oh, and not properly terminating your C String seriously
messes with the C's strlen()
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
mailto:perl6-users@perl.org>> wrote:
A recent addition to my hashes keeper:
Confining hashes:
Note: as of 2020-01-15, confining only works with Str.
And you must confine the entire hash, not each
Capital I in Int, to not use native type
> my Int %h = A => 123
{A => 123}
-y
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <
perl6-users@perl.org> wrote:
> A recent addition to my hashes keeper:
>
>
> Confining hashes:
> Note: as of 2020-01-15, confining only works
A recent addition to my hashes keeper:
Confining hashes:
Note: as of 2020-01-15, confining only works with Str.
And you must confine the entire hash, not each member
my Str %h = A => "a"
{A => a}
my int %h = A => 123
native value types for hashes not yet
On 2020-01-15 17:32, Tillman Peng wrote:
I in fact like to read Todd's every post. Because of his active posting,
I know perl6 is there and still alive.
regards.
Thank you for that.
:-)
I in fact like to read Todd's every post. Because of his active posting,
I know perl6 is there and still alive.
regards.
on 2020/1/16 5:57, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Todd,
Once again I find myself writing to you directly in response to a post
of yours and asking again that you be respectful
On 2020-01-15 16:59, Peter Scott wrote:
On 1/15/2020 2:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
On 2020-01-15 14:18, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
Thank you Richard for this long and thoughtful answer.
I have already given up on Todd, I'm glad to see others haven't
(yet). What will follow is
On 2020-01-15 16:47, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 18:38 ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
mailto:perl6-users@perl.org>> wrote:
On 2020-01-15 15:50, Laurent Rosenfeld via perl6-users wrote:
> So, the way you behave with him is just nasty and evil. Please stop
> doing
On 1/15/2020 2:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
On 2020-01-15 14:18, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
Thank you Richard for this long and thoughtful answer.
I have already given up on Todd, I'm glad to see others haven't
(yet). What will follow is probably a response that is either: a.
On 2020-01-15 15:36, Trey Harris wrote:
And there’s another example of exactly the sort of things Richard
brought up.
How about: “I feel like Richard has not liked me for a long time, and
that there’s nothing I can do about it. I feel like I could say almost
anything and he would find
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 18:38 ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <
perl6-users@perl.org> wrote:
> On 2020-01-15 15:50, Laurent Rosenfeld via perl6-users wrote:
> > So, the way you behave with him is just nasty and evil. Please stop
> > doing that.
>
> That is in your own head.
Todd, why can't you
On 2020-01-15 15:50, Laurent Rosenfeld via perl6-users wrote:
So, the way you behave with him is just nasty and evil. Please stop
doing that.
That is in your own head.
The point is really not whether people like you or don't, and also not
about whether you like specific people or don't.
I don't know you (at least personally), you don't know me personally, and
nobody cares about whether I like you or whether you like me.
The whole point is about being polite,
On 2020-01-15 15:36, Trey Harris wrote:
artificially-hyperbolized reference to JJ helped anything after
previously calling him a dog.
To anyone still misunderstanding this. "Guard Dog" is
a figure of speech. It means he is over protective.
I DID NOT CALL HIM A DOG. And JJ knew this. I was
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 17:39 ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <
perl6-users@perl.org> wrote:
> On 2020-01-15 14:18, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> > Thank you Richard for this long and thoughtful answer.
> >
> > I have already given up on Todd, I'm glad to see others haven't (yet).
> What will follow
On 2020-01-15 15:05, Laurent Rosenfeld via perl6-users wrote:
I join with Liz and Tom to thank you, Richard, for this long and
thoughtful answer.
Hi Laurent,
I can be long winded too. Wait, it is okay for
Richard, but not for me?
Anyway, I will eventually wear you down and
we will become
Richard,
Please put aside your personal distaste of me
when writing on this group.
Write me off line if you want to want to
vent.
-T
On 2020-01-15 14:25, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 4:19 PM Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
Thank you Richard for this long and thoughtful answer.
Amen, Liz!
-Tom (tbrowder)
With love and understanding, I will wear both you down
and we will become friends again.
On 2020-01-15 13:57, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Todd,
Once again I find myself writing to you directly in response to a post
of yours and asking again that you be respectful to others in this
community. Striving for respect for everyone from everyone directly
benefits us all.
And disrespect
Todd,
You just did exactly what Liz said you would do by writing 'Richard has
not liked me for a long time'.
Do you not even re-read your own posts or have the self-awareness to
recognise it? Really?
Does it matter whether or not 'I like you'? This list is not some place
for social media
I join with Liz and Tom to thank you, Richard, for this long and thoughtful
answer.
Le mer. 15 janv. 2020 à 22:57, Richard Hainsworth
a écrit :
> Todd,
>
> Once again I find myself writing to you directly in response to a post
> of yours and asking again that you be respectful to others in
On 2020-01-15 14:18, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
Thank you Richard for this long and thoughtful answer.
I have already given up on Todd, I'm glad to see others haven't (yet). What
will follow is probably a response that is either: a. everybody is against me,
b. the Raku community won't
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 4:19 PM Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>
> Thank you Richard for this long and thoughtful answer.
Amen, Liz!
-Tom (tbrowder)
Thank you Richard for this long and thoughtful answer.
I have already given up on Todd, I'm glad to see others haven't (yet). What
will follow is probably a response that is either: a. everybody is against me,
b. the Raku community won't listen, c. the various variations on those themes.
I
Todd,
Once again I find myself writing to you directly in response to a post
of yours and asking again that you be respectful to others in this
community. Striving for respect for everyone from everyone directly
benefits us all.
And disrespect harms you: your long emails defending your
On 2020-01-13 23:11, Darren Duncan wrote:
Yes, a uint32 CAN represent a cardinal, but it can ALSO represent an
ordinal or a nominal or various other things.
It would help me if you would show me some examples
of a uint would values were not whole nubmers
greater than or equal to zero
$_
On 2020-01-15 10:13, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
Note that "*lpData" can be a little endian four byte
DWORD cardial or a UTF16 array of WORDS.
And the UTF array of WORDS is also little endian.
On 2020-01-14 01:13, JJ Merelo wrote:
Never miss a good chance to bash documentation...
Guilty as charged?
By the way, "C String" REQUIRES a nul at the end:
an error in the NativeCall documentation.
No, it does not. And even if it did, it should better go to the C, not
Raku,
guys, interesting thread, but it's "complement"
-Tom
32 matches
Mail list logo
