hi all,
I've just read that pgadmin team was hired by some company and the
project will be closed... It was a post from 2009.
I'm just curious what's the story behind that. Did anyone leave?
thanks.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your s
Chris Browne wrote:
andrew writes:
hi all,
I've just read that pgadmin team was hired by some company and the
project will be closed... It was a post from 2009.
I'm just curious what's the story behind that. Did anyone leave?
thanks.
Are you thinking about this annou
Re-reading the documentation, and I have the answer. If adding a
tsvector column, then for per row selection, I should also add a second
column of type regconfig to specify the language that rows contents are in.
Cheers,
Andy
Andrew wrote:
Apologies if this question has been previously
Apologies if this question has been previously covered, but I was not
able to find something similar in any of the mailing list archives.
With full text search, if you need to support a table where the content
of individual tuples/rows may be in different languages with the
language of the con
I have a feeling that an issue I'm running into is related to this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-06/msg00113.php
On Windows XP running PgAdmin III 1.8.4 against either PostgreSQL 8.3.0
or 8.3.3 DB, when attempting to do a:
select * from ts_debug('french', 'catalogue');
gett
Sorry one last detail.
All of my databases are in utf-8 format. My Windows XP is en_AU and
defaults to ISO-8859-1 character sets. My postgresql.conf is set to the
default for the client_encoding setting, which should then default to
the database utf-8 format.
Andrew wrote:
One additional
s, which I have
not touched in anyway and it is also occurring with the portuguese
catalogue.
Cheers
Andy
Andrew wrote:
I have a feeling that an issue I'm running into is related to this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-06/msg00113.php
On Windows XP running PgAdmin
I'm currently using JPA with Hibernate as my ORM and have been able to
convince hibernate to play nicely with the Postgresql UUID. Most of my
queries have been in EJBQL using the JPA entity manager's createQuery.
However when I try to do a UNION, JPA only returned the results of the
first que
Yeah, tried that, but get the following:
org.hibernate.MappingException: No Dialect mapping for JDBC type:
Thanks for the suggestion though.
Douglas McNaught wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only relevant thing I have been able t
iated though.
A.M. wrote:
On Jul 31, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Andrew wrote:
I'm currently using JPA with Hibernate as my ORM and have been able
to convince hibernate to play nicely with the Postgresql UUID. Most
of my queries have been in EJBQL using the JPA entity manager's
createQuery.
Oh, I see what you mean. Use EJBQL on a view. That would probably
work. Have to get going, so will try that when I get back in several
hours. I'll let you know how I go.
Andrew wrote:
I have given it consideration, but haven't tried it as I have
concluded that I would still hav
oops, forgot to cc the mailing list again...
Andrew wrote:
I know none of this relates directly to postgresql and on reflection
is probably more appropriate for the hibernate forums. So apologies
for having raised the topic here. Also, thanks for the suggestions
that I have received on the
For an alternative view of the security argument, which may be a little
off topic...
One consideration in regard to arguments for additional security,
whether column and row level security or the divergent thread on
obfuscated stored procedures is whether postgresql currently supports
PCI (in
Hi Mohammed,
See my answers below, and hopefully they won't lead you too far astray.
Note though, it has been a long time since I have done this and there
are doubtless more knowledgeable people in this forum who will be able
to correct anything I say that may be misleading or incorrect.
Ch
Mohamed wrote:
Thank you for you detailed answer. I have learned alot more about this
stuff now :)
Your welcome :-)
As I see it accordingly to the results it's between Hunspell and
Aspell. My Aspell version is 0.6 released 2006. The Hunspell was
released in 2008.
When I run the Postgres c
I think is almost the same that in many other languages, and like in
many other with the time you can have function's libraries, or more
likely class libraries with the usefull stuff.
In desktop programming environments you have components, here you have
classes that are the same thing using it in
Hi,I am using the binary install for postgresql 8.1 Win32 on Windows XP. I know how to intstall SSL if I was installing from source, --with-openssl, but I am installing onto Windows XP for the first time, so my question is:
1. How do I install the SSL module via the install wizard?Blessings
Andrew
I use 7.3 and use RECORD as the input data type of the function by
"create function foo(record) returns int4 as '$libdir/bar' language
C". But I got this error msg:" ERROR: parser: parse error at or near
"record" at character". What is the problem? I look up the 7.3
manual. it seems record is a
in Warn_restart code
What is the problem here? Did you test it on 7.3?
