Hi all, been awhile! Some may be saying "not long enough" but eh.
I recently moved a mybb forum away from mysql to postgres. Along the way
I encountered a couple of things that either didn't seem to be supported
or I'm just not doing it right.
First, the server this is on is running
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
If there were a comp.databases.postgresql.hackers newsgroup created and
carried by all the news servers ... would you move to using it vs using
the mailing lists?
No. (yes, I'm still here :)
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
If there were a comp.databases.postgresql.hackers newsgroup created and
carried by all the news servers ... would you move to using it vs using
the mailing lists?
Trying this again with the right From address...
No. (and yes, I'm still here :)
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
On 2 Sep 2003 at 15:50, Czuczy Gergely wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
i'm using pgsql 7.3.4.
how can I fix it? i think so, i should modify the header files, i've tried
to put it into an ``extern C {...}'' block, but i didn't
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
The PostgreSQL Core would like to publicly welcome welcome Josh Berkus as
our newest member.
Josh is being included especially as a liason between the
source-programmer and non-source-programmer contributors to PostgreSQL, in
an effort to expand
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
for the web, yes ... the new site doesn't support mirroring, as its highly
database driven ... only thing still mirrorable, really, is the ftp
server ...
I knew that was gonna happen.
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
*Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through 300 messages
nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
290 are trash ...
What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
Avoid
FYI.
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
My feeling too. Whatever you may think of its usefulness, it's been a
documented feature since 7.1. It's a bit late to reconsider.
It's never too late for new users to reconsider. It's also never too late
to change your
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Justin Clift wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
My feeling too. Whatever you may think of its usefulness, it's been a
documented feature since 7.1. It's a bit late to reconsider.
It's never too late for new users to reconsider. It's also never too
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, mlw wrote:
I am not familiar with ILIKE, but I suspect that if people are moving
from a platfrom on which it exists, or even creatingmulti-platform
applications, there may be a substancial amount of code that may use it.
I don't know about other platforms but I've been
On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote:
If you are interested in reading a contrary position, you can read
Berstein's arguments for his recommended way to install services at:
http://cr.yp.to/unix.html
But since DJB is a class-A monomaniac, he may not be the best person to
listen to.
On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 14:21, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote:
If you are interested in reading a contrary position, you can read
Berstein's arguments for his recommended way to install services at:
http
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 18:45, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 17:52, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Seems to me that if FHS allows such a mess, it's reason enough to avoid
compliance. Either that or those of you who
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:
What your comments strongly suggest to me is that projects like
PostgreSQL and pine, along with everything else, should comply with FHS;
then there will be no confusion because everyone will be following the
smae standards. Messes arise when people
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday 13 February 2003 18:07, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Actually FHS says the opposite. If the distribution installs PostgreSQL
then the config files belong in /etc/postgresql. If the admin does then
they belong in /usr/local/etc/postgresql. FHS
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:00, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Which means if the the vendor installed Postgresql (say, the
Red Hat Database) you'd expect config files to be in /etc.
If the postgresql is compiled from source by local admin,
you might look
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, J. M. Brenner wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here's one: most Unix systems store all of the configuration
files in a well known directory: /etc. These days it's a hierarchy of
directories with /etc as the root of the hierarchy.
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Dave Page wrote:
Well the results are finally in. Hopefully we can concentrate on putting
them right, rather than having a round of told you so's :-)
I modified the test program slightly to improve the consistency checks.
The updated version is attached.
[...]
Run |
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
Like it or not, if PG releases a very good Win32 port, ALL the unixoids
combined will be out numbered by the windoze users.
Now that's certainly something to look forward to.
Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ron Mayer wrote:
Cool irony in the automated .sig on the mailinglist software...
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
...
hammering the betas is a far cry from an industrial-strength solution.
...
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Sounds like you're
Dave, Lamar and Katie can cheer now 'cuze this is the last comment
I'm going to make on this. All others will be ignored, probably.
The one thing I haven't seen from Dave, Lamar or Katie on this is
reputation. You're all for the PostgreSQL name going on it but I
have yet to see any of you so
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 January 2003 19:20
To: Lamar Owen
Cc: Tom Lane; Dave Page; Ron Mayer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
I've
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
Vince, I would say that we, the developers of PostgreSQL, are then not
qualified to test our own releases for the reasons you mentioned that Katie
should not test her own releases. Of course that's ridiculous -- often the
developers can do a better job
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday 30 January 2003 13:17, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
Vince, I would say that we, the developers of PostgreSQL, are then not
qualified to test our own releases for the reasons you mentioned that
Katie
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
flame on
In all honesty, I do not *want* Windows people to think that they're not
running on the poor stepchild platform.If we go down that path,
they'll start trying to run production databases on Windows, and then
we'll get blamed for the
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James Hubbard wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
actually think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 16:27
To: Katie Ward
Cc: Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
The only assumption
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
hammering the betas is a far cry from an industrial-strength
solution.
Have you a better suggestion? Seems a bit catch 22 if testing won't
prove it's good and we can't use it until we know it's good... Still,
industrial strength testing or not, it's
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vince Vielhaber
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Dave Page
Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mail] Re
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
I would be interested to know how many windows servers those that are
against a windows port of PostgreSQL have or do manage, and how
experienced they are with that platform...
At this point I'm not for or against. But you're going to have to do
more
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
actually think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some
months.
So you've been running these unscientific tests
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
hammering the betas is a far cry from an industrial-strength
solution.
Have you a better suggestion? Seems a bit catch 22 if testing won't
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 17:10
To: Dave Page
Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
On Wed
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?
Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic.
On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
Sorry to be dense, but what time period
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FTP is just over 800MB, plan
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
To: Vince Vielhaber
Cc: Dan Langille; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
Total Hits 1339547
Total Files 1064536
Total Pages 324346
Total Visits 58178
Total KBytes 2712883
In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)
It's
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.
FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
On www/ftp.us I don't
On 7 Jan 2003, Greg Copeland wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:46, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.
FTP is just over 800MB
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out
and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a
little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out
and let us know if there are any problems
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have not been aggressive about backpatching documentation improvements
into 7.3.1. Is that something I should check?
As I remember, we didn't update the official docs for minor releases.
Is that still true?
They say hydergine helps the memory.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- for example: Marc owns, runs, and pays for the
postgresql.org servers.
Is the cvs repo mirrored?
Anyone running cvsup would have a complete copy of the source CVS,
I believe. It would be more troubling to
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote:
But once Postgres has been packaged, we need to have a group making a
loud enough noise to get the world to pay attention. I'm not asking
everyone on this list to participate, but I am asking everyone on this
list to recognize the utility of the
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
Well, my previous employer uses postgresql, but they were under constant
assault from their clients to use oracle or db2. Technically there was no
reason to switch, but if your choice
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Because of this taken from the above quoted text:
they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or db2
Last I looked neither Oracle or DB2 were open source, but they both just
happen to be commercial
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Because of this taken from the above quoted text:
they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or db2
Last I looked neither Oracle
On 7 Dec 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
What too many people fail to realize is that in a commercial environment
many companies want another company to point the finger at in case of
disaster. Sybase failed, or HP failed, or IBM failed, or Microsoft
failed. They feel they can do something
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
That's what I thought. You have no argument so your just typing.
Hi Vince,
Was more hoping you'd care to share your basis for stating Robert's
employers clients wanted a commercial database, after he mentioned
On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 20:52, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Why do you say that?
Because of this taken from the above quoted text:
they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or db2
Last I looked neither Oracle or DB2 were open
On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 22:27, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote:
If something is familiar, it feels safe. We need to make PostgreSQL
familiar. That's why we need marketing.
Then why wasn't mysql in the list? It's
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
On Saturday 07 December 2002 11:10 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
www is a closed group consisting of a few of us who actually do the
work on the sites
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
It isn't, but those working on -advocacy were asked to help come up with a
stronger release *announcement* then we've had in the past ...
Consider that a failed experiment. PostgreSQL is
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Brian Knox wrote:
Speaking from the perspective of a long time postgresql user, who
currently has several very mission critical applications using postgresql
on the back end, at a very large company...
I can say the one consequence of the problem that I have run into
On 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
www is a closed group consisting of a few of us who actually do the work
on the sites.
