Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Josh Berkus
Bruce, Realistically I just don't see getting everything in the ToDo patch list in; my vote is that we start deferring stuff for 8.4 if it doesn't have a reviewer, except for items which were submitted early in the cycle (and to whom it would be unfair). If that means shortening the 8.4 cycle

Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > FYI, whoever did that Todo:Patch status, Bravo! That is easily one of > the smallest but best improvements to the process I have seen in recent > memory. well bruce asked for something like that: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00249.php and I sim

Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Gregory Stark
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > Based on our progress during this feature freeze, we will not complete >> > the feature freeze until August/September. I think we need adjust >> > expectations about an 8.3 release date, and decide

Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Patch status: > > > > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus > > If... this is actually a problem (I leave to other committers and > reviewers to comment) then I suggest we push all patches without a > reviewer as of now to 8.4. > > Leaving on

Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Based on our progress during this feature freeze, we will not complete > > the feature freeze until August/September. I think we need adjust > > expectations about an 8.3 release date, and decide if we want to > > radically change our work process.

Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Bruce Momjian wrote: Based on our progress during this feature freeze, we will not complete the feature freeze until August/September. I think we need adjust expectations about an 8.3 release date, and decide if we want to radically change our work process. Basically, to make a release anywhere

Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Gregory Stark
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the only other thing we _could_ do is to re-open normal 8.3 > development, so we aren't hampering updates to trivial parts of the > code. Many of the patches now in the queue had been developed for months > before 8.3 started, so the hope is th

<    1   2