On Mon, 17 May 2004, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:53:19 -0300,
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Not true ... you just have to fix your definition of what a feature is ...
> > a feature is an improvement to the system, whether it be new
> > functional
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > Agreed, but you are a "me too", not a huge percentage of our userbase.
> >
> > How do you know? Have you polled our complete userbase?
> >
> > > Basically, after 6-7 months of development, I want more than a vacuum
> > > pa
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> See my recent email. You are stating that all features are of equal
> significance. Basically, the important missing features are also the
> ones the require the most work to complete.
Agreed ... and the ones that require the most work to complete *wi
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:53:19 -0300,
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not true ... you just have to fix your definition of what a feature is ...
> a feature is an improvement to the system, whether it be new
> functionality, or improved performance ... I consider the work Tom
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Agreed, but you are a "me too", not a huge percentage of our userbase.
>
> How do you know? Have you polled our complete userbase?
>
> > Basically, after 6-7 months of development, I want more than a vacuum
> > patch and a new cache replacement policy. I want somethi
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > I personally don't think Win32 is enough of a new feature either, but
> > > > others disagree.
> > >
> > > Jan, correct me if I'm wrong ..
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > I personally don't think Win32 is enough of a new feature either, but
> > > others disagree.
> >
> > Jan, correct me if I'm wrong ... Jan's point is that we have enough
> > a
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > > Sure, you can work around the lack of a Win32 port with Cygwin, and
> > > maybe use replication in place of PITR, but the big question is are you
> > > hitting a large precentage of users with an enhancement.
> >
> > I'm not su
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Is there any security risk if we enable tcpip_socket by default? We
> > restrict connection from localhost only by default so I think enabling
> > tcpip_socket adds no security risk. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Right, and 7.5 will ship with tcp and localhost enab
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Is there any security risk if we enable tcpip_socket by default? We
> restrict connection from localhost only by default so I think enabling
> tcpip_socket adds no security risk. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Right, and 7.5 will ship with tcp and localhost enabled.
--
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 04:36:55 +0200,
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The type is indexable and provide also conversion methods:
>
> text <--> email
> and the operator >>, is possible use it in select like:
When you are converting between text and email data, what format are t
Is there any security risk if we enable tcpip_socket by default? We
restrict connection from localhost only by default so I think enabling
tcpip_socket adds no security risk. Please correct me if I am wrong.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
---(end of broadcast)---
T
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I personally don't think Win32 is enough of a new feature either, but
> > others disagree.
>
> Jan, correct me if I'm wrong ... Jan's point is that we have enough
> already to warrant a beta on June 1st, even without Win32
On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 23:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I personally don't think Win32 is enough of a new feature either, but
> > others disagree.
>
> Jan, correct me if I'm wrong ... Jan's point is that we have enough
> already to warrant a beta on
Jan, correct me if I'm wrong ... Jan's point is that we have enough
already to warrant a beta on June 1st, even without Win32 ... Win32 (or
any of the other stuff, like PITR/tablespaces) would be icing on the cake
...
I think we're close enough on win32 to wait for it. It would look bad
for us to
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I personally don't think Win32 is enough of a new feature either, but
> others disagree.
Jan, correct me if I'm wrong ... Jan's point is that we have enough
already to warrant a beta on June 1st, even without Win32 ... Win32 (or
any of the other stuff,
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > As an illustration, the apache software installs by default all
> > > necessary includes and even a special tailored command (apxs) so as
> > > to help extension modules to be compiled, installed and even configured
> > > easilly.
> > >
> > > Is there any opposition to
> initdb could even emit a warning if the --encoding option was
> used without also specifying --no-locale.
Please don't do that. Most Asian chasets does not work with locale
enabled PostgreSQL installation. i.e. it returns WRONG SELECT
results. I've been telling this to Japanese users for hundred
On Sat, 15 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >
> > Dear hackers,
> >
> > I wish to submit a small patch so that server includes and
> > all necessary configuration files could be installed *by default*.
> >
> > The current status is that server includes files are only install
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Sure, you can work around the lack of a Win32 port with Cygwin, and
> > maybe use replication in place of PITR, but the big question is are you
> > hitting a large precentage of users with an enhancement.
>
> I'm not sure that the initial version of PITR will be a good rep
Marko Karppinen wrote:
I think this interaction between the locale and server_encoding is
confusing. Is there any use case for running an incompatible mix?
If not, would it not make sense to fetch initdb's default database
encoding with nl_langinfo(CODESET) instead of using SQL_ASCII?
Peter Eisentr
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Hi all, this is the alpha version for the new email data type,
is not written as built in type but as plug in, Tome Lane and others
drove me in this direction.
The type is indexable and provide also conversion methods:
text <--> email
and the operator >>, is possible use it i
Marko Karppinen wrote:
> I think this interaction between the locale and server_encoding is
> confusing. Is there any use case for running an incompatible mix?
> If not, would it not make sense to fetch initdb's default database
> encoding with nl_langinfo(CODESET) instead of using SQL_ASCII?
This
Bruce Momjian kirjutas P, 16.05.2004 kell 22:45:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > We have ARC, the background writer and vacuum delay, and people even ask
> > me for backports of that (I have one for vacuum delay, but refuse to
> > make one for the others). How long do you want to delay that being ready
>
Jan Wieck wrote:
> We have ARC, the background writer and vacuum delay, and people even ask
> me for backports of that (I have one for vacuum delay, but refuse to
> make one for the others). How long do you want to delay that being ready
> for production? Do you really think people that are suff
Tom Lane wrote:
This code will only work if the database is running under an LC_CTYPE
setting that implies the same encoding specified by server_encoding.
However, I don't see that as a fatal objection, because in point of
fact
the existing upper/lower code assumes the same thing.
I think this int
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In the first place it's unfair to other developers to make schedule
>> slips at the last moment, and especially to *plan* to do so.
> Isn't it equally unfair to slip the sch
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'm currently thinking is that for each entry in the cache, we'll
> save the current refcount at subtransaction start, and then restore it
> at subtransaction abort. At subtransaction commit, the parent's
> refcount will be updated with the subtran
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear hackers,
>
> I wish to submit a small patch so that server includes and
> all necessary configuration files could be installed *by default*.
>
> The current status is that server includes files are only installed
> if explicitly required (make install-all-headers).
Fabien COELHO wrote:
Dear hackers,
I wish to submit a small patch so that server includes and
all necessary configuration files could be installed *by default*.
The current status is that server includes files are only installed
if explicitly required (make install-all-headers).
The idea is that ex
Fabien COELHO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 4. I think that the system ACL entry should be "hidden" and not
>> displayed by ACL-list printing. I'm not quite sure yet how to make
>> that happen. It would be nicer if the owner ID could be passed to
>> recursive_revoke out-of-band, instead of being
Fabien COELHO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wish to submit a small patch so that server includes and
> all necessary configuration files could be installed *by default*.
There is a reason why install-all-headers is not the default. It is
that it shouldn't be the default: most people do not need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all, this is the alpha version for the new email data type,
is not written as built in type but as plug in, Tome Lane and others
drove me in this direction.
The type is indexable and provide also conversion methods:
text <--> email
and the operator >
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regarding the lock mechanism, I simply added some code to LockReleaseAll
> so it gets the array of committed child Xids; on subtransaction abort,
> the whole lock struct is scanned just like it's done on main transaction
> abort; only those locks affilia
I wrote:
> I think the correct solution involves having recursive_revoke look to
> see if D still has the rights from somewhere else before it goes off to
> recursively revoke D's grants. This makes it correctly implement the
> notion that one always has the union of the rights granted by anyone.
I already post this message using [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with attached a binary file but I guess the newsgroup not
accept binary file.
The following was almost the message, now the file is on pg_foundry (
now it's working ).
=
Hi all, t
36 matches
Mail list logo
