On 10/13/05, Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com wrote:
Tom,
I think my preference is to allow '24:00:00' (but not anything larger)
as a valid input value of the time datatypes. This for two reasons:
* existing dump files may contain such values
* it's consistent with allowing,
Hopefully your problem is solved by now; but if not, here's the link:
do read the README expanded at the end of the file-list:
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.1.2/win32/
I could give you a long lecture on how to look for the things on your
own a little bit before pestering these mailing
Hi William(uniware), Chuck and Hackers,
I have been interested in doing complete PGSQL development in MSVC
for a long time now. With reference to one of Chuck's mails to
-hackers-win32 with the same subject, you said that you were able to
successfully compile PG 8.1 with some minor tweaks.
(missed the mailing list last time)
Hi William,
Thanks for the steps to succeed with vcproject. I am sure that
there will be a few more tweaks involved (like setting VC's include
path etc.). I will try to build it and consult/inform you if there is
any deviation from the README.
This will
On 5/5/06, Jonah H. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/5/06, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is such a 'simple porting', may I ask why hasn't it been
attempted successfuly in so many years of PG's history?
Because most of use don't use Windows... I thought I said
I dont think anyone is arguing that such an application is not
broken. We should see how we can stop a developer from writing buggy
code.
IMO, such a GUC variable _should_ be created and turned on by default.
In case an application fails, at the least, the developer knows
that his
can do within Eclipse. Any inputs on the document will be
appreciated.
Thanks,
Gurjeet.
On 5/8/06, Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
Thomas, I love the idea of eclipse; any platform, any language,
one IDE. I am downloading it right now. Can you please send
No I am not... I used Eclipse for the first time just last week.
But yes, I wish to contribute to the CDT plugin. I think their Indexer
is a bit slow... it takes more than an hour (about two hours) to index
postgres' source code!!! Also, I just noticed that the background gdb
crashes when
It done so, because InitProcess() is supposed to be called only
once per backend, because it allocates a PGPROC from a LIST OF free
PGPROCs.
So with this test, and calling elog( ERROR, ... ) we are stopping
the caller from doing a second initialization for this backend.
On 5/16/06, ipig
I don't think Cristiano is asking for the schema_name in the
EXPLAIN o/p. The request is for the table ALIASes to be shown in the
o/p, which makes more sense than schema_name+table_name, since the
same table can be used in the same query more than once.
Gurjeet.
On 5/15/06, Jim C. Nasby
I think Jonah is referring to the the 'START WITH ... CONNECT BY'
clause feature from Oracle. Am I right Jonah?
For such queries, Oracle introduces a pseudocolumn LEVEL, that
holds the value of the indentation level of the current rusultant row.
In Oracle, the LEVEL column returns 0 for
On 5/16/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:15:13AM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
As has been pointed out, aliases ave always been displayed. The OPs
problem was that he was using schema.tablename everywhere and explain
didn't distinguish between schema1
I agree... VERBOSE option can be made parameterised to include
additional information in the EXPLAIN's output.
I also agree that adding the schema name wouldn't add any
overhead, and I support Tom's suggestion: 'Possibly a reasonable
compromise would be for EXPLAIN to act like rule
Do we have any plans of introducing 'AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION' like feature?
Again, it might not be a part of the standard but it is very
helpful in situations like these!!! You can run a trigger with an
autonomous transaction attached to it, which guarantees that the work
done by
Just a small example of the fact that people need such
functionality... and will devise other ways, albeit inefficient and
dangerous, to implement the missing feature.
The success of an RDBMS (or any other product for that matter)
depends on how well it strikes the balance between the
Hi All,
While trying to implement a recent TODO item, I noticed this behaviour:
test=# drop table t2; drop table t1;
DROP TABLE
DROP TABLE
test=# create table t1(a int primary key );
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
t1_pkey for table t1
CREATE TABLE
test=#
,
Gurjeet.
On 5/21/06, Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/21/06, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
While trying to implement a recent TODO item, I noticed this behaviour:
test=# select * from t2;
ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end
One more question comes to mind. IIRC, Oracle doesn't need you to
rollback the whole transaction if one statement fails (like constarint
violation in this case)!!! Does the standard dictate that an error in
a transaction should force a rollback?
I could be wrong about Oracle; I do not have
Hi Sibel,
Here's the mail that I posted about 10 days ago about compiling
and debugging postgres on windows. I have used msys/mingw toolkit and
it is the recommended (by pg community) toolkit to compile postgres on
windows.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg00396.php
the folder
to someting else (cygwin.before.mingw) so that you don't accidentally
use cygwin's binaries.
Regards,
Gurjeet.
On 5/25/06, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sibel,
Here's the mail that I posted about 10 days ago about compiling
and debugging postgres on windows. I have used
.
Sorry for uiintentionally misleading someone, if I did!
Regards,
Gurjeet
On 5/25/06, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh said:
Also, I would recommend uninstalling cygwin before you install
mingw,
If you don't wish to uninstall cygwin, at least rename the folder
On 5/26/06, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:22 +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
Shouldn't SELECT max(*) FROM foo;
give an error?IMO, yes. SQL:2003 would not allow this; SQL:2003 permits only COUNT(*) and no other aggregate function. All other aggregates require a
Hi All,
I am constantly getting this error:
make -C pl all
make[2]: Entering directory `/d/Dev/postgres/pgsql_tip/src/pl'
make[3]: Entering directory `/d/Dev/postgres/pgsql_tip/src/pl/plpgsql'
make -C src all
make[4]: Entering directory `/d/Dev/postgres/pgsql_tip/src/pl/plpgsql/src'
dlltool
Any ideas how I can revert back to compilable code?
On 5/28/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
I am thinking it is best to always use E'' in that case. OK?
I'm planning to revert it to the previous logic: E if there's any
backslash. I think we
Confirmation: The patch rollback in src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y resolved
the issue.
On 5/28/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Currently looking through the rest of the patch. I'm wondering
about appendStringLiteral: maybe we should kill that entirely
in favor of using
Probably this explains the ERROR for the last query... The ORDER BY
and LIMIT clauses are expected to end a query (except for subqueries,
of course), and hence the keyword UNION is not expected after the
LIMIT clause...
On 6/18/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/20/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One idea that comes to mind is to have a compile time option to record
the palloc __FILE__ and _LINE__ in every AllocChunk header. Then it
would not be so hard to identify the culprit while trawling through
memory. The overhead costs would be so
(www.eclipse.org/buckminster). I'd be happy to help the guys from data
tools with PostgreSQL if there's anything I can do. Not sure what that
would be though. Which Mike is it you're referring to?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
No I am not... I used Eclipse for the first time just last
At the end of the following page:http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/indexes-partial.htmlthere is a link [
Generalized Partial Indexes] which is pointing to a missing link. Can someone update the link with a live doc? Probably
this one Regards,-- [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail |
Hi All,
I noticed something strange today, and thought I should report it. I
vacuumed a database, and as expected, one of the table's size decreased
(other table were VACUUMed individually earlier); but o my astonishment, the
size of the UNIQUE KEY index on one of the columns increased.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
I noticed something strange today, and thought I should report it. I
vacuumed a database, and as expected, one of the table's size decreased
(other table were VACUUMed individually earlier
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's normal. VACUUM FULL creates new index pointers for the tuples it
moves, which can lead to a bigger index
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pg_relation_size() doesn't include the size of the FSM. Should it? I'm
thinking no,
No
but pg_total_relation_size() should.
+1
The FSM is not updated during WAL replay. That means that after crash
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit :
pg_relation_size() doesn't include the size of the FSM. Should it? I'm
thinking no, but pg_total_relation_size() should.
What's practical about
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I vote for contrib/pg_freespacemap functions to be included in the core
since FSM is in core.
The old FSM was in core, too. That's not a helpful argument.
In the absence
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Decibel! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From -HEAD:
ERROR: aggregates not allowed in WHERE clause
STATEMENT: SELECT *
FROM loans l
WHERE id IN ( SELECT max(l.id)
FROM loans
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Decibel! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ERROR: aggregates not allowed in WHERE clause
No, the real issue is that you are referencing the outer table's
I think the -hackers subscribers list is a subset of -general subscribers;
so this wasn't necessary.
Any hackers out there who is not on general list?
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Darren Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I put the email below on the general list, without response. I hope
it
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Reg Me Please escribió:
Il Thursday 02 October 2008 16:15:10 Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
You can nest blocks arbitrarily, giving you the chance to selectively
rollback pieces of the function. It's only a bit more
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Would a patch that changes that have any chance of being accepted? Or is
the gain (not having to repeat the DEFAULT clause, and being able to
maintain it at one place instead of many) considered too small compared
to
2009/12/16 decibel deci...@decibel.org
On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Ashish wrote:
I am thinking about starting with the following TODO item:
-- Have EXPLAIN ANALYZE issue NOTICE messages when the estimated
and actual row counts
2009/12/15 Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com
Jaime Casanova wrote:
So in this extreme case avg tps is just 6 transactions better
Great job trying to find the spot where the code worked better. I'm not so
sure I trust pgbench results where the TPS was so low though. Which leads
us right
, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh gurjeet.si...@enterprisedb.com writes:
SET ROLE is safe in any context since it can be used to switch to only to
those roles that the Session User is a member of, whereas SET SESSION
AUTHORIZATION is unsafe since it can
...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh gurjeet.si...@enterprisedb.com writes:
SET ROLE is safe in any context since it can be used to switch to only to
those roles that the Session User is a member of, whereas SET SESSION
AUTHORIZATION is unsafe since it can be used to switch to any role
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com writes:
We are seeking to enable SET ROLE in security-definer functions,
since @
D.E Shaw there are scripts from the past that used this feature, and I
think
you'd also agree
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com w
We could either endlessly repeat this
ERROR: current transaction is aborted because of conflict with
recovery, commands ignored until end of transaction
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Windows, the write to log file is done by a thread (whose main
function is pipeThread() ), and since it works completely independent of
the
SysLoggerMain() ( which
Hi all,
explain
select v from (
select array(
select 1
union all
select 2) as v
from (select 1) ) as s
where v is not null;
The plan looks like:
QUERY PLAN
Result (cost=0.08..0.10 rows=1
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a way to avoid this double evaluation?
Maybe with a CTE?
WITH x AS (...) SELECT ...
It does look like surprising behavior
There are quite a few GUC parameters that need restart. Is there a way we
can avoid some of them needing restart? I am specifically looking at
archive_mode and the new wal_level.
From my limited understanding, these parameters need restart because in a
running cluster we cannot safely change
PROTECTED] gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com
17°29'34.37N 78°30'59.76E - Hyderabad
18°32'57.25N 73°56'25.42E - Pune *
On 4/6/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please find attached the latest version of the patch. It applies cleanly
on
REL8_2_STABLE
On 4/12/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
The interface etc. may not be beautiful, but it isn't ugly either!
It is
a lot better than manually creating pg_index records and inserting them
into
cache; we use index_create() API to create the index (build
On 5/30/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
But I did not understand the haste to commit the patch within almost
half an
hour of proposing the second version of the patch!!!
It happens some times when a patch applier has gotten
I am done with refactoring the Index adviser code to make use of the current
planner hooks, and as part of this drive I was thinking of changing the name
of the feature/plugin too.
Since there's a possibility that the same architecture can be used by
other types of adviser plugins
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de wrote:
--On 21. September 2009 13:42:21 +0200 Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de
wrote:
--On 20. September 2009 22:56:53 -0400 Robert Haas
robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
So is this ready to commit, or what?
Not yet,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
Hmmm, that would be a useful, easy (I think) security feature: add a GUC
for failed_logins_allowed.
And the counts would be tracked and enforced where?
Combining this with other
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realized that the patch I applied here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-03/msg00531.php
for Taiki Yamaguchi's bug report here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-03/msg00275.php
really
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morris Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose I have a database with $PGDATA on /dev/sda, and a tablespace
directory on /dev/sdb. Will Postgres start successfully if /dev/sda is
mounted and /dev/sdb is not? If not,
On Sun, Sep 9, 2007 at 4:16 AM, apoc9009 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No! Actually I'm wearing my tin hat right now and I Never say Anything
about My Suspicions about 9/11 on Internet in fear of Echelon catching
and filing me.
---
Hannu
hmm, a little bit Para?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
When you are able detect ordering difference you are able also check if
it
is important for the test or not without any extra effort. Only what we
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Decibel! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 22, 2008, at 5:13 AM, PFC wrote:
In order to have it use the fast plan I must set random_page_cost to 1
which I absolutely don't want to do.
Setting effective_cache_size to huge values has no effect.
If I select
RECORD.* doesn't work in plpgsql, but NEW.* and OLD.* do in trigger
functions created in plpgsql.
The example function process_emp_audit() on page
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/plpgsql-trigger.html , shows
that we can use OLD.* and NEW.* as:
INSERT INTO emp_audit SELECT 'D',
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RECORD.* doesn't work in plpgsql, but NEW.* and OLD.* do in trigger
functions created in plpgsql.
The example function process_emp_audit
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Thomas Mueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For PostgreSQL the 'disable literals' feature would be great
publicity:
'publicity' is something this community does not crave for, at least not
feature wise. If that were the case we would have had a million
In the plan below, we can see that the optimizer is sorting an already
sorted result. It seems to forget the sort order across the UNIQUE node. My
question is, do we make any attempts in the optimizer to remember the sort
order of a result, to avoid any further sorting on same sort-key? If not,
I just saw this issue... so though of reporting it before I have to get rid
of the environment.
I `touch`d the trigger file and I saw the following message:
Trigger file: /tmp/pg_standby.trigger.5444
Waiting for WAL file: 0001000B00F2
WAL file path :
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Thomas Mueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Constants are just convenience: instead of constants, user defined
functions can be used. This already works, however it's a bit verbose:
CREATE FUNCTION STATE_ACTIVE() RETURNS VARCHAR AS
$$ BEGIN RETURN
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we can extend the SQL's WITH clause do declare the constant along
with
the query, and not separate from the query.
WITH CONSTANT c_jobrole = 'clerk', CONSTANT c_dept = 10
Hi All,
I noticed that the TidScan fails to identify when the requested block is
not in the relation. Consider this (pg_class has 6 blocks):
postgres=# explain analyze select ctid, * from pg_class where ctid in (
'(6,1)' );
ERROR: could not read block 6 of relation 1663/11511/1259: read
Hi All,
I changed the postgresql.conf file (of an 8.2.4 server), and issued
relaod using pg_reload_config(). Following are the messages I see in the log
files:
May 14 21:38:40 sfphotodb001 postgres[29658]: [19-1] 2008-05-14 21:38:40
PDTLOG: received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
May
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am still looking for comments on the correctness of this script and above
mentioned procedure for running it on an 8.2.x release.
Well, I came across a serious bug in the script. Here's the corrected
version
Hi All,
Can this random order in archival of files be explained?
grep archived /var/log/localmessages
2008-05-23 08:43:43 PDTLOG: archived transaction log file
000109BD009D
2008-05-23 08:44:41 PDTLOG: archived transaction log file
000109BD00A0 - 9D and 9F
Hi All,
Does the command ALTER INDEX take exclusive lock on the objects involved?
Specifically I am looking at ALTER INDEX ... SET TABLESPACE. The docs do not
mention anything about this. I assume it would, and can do a few tests (or
look at code :) ), but asking here wouldn't hurt!
Best
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But since you mention it: one of the plausible answers for fixing the
vacuum problem for read-only slaves is to have the slaves push an xmin
back upstream to the master to prevent premature vacuuming. The current
design of
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The big problem
is that long-running slave-side queries might still need tuples that are
vacuumable on the master, and so replication of vacuuming actions would
cause the slave's queries to deliver wrong answers.
Another
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Then you ship 16 MB binary stuff every 30 second or every minute but
you only have some kbyte real data in the logfile.
Not if you use pg_clearxlogtail (
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
Not if you use pg_clearxlogtail
This means we need to modify pg_standby to not check for filesize when
reading XLogs.
No, the idea is that you run the segments through
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In any case, this seems a case of stuffing too much in the primary
message.
Yeah, good point.
I think it should be something like
errmsg(parameter \shared_buffer\ change in
I was trying to set up warm standby for an 8.1.11 instance, and was using
pg_standby's -l option so that it creates links and does not actually copies
files. After struggling for a few hours, I found two problems; one big, one
small.
The smaller issue is that even if we do not end the
Hi All,
I have been perplexed by random load spikes on an 8.1.11 instance. many
a times they are random, in the sense we cannot tie a particular scenario as
the cause for it! But a few times we can see that when we are executing huge
scripts, which include DDL as well as DML, the load on the
Just an addition... the strace o/p with selects timing out just runs almost
continuously, it doesn't seem to pause anywhere!
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
I have been perplexed by random load spikes on an 8.1.11 instance. many
a times
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During these spikes, in the 'top' sessions we see the 'idle' PG
processes consuming between 2 and 5 % CPU, and since the box has 8 CPUS
(2
sockets and each CPU is a quad core
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During these spikes, in the 'top' sessions we see the 'idle' PG
processes consuming between 2 and 5 % CPU
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:05:33AM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
I just ran DROP SCHEMA _slony schema CASCADE; and it spiked again, on a
very low loaded box!!
Ah, well, if slony is involved, then you have possible
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:15 PM, David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:15:42AM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 07:09:46AM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
Will try this option, at least in the next schema upgrade or when setting
up
Slony.
As I've already suggested, however, if you try to set up slony
On Dec 22, 2007 6:25 AM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is possible for the attacker to use one of the interfaces (tcp or
unix domain) and wait for the postmaster to start. The postmaster will
fail to start on the interface in use but will start on the other
interface and the
Hi All,
We were trying to move a big database from one machine to the other
using PITR mechanism. We hit the following LOG message in during the
recovery (WAL replay) process
LOG: incorrect resource manager data checksum in record at 111/A7738C8
I had used this procedure to do such
Hi guys,
I saw a strange behaviour on one of the production boxes. The
pg_stat_activity shows a process as IDLE and yet 'waiting' !!! On top of
it (understandably, since its IDLE), there are no entries for this pid in
pg_locks!
Following are the snapshots of the two system views.
| 2008-02-01 13:36:15.31027-08
11975 | select * from pg_stat_activity ; | f | -00:01:
52.554697 | 2008-02-01 13:30:40.396392-08
(2 rows)
Clearly, there's something wrong
On Feb 1, 2008 8:16 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I saw
On Feb 1, 2008 3:56 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The situation seems pretty bad!!
I think at least part of your problem is not understanding that a single
transaction sees a frozen snapshot of pg_stat_activity.
It does! I assumed
Hi All,
I just noticed a minor bug in our search results. Searching for
is_insteadbool in 8.3 docs returns the following page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/catalog-pg-rewrite.html
is_instead is a column, and bool is the datatype, both mentioned in
different columns. I know
On Feb 2, 2008 2:28 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I saw a strange behaviour on one of the production boxes. The
pg_stat_activity shows a process as IDLE and yet 'waiting' !!! On top
of
it (understandably, since its IDLE
On Feb 2, 2008 3:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh escribió:
I just looked at the patch... Isn't PG_TRY() an expensive call to make
in
the lock.c code? I was thinking of registering a Xact callback using
RegisterXactCallback() and performing 'waiting' reset
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/indexes-opclass.html
The examples given at the end of this page do not work in 8.2.4. I referred
the 8.3 docs, and the examples there work fine for 8.2.4 db.
Best regards,
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo
Sorry for the noise I am using SCREEN sessoins, and confused the session
I was in.
Sorry again...
On Feb 2, 2008 9:05 PM, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/indexes-opclass.html
The examples given at the end of this page do not work
Hi All,
I have wanted to create a reverse key index for some time now, and it
seems that an evening of reading and half a day of efforts finally paid off.
This is just a proof of concept, and sure, the bit-reversing technique can
use a native language's power for better results.
I
Hi guys any updates on this? Pinging you just so that we do not forget
it in the heap of mails in our inboxes.
Best regards,
On Feb 3, 2008 8:40 AM, Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
Hi All,
I just noticed
libpqxx seems to have moved around quite a bit. The attached patch corrects
libpqxx's homepage.
Best regards,
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
17° 29' 34.37N, 78° 30' 59.76E - Hyderabad
18° 32'
Plausible theory, and nice explanation
Try the following link (I had to wait for 50 sec for the link to appear, but
I guess the trade-off of getting knowledge in return is worth it :) )
http://www5.upload2.net/download/77fa86e16a02e52fd5439c76e148d231/47c7fdce/rfsLfnuVlYjEcCJ/basetables.tgz
1 - 100 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
