Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
 * Alvaro Herrera wrote:

 Michael Paquier wrote:

 Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
 rather different thing:
 -   if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
 RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
 
 +   if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
 RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
  !smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
 As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch
 it:
 the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.


 There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
 patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.

 Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes.  Thanks!


 The buildfarm says -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS does not like this patch.
The complaint comes from jaguarundi, like here:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jaguarundidt=2014-11-16%2015%3A33%3A23

Adding a new parameter to RelationSetNewRelFile
As Tom mentioned, adding a new parameter to set the persistence
through RelationSetNewRelfilenode works. Patch, actually tested with
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, attached.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27238.1416073...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Regards,
-- 
Michael
From a1a7e4182bd1b5d66260220f040aee4a35e91c75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Paquier mpaqu...@otacoo.com
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:04:05 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS broken by 85b506b

Previous commit that removed ATChangeIndexesPersistence to replace it
with a lower-level API able to define a new relpersistence for a relation
when reindexing it failed with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS enabled. This patch
fixes it by setting the relpersistence of the newly-created relation after
its relfilenode is created by passing a new parameter to RelationSetNewRelfilenode
able to set the persistence of a relation.
---
 src/backend/catalog/index.c| 5 +
 src/backend/commands/sequence.c| 3 ++-
 src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c   | 6 --
 src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c | 6 +++---
 src/include/utils/relcache.h   | 4 +++-
 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index b57aa95..825235a 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -3191,12 +3191,9 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks, char persistence)
 			indexInfo-ii_ExclusionStrats = NULL;
 		}
 
-		/* Set the relpersistence of the new index */
-		iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence = persistence;
-
 		/* We'll build a new physical relation for the index */
 		RelationSetNewRelfilenode(iRel, InvalidTransactionId,
-  InvalidMultiXactId);
+  InvalidMultiXactId, persistence);
 
 		/* Initialize the index and rebuild */
 		/* Note: we do not need to re-establish pkey setting */
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/sequence.c b/src/backend/commands/sequence.c
index e5f7765..4f7f586 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/sequence.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/sequence.c
@@ -304,7 +304,8 @@ ResetSequence(Oid seq_relid)
 	 * Same with relminmxid, since a sequence will never contain multixacts.
 	 */
 	RelationSetNewRelfilenode(seq_rel, InvalidTransactionId,
-			  InvalidMultiXactId);
+			  InvalidMultiXactId,
+			  seq_rel-rd_rel-relpersistence);
 
 	/*
 	 * Insert the modified tuple into the new storage file.
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
index 093224f..c57751e 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
@@ -1196,7 +1196,8 @@ ExecuteTruncate(TruncateStmt *stmt)
 			 * as the relfilenode value. The old storage file is scheduled for
 			 * deletion at commit.
 			 */
-			RelationSetNewRelfilenode(rel, RecentXmin, minmulti);
+			RelationSetNewRelfilenode(rel, RecentXmin, minmulti,
+	  rel-rd_rel-relpersistence);
 			if (rel-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED)
 heap_create_init_fork(rel);
 
@@ -1209,7 +1210,8 @@ ExecuteTruncate(TruncateStmt *stmt)
 			if (OidIsValid(toast_relid))
 			{
 rel = relation_open(toast_relid, AccessExclusiveLock);
-RelationSetNewRelfilenode(rel, RecentXmin, minmulti);
+RelationSetNewRelfilenode(rel, RecentXmin, minmulti,
+		  rel-rd_rel-relpersistence);
 if (rel-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED)
 	heap_create_init_fork(rel);
 heap_close(rel, NoLock);
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c
index 2250c56..fa75771 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c
@@ -3008,7 +3008,7 @@ RelationBuildLocalRelation(const char *relname,
  */
 void
 RelationSetNewRelfilenode(Relation relation, TransactionId freezeXid,
-		  MultiXactId minmulti)
+		  MultiXactId minmulti, char relpersistence)
 {
 	Oid			newrelfilenode;
 	

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Michael Paquier wrote:

 The complaint comes from jaguarundi, like here:
 http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jaguarundidt=2014-11-16%2015%3A33%3A23
 
 As Tom mentioned, adding a new parameter to set the persistence
 through RelationSetNewRelfilenode works. Patch, actually tested with
 CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, attached.

I wrote an identical patch on Saturday and watched it pass
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS test on Sunday.  But the reason I didn't push is I
couldn't understand *why* is there a problem here.  I imagine that the
source of the issue is supposed to be a relcache invalidation that takes
place (in the original code) after reindex_index changes relpersistence,
and before RelationSetNewRelfilenode() creates the filenode.  But at
what point does that code absorb invalidation messages?  Or is there a
completely different mechanism that causes the problem?  If so, what?

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Alvaro Herrera wrote:

 I wrote an identical patch on Saturday and watched it pass
 CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS test on Sunday.  But the reason I didn't push is I
 couldn't understand *why* is there a problem here.  I imagine that the
 source of the issue is supposed to be a relcache invalidation that takes
 place (in the original code) after reindex_index changes relpersistence,
 and before RelationSetNewRelfilenode() creates the filenode.  But at
 what point does that code absorb invalidation messages?  Or is there a
 completely different mechanism that causes the problem?  If so, what?

Ah, it's the anti-collision stuff in GetNewOid(), isn't it.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-16 Thread Christian Ullrich

* Alvaro Herrera wrote:


Michael Paquier wrote:


Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
rather different thing:
-   if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED

+   if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
 !smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch it:
the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.


There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.

Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes.  Thanks!


The buildfarm says -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS does not like this patch.

--
Christian





--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-15 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 Michael Paquier wrote:

  Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is
a
  rather different thing:
  -   if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
  
  +   if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
  RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
  !smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
  As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch
it:
  the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.

 There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
 patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.

 Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes.  Thanks!


Thanks!

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Michael Paquier wrote:

 Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
 rather different thing:
 -   if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
 
 +   if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
 RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
 !smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
 As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch it:
 the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.

There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.

Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes.  Thanks!

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-10 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
 fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
  Patch rebased and added to commitfest [1].
 It looks like a good thing to remove ATChangeIndexesPersistence, this
 puts the persistence switch directly into reindex process.

 A couple of minor comments about this patch:
 1) Reading it, I am wondering if it would not be finally time to
 switch to a macro to get a relation's persistence, something like
 RelationGetPersistence in rel.h... Not related directly to this patch.

Good idea... I'll provide a patch soon.


 2) reindex_index has as new argument a relpersislence value for the
 new index. reindex_relation has differently a new set of flags to
 enforce the relpersistence of all the underling indexes. Wouldn't it
 be better for API consistency to pass directly a relpersistence value
 through reindex_relation? In any case, the comment block of
 reindex_relation does not contain a description of the new flags.

I did it because the ReindexDatabase build a list of oids to run
reindex_relation for each item of the list. I can change the list to store
the relpersistence also, but this can lead us to a concurrency trouble
because if one session execute REINDEX DATABASE and other session run
ALTER TABLE name SET {LOGGED|UNLOGGED} during the building of the list
the reindex can lead us to a inconsitence state.

Added comments to comment block of reindex_relation.


 3) Here you may as well just set the value and be done:
 +/*
 + * Check if need to set the new relpersistence
 + */
 +if (iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence != relpersistence)
 +iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence = relpersistence;

Hmmm... I really don't know why I did it... fixed.

Thanks!

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index 912038a..50cf0ef 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -1980,7 +1980,7 @@ index_build(Relation heapRelation,
 	 * created it, or truncated twice in a subsequent transaction, the
 	 * relfilenode won't change, and nothing needs to be done here.
 	 */
-	if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
+	if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
 		!smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM))
 	{
 		RegProcedure ambuildempty = indexRelation-rd_am-ambuildempty;
@@ -3130,7 +3130,7 @@ IndexGetRelation(Oid indexId, bool missing_ok)
  * reindex_index - This routine is used to recreate a single index
  */
 void
-reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
+reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks, char relpersistence)
 {
 	Relation	iRel,
 heapRelation;
@@ -3191,6 +3191,9 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
 			indexInfo-ii_ExclusionStrats = NULL;
 		}
 
+		/* Set the relpersistence of the new index */
+		iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence = relpersistence;
+
 		/* We'll build a new physical relation for the index */
 		RelationSetNewRelfilenode(iRel, InvalidTransactionId,
   InvalidMultiXactId);
@@ -3310,6 +3313,12 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
  * performance, other callers should include the flag only after transforming
  * the data in a manner that risks a change in constraint validity.
  *
+ * REINDEX_REL_FORCE_UNLOGGED: if true, force the new rebuilded indexes to be
+ * unlogged.
+ *
+ * REINDEX_REL_FORCE_LOGGED: if true, force the new rebuilded indexes to be
+ * permanent.
+ *
  * Returns true if any indexes were rebuilt (including toast table's index
  * when relevant).  Note that a CommandCounterIncrement will occur after each
  * index rebuild.
@@ -3389,11 +3398,19 @@ reindex_relation(Oid relid, int flags)
 		foreach(indexId, indexIds)
 		{
 			Oid			indexOid = lfirst_oid(indexId);
+			char		relpersistence = rel-rd_rel-relpersistence;
 
 			if (is_pg_class)
 RelationSetIndexList(rel, doneIndexes, InvalidOid);
 
-			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS));
+			/* Check for flags to force UNLOGGED or PERMANENT persistence */
+			if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_UNLOGGED)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
+			else if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_PERMANENT)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
+
+			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS),
+		  relpersistence);
 
 			CommandCounterIncrement();
 
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index 6a578ec..95b9a4f 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
@@ -589,7 +589,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-10 Thread Michael Paquier
Thanks for the updated patch, Fabrizio.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:

  A couple of minor comments about this patch:
  1) Reading it, I am wondering if it would not be finally time to
  switch to a macro to get a relation's persistence, something like
  RelationGetPersistence in rel.h... Not related directly to this patch.

 Good idea... I'll provide a patch soon.

I created a thread dedicated to that:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cab7npqseb+hwitxfwkqypa7+9bjolnxio47qsro3hcbsoq0...@mail.gmail.com
Now few people cared enough to comment :)

 2) reindex_index has as new argument a relpersislence value for the
  new index. reindex_relation has differently a new set of flags to
  enforce the relpersistence of all the underling indexes. Wouldn't it
  be better for API consistency to pass directly a relpersistence value
  through reindex_relation? In any case, the comment block of
  reindex_relation does not contain a description of the new flags.

 I did it because the ReindexDatabase build a list of oids to run
 reindex_relation for each item of the list. I can change the list to store
 the relpersistence also, but this can lead us to a concurrency trouble
 because if one session execute REINDEX DATABASE and other session run
 ALTER TABLE name SET {LOGGED|UNLOGGED} during the building of the list
 the reindex can lead us to a inconsistent state.

Fair point. I forgot this code path.


Except a typo with s/rebuilded/rebuilt/ in the patch, corrected in the
patch attached with some extra comments bundled, it seems to be that this
patch can be passed to a committer, so marking it so.

Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
rather different thing:
-   if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED

+   if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
!smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch it:
the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.
Regards,
-- 
Michael
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index 912038a..a0a81e8 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -1980,7 +1980,7 @@ index_build(Relation heapRelation,
 	 * created it, or truncated twice in a subsequent transaction, the
 	 * relfilenode won't change, and nothing needs to be done here.
 	 */
-	if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
+	if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
 		!smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM))
 	{
 		RegProcedure ambuildempty = indexRelation-rd_am-ambuildempty;
@@ -3130,7 +3130,7 @@ IndexGetRelation(Oid indexId, bool missing_ok)
  * reindex_index - This routine is used to recreate a single index
  */
 void
-reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
+reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks, char relpersistence)
 {
 	Relation	iRel,
 heapRelation;
@@ -3191,6 +3191,9 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
 			indexInfo-ii_ExclusionStrats = NULL;
 		}
 
+		/* Set the relpersistence of the new index */
+		iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence = relpersistence;
+
 		/* We'll build a new physical relation for the index */
 		RelationSetNewRelfilenode(iRel, InvalidTransactionId,
   InvalidMultiXactId);
@@ -3310,6 +3313,12 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
  * performance, other callers should include the flag only after transforming
  * the data in a manner that risks a change in constraint validity.
  *
+ * REINDEX_REL_FORCE_UNLOGGED: if true, set the persistence of the rebuilt
+ * indexes to unlogged.
+ *
+ * REINDEX_REL_FORCE_LOGGED: if true, set the persistence of the rebuilt
+ * indexes to permanent.
+ *
  * Returns true if any indexes were rebuilt (including toast table's index
  * when relevant).  Note that a CommandCounterIncrement will occur after each
  * index rebuild.
@@ -3389,11 +3398,19 @@ reindex_relation(Oid relid, int flags)
 		foreach(indexId, indexIds)
 		{
 			Oid			indexOid = lfirst_oid(indexId);
+			char		relpersistence = rel-rd_rel-relpersistence;
 
 			if (is_pg_class)
 RelationSetIndexList(rel, doneIndexes, InvalidOid);
 
-			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS));
+			/* Check for flags to enforce UNLOGGED or PERMANENT persistence */
+			if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_UNLOGGED)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
+			else if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_PERMANENT)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
+
+			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS),
+		  relpersistence);
 
 			CommandCounterIncrement();
 
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index 6a578ec..e067abc 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Paquier
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
 Patch rebased and added to commitfest [1].
It looks like a good thing to remove ATChangeIndexesPersistence, this
puts the persistence switch directly into reindex process.

A couple of minor comments about this patch:
1) Reading it, I am wondering if it would not be finally time to
switch to a macro to get a relation's persistence, something like
RelationGetPersistence in rel.h... Not related directly to this patch.
2) reindex_index has as new argument a relpersislence value for the
new index. reindex_relation has differently a new set of flags to
enforce the relpersistence of all the underling indexes. Wouldn't it
be better for API consistency to pass directly a relpersistence value
through reindex_relation? In any case, the comment block of
reindex_relation does not contain a description of the new flags.
3) Here you may as well just set the value and be done:
+/*
+ * Check if need to set the new relpersistence
+ */
+if (iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence != relpersistence)
+iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence = relpersistence;
Regards,
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-09-13 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
 
  Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
   On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera 
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
   wrote:
 
I pointed out, in the email just before pushing the patch, that
perhaps
we should pass down the new relpersistence flag into
finish_heap_swap,
and from there we could pass it down to reindex_index() which is
where
it would be needed.  I'm not sure it's worth the trouble, but I
think we
can still ask Fabrizio to rework that part.
 
   I can rework this part if it's a real concern.
 
  I guess we can make a better assessment by seeing what it would take.
  I'm afraid it will turn out to be really ugly.
 
  Now, there's some desire to have unlogged indexes on logged tables; I
  guess if we have that, then eventually there will also be a desire to
  swap individual indexes from logged to unlogged.  Perhaps whatever fix
  we come up with here would pave the road for that future feature.
 

 Álvaro,

 I did a refactoring to pass down the relpersistence to finish_heap_swap
and then change the catalog inside the reindex_index instead of in the
rewrite table phase.

