Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
are thrown in my face for complaining about these facts. I want to see PostgreSQL succeed and take over the Open Source DataBase world, and want to help, but y'all are making it HARD. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 23:17:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Don't start on the SCO issue. I submitted patches last weekend to fix the UnixWare (and possibly other) issues. You said you were working on them, then I see the note tha

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
;s above is what's in cvs now, we're fine, but we still can't --enable-thread-safety due to the code in thread.c. I'll shut up now. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
support. I need to know the cleanest way of attacking that, so I don't break more platforms. Actually, we **ONLY** have getpwuid_r, not gethostbyname_r nor strerror_r LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
nt to help, but y'all are making it HARD. Because one patch wasn't committed before we tar'd up a new beta? no, because the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits keep getting thrown in my face everytime I ask for UnixWare specific changes. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.le

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:35:10 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:19:49 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So be it, bu

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:57:45 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Index: src/port/thread.c === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
need a configure check to set HAVE_GETPWUID_R, so we will use getpwuid_r in the ENABLE_THREADS case. UnixWare does NOT have strerror_r nor does it have gethostbyname_r, and the libc versions are reentrant in libc, for those 2. We need to use getpwuid_r for threaded apps. Does this clarify thin

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:17:41 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 01:09:54 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 'K, but why the change to NEEDS_REENTRANT_FUNC_NA

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:51:01 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are > thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other > such platforms before I

Re: [HACKERS] dns prob

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
RIGIN postgresql.org. $ --On Sunday, August 31, 2003 22:18:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a problem with DNS? a few hours ago, www.fr.postgresql.org was not defined, now that it works again, ftp.fr.postgresql.org dosn't exist -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerct

Re: [HACKERS] dns prob

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
. www A 194.250.190.252 www2 --On Sunday, August 31, 2003 15:27:19 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks like Marc's script removed it $ cd /var/adm/named/cache $ grep ftp.fr postgresql.org $ ls -l postgresql.org -rw-r--r--1 root sys

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
ues. That sounds like a clear plan. I have no preference. I would just like to see a thread-safe libpq. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Dri

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 13:11:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it'

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 14:24:14 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > --On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
ut with my patch it does build. LER regards, tom lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 22:02:00 +0100 Lee Kindness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: then how do we *PROVE* thread-safety on a particular platform? You're not going to be able to prove it anyway! which is my poin

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 00:04:35 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: >> > Oh, interesting. So you are saying that if the OS supports threads, >> > then we use the *_r if they have them, and assume the non *_r >> > fun

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
with three functions, to it should be doable. Right. We can't assume because a *_r function is missing that the normal function is thread-safe. So, given that UnixWare doesn't have gethostbyname_r and strerror_r, but does have getpwuid_r, will y'all declare that Uni

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:32:08 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > Where does it say that you have to use getpwuid_r() to be thread safe? > I don't see any mention in the docs. It does say about getpwuid: > > For getpw

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:35:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:20:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Lee Kindness writes: >> >&

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
nabled on UnixWare with only the getpwuid_r() function? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:12:48 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 19:53:38 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lee Kindness writes: > >> Bruce Momjian writes: >> >

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:32:03 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> Bruce Momjian writes: >> >> > Right. We can't assume because a *_r function is missing that >> >> > the normal function i

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 14:00:55 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: >> > Woh, I thought we just agreed that getpwuid_r() isn't required for >> > thread-safety on your platform. >> it's CLEANER to use it. &

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
In hindsight, I should have done this long ago. However, it only tests the thread-safety of functions. It does not completely test your threading capability. I would like every operating system that supports thread-safety to run this program and report back the results. -- Larry Rose

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 17:09:49 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> > From UnixWare: >> >>

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl UX:acomp: WARNING: "test_thread.c", line 60: argument #3 incompatible with protot

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can you pass me what's in CVS (anon hasn't updated afaict). And, what didn't you like about my version? LER --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 18:35:44 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: >> > What does your OS want for the 3rd ar

[HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there. I'm doing: cvs update -d -P (I sent another note to Marc as a safety). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboa

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
just manually ran it .. did that help? Nope. I'm still not seeing Bruce's changes for the threads stuff nor the added tools files. :-( LER On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there. I'm doing: cvs update -d -P (

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 23:34:09 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly, and ther

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 14:44:07 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > k, I just wipe'd out and rebuild /projects/cvsroot, and it looks like > the files are in sync again ... I checked abased on the plt

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
o obtain dir lock in repository `/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server' cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up $ On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > everythin

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
ckout and see if that helps ... ? The src/tools/test_thread stuff, Added files: >> >> src/tools : test_thread_funcs.c >> >> I'll try a full checkout. LER On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: I still did NOT pick up any changes :-( Would you like a

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 13:39:44 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 15:35:48 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: k, which file specifically are you expecting a change in? as I said, the changes t

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
be related *shrug* let me know if it happens again, that's all ... Will do. Thanks for the fix(es). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Spring

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang

2003-09-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
t now? It would seem to me to be a good thing(tm) to have it in. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[HACKERS] UnixWare patches placed on my www site

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
this will allow us to NOT have to muck with LD_LIBRARY_PATH nor symlinks out of /usr/lib/ These are against today's CVS. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Driv

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
t;." must be struct/union object UX:acomp: WARNING: "ip.c", line 465: left operand of "." must be struct/union object UX:acomp: WARNING: "ip.c", line 466: left operand of "." must be struct/union object UX:acomp: line 416 is: int32 s_addr; s_add

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:52:18 -0700 Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all > gmake[3]: Entering dire

Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD/i386 thread test

2003-09-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
_r( 3), setpassent(3), setpwent(3), endpwent(3) - password database operations $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 14:19:00 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/libpq' cc

Re: [HACKERS] __cpu__ defines

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
sent the details to Tom, since he seems to be the spinlock maintainer. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
No such file or directory $ locate pthread.h $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:03:33 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. --On Friday, September 12, 2003 12:18:52 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I need someone running NetBSD to rea

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:30:38 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > Wow, that is strange. Someone else told me NetBSD supports threads, > and doesn't need any special compile flags, but of course, it has to > have pthread.

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
v7.4, with the "cleanup patch" being applied right away after v7.4? Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all care). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 23:13:54 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all= =20 care). Unfixably? Or just a small oversight? I'm actu

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
pace symbols. that's reasonable. At least until 64-bit UnixWare. :-) (announced at SCOForum). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.htm

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:00:43 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Please, only the first two. Make the Unixware template add __i386__. Don't add assumptions about valid user-namespace symbols. that's reasonab

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO. Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add* an implicit #define of _

[HACKERS] Link.shared help

2003-09-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
g to help? I didn't notice the problem since I have a 7.4 install in my normal prefix. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Link.shared help/BROKEN UNIXWARE!/Reversion Request.

2003-09-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
Since I haven't gotten a reply, can someone REVERT the lines in src/Makefile.shlib that adds $(libdir)/$(soname) for port,eq,unixware to $(soname)? I need to look harder. Thanks! --On Saturday, September 13, 2003 15:47:44 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: With

Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2007-02-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
I can set up build farm on it if yall need it. Its running 6.2/amd64 --- Original Message --- From: "Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: " Larry Rosenman " Sent: 2/8/07, 12:19:07 PM Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? On Ja

Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2

2007-03-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
.c does fix this issue. The stats collector CPU usage has dropped from inexcess of 95% to 5% Thanks. Any guess on when we'd see an 8.2.4? I have a business reason for asking. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Ma

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

2006-06-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
asks, the files I wrote in contrib/mac are free to be licensed any way the project sees fit. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 --

Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions)

2006-06-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
t; a port. If we can't find anyone who cares enough about Cygwin to > host a regularly-scheduled buildfarm member, I'm for blowing it off. > What all's needed on the host for this? I might be able to use either my house machine or my work desktop here @pervasive, or one of m

