explicitly
have info about what each column can do.
I'd second that, even if it takes time ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs
(maybe with a cascade option, deleting unupdtable
objects as needed ?).
Am I dreaming awake ? Or is this implementable ? An sufficiently generally
useful ?
Comments ?
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6
Tom Lane wrote:
Emmanuel Charpentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, this does *not* work between a 7.3-generated dump and a 7.2
production server. The archiver complaints of an 'unknown archive format :
0' (I'm quoting this from the top of my head : my production server is
not reachable
Posted about 2 weeks to the General and Questions lists. Got no answers
and found no workaround (yet !).
Any ideas ?
Emmanuel Charpentier
PS : If possible, Please Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] : I'm reading
the list through the news server, and nor very often ...
Original Message
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
tolerable ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
[ Back to lurking ... ]
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
Jan Wieck wrote:
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
tolerable ...
How good is the debugging support under mingW? Is it at least comparable
to using gdb
Dann Corbit wrote:
[ ... ]
GDB works fine. Some of the other tools don't work right (e.g. sed is
broken).
Recent fixes exist, but I didn't check all of them. WorksForMe(TM), but my
projects are *much* simpler ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of broadcast
to 7.3
modifications ...]
The same could be said of the JDBC driver, btw, while it's doc is still in
the main doc tree.
This one is one of my pet peeves at the moment ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you
needing that) started complaining that this table has no OID, which
really means that the ODBC driver complaints that ...
Is that a side effect of the above problem ?
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
[ ... ]
What about this.
1. Implement pg_get_foreignkey_def() or whatever
2. Adjust pg_dump to dump foreign keys using an ALTER statement
3. Back port the above to rel 7_2_2
4. Release a 7.2.2 version and ask that people upgrade to that version and
do a
-processing of other
view definitions. But so is the case with the modification of a table ...
What do you think ?
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail
Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 04:08, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Dear all,
...
Of course, I am aware that view definitions aren't just stored, but that
a lot of rewriting is involved before storing the actual execution
plan.Modifying a view definition would entail
Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 04:23, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
I'm trying to propose a scenario where
1. The SELECT clause defining the view is preserved
2. DROP of undrlying table/column will _not_ drop the view, but just
mark it dirty
3. Using
, where can I find the docs of the 7.0 system tables ? I know
where the 7.1 docs are ...
Sincerely yours,
Emmanuel Charpentier
lmot of people using Postgres for everyday office work through "nice"
interface, it's bread-and-butter, and these issues *should* be fixed
*before* release ...
[ crawling back under my rock ... ]
Emmanuel Charpentier
pgaccess ? Views doesn't show up, while psql
sees them.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
problems, with
data sources ranging from SAS datasets under MVS/XA to Excel files to
Oracle databases to younameit ... That's the kind of problem I would
*love* to have PostgreSQL to cope with, and *not* M$ Access ...
[ Back to lurking mode ... ]
E. Char
awfully busy and once said that 7.1 required a
*lot* of packaging ... Better not bug him right now ...
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Horst Herb wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2001 21:31, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
[ ... ]
Excuse me, but where has MS Access competence? It is a pretty useless data
lottery with an admittedly very capable easy user interface. The odds of
data corruption can't possibly be higher with any
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Emmanuel Charpentier writes:
1) Updatable views.
You can make rules updateable by attaching appropriate rules to them.
The transparent implementation of updateable views would essentially do
that. It's a planned feature but I don't know of anyone who has made
ative" tables.
Of course, the use of these bridges involve some (maybe quite serious)
performance loss. But then again, I'm less interested in performance
than in competence ...
What do you think ?
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
to produce, and that Oliver Elphick
is almost alone on this task.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
quot;CleUtil" is
not null);
Cle
-
2
3
4
(3 rows) -- That's what I expected in the first place.
Could someone explain to me why not eliminating nulls destroys the
potential results of the query ? In other words, for any X not null, X
not in (some NULLs) is false.
/NewbieMode
LurkingMode
Emmanuel Charpentier
Hiroshi Inoue wrote :
[ ... ]
Column order isn't essential in rdbms.
Nitpicking
A relation (a table) is a subset of the Cartesain cross-product of the
definition domains of the attributes (columns). Cartesian product being
a commutative operation, "order of columns" does not really exists.
24 matches
Mail list logo