On 1/25/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I use 7.3 and use RECORD as the input data type of the function by
> > "create function foo(record) re
Function complete(person) does not exist
Unable to identify a function that satisfies the given argument types
You may need to add explicit typecasts
On 1/25/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ERROR: parser:
les generated by the join
operation. How can I do that?
Thanks!
--
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
sorry, mistakenly leave out another try:
backend> select *, complete(CAST (Person AS record)) from Person
QUERY: select *, complete(CAST (Person AS record)) from Person
ERROR: Relation reference "person" cannot be used in an expression
On 1/25/06, andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks, Tom. It is done by modifying coerce_type() and
can_coerce_type(). The reason I have to keep to verson 7.3 is I am
working on a research prototype that is built over pgsql 7.3. I need
the extra functions provided by that prototype.
On 1/25/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
Hi
Can I implement a stateful UDF in C? i.e. storing the state of the
previous run of the function and access them in the succeeding runs.
Is it supported? How do I implement it? Thanks.
--
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched
this function is computed based on
this information and the current input tuple.
On 2/15/06, Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0100, andrew wrote:
> > Can I implement a stateful UDF in C? i.e. storing the state of the
> > previous ru
100, andrew wrote:
> > Within the same query. The function takes a tuple as its input
> > parameter. It will be used in the where clause. So I think it will be
> > called one time for each read tuple, right? I want to maintain a
> > structure to store the information about the tup
Hi,
What are the techniques used by PostgreSQL to optimize disjunctive
queries? Treat every disjunct separately? Or special optimization is
performed to save the cost?
Could any one give me some general ideas? Thanks!
--
andrew
---(end of broadcast
Table A has a CHECK constraint testing boolean function F.
Function F has a SELECT from Table A.
In my manual build script, I create the table, then the function, and then at the very
end of the script to I do an ALTER TABLE ADD CHECK.
pg_dump appears to put the CHECK constraint as a clause in t
Please see the attached file for details.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Hi,
Don't think this made it the first time...
Thanks,
Andrew
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 15:45:55 +1000 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Local Users "su'ing"
Hi,
I'm running postgresql 7.0.2 under Free
, motor boats etc as you store different attributes.
As postgresql is an OORBMS it should be able to handle it without any
nasty squash into the relational model tricks.
I've never used an OO database in production mind you...perhaps there is
some catch I'm not aware of.
Andrew
Hi,
If I run an UPDATE operation from one connection the changed data is only
visible form that connection. How do make the change visible from other
connections? Do I have to wrap everything in a transaction?
I'm using libpq if that makes a difference.
Thanks,
Andrew
Hi,
If I run an UPDATE operation from one connection the changed data is only
visible from that connection. How do make the change visible from other
connections? Do I have to wrap everything in a transaction?
I'm using libpq if that makes a difference.
Thanks,
Andrew
don't know
whether Bucardo or Londiste (two alternative systems that work on
roughly the same principle) have this functionality, but I kind of
doubt it since both were designed to get rid of several of the
complexities that Slony presented. (Slony had all those complexities
because it w
ure it does the thing requested in this case.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
corruption fixes since 9.0.4. You should always try to
stay on the latest minor release of your version of Postgres.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.p
ring and are
> consuming by far the most disk space (still somewhat expensive on SSD)!
This doesn't actually solve your problem, but you could mitigate the
cost by putting those tables on spinning-rust disks using tablespaces
or symlinks or whatever.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
":db"
Is there a flag I can give to ecpg to ignore input parameters?
Is there a patch we could make to ecpg to accept input parameters?
Is there another way to write my input parameters to work around this error?
--
Cheers,
Andrew Pennebaker
www.yellosoft.us
Could you be more specific?
I can't find a relevant section to address my specific problem: ecpg
complaining when I try to check the syntax of my .sql files that use input
parameters.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 07:22 AM, Andrew Pennebak
Makes sense.
Yes, it would be great if psql offered a flag for validating syntax. Other
programming languages do this, for example, bash -n, ruby -c, and php -l.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Pennebaker writes:
> > I can't find a relevant section
systems to move all the data from one to the
other. Depending on your uptime requirements and the size of the
database, this approach can either be a life saver or a total waste of
time and will to live. More often the latter, please be aware.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sen
b from the
old machine and restore locally, you could do
pg_dump -U postgres -h 192.0.2.1 -C egdb | psql -U postgres
I recommend reading the pg_dump (and if you like, pg_dumpall) manuals
before proceeding.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
ty's time with crowdsourced editing of job
postings is in any way appropriate for the pgsql-general list.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql
onvention.
This case is no different.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
emed developer claimed something and
maybe should have relinquished sooner given his workload. That
happens; nobody's perfect. It's frustrating, but this is not the only
community to have had that issue (cf. Linux kernel, for an
approximately infinite series of examples of this). I am not su
Please do not cross-post on the PostgreSQL lists. Pick the most
appropriate list to post to and just post there.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
st, I
found that to be useful when talking to Oracle partisans.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Dear all,
I'm setting up hot backups on my database server. As such, I'd like to set up a
Postgres user that has access to only pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup.
I'm unable to work out how to do this with the various GRANT options. Can
someone
point me in the right direction please? Or is ther
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 16:54 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm setting up hot backups on my database server. As such, I'd like to set
> > up a
> > Postgres user
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 01:46 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/21/2015 1:31 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > I had to specify a database name when connecting:
> >
> > psql -U backup -c "select pg_start_backup('Daily backup')" -d postgres
>
>
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 03:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/21/2015 1:51 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > Thanks John. The backup script is running as root, so presumably I'd have
> > to
> > use
> > sudo? Or should I run a separate cron job as postgres to do
e all the
data in the table. I don't know what rewriting such a query would
mean.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
ut you asked what was behind the design
decision and I told you. But in general, the experience seems to be
that triggers are easier to get right (novice or no, _pace_ section
38.7).
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-genera
lly sure why you think the manual is misleading.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
hacks, but if you need a bugfix prior to a real solution
they'd give you a path.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I. But do consider
trying out the command line. You'll be surprised at the power you get
once the initial learning curve is over.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
h
m MySQL already.
Consistency and rigour are the changes ;-)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Dear all,
I'm performing a query with many joins, with a WHERE condition on the
"root" table. As far as I am aware, each join is indexed, as is the
WHERE clause. To my simple mind, this is just a case of taking a set of
conditional indexed values, and then "adding on" the relevant indexed
data.
W
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 Andrew Beverley wrote:
> When I run EXPLAIN ANALYZE, I see that the actual query is scanning
> significantly more rows for the join than was estimated. There is also
> a huge number of loops for the joins. Why is this, and is there an
> easy fix?
I should have said
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 Andrew Beverley wrote:
> I'm performing a query with many joins, with a WHERE condition on the
> "root" table. As far as I am aware, each join is indexed, as is the
> WHERE clause. To my simple mind, this is just a case of taking a set
> of condition
Dear all,
Is there a way to efficiently perform OR conditions across multiple
joins?
For example, I have the following statement:
SELECT RECORD.id
FROM RECORD
left join string
ON string.record_id = RECORD.id
AND string.layout_id = 6
left join DATE
So, I am a decent oracle SQL and PL/SQL programmer looking to expand into
PostgreSQL. Can someone point me to a decent programming book on the
topic? I have looked Amazon and Apress and not found much, so I am not
sure where to turn. Or perhaps I am looking the wrong places.
--
Andrew W
s to MySQL, MySQL always wins, what you teach them is
"Postgres performance sucks."
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
this mysql2pgsql conversion rather than N dedicated small teams for
> every mysql client out there.
…I don't think anyone is telling you, "Don't build this." You should
do what you like with your time :)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailin
function signature be?
Thanks
Andrew
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/xindex.html
27;t deserve while
> they treat customers and employees with similar levels of arrogance.
Nothin' for nothin', but I don't think it helps Postgres to attack
others' business plans -- whatever one thinks of them -- as part of an
argument about why Postgres is the right tool fo
mpatibility historically was the basis for something
becoming a major version upgrade. (I can recall a couple bugs where
you had to tickle the catalogues, so it's not exactly true that
they're never incompatible, but it's incredibly rare.)
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanu
m. But one has to
face the critique in its own terms.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
ason we're still using 9.2.
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
dd to
get the next logical row number; the "x" table actually computes the
logical row number; finally we group by the logical row number and use
string_agg to get a single name for each row.
Is there an easier way to write this query, using some window function
functionality that I
to some other
place later, and it'd suck if the transaction failed half way through
because it turns out there's nowhere to put the data I've just staged.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Hi everyone!
From time to time I teach at Ural Federal University. Currently
university wants me to make up online course. They are going to put it
to platform like edX or something.
I do not want to do another general programming course, so I made up
my mind to do a “postgres-hacker” course. But
Cutting ties by my own interest: I want better Postgres. I want to teach
those who probably will push patches.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
четверг, 6 октября 2016 г. пользователь Joshua D. Drake написал:
> On 10/06/2016 10:39 AM, Andrew Borodin wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
&g
Does PostgreSQL 9.4 support large pages in windows? The setting is there
in the postgresql.conf, but I cant tell if it is supported in windows?
--
Andrew W. Kerber
'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
Thats what I needed, thank you. Windows generally calls them large pages,
AIX also calls them large pages, really they are typically only called
hugepages on Linux.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 01/17/2017 07:20 AM, Andrew Kerber wrote:
>
>> Does Po
Oh, I can answer that. The owner of the postgreSQL executable must have
the privilege to lock pages in memory.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Kerber writes:
> > Does PostgreSQL 9.4 support large pages in windows? The setting is there
> > in the postg
ssibly be exfiltrated,
you need to know the state of all of it.
For realistic cases, I expect that deleted data is usually more
important than updated data. But a threat modeller needs to
understand all these variables anyway.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-g
metimes people delete data from a system because
it's been archived somewhere else or something like that -- not all
databases have the totality of all the relevant data in them, but can
often represent just "current" data.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
al risk to be
mitigated is. It might, sure. The security profiler would still need
to make a list of this fact and then ask how countermeasures mitigate
it.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresq
uditor, this might be enough
to satisfy the condition.
Also, of course, there is the application_name (string) parameter. In
principle, you ought to be able to filter on this. Again, won't help
you if your application login is somehow compromised.
I agree that all of this depends on logging
e you can! There are also some firms that can help with
migration if you like.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
losing the
shell so that the session hangs around). Eventually, the Postgres
backend will try to talk to the session and discover it isn't there,
and you'll get a termination logged (assuming you have loging turned
up that high).
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent
e the query as a single select and if so how?
Thanks in advance
Andrew Bailey
urage those who think there is a problem to
be solved to make a scratch proposal and see whether it flies. It's
always easier to discuss a concrete proposal than to try to figure out
whether something is a good idea in the abstract. The shorter and
easier to understand the proposal is, I
children of slaves.
If someone did that, it would fall under (2), no? (I note that a
recent RFC, of which I am a co-author, about DNS terminology did say
that "primary" and "secondary" were to be preferred over "master" and
"slave". I didn't personally
an we can do something about it by writing down rules.
Still, the exercise of writing down rules may help to notice things
one wouldn't say to a friend. And I hope we're all friends here.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
tended in the generic sense. I apologise in case
that wasn't clear.
> It is the perceived intention of what one says that is important, not what
> one actually says!
I think that is perhaps a false dichotomy. But I also think I have
said enough on this topic, so I shall stop now.
B
that you actually want to fail over.
I've seen an awful lot of people want automatic failover who also
can't afford for the already-committed transactions on the master to
be lost. Unless you're running synchronous, be sure you have the
workload that can actually accept lost w
at stuff about what the IETF does some
while ago. There is definitely more than one way to do this.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
at can be done about it?
You may end up taking an outage in effect, because you need to compact
them at least once. If you can flip to a replica, that is the easiest
way to fix it.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.o
to recover after a restart.
It may not be the hardware. Depending on how vmware is configured, it
could just be a setting. Also, something in the OP's message made me
think that this was _actually_ a network-attached disk, which can also
have such problems. (But in general, I agree.)
A
verhead involved in getting
this data into the internal storage format used by PostgreSQL. But even if
I triple the number of bytes stored for each record, I only end up with 51
MB or so. Am I missing something obvious?
Cheers,
Andrew
s: they are essentially
one-dimensional heterogenous lists, not multi-dimensional homogeneous
matrices. So while a Postgres array that's been converted to a json
array should in principle be convertible back, an arbitrary json array
could easily not be.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 02/24/2016 09:11 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016, Andrew Dunstan <mailto:and...@dunslane.net>> wrote:
Having json(b)_populate_record recursively process nested complex
objects would be a large undertaking. One thing to consider is
that js
he json array to produce a Postgres array
literal. But if we're handling nested composites as well that probably
won't pass muster and we would need to decompose all the objects fully
and reassemble them into Postgres objects. Maybe it won't take as long
as I suspect. If anyone
fork. But …
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/postgresql/Driver
… since it can't find the driver, I'd bet that your classpath doesn't
contain /opt/postgresplus/edbmtk/lib.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
receive a message that data is committed before any replication of the
data has commenced," would that help?
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
card number gets lost in an
eventually-consistent system, and people suddenly understand
viscerally why transactions semantics are so hard.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subs
hors intended. Doesn't matter for
these purposes! :)
[2] Apparently, Marshall McLuhan didn't say this; instead, his tribune
John Culkin, SJ said it. It's still an excellent point, whoever made it.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
1 - 100 of 1434 matches
Mail list logo
