On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 02:25:00PM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Feb 16, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
p.s. One quick heads-up: David Wheeler has reported a possible issue
with Safe 2.21. I hope to investigate that tomorrow.
Actually it's 2.22. 2.21 is already dead.
Oops, typo.
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:39:16 Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
* Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:22:27PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
It's certainly been an interesting introduction to PostgreSQL
development!
Hopefully we haven't scared you off - your work is definitely very
much appreciated (and I at least hope to see you back for 9.1)!
Thanks Robert. That's
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
* Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync. This is really two
patches now, one of which is apparently to be backpatched.
This one (both parts) seems to have crashed and burned on unexpected
portability issues :-(. Do we
I wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
* Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
someone else would like to take a
Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
* Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
someone else
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
* Listen / Notify rewrite. This is the only one of the remaining
patches that is not marked as Ready for Committer, but I think it
would be good if someone (probably Tom) at least took a look at it.
I'm not sure if it's
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:14:28PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
We're down to 5 patches remaining, and 1 day remaining, so it's time
to try to wrap things up.
* Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl. Andrew Dunstan
is taking care of
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:42:29PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:14:28PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
We're down to 5 patches remaining, and 1 day remaining, so it's time
to try to wrap things up.
* Package namespace and Safe
On Feb 16, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's certainly been an interesting introduction to PostgreSQL development!
Interesting, eh? Look forward to your blog post about the experience. ;-P
Tim.
p.s. One quick heads-up: David Wheeler has reported a possible issue
with Safe 2.21. I
It's certainly been an interesting introduction to PostgreSQL
development!
Hopefully we haven't scared you off - your work is definitely very
much appreciated (and I at least hope to see you back for 9.1)!
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
* Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
someone else would like to take a look? This
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:14:28PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
We're down to 5 patches remaining, and 1 day remaining, so it's time
to try to wrap things up.
* Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl. Andrew Dunstan
is taking care of this one, I believe.
(2010/02/14 13:34), Robert Haas wrote:
* Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
someone else would like to take a look? This is
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
* Listen / Notify rewrite. This is the only one of the remaining
patches that is not marked as Ready for Committer, but I think it
would be good if someone (probably Tom) at least took a look at it.
I'm not sure if it's committable at this point, but
I will look at this one. It'd be nice to get it in if at all possible,
because the existing listen/notify infrastructure won't play very nicely
with HS --- eg, inspecting pg_listener on the slave might yield the
false impression that some of the slave-side backends had active LISTENs
Robert Haas wrote:
We're down to 5 patches remaining, and 1 day remaining, so it's time
to try to wrap things up.
* Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl. Andrew Dunstan
is taking care of this one, I believe.
I will get this in, with changes as discussed recently.
I also
We're down to 5 patches remaining, and 1 day remaining, so it's time
to try to wrap things up.
* Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits;
18 matches
Mail list logo