This is one of the primary reasons the sites are so fractured. We have 4
different mailing lists for website development
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote:
Dave,
BTW, we do coordinate with the Website development group
When did that happen then? I think I must have blinked :-)
Marc and Justin are periodically keeping the Advocacy group informed
of progress on wwwdevel, and we were asked to test
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Yup, as with doing anything for the firs ttime, the press release itself
had its 'bugs' ... considering how many times Josh asked for comments on
it, I'm surprised that nobody picked up on it *shrug
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
Yup, as with doing anything for the firs ttime, the press release itself
had its 'bugs' ... considering how many times Josh asked for comments on
it, I'm surprised that
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Justin Clift writes:
Of course we are, it's just that we're also trying to direct people to
the Advocacy site where there is a lot more info, in a lot more languages.
Why don't we just shut
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote:
I'll preempt the 'this was all discussed on -advocacy, you should have
been there' response with yet another agreement with Vince :-) - I too
am getting far too much mail these days and another list is the
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
That wasn't stronger, it was fluffier. It was full of buzzwords that
were masking the actual content. Are you trying to hide the
accomplishments or promote them? If you're
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Excellent. Are there any other people involved in PostgreSQL and
universities or educational institutions? If so we could put something
together about experiences for the advocacy Web site.
Is this
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 19:12
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global
Development Group Announces
On Thu,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote:
I could have sworn we used to have a bunch of ftp mirrors for downloads.
Come to think of it I rewrote/stole a load of Vince's PHP code to allow
you to select one from the portal recently. Are we not using
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Neil Conway wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
snip
Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's
availability being on the advocacy site?
*We* mentioned it's
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact that it obscured the
release to the point that many people didn't even know it was released.
I found out by folks complaining about broken links.
Hrm - the subject said it all, plus
On 29 Nov 2002, Ryan Mahoney wrote:
Scroll down and read the rest of, it's an excellent announcement! If
the website and mirrors made mention of the release (as of 8:19PM CST
they don't!) and the message was sent to all the mailing lists, there
would probably be less confusion. When I read
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual
places that I monitor.
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general
though). Evidently you and Vince never got it either ...
After alot of searching I did
I'm reading from a remote site with horrible resolution or
just an 80x25 screen.
---
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects i was missing
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are we ready for RC1 yet?
This is Tuesday, you can only ask on Fridays :)
Vince.
--
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Gee. I didn't know that existed. We are probably better off doing it
via mailing list so we can discuss the results.
What do you mean you didn't know it existed? It's been there for the
last few releases (since 7.1). You've even submitted to it!
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Gee. I didn't know that existed. We are probably better off doing it
via mailing list so we can discuss the results.
What do you mean you didn't know it existed? It's
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
to be honest ... I forgot it was there too :(
Just means I'm gonna have to do a bunch of popup ads!
** ducking and running
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Gee. I didn't know
.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com
http
complaining about. I get teh 7.2.1 admin guide.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping
The above url will show the notes and what they're in relation to with
a link to that particular piece of documentation.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide
% accurate. Nothing is
final until it's announced on the announce mailing list and/or
the main website.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from
one up asap and before things bust loose again.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi Oleg,
It's supposed to show roughly where everyone is.
Based mostly on Vince's map from the developer site, but this one is
really easy to update
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi Oleg,
It's supposed to show roughly where everyone
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:59:33AM -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Gavin Sherry wrote:
Hi all,
It occurs to me that opening web page on www.postgresql.org, asking the
user to select the mirror, is rather
. Too much of a job to keep track of
that many IP blocks too.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http
)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
have all the updates I know of
that are needed.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
%ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta
Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp/pub/beta.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
working.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com
])
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
%ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta
Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp/pub/beta.
actually, should be a symlink, but until I
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I will work on that this month. It is part of the advocacy project.
Since when?
Since I decide to take over the world. :-)
What I meant was that it was on my TODO list
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I will work on that this month. It is part of the advocacy project.
Since when?
Since
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I haven't see the beta announcement on the announce list. Do we
announce it there?
I've been expecting it but haven't seen it yet.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH
.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com
http://www.meanstreamradio.com
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
ignore if you see this ...
What if we don't see it?
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup
days for
the IP to completely propogate.
Looks like someone already got it. I just got back into town and am
catching up.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