 That way we can get rid the function ATChangeIndexesPersistence in the
src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c.

 Thoughts?


Patch rebased and added to commitfest [1].

Regards,

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=24

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index ee10594..173f412 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -1973,7 +1973,7 @@ index_build(Relation heapRelation,
 	 * created it, or truncated twice in a subsequent transaction, the
 	 * relfilenode won't change, and nothing needs to be done here.
 	 */
-	if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
+	if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
 		!smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM))
 	{
 		RegProcedure ambuildempty = indexRelation-rd_am-ambuildempty;
@@ -3099,7 +3099,7 @@ IndexGetRelation(Oid indexId, bool missing_ok)
  * reindex_index - This routine is used to recreate a single index
  */
 void
-reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
+reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks, char relpersistence)
 {
 	Relation	iRel,
 heapRelation;
@@ -3160,6 +3160,12 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
 			indexInfo-ii_ExclusionStrats = NULL;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * Check if need to set the new relpersistence
+		 */
+		if (iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence != relpersistence)
+			iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence = relpersistence;
+
 		/* We'll build a new physical relation for the index */
 		RelationSetNewRelfilenode(iRel, InvalidTransactionId,
   InvalidMultiXactId);
@@ -3358,11 +3364,19 @@ reindex_relation(Oid relid, int flags)
 		foreach(indexId, indexIds)
 		{
 			Oid			indexOid = lfirst_oid(indexId);
+			char		relpersistence = rel-rd_rel-relpersistence;
 
 			if (is_pg_class)
 RelationSetIndexList(rel, doneIndexes, InvalidOid);
 
-			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS));
+			/* Check for flags to force UNLOGGED or PERMANENT persistence */
+			if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_UNLOGGED)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
+			else if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_PERMANENT)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
+
+			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS),
+		  relpersistence);
 
 			CommandCounterIncrement();
 
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index ff80b09..f285026 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
@@ -588,7 +588,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
 	 */
 	finish_heap_swap(tableOid, OIDNewHeap, is_system_catalog,
 	 swap_toast_by_content, false, true,
-	 frozenXid, cutoffMulti);
+	 frozenXid, cutoffMulti,
+	 OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence);
 }
 
 
@@ -1474,7 +1475,8 @@ finish_heap_swap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid OIDNewHeap,
  bool check_constraints,
  bool is_internal,
  TransactionId frozenXid,
- MultiXactId cutoffMulti)
+ MultiXactId cutoffMulti,
+ char newrelpersistence)
 {
 	ObjectAddress object;
 	Oid			mapped_tables[4];
@@ -1518,6 +1520,12 @@ finish_heap_swap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid OIDNewHeap,
 	reindex_flags = REINDEX_REL_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE;
 	if (check_constraints)
 		reindex_flags |= REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS;
+
+	if (newrelpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED)
+		reindex_flags |= 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-25 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Alvaro Herrera
  alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
   Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.
  There is a typo in what has been pushed. Patch attached.
 
 
 Thanks... I fixed that in my last patch to change 'loggedness' to
 'persistence'. Attached.

Thanks, pushed.  I also added a comment explaining why it's okay to do
what we're doing.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-25 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
  On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Michael Paquier 
michael.paqu...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Alvaro Herrera
   alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.
   There is a typo in what has been pushed. Patch attached.
  
 
  Thanks... I fixed that in my last patch to change 'loggedness' to
  'persistence'. Attached.

 Thanks, pushed.  I also added a comment explaining why it's okay to do
 what we're doing.


Thanks...

I'm working on a refactoring to pass down the relpersistence flag to
finish_heap_swap... is this valid for now or I should leave it to another
patch?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-25 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
  On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera 
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
  wrote:

   I pointed out, in the email just before pushing the patch, that
perhaps
   we should pass down the new relpersistence flag into finish_heap_swap,
   and from there we could pass it down to reindex_index() which is where
   it would be needed.  I'm not sure it's worth the trouble, but I think
we
   can still ask Fabrizio to rework that part.

  I can rework this part if it's a real concern.

 I guess we can make a better assessment by seeing what it would take.
 I'm afraid it will turn out to be really ugly.

 Now, there's some desire to have unlogged indexes on logged tables; I
 guess if we have that, then eventually there will also be a desire to
 swap individual indexes from logged to unlogged.  Perhaps whatever fix
 we come up with here would pave the road for that future feature.


Álvaro,

I did a refactoring to pass down the relpersistence to finish_heap_swap
and then change the catalog inside the reindex_index instead of in the
rewrite table phase.

That way we can get rid the function ATChangeIndexesPersistence in the
src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c.

Thoughts?

