are still there at present). I
don't know if the libpqxx guys have moved yet, or are still using the
old lists.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
for the longer names used on Windows? Could someone confirm that,
please?
The longest I can find is:
Serbian (Cyrillic)_Bosnia and Herzegovina
at 42 characters.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
instead of a database name, which would allow us to operate
against servers other than the one with the catalogs installed.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
Andreas I integrated this stuff into the backend for 8.1.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
and
pg_total_relation_size, one takes an OID and one takes a relation name as
argument. Any objections to having just one of each function, taking a
'regclass'? The user-visible behavior wouldn't change, but I thought I'd ask
first in case I'm missing something.
None here.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK
at PGDay next week.
Might be useful.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
on the Wiki explaining how
to setup the project under Eclipse and share our settings.
I don't know of anyone else actually working that way, but I've
certainly heard of people wanting to. It would be good if you can
document what you've done for their benefit.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Emmanuel Cecchet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
I don't know of anyone else actually working that way, but I've
certainly heard of people wanting to. It would be good if you can
document what you've done for their benefit.
Any recommendation where
be found at
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Eclipse
Very impressive - thanks for taking the time.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
think I've
seen two reports of people running into the problem when building from
source themselves, and one was internal here in EDB), so the urgency
is simply to ensure it's fixed before we do produce our next release
imho.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Well - building your own Postgres 8.3 on Windows using MingW appears
broken.
Not sure how many people fall into that category, but its seems like a
fairly major issue.
Very few people build
-console terminal service sessions should be
categorized as pretty rare.
I use them routinely.
For installing and running Postgres? Note that we're not talking about
running clients apps here, but the server itself.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql
exactly how much this interlock is reduced, and if there is
something else we can do to make it work on Vista+...
This isn't a Vista+ issue - it happens on XP as well.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
out for no obvious reason.
You do get such a message from the installer.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
few people build their own Postgres on Windows, because it's not
exactly straightforward to do because of all the dependencies.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription
an existing postmaster. Especially in situations where the db is
started
by hand, the protection against duplicate startup is important.
Yeah, as Magnus reminded me.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Nov 2008, at 06:57, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Tom, Robert, Simon,
What, are people just on edge because of the US election?
It looks to me like the commitfest system is going really well. Of
course, we'll see how long it takes to
to a newbie to the community, that
would be another matter.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 08:57 +, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 02:21 +, Gregory Stark wrote:
On the other hand what does occur to me
could make it an addon module, or a pgfoundry project.
That would defeat the point. Not that I have any great feelings either
way, but fwiw, Microsoft and Oracle both create a sample database
iirc.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
It might also be useful to create such a database at initdb time so
newbies have something interesting to look at right away.
No, there is no need to clutter every
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
That would defeat the point. Not that I have any great feelings either
way, but fwiw, Microsoft and Oracle both create a sample database
iirc.
Last I checked, MS did it optionally only, no?
Yes
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, there is no need to clutter every installation in the world with such a
database. You could make it an addon
something interesting to look at right away.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-paste-play.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm in favour of including it by default (at initdb), so it's there
for new users to play with on any fresh install - however, there is
only a point to that if all the documentation examples
), but please note that we're in the middle of the final phase of
the development cycle at the moment, so new patches are unlikely to be
looked at for at least a couple of months.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
it?
It's the same IP address - but try port 35 for ssh. Marc changed it
(temporarily) due to a vast number of malicious connection attempts.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
effective size (out of tests on
32MB, 512MB and 1GB). There wasn't much between 32 and 512 though - my
suspicion is that 128 or 256 would be similarly effective. I didn't
have time to test that though.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
generous in the input one can accept, but in
this case it seems ambiguous to me. Is that supposed to be :30 or :03?
There's no way to tell.
How is it ambiguous? The leading zero is technically redundant. A
trailing on most certainly isn't.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
wouldn't either, but I have no data to back that up of course.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
in the office).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 22 October 2009 15:07:13 Dave Page wrote:
Updated patch attached. Per discussion, this:
- Changes the envvar name to PGAPPNAME
- Removes support for setting application_name in the startup packet
;
}
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Updated application name patch, including a GUC assign hook to clean
the application name of any unsafe characters, per discussion.
Regards, Dave
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
appname-v4.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
Updated application name patch, including a GUC assign hook to clean
the application name of any unsafe characters, per discussion.
Applied with assorted editorialization. There were
to work on it (hesitantly as it means touching the parser
and other areas of the code I currently have no experience of).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Upthread, Tom suggested a new 'SET DEFAULT ...' variant of SET which
could be used to set the default GUC value that RESET would revert to.
This seems to me to be the ideal solution
should just
go that way.
I looked (briefly) at doing that when we first ran into this
suggestion. As you pointed out at the time, it seemed like that would
require some fairly ugly hackery in fe-connect.c
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
look at how to make it happen.
That's good, 'cos I'm sure it'll end up being a whole lot less ugly
than if I did it :-)
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
and maybe 8.0 six months earlier.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
?
regards, tom lane
Given that this can probably be considered an *extremely* safe patch
:-), I say go for it. It'll certainly make for less error reports
around something that's not an error.
If the patch was in any way complex I'd object against it, but this
clearly isn't...
Agreed.
--
Dave
EOL Date
PostgreSQL 7.4 July 2010 (extended)
PostgreSQL 8.0 July 2010 (extended)
PostgreSQL 8.1 November 2010
PostgreSQL 8.2 December 2011
PostgreSQL 8.3 February 2013
PostgreSQL 8.4 July 2014
--
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Core Team
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 04 December 2009 17:36:00 Dave Page wrote:
Version EOL Date
PostgreSQL 7.4 July 2010 (extended)
PostgreSQL 8.0 July 2010 (extended)
PostgreSQL 8.1 November 2010
implementation of VACUUM FULL.
Congratulations!
--
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Core Team
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
for this architecture!
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
, but I bet
it doesn't.
What about msys? Or is that not capable of building the newer versions of flex?
The other possible option that I hesitate to suggest is Windows
Services for Unix or SUA as I think it's now called.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:36, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Yes. I spent a few cents and a few hours wrestling with it. AFAICT your
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
The other possible option that I hesitate to suggest is Windows
Services for Unix or SUA as I think it's now called.
You mean we should post flex to that? Or have you found someone who has
://svn.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/REL-1_8_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3/docs/en_US/tips.txt?rev=6770view=markup)
Neither of those tips has changed since they were committed in July
2003. I also can't find any reference to this list in the docs or the
guru hints.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 13/11/2009 12:11, Dave Page a écrit :
[...]
What about pg_dump/psql setting fallback_application_name?
Per Tom, I'm waiting on the possible new array-based libpq connect API
which will make a conversion
.
It would also be a nice touch to have the 64 bit MSVC build system
create both the 64 and 32 bit libraries. That would make it much
easier for those of us that need to combine 32 and 64 bit packages
together, saving the pain of building 32 and 64 bit separately.
Thoughts?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK
and 64 bit separately.
Are there plans to move to building with VC++ 2008 at the same time? I'd be
somewhat concerned about building and shipping libp64 with VC++ 2005.
Yes, Magnus has already made that work.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
After chatting with Magnus, we feel that a good solution would be to
rename libpq on Win64 to libpq64.dll to distinguish it from the 32 bit
equivalent.
Isn't that going to break
On Tuesday, January 5, 2010, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tis, 2010-01-05 at 16:48 +, Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I would have thought Microsoft would have a better solution than this
for managing 64-bit libraries
of other utilities installed in parallel.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp wrote:
Maybe I'm missing the point and have a question.
For example, do 32bit psql and the 64bit one have the same name?
If so, where
the outset, with
no dependencies required. Of course, the server side doesn't matter.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
be the complete opposite of our past errors.
Especially given that Heikki is spending significant time on it right
now...
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
flux and people are
watching us closely.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
it in a way that will never
work for maybe 50% or more of PostgreSQL installations, then you have
fundamental design issues to overcome'.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Building them is no problem - authors can easily use EC2 for which we
have an AMI pre-configured for next to no cost, can build on their own
platform, on a community provided system, or get a friend to do it.
So any module
selection.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
for such modules (c.f.
OpenSuse's build service).
+1
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:12 +, Dave Page wrote:
Hey Andrew
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Windows came late to the buildfarm. According to the CVS log
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:33 +, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:12 +, Dave Page wrote:
Hey Andrew
On Fri, Jan 8
its domain. Thus, I've also changed the FAQ to:
If that is the goal of your project then I withdraw my previous
comments, which were written on the belief that you were proposing a
generic distribution/build/installation system for PostgreSQL users.
Sorry for the noise!
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB
stored elsewhere.
The current set of active mirrors can always be found at
http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors.xml, so you can build URLs on the
mirror network using the protocol, host, port and path from the mirror
list, and then the relative path for the file.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
2010/1/8 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 18:44, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
The current set of active mirrors can always be found at
http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors.xml, so you can build URLs on the
mirror network using the protocol, host, port and path
can be arranged. For StackBuilder, we created a pgFoundry
project, so files can just be uploaded there by authorised users, from
where they get replicated back onto the mirror network.
Which leads us neatly back to the GForge URL thread :-)
BTW, what's a PAUS? I missed that one...
--
Dave Page
GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
archiver
from scratch. I too forget why I gave up on it, but it was a strong
enough reason for me to start coding from scratch.
BTW, we only need to replace the archiver/display code. The search
works well already.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
compatibility
Now there's encouragement :-)
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:24 +0530, Dave Page wrote:
So just to put this into perspective and give anyone paying attention
an idea of the pain that lies ahead should they decide
, that said :)
Yup.
Matteo - Can you try loading up a lot more of the old mbox files,
particularly the very early ones from -hackers? It would be good to
see how it copes under load with a few hundred thousand messages in
the database.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Il 14/01/2010 14:46, Dave Page ha scritto:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dfonta...@hi-media.com wrote:
Matteo Beccatip...@beccati.com writes:
I've extended AOX with a trigger that takes care
In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be
Wait for it
9.0.
--
Dave
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
You don't have a code-name. All the cool kids have code-names for their
projects.
There - that should distract everyone from actual release-related work for
the next week or so :-)
Nicely done Sir :-)
--
Dave Page
alpha/beta will be named 9.0 too?
9.0alpha4
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
enough last time.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2007-11/msg00109.php
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org) wrote:
Wait for it
9.0.
Sure, tell us now, after we've all already had to submit our 8.5-related
talks for PGCon... ;)
What's 8.5?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
2008/11/14
19:58:45 tgl Exp $
Seems we either have to contact the author or rewrite the file.
Why? Even if the text is removed, he will still own the copyright, as
is the case for any patch submitted because we don't have any form of
copyright assignment.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
the code.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
://blog.hagander.net/archives/151-Testing-PostgreSQL-patches-on-Windows-using-Amazon-EC2.html
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org wrote:
Btw, I was
at FOSDEM as probably other PostgreSQL people were and all this could
have been discussed while drinking a couple of beers if only someone
cared to contact me.
Hmm, I resent that. As one of the people at
change things too drastically if
they've got it working the way we had it... we'll just have to see
what reports we get, I suppose.
We're not planning to reimplement our existing parser for this release
so it won't bother us if you want to bash about any of the new
formats.
--
Dave Page
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We can still hope that some feedback comes
importantly, due to the lack of timely releases of
the Kerberos for Windows builds, as noted here:
http://pgsnake.blogspot.com/2009/12/kerberos-support-in-postgresql-on.html.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how difficult is this
Why not just use pgAgent? It's far more flexible than the design
you've suggested, and already exists.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how difficult
scheduler, neither
of which would require 20K lines of Java code.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dfonta...@hi-media.com wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
Why not just use pgAgent? It's far more flexible than the design
you've suggested, and already exists.
What would it take to have it included in core, so that it's
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Dave Page dp
On 2/22/10, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 18:45 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
2010/2/22 Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:00:33 +0100, Magnus Hagander
mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
We also have to consider our Windows
\data
cacls D:\APPS\PostgreSQL\8.4
cacls D:\APPS\PostgreSQL
cacls D:\APPS
cacls D:\
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
it will), it won't try to run initdb or modify it in any way.
It'll just check the catalog version and datetime format are
compatible.
You'd have to run the adminpack SQL script manually.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I think these
might need to have c:\pgBuild\{libxslt,iconv}\bin added to the PATH in the
buildfarm.conf file, right after where c:\pgBuild\libxml2\bin is added.
This is now done. Sorry for the delay.
--
Dave Page
of the build
environment, just the same as the Windows SDK.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription
be split into
server binary and separate headers+pdb+sources packages, with the sdk
package including gettext headers and sources too. It'd be a LOT easier
to develop with Pg on win32 this way.
How does breaking it up into multiple packages make it easier?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http
701 - 800 of 1699 matches
Mail list logo
