Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Warren Turkal wrote: On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote: Warren Turkal wrote: On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote: head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v head ? ?1.3; access; symbols ? ? ? ? Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-27 Thread Warren Turkal
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you don't see them.  Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines, so now there is only one line in each file.  Let me know how that works. Everything looks good

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-27 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Warren Turkal wrote: On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you don't see them. Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines, so now there is only one line in each file. Let me know how that works.

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-27 Thread Warren Turkal
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 13:50, Andrew Dunstan wrote: You know, you can prune what is rsynced. I am not sure why you brought this up, but yes I did know this. my rsync line looks like this:   rsync -avzCH --delete --exclude-from=/home/cvsmirror/pg-exclude

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-27 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Warren Turkal wrote: On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you don't see them. Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines, so now there is only one line in each file. Let me know how that works.

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-27 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Warren Turkal wrote: On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you don't see them. Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines, so now there is only one line in each file. Let me know how that works.

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-27 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Warren Turkal wrote: On Tuesday 27 February 2007 13:50, Andrew Dunstan wrote: You know, you can prune what is rsynced. I am not sure why you brought this up, but yes I did know this. Well I thought it might be useful to prune that directory you were having trouble with. But we

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Michael Paesold
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Warren Turkal wrote: On Saturday 24 February 2007 15:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Keep in mind that the repository as converted by Josh, above, is strangely corrupted in weird and unpredictable ways. Would you care to elaborate on that statement? I'd like to check my

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Joshua D. Drake
I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found. Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an issue with re-creating the SVN repo. Joshua, do you run trac-admin /path/to/trac/env resync after

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Warren Turkal wrote: On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote: head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v head ? ?1.3; access; symbols ? ? ? ? Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? creation:1.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? creation:1.1.1; ? ? What the heck happened here? locks;

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote: Done. Any other problems? I don't see the fix in the rsync archive. When will it show up there? For reference, the changes were needed in the following files in cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic: * ApachePg.pl,v *

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Warren Turkal wrote: On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote: Done. Any other problems? I don't see the fix in the rsync archive. When will it show up there? For About an hour. reference, the changes were needed in the following files in

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Joshua D. Drake wrote: I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found. Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an issue with re-creating the SVN repo. Joshua, do you run trac-admin

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote: Done. Any other problems? Only figuring out the encoding issues with cvs. Thanks, wt -- Warren Turkal (w00t) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found. Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an issue with re-creating the SVN repo. Joshua, do

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found. Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an issue with re-creating the SVN

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-26 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote: Warren Turkal wrote: On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote: head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v head ? ?1.3; access; symbols ? ? ? ? Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? creation:1.1.1.1 ?

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Warren Turkal wrote: On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:24, Warren Turkal wrote: The interesting thing about Git is that is has two way sync support for a SVN repository also. You could run a Git repository pushing changes in real time to a SVN repository and present a CVS frontend also. I would

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Warren Turkal wrote: As a followup, the cvs2svn conversion says the following. Error summary: ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in '../pgsql-cvs/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.newstyle,v' ERROR: Multiple definitions of the

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Warren Turkal
On Saturday 24 February 2007 15:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Keep in mind that the repository as converted by Josh, above, is strangely corrupted in weird and unpredictable ways. Would you care to elaborate on that statement? I'd like to check my converted repositories for what you're referring

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: Warren Turkal wrote: As a followup, the cvs2svn conversion says the following. Error summary: ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in '../pgsql-cvs/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.newstyle,v' ERROR: Multiple

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Warren Turkal wrote: On Saturday 24 February 2007 15:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Keep in mind that the repository as converted by Josh, above, is strangely corrupted in weird and unpredictable ways. Would you care to elaborate on that statement? I'd like to check my converted repositories

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Chad Wagner
On 2/24/07, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in '../pgsql-cvs/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.newstyle,v' ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Chad Wagner
On 2/24/07, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know :-( I've tried to use the Trac site looking for particular changesets and found that for some of them, the list of files are out of sync with reality, and sometimes the diff don't have anything to do with what the commit message

Re: conversion efforts (Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question)

2007-02-24 Thread Warren Turkal
On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote: head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v head    1.3; access; symbols         Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1         creation:1.1.1.1         creation:1.1.1;     What the heck happened here? locks; strict; comment @# @; Can a