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index ee10594..173f412 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -1973,7 +1973,7 @@ index_build(Relation heapRelation,
 	 * created it, or truncated twice in a subsequent transaction, the
 	 * relfilenode won't change, and nothing needs to be done here.
 	 */
-	if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
+	if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
 		!smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM))
 	{
 		RegProcedure ambuildempty = indexRelation-rd_am-ambuildempty;
@@ -3099,7 +3099,7 @@ IndexGetRelation(Oid indexId, bool missing_ok)
  * reindex_index - This routine is used to recreate a single index
  */
 void
-reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
+reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks, char relpersistence)
 {
 	Relation	iRel,
 heapRelation;
@@ -3160,6 +3160,12 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool skip_constraint_checks)
 			indexInfo-ii_ExclusionStrats = NULL;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * Check if need to set the new relpersistence
+		 */
+		if (iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence != relpersistence)
+			iRel-rd_rel-relpersistence = relpersistence;
+
 		/* We'll build a new physical relation for the index */
 		RelationSetNewRelfilenode(iRel, InvalidTransactionId,
   InvalidMultiXactId);
@@ -3358,11 +3364,19 @@ reindex_relation(Oid relid, int flags)
 		foreach(indexId, indexIds)
 		{
 			Oid			indexOid = lfirst_oid(indexId);
+			char		relpersistence = rel-rd_rel-relpersistence;
 
 			if (is_pg_class)
 RelationSetIndexList(rel, doneIndexes, InvalidOid);
 
-			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS));
+			/* Check for flags to force UNLOGGED or PERMANENT persistence */
+			if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_UNLOGGED)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
+			else if (flags  REINDEX_REL_FORCE_PERMANENT)
+relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
+
+			reindex_index(indexOid, !(flags  REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS),
+		  relpersistence);
 
 			CommandCounterIncrement();
 
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index ff80b09..f285026 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
@@ -588,7 +588,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
 	 */
 	finish_heap_swap(tableOid, OIDNewHeap, is_system_catalog,
 	 swap_toast_by_content, false, true,
-	 frozenXid, cutoffMulti);
+	 frozenXid, cutoffMulti,
+	 OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence);
 }
 
 
@@ -1474,7 +1475,8 @@ finish_heap_swap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid OIDNewHeap,
  bool check_constraints,
  bool is_internal,
  TransactionId frozenXid,
- MultiXactId cutoffMulti)
+ MultiXactId cutoffMulti,
+ char newrelpersistence)
 {
 	ObjectAddress object;
 	Oid			mapped_tables[4];
@@ -1518,6 +1520,12 @@ finish_heap_swap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid OIDNewHeap,
 	reindex_flags = REINDEX_REL_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE;
 	if (check_constraints)
 		reindex_flags |= REINDEX_REL_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS;
+
+	if (newrelpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED)
+		reindex_flags |= REINDEX_REL_FORCE_UNLOGGED;
+	else if (newrelpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT)
+		reindex_flags |= REINDEX_REL_FORCE_PERMANENT;
+
 	reindex_relation(OIDOldHeap, reindex_flags);
 
 	/*
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-23 Thread Michael Paquier
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
 Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.
There is a typo in what has been pushed. Patch attached.
-- 
Michael
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
index d37534e..1bb46ea 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
@@ -10722,7 +10722,7 @@ ATPrepChangeLoggedness(Relation rel, bool toLogged)
 
 	/*
 	 * Scan conrelid if changing to permanent, else confrelid.  This also
-	 * determines whether an useful index exists.
+	 * determines whether a useful index exists.
 	 */
 	ScanKeyInit(skey[0],
 toLogged ? Anum_pg_constraint_conrelid :

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-23 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Alvaro Herrera
 alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
  Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.
 There is a typo in what has been pushed. Patch attached.


Thanks... I fixed that in my last patch to change 'loggedness' to
'persistence'. Attached.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
index d37534e..1d2fe1f 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ typedef struct AlteredTableInfo
 	bool		new_notnull;	/* T if we added new NOT NULL constraints */
 	bool		rewrite;		/* T if a rewrite is forced */
 	Oid			newTableSpace;	/* new tablespace; 0 means no change */
-	bool		chgLoggedness;	/* T if SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED is used */
+	bool		chgPersistence;	/* T if SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED is used */
 	char		newrelpersistence;		/* if above is true */
 	/* Objects to rebuild after completing ALTER TYPE operations */
 	List	   *changedConstraintOids;	/* OIDs of constraints to rebuild */
@@ -388,8 +388,8 @@ static void change_owner_recurse_to_sequences(Oid relationOid,
 static void ATExecClusterOn(Relation rel, const char *indexName,
 LOCKMODE lockmode);
 static void ATExecDropCluster(Relation rel, LOCKMODE lockmode);
-static bool ATPrepChangeLoggedness(Relation rel, bool toLogged);
-static void ATChangeIndexesLoggedness(Oid relid, char relpersistence);
+static bool ATPrepChangePersistence(Relation rel, bool toLogged);
+static void ATChangeIndexesPersistence(Oid relid, char relpersistence);
 static void ATPrepSetTableSpace(AlteredTableInfo *tab, Relation rel,
 	char *tablespacename, LOCKMODE lockmode);
 static void ATExecSetTableSpace(Oid tableOid, Oid newTableSpace, LOCKMODE lockmode);
@@ -3174,19 +3174,19 @@ ATPrepCmd(List **wqueue, Relation rel, AlterTableCmd *cmd,
 			break;
 		case AT_SetLogged:		/* SET LOGGED */
 			ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE);
-			tab-chgLoggedness = ATPrepChangeLoggedness(rel, true);
+			tab-chgPersistence = ATPrepChangePersistence(rel, true);
 			tab-newrelpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
 			/* force rewrite if necessary */
-			if (tab-chgLoggedness)
+			if (tab-chgPersistence)
 tab-rewrite = true;
 			pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
 			break;
 		case AT_SetUnLogged:	/* SET UNLOGGED */
 			ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE);
-			tab-chgLoggedness = ATPrepChangeLoggedness(rel, false);
+			tab-chgPersistence = ATPrepChangePersistence(rel, false);
 			tab-newrelpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
 			/* force rewrite if necessary */
-			if (tab-chgLoggedness)
+			if (tab-chgPersistence)
 tab-rewrite = true;
 			pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
 			break;
@@ -3668,7 +3668,7 @@ ATRewriteTables(List **wqueue, LOCKMODE lockmode)
 			 * Select persistence of transient table (same as original unless
 			 * user requested a change)
 			 */
-			persistence = tab-chgLoggedness ?
+			persistence = tab-chgPersistence ?
 tab-newrelpersistence : OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence;
 
 			heap_close(OldHeap, NoLock);
@@ -3705,8 +3705,8 @@ ATRewriteTables(List **wqueue, LOCKMODE lockmode)
 			 * because the rewrite step might read the indexes, and that would
 			 * cause buffers for them to have the wrong setting.
 			 */
-			if (tab-chgLoggedness)
-ATChangeIndexesLoggedness(tab-relid, tab-newrelpersistence);
+			if (tab-chgPersistence)
+ATChangeIndexesPersistence(tab-relid, tab-newrelpersistence);
 
 			/*
 			 * Swap the physical files of the old and new heaps, then rebuild
@@ -4119,7 +4119,7 @@ ATGetQueueEntry(List **wqueue, Relation rel)
 	tab-relkind = rel-rd_rel-relkind;
 	tab-oldDesc = CreateTupleDescCopy(RelationGetDescr(rel));
 	tab-newrelpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
-	tab-chgLoggedness = false;
+	tab-chgPersistence = false;
 
 	*wqueue = lappend(*wqueue, tab);
 
@@ -10678,7 +10678,7 @@ ATExecGenericOptions(Relation rel, List *options)
  * checks are skipped), otherwise true.
  */
 static bool
-ATPrepChangeLoggedness(Relation rel, bool toLogged)
+ATPrepChangePersistence(Relation rel, bool toLogged)
 {
 	Relation	pg_constraint;
 	HeapTuple	tuple;
@@ -10722,7 +10722,7 @@ ATPrepChangeLoggedness(Relation rel, bool toLogged)
 
 	/*
 	 * Scan conrelid if changing to permanent, else confrelid.  This also
-	 * determines whether an useful index exists.
+	 * determines whether a useful index exists.
 	 */
 	ScanKeyInit(skey[0],
 toLogged ? Anum_pg_constraint_conrelid :
@@ -10792,7 +10792,7 @@ ATPrepChangeLoggedness(Relation rel, bool toLogged)
  * given persistence.
  */
 static void
-ATChangeIndexesLoggedness(Oid relid, char relpersistence)
+ATChangeIndexesPersistence(Oid relid, char relpersistence)
 {
 	

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 Em sexta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2014, Alvaro Herrera 
 alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com escreveu:
 
  Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 
   I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
   replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
   - slaves async
   - slaves sync
   - cascade slaves
 
  On v13 you mean?
 
 Exactly!

Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
  Em sexta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2014, Alvaro Herrera 
  alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com escreveu:
 
   Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
  
I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
- slaves async
- slaves sync
- cascade slaves
  
   On v13 you mean?
  
  Exactly!

 Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.


Awesome!!! Actually I should say thank you my friend!! See you in
Campinas...

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
 Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 Em sexta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2014, Alvaro Herrera 
 alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com escreveu:

  Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 
   I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
   replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
   - slaves async
   - slaves sync
   - cascade slaves
 
  On v13 you mean?
 
 Exactly!

 Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.

Hmm.  I confess to not having paid enough attention to this, but:

1. Loggedness is not a word.  I think that persistence or
relpersistence would be better.

2. The patch seems to think that it can sometimes be safe to change
the relpersistence of an existing relation.  Unless you can be sure
that no buffers can possibly be present in shared_buffers and nobody
will use an existing relcache entry to read a new one in, it's not,
because the buffers won't have the right BM_PERSISTENT marking.  I'm
very nervous about the fact that this patch seems not to have touched
bufmgr.c, but maybe I'm missing something.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera
 alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
  Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
  Em sexta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2014, Alvaro Herrera 
  alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com escreveu:
 
   Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
  
I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
- slaves async
- slaves sync
- cascade slaves
  
   On v13 you mean?
  
  Exactly!
 
  Great.  Pushed.  Thanks for the patch.

 Hmm.  I confess to not having paid enough attention to this, but:

 1. Loggedness is not a word.  I think that persistence or
 relpersistence would be better.


I changed to Persistence...


 2. The patch seems to think that it can sometimes be safe to change
 the relpersistence of an existing relation.  Unless you can be sure
 that no buffers can possibly be present in shared_buffers and nobody
 will use an existing relcache entry to read a new one in, it's not,
 because the buffers won't have the right BM_PERSISTENT marking.  I'm
 very nervous about the fact that this patch seems not to have touched
 bufmgr.c, but maybe I'm missing something.


Because of this concern I implement a solution pointed by Andres [1].

Regards,

[1]
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140717230220.gk21...@awork2.anarazel.de

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
index d37534e..5a233e2 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ typedef struct AlteredTableInfo
 	bool		new_notnull;	/* T if we added new NOT NULL constraints */
 	bool		rewrite;		/* T if a rewrite is forced */
 	Oid			newTableSpace;	/* new tablespace; 0 means no change */
-	bool		chgLoggedness;	/* T if SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED is used */
+	bool		chgPersistence;	/* T if SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED is used */
 	char		newrelpersistence;		/* if above is true */
 	/* Objects to rebuild after completing ALTER TYPE operations */
 	List	   *changedConstraintOids;	/* OIDs of constraints to rebuild */
@@ -388,8 +388,8 @@ static void change_owner_recurse_to_sequences(Oid relationOid,
 static void ATExecClusterOn(Relation rel, const char *indexName,
 LOCKMODE lockmode);
 static void ATExecDropCluster(Relation rel, LOCKMODE lockmode);
-static bool ATPrepChangeLoggedness(Relation rel, bool toLogged);
-static void ATChangeIndexesLoggedness(Oid relid, char relpersistence);
+static bool ATPrepChangePersistence(Relation rel, bool toLogged);
+static void ATChangeIndexesPersistence(Oid relid, char relpersistence);
 static void ATPrepSetTableSpace(AlteredTableInfo *tab, Relation rel,
 	char *tablespacename, LOCKMODE lockmode);
 static void ATExecSetTableSpace(Oid tableOid, Oid newTableSpace, LOCKMODE lockmode);
@@ -3174,19 +3174,19 @@ ATPrepCmd(List **wqueue, Relation rel, AlterTableCmd *cmd,
 			break;
 		case AT_SetLogged:		/* SET LOGGED */
 			ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE);
-			tab-chgLoggedness = ATPrepChangeLoggedness(rel, true);
+			tab-chgPersistence = ATPrepChangePersistence(rel, true);
 			tab-newrelpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
 			/* force rewrite if necessary */
-			if (tab-chgLoggedness)
+			if (tab-chgPersistence)
 tab-rewrite = true;
 			pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
 			break;
 		case AT_SetUnLogged:	/* SET UNLOGGED */
 			ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE);
-			tab-chgLoggedness = ATPrepChangeLoggedness(rel, false);
+			tab-chgPersistence = ATPrepChangePersistence(rel, false);
 			tab-newrelpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
 			/* force rewrite if necessary */
-			if (tab-chgLoggedness)
+			if (tab-chgPersistence)
 tab-rewrite = true;
 			pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
 			break;
@@ -3668,7 +3668,7 @@ ATRewriteTables(List **wqueue, LOCKMODE lockmode)
 			 * Select persistence of transient table (same as original unless
 			 * user requested a change)
 			 */
-			persistence = tab-chgLoggedness ?
+			persistence = tab-chgPersistence ?
 tab-newrelpersistence : OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence;
 
 			heap_close(OldHeap, NoLock);
@@ -3705,8 +3705,8 @@ ATRewriteTables(List **wqueue, LOCKMODE lockmode)
 			 * because the rewrite step might read the indexes, and that would
 			 * cause buffers for them to have the wrong setting.
 			 */
-			if (tab-chgLoggedness)
-ATChangeIndexesLoggedness(tab-relid, tab-newrelpersistence);
+			if (tab-chgPersistence)
+ATChangeIndexesPersistence(tab-relid, tab-newrelpersistence);
 
 			/*
 			 * Swap the physical files of the old and new heaps, then rebuild
@@ -4119,7 +4119,7 @@ ATGetQueueEntry(List **wqueue, Relation rel)
 	tab-relkind = rel-rd_rel-relkind;
 	tab-oldDesc = 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote:

 Hmm.  I confess to not having paid enough attention to this,

Sorry about that.  I guess I should somehow flag threads I'm planning
to commit this so that other people can review stuff carefully.

 but:

 1. Loggedness is not a word.  I think that persistence or
 relpersistence would be better.

Yeah, AFAICS this is only used in the variable chgLoggedness and a
couple of functions.  I don't think we're tense about unwordness of
words we use in source code (as opposed to error messages and docs), and
we have lots of russianisms left by Vadim and others, so I didn't see it
as a serious issue.  But then I'm not a native english speaker and I'm
not bothered by it.  OTOH I came up with loggedness on my own -- you
wouldn't have seen it even in Fabrizio's latest version of the patch.

Who knows, it might become a real english word one day.

You want me to change that to chgPersistence and so on?  No prob, just
LMK.

 2. The patch seems to think that it can sometimes be safe to change
 the relpersistence of an existing relation.  Unless you can be sure
 that no buffers can possibly be present in shared_buffers and nobody
 will use an existing relcache entry to read a new one in, it's not,
 because the buffers won't have the right BM_PERSISTENT marking.  I'm
 very nervous about the fact that this patch seems not to have touched
 bufmgr.c, but maybe I'm missing something.

Right.  Andres pointed this out previously, and the patch was updated
consequently.  The only remaining case in which we do that, again AFAIR,
is for indexes, just after the table has been rewritten and just before
the indexes are reindexed.  There should be no buffer access of the old
indexes at that point, so there would be no buffer marked with the wrong
flag.  Also, the table is locked access-exclusively (is that a word?),
so no other transaction could possibly be reading buffers for its
indexes.

I pointed out, in the email just before pushing the patch, that perhaps
we should pass down the new relpersistence flag into finish_heap_swap,
and from there we could pass it down to reindex_index() which is where
it would be needed.  I'm not sure it's worth the trouble, but I think we
can still ask Fabrizio to rework that part.

Maybe it is me missing something.

BTW why is it that index_build() checks the heap's relpersistence flag
rather than the index'?

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:

  2. The patch seems to think that it can sometimes be safe to change
  the relpersistence of an existing relation.  Unless you can be sure
  that no buffers can possibly be present in shared_buffers and nobody
  will use an existing relcache entry to read a new one in, it's not,
  because the buffers won't have the right BM_PERSISTENT marking.  I'm
  very nervous about the fact that this patch seems not to have touched
  bufmgr.c, but maybe I'm missing something.
 
 Because of this concern I implement a solution pointed by Andres [1].

Actually what you did was better than what he suggested.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

  2. The patch seems to think that it can sometimes be safe to change
  the relpersistence of an existing relation.  Unless you can be sure
  that no buffers can possibly be present in shared_buffers and nobody
  will use an existing relcache entry to read a new one in, it's not,
  because the buffers won't have the right BM_PERSISTENT marking.  I'm
  very nervous about the fact that this patch seems not to have touched
  bufmgr.c, but maybe I'm missing something.

 Right.  Andres pointed this out previously, and the patch was updated
 consequently.  The only remaining case in which we do that, again AFAIR,
 is for indexes, just after the table has been rewritten and just before
 the indexes are reindexed.  There should be no buffer access of the old
 indexes at that point, so there would be no buffer marked with the wrong
 flag.  Also, the table is locked access-exclusively (is that a word?),
 so no other transaction could possibly be reading buffers for its
 indexes.

 I pointed out, in the email just before pushing the patch, that perhaps
 we should pass down the new relpersistence flag into finish_heap_swap,
 and from there we could pass it down to reindex_index() which is where
 it would be needed.  I'm not sure it's worth the trouble, but I think we
 can still ask Fabrizio to rework that part.

 Maybe it is me missing something.

 BTW why is it that index_build() checks the heap's relpersistence flag
 rather than the index'?


I can rework this part if it's a real concern.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
 wrote:

  I pointed out, in the email just before pushing the patch, that perhaps
  we should pass down the new relpersistence flag into finish_heap_swap,
  and from there we could pass it down to reindex_index() which is where
  it would be needed.  I'm not sure it's worth the trouble, but I think we
  can still ask Fabrizio to rework that part.

 I can rework this part if it's a real concern.

I guess we can make a better assessment by seeing what it would take.
I'm afraid it will turn out to be really ugly.

Now, there's some desire to have unlogged indexes on logged tables; I
guess if we have that, then eventually there will also be a desire to
swap individual indexes from logged to unlogged.  Perhaps whatever fix
we come up with here would pave the road for that future feature.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
 2. The patch seems to think that it can sometimes be safe to change
 the relpersistence of an existing relation.  Unless you can be sure
 that no buffers can possibly be present in shared_buffers and nobody
 will use an existing relcache entry to read a new one in, it's not,
 because the buffers won't have the right BM_PERSISTENT marking.  I'm
 very nervous about the fact that this patch seems not to have touched
 bufmgr.c, but maybe I'm missing something.

Maybe I misunderstood something, but I had the impression that this was
handled by assigning a new relfilenode (and hence copying all the data).
So the buffers with one marking would be disjoint from the ones with the
other marking.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
 Robert Haas wrote:
 1. Loggedness is not a word.  I think that persistence or
 relpersistence would be better.

 You want me to change that to chgPersistence and so on?  No prob, just
 LMK.

+1 for s/loggedness/persistence/ -- I agree with Robert that it's
a bit grating on the native ear.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-22 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 BTW why is it that index_build() checks the heap's relpersistence flag
 rather than the index'?


I'm curious about it too... the code in src/backend/catalog/index.c is:

1975 if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
1976 !smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM))
1977 {


Should not to be in that way?

1975 if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED 
1976 !smgrexists(indexRelation-rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM))
1977 {


Alvaro, is this your concern? Right?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Thom Brown 2014-08-20 
CAA-aLv7TeF8iM=7u7tsgl4s5jh1a+shq_ny7gorzc_g_yj7...@mail.gmail.com
 ERROR:  table test is not permanent
 
 Perhaps this would be better as table test is unlogged as permanent
 doesn't match the term used in the DDL syntