Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Clearly, for a few languages the current facilities are sufficient. > If we make the process easier, we're likely to have more translations. > Will there be people verifying the quality also? It seems to me that

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

Tels wrote: > Last but not least I'd be able to help with the german translation, but I > have no clear idea how, or what the actual status is. Are German > translators actually needed? German, along with Russian and French, are pretty much the only translations kept fully up to date almost all

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > That section is meant to say, if a translation ships in 10.0 with 81% > but then drops to 79% because some backpatching changes strings, we > won't drop it in 10.2. > > In the opposite case, it would be

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On 2/23/18 10:48, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Thom Brown writes: >>> Something that isn't clear to me is, for a language that didn't meet >>> 80% translation for a component, if it does reach 80% after the major

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Thu, February 22, 2018 11:04 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: >> Please join pgsql-translat...@postgresql.org. > > What surprises me about this thread is that apparently the sad state > of the v10 translations wasn't already discussed on that list? The

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Thom Brown writes: >> Something that isn't clear to me is, for a language that didn't meet >> 80% translation for a component, if it does reach 80% after the major >> version release, does it then get shipped

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

Thom Brown writes: > Something that isn't clear to me is, for a language that didn't meet > 80% translation for a component, if it does reach 80% after the major > version release, does it then get shipped in a minor release, or is > out of that version completely until the next

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On 23 February 2018 at 04:04, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: >> Please join pgsql-translat...@postgresql.org. > > What surprises me about this thread is that apparently the sad state > of the v10 translations wasn't already discussed on that

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

Alvaro Herrera writes: > Please join pgsql-translat...@postgresql.org. What surprises me about this thread is that apparently the sad state of the v10 translations wasn't already discussed on that list? I have no objection to calling for more translation volunteers on

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On 23 February 2018 at 09:50, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > I was wondering a bit about how translations are maintained. Experience > > with another highly internationalised project years ago showed that many > > people who are willing to volunteer as translators are NOT willing to

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:51:02AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> I'm not working on message translations. Hotta-san is actively >> working on the translations here: >> >> https://github.com/hotta/pg-nls-ja > > If you need help here, feel free to ping me. I have done translation to > Japanese

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

> Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:51:02AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> > I'm not working on message translations. Hotta-san is actively >> > working on the translations here: >> > >> > https://github.com/hotta/pg-nls-ja >> >> If you need help here, feel free to ping me. I

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:45:11PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > How many repositories do we need, though? There is already one in > git.postgresql.org -- see https://babel.postgresql.org/ Centralizing things into postgresql.org is nice for the long term. > Please join

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:51:02AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > I'm not working on message translations. Hotta-san is actively > > working on the translations here: > > > > https://github.com/hotta/pg-nls-ja > > If you need help here, feel free to ping me. I have

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:51:02AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > I'm not working on message translations. Hotta-san is actively > working on the translations here: > > https://github.com/hotta/pg-nls-ja If you need help here, feel free to ping me. I have done translation to Japanese for other

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

> I was wondering a bit about how translations are maintained. Experience > with another highly internationalised project years ago showed that many > people who are willing to volunteer as translators are NOT willing to > interact with git (or at the time, svn) and the other tools many of us take

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On 23 February 2018 at 08:51, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > I also noticed the same thing few days ago, by the fact that RPM > > release of PG10 doesn't contain psql translation. > > > > @10 > ja | pg_basebackup,pg_resetxlog, > plpython,pltcl,postgres,psql > > @9.4> ja

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

> I also noticed the same thing few days ago, by the fact that RPM > release of PG10 doesn't contain psql translation. > > @10 > ja | pg_basebackup,pg_resetxlog,plpython,pltcl,postgres,psql > @9.4> ja | pg_basebackup,pg_resetxlog > > I'm not sure how the translations are maintained

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

# my clone repository has been corrupted...sigh. At Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:32:15 -0500, Robert Haas wrote in > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > >> I have found

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

>> Was that mentioned in the 10.0 release note? I didn't know that. > > I don't think we ever mention translations that are added or dropped > in minor release notes. I think it would better for users to be noticed that in the release notes because the message translations are apparently visible

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> I have found that Japanese language support for the database server >> has been dropped for 10. This is because it fell below the 80% of >> strings translated requirement, so it was shipped without Japanese. > > Was that

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

> I have found that Japanese language support for the database server > has been dropped for 10. This is because it fell below the 80% of > strings translated requirement, so it was shipped without Japanese. Was that mentioned in the 10.0 release note? I didn't know that. Best regards, --

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

Hi, I’m translating to Korean since 10 years over. I think this issue should be left to the local community. It may be omitted in some versions, or added in some versions. because, it depends on volunteering. Let It Be! Regards Ioseph. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:29:11PM +, Thom Brown wrote:

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On 22 February 2018 at 17:24, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Thom Brown wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have found that Japanese language support for the database server >> has been dropped for 10. This is because it fell below the 80% of

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Thom Brown wrote: > Hi, > > I have found that Japanese language support for the database server > has been dropped for 10. This is because it fell below the 80% of > strings translated requirement, so it was shipped without Japanese. > This isn't

Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

2018-02-22 18:20 GMT+01:00 Thom Brown : > Hi, > > I have found that Japanese language support for the database server > has been dropped for 10. This is because it fell below the 80% of > strings translated requirement, so it was shipped without Japanese. > This isn't true of all