2010/7/31 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On fre, 2010-07-30 at 12:50 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
* xml_is_well_formed returns true for simple text
postgres=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('');
xml_is_well_formed
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Here is a proof of concept for per-column collation support.
Hi,
i was looking at this.
nowadays, CREATE DATABASE has a lc_collate clause. is the new collate
clause similar as the lc_collate?
i mean, is lc_collate what
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 21:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
Thank you for the review.
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 17:17 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
(1) Exclusion constraints support for operators where x operator x
is false
2010/8/2 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2010/7/31 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On fre, 2010-07-30 at 12:50 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
* xml_is_well_formed returns true for simple text
postgres=# SELECT
We are using postgres as RDBMS for our product. There is a requirement
coming for a feature which will require me to store data about various data
points (mainly numbers) on a time scale. Data measurement is being taken
every few secs/mins based and it is needed to be stored for statistical
Hi,
On 08/01/2010 08:04 PM, Sushant Sinha wrote:
1. We do not have separate tokens wikipedia and org
2. If we have the two tokens we should have them at adjacent position so
that a phrase search for wikipedia org should work.
This would needlessly increase the number of tokens. Instead you'd
Hello
2010/8/2 Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com:
Hi Pavel,
Currently your patch isn't applying to head, from the looks of things a
function signature has changed. Can you update your patch please?
yes - see attachment
Also, having had a read through the patch itself I note that there are no
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I don't think any of this quorum stuff makes much sense without explicitly
registering standbys in the master.
I'm not sure if this is a good idea. This requires users to do more
manual operations than
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps someone will claim that nobody wants to do that anyway (which
I don't believe, BTW), but even in simpler cases it would be nicer to
have an explicit policy rather than - in effect - inferring a policy
from a soup
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps someone will claim that nobody wants to do that anyway (which
I don't believe, BTW), but even in simpler cases it would be nicer to
have an
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Hardik Belani hardikbel...@gmail.com wrote:
We are using postgres as RDBMS for our product. There is a requirement
coming for a feature which will require me to store data about various data
points (mainly numbers) on a time scale. Data measurement is being taken
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's not get *the manner of specifying the policy* confused with *the
need to update the policy when the master changes*. It doesn't seem
likely you would want the same value for synchronous_standbys on all
your
Marc Cousin írta:
The Thursday 29 July 2010 13:55:38, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote :
I fixed this by adding CheckLockTimeout() function that works like
CheckStatementTimeout() and ensuring that the same start time is
used for both deadlock_timeout and lock_timeout if both are active.
The
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's not get *the manner of specifying the policy* confused with *the
need to update the policy when the master changes*. It doesn't seem
likely
Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
Marc Cousin írta:
The Thursday 29 July 2010 13:55:38, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote :
I fixed this by adding CheckLockTimeout() function that works like
CheckStatementTimeout() and ensuring that the same start time is
used for both deadlock_timeout and
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. If you give the standbys names, then if people change the
names, they'll have to update their configuration. But I can't see
that as an argument against doing it. You can remove the possibility
that someone will
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's not get *the manner of specifying the policy* confused with *the
need to update the policy when the master changes*. It doesn't seem
likely you would want the same value for
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's not get *the manner of specifying the policy* confused with *the
need to update the policy when the master changes*. It
On 08/01/2010 08:04 PM, Sushant Sinha wrote:
1. We do not have separate tokens wikipedia and org
2. If we have the two tokens we should have them at adjacent position so
that a phrase search for wikipedia org should work.
This would needlessly increase the number of tokens. Instead you'd
Robert Haas wrote:
I agree that's the crux of the problem, but I can't see solving it
with a global variable. I realize you were just testing...
Yes it was just a test. However, somewhere information must be kept or
altered so it can be detected that a relation has already been visited,
On 02/08/2010 3:20 AM, Hardik Belani wrote:
We are using postgres as RDBMS for our product. There is a requirement
coming for a feature which will require me to store data about various
data points (mainly numbers) on a time scale. Data measurement is
being taken every few secs/mins based and
Hi,
On 08/02/2010 03:12 PM, Sushant Sinha wrote:
The current text parser already returns url and url_path. That already
increases the number of unique tokens.
Well, I think I simply turned that off to be able to search for plain
words. It still works for complete URLs, those are just treated
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Sushant Sinha sushant...@gmail.com wrote:
The current text parser already returns url and url_path. That already
increases the number of unique tokens. I am only asking for adding of
normal english words as well so that if someone types only wikipedia
he gets a
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
I agree that's the crux of the problem, but I can't see solving it
with a global variable. I realize you were just testing...
Yes it was just a test. However, somewhere information must be kept or
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Sushant Sinha sushant...@gmail.com wrote:
The current text parser already returns url and url_path. That already
increases the number of unique tokens. I am only asking for adding of
normal english words
Sushant Sinha sushant...@gmail.com writes:
This would needlessly increase the number of tokens. Instead you'd
better make it work like compound word support, having just wikipedia
and org as tokens.
The current text parser already returns url and url_path. That already
increases the number
Sushant Sinha sushant...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes thats what I am planning to do. I just wanted to see if anyone
can help me in estimating whether this is doable in the current
parser or I need to write a new one. If possible, then some idea
on how to go about implementing?
The current tsearch
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Sushant Sinha sushant...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes thats what I am planning to do. I just wanted to see if anyone
can help me in estimating whether this is doable in the current
parser or I need to write a new one.
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached patch uses the globally defined list.
I can't speak for any other committer, but personally I'm prepared to
reject out of hand any solution involving a global variable. This
code is none to
2010/8/2 Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I reviewed this code in a fair amount of detail today and ended up
rewriting it. In general terms, it's best to avoid changing things
that are not relevant to the central
The Monday 02 August 2010 13:59:59, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote :
Also, I made sure that only one or two timeout causes (one of
deadlock_timeout
and lock_timeout in the first case or statement_timeout plus one of the
other two)
can be active at a time.
A little clarification is needed.
Neil Conway neil.con...@gmail.com writes:
FWIW, I think we should aim to eventually remove the dependency on
-fwrapv, and instead make the code correct under the semantics
guaranteed by the C spec.
[ shrug... ] We've gone around on that before. I can't get excited
about it, and the reason is
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached patch uses the globally defined list.
I can't speak for any other committer, but personally I'm prepared to
reject out of hand any solution involving a global variable. This
code is none to easy to follow
2010/7/29 Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com:
But, in pg_trgm it makes it possible to combine different similarity levels
in one query. For example:
select * from test_trgm order by t - 'asdf' 0.5 or t - 'qwer' 0.4;
Is there any chance to handle this syntax also?
Maybe I'm missing
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 21:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
Thank you for the review.
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 17:17 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
(1)
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Here's the problem: if the compiler is allowed to assume that overflow
cannot happen, it is always going to be able to prove that the
if-test is constant false. This is inherent. Anybody claiming to
exhibit a safe way to code
Robert Haas wrote:
I don't think that this is much cleaner than the global variable
solution; you haven't really localized that need to know about the new
flag in any meaningful way, the hacks in ATOneLevelRecusion()
basically destroy any pretense of that code possibly being reusable
for some
Marc Cousin cousinm...@gmail.com wrote:
This time, it's this case that doesn't work :
I really feel that the timeout framework is the way to go here.
Since Zoltán also seems to feel this way:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4c516c3a.6090...@cybertec.at
I wonder whether this
Hi,
Kevin Grittner írta:
Marc Cousin cousinm...@gmail.com wrote:
This time, it's this case that doesn't work :
I really feel that the timeout framework is the way to go here.
Since Zoltán also seems to feel this way:
Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at wrote:
Kevin Grittner írta:
I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request
that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF. Does
anyone feel this approach (without the framework) should be
pursued further?
I certainly think
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Marc Cousin cousinm...@gmail.com wrote:
This time, it's this case that doesn't work :
I really feel that the timeout framework is the way to go here.
Since Zoltán also seems to feel this way:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request
that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF.
I think Returned with Feedback would be more appropriate than
Rejected, since we're asking for a rework, rather than saying -
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not completely understand what you mean with the destruction of
reusability of ATOneLevelRecursion, currently only called by ATPrepAddColumn
- in the patch it is documented in the definition of relVisited that is it
2010/8/2 Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com:
The dump of the table with russian dictionary is in attachment.
I use following tests:
SELECT SUM(levenshtein(a, 'foo')) from words;
SELECT SUM(levenshtein(a, 'Urbański')) FROM words;
SELECT SUM(levenshtein(a, 'ańs')) FROM words;
SELECT
On 02/08/10 07:46, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I have not any suggestions now - so I'll change flag to ready to commit
sorry - contrib module should be a fixed
patch attached
Thanks Pavel, you saved me some time!
Regards,
--
Mike Fowler
Registered Linux user: 379787
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
I haven't seen any posts or CF activity from Itagaki in over a week,
so I'm wondering how to handle some patches in the CF. Does anyone
know whether he's on vacation? Expected return?
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Hi
I've updated mvcc.sgml to explain the new serialization conflict rules for
row-level locks, and added a paragraph to backend/executor/README that explains
the implementation of those. I've chosen backend/executor/README because it
already contains a description of UPDATE handling in READ
2010/8/3 Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
I haven't seen any posts or CF activity from Itagaki in over a week,
so I'm wondering how to handle some patches in the CF. Does anyone
know whether he's on vacation? Expected return?
Sorry for delayed reply. I moved to a new job,
and was
On 8/2/10 3:42 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
Sorry for delayed reply. I moved to a new job,
and was very busy for it.
Congratulations! Are you still at NTT Open Source?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I think patch is as good as can be. :)
OK, committed.
I'm going to prepare less-or-equal function in same manner as this patch.
Sounds good. Since we're now more than half-way through this
CommitFest and this
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
b) more robust algorithm for header rows identification
Have not gotten to this one yet.
I notIce that on WIN32 the default editor is notepad.exe and the
default editor navigation option is /. Does notepad.exe /lineno
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
This is actually my biggest concern about this patch - that it may be
just too much of a hassle to actually make it work for people. I just
tried setting $EDITOR to MacOS's TextEdit program, and it turns out
that TextEdit doesn't understand +. I'm
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
This is actually my biggest concern about this patch - that it may be
just too much of a hassle to actually make it work for people. I just
tried setting $EDITOR to MacOS's TextEdit
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm tempted
to suggest forgetting about any user-configurable parameter and just
provide code that strcmp's the $EDITOR value to see if it recognizes the
editor name, otherwise do
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 12:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I was also wondering if it would be worth adding some additional
regression testing to contrib/btree_gist exercising this new
functionality. Thoughts?
Sure. I attached two tests.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
***
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm tempted
to suggest forgetting about any user-configurable parameter and just
provide code that strcmp's the
2010/8/3 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
b) more robust algorithm for header rows identification
Have not gotten to this one yet.
I notIce that on WIN32 the default editor is notepad.exe and the
default editor
2010/8/3 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm tempted
to suggest forgetting about any user-configurable parameter
In case anyone's interested, I've taken the CTE-based grouping sets patch from
[1] and made it apply to 9.1, attached. I haven't yet done things like checked
it for whitespace consistency, style conformity, or anything else, but (tuits
permitting) hope to figure out how it works and get it closer
59 matches
Mail list logo