Re: [HACKERS] Change in Pervasive's PostgreSQL strategy

2006-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
ntribute to the > community (such as our knowledge base, and the directory), and we'll > be talking with Josh Berkus about that. I'd like to echo Jim's sentiment. The last 9 months here have been great, and the community is still as wonderful as ever. I hope I've been a posi

Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features status)

2006-08-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
I've used and use RT. It is web based for admin, but all the transactions are E-Mail based. http://www.bestpractical.com I can also make a test queue on my instance if someone wants to play. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
at it's *currently* doing, but it > doesn't let you know what has happened in the last day or whatever. > It can't answer "has table foo been vacuumed recently?" or "what > tables haven't been vacuumed at all during this week?" I added last vacuum

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: >>>>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>>>> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: >>>>>> >>

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
> Nevermind -- it's just that if you vacuum a table which you haven't > touched (insert, update, delete) since the last stats reset, then the > vacuum info isn't recorded because we refuse to create the pgstat > entry for the table. Do I need to write a Doc p

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
info about regular (manual) vacuums, so > the above scenario still applies. They do. The stats patch as applied captures both autovacuum and manual vacuum as well as analyze (both from the Autovacuum daemon and manual). -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Pho

Re: [HACKERS] gBorg status?

2006-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
No, since my time is up in the air at the moment, I've bowed out for now. Once I get settled at Surgient, I might take it up again, but not right now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 5:42

[HACKERS] HEAD: Compile issues on UnixWare 7.1.4

2005-06-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
ith perl, but...). I've got a REL8_0_STABLE run running now (should work, unless something is REALLY broken). Did the build system change between 8.0 and HEAD? Thanks! LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@le

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD: Compile issues on UnixWare 7.1.4

2005-06-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Trying to set up my 7.1.4 box as a buildfarm member, and can't get > through A build. The latest failure (after removing --with-perl) is: > > $ tail -20 ../../../lastrun-logs/make-contrib.log > cc -O -Kinline -g -K PIC -I. -I../../src/include > -

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD: Compile issues on UnixWare 7.1.4

2005-06-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" writes: >> Did the build system change between 8.0 and HEAD? > > I don't think so --- certainly there are no changes in > template/unixware or makefiles/Makefile.unixware, which is where > you'd expect to find any

[HACKERS] REL7_4_STABLE: Check failure

2005-06-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
Getting my UnixWare box to be part of the buildfarm. Could one of the knowledgeable hackers look at the failure for 'firefly' on REL7_4_STABLE and tell me if it's ok? Thanks. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

[HACKERS] HEAD: create index failure: firefly on buildfarm

2005-07-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
My UnixWare 7.1.4 box started flunking with it's latest run.. See the firefly entry on the buildfarm. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-36

[HACKERS] Buildfarm

2005-07-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Since tom seems to be fixing the back branches, I added 7.3 and 7.2 to firefly's set of branches it tries. Unfortunately neither one went green :(. Also, 7.4 seems to now need some contrib check hacking. (It got further, but not green yet). Just FYI. LER -- Larry Ros

[HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Looks like it's time for an update to the config.guess/config.sub scripts. SCO (don't yell, I'm just the messenger), released OpenServer 6, and needs updated versions to compile. Do I need to generate a patch, or can we just get them updated in HEAD? LER --

Re: [HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 19 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > Do I need to generate a patch, or can we just get them updated in > HEAD? They were updated two weeks ago and there weren't any SCO-related changes since then. If you have patches, please submit them to <[E

Re: [HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 19 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: > Looks like it's time for an update to the config.guess/config.sub > scripts. Didn't we just do that? 2005-07-01 14:17 petere * configure, configure.in, config/config.guess, config/config.sub, c

Re: [HACKERS] More buildfarm stuff

2005-07-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
on't 'kill -9' the postmaster I don't have SMP, but I do have a 4.11 box. Libc_r is what you want for threads. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, D

Re: [HACKERS] More buildfarm stuff

2005-07-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
> thanks > > andrew It appears that the box is down at the moment. As soon as I can get someone back in Dallas (I'm in Charlotte) To get it back up I will. One question: was the python install on octopus from ports? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
- > ! @ 4 years 1 mon 9 days 4 hours 18 mins 23 secs > (1 row) > > -- test long interval input > > == > > Regards > -- Larry Rosenman http://

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
compiler group (They'll want a small test case :( ) LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 > From: Larry Rosenman > To: ohp@pyrenet.fr > Cc: pgsql-hackers list > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS > > On Jul 25 2005,

Re: [HACKERS] More buildfarm stuff

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 07:38:46PM -0400, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> Larry, >>> >>> please try building and testing (especially PL installcheck) on that >>> box using as close as possible to the sa

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 >> From: Larry Rosenman >> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr >> Cc: pgsql-hackers list >> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS >> >>

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: >> >> >>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 >>>> From: Larry Rosen

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >>> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 >>> From: Larry Rosenman >>> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr >>> Cc: pgsql-hackers list >>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] r

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: > "Larry Rosenman" writes: >> For those following along at home: > >> Removing --enable-cassert and --enable-debug from the options causes >> Firefly to fail. > > FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these > optio

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
t to the bottom of it :) They've got all the info they need, as far as I know, as well as access to my box. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611

Re: [HACKERS] More buildfarm stuff

2005-07-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
g.pl?nm=octopus&dt=2005-07-26%2015:29:33 So the question now is: how do we fix the issue with threaded python? how do we get libc_r into the mix on FreeBSD 4.11? I think that will answer it (IIRC, libc_r has the pthread_* functions in it). LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Couple of minor buildfarm issues

2005-07-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
. Just my $0.02. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
find, first. They may have a work-around (they don't yet, but...). -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US ---(end of broa

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
t that's another story). The SCO guys have, in the past, found other ways to fix the code as well, so let's give them a few days. I do know they are working it (I'm getting questions back and forth about getting their systems up to snuf to compile it :) ) LER cheers andrew

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
n off optimization for that compiler. No we shouldn't. I'm actually working with the SCO compiler guys to get this BUG fixed. Let's not pre-judge. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@

[HACKERS] Sanity Check?

2005-07-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
**NOT** seeing this on my box, but. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4:

Re: [HACKERS] More buildfarm stuff

2005-07-29 Thread Larry Rosenman
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > My buildfarm machine > (http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=octopus&br=HEAD) > is SMP, so if anything we need UP testing. My UP 4.11-STABLE box is back accessable again. If someone wants, I can set up another buildfarm member... LER --

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive

2005-07-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Looks like Unixware is broken too, > > cheers > > andrew > I think Tom's fix to use IPPROTO_TCP will fix firefly. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: le

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive

2005-07-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > > I think Tom's fix to use IPPROTO_TCP will fix firefly. > > LER And based on the last run, it did. Thanks, Tom! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US

[HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads flags...

2004-03-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
emplate/unixware to Bruce already). -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads flags...

2004-03-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > I attempted(!) to compile up CVS Head, and if you --enable-thread-safety, > you need to include the THREADS stuff to cc: > > gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/pgsql/src/port' > cc -O -Kinline initdb.o -L../../../src/i

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads

2004-03-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, March 18, 2004 19:39:56 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What is the concensus of the community? AFAICS, initdb should not need to depend on libpq in the first place; it never makes a connection to a live postmast

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads

2004-03-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, March 18, 2004 23:03:16 -0500 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > I attempted(!) to compile up CVS Head, and if you > --enable-thread-safety, you need to include the THREADS stuff to cc:

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads

2004-03-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, March 18, 2004 22:47:39 -0600 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Thursday, March 18, 2004 23:03:16 -0500 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see that initdb is just the first of many /bin programs to be compiled, so if we have to add the thread

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 09:52:54 -0500 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > The a.out (not any library) should be linked with -Kpthread (not > -lpthread). > This will force libthread to be linked in the right order relative

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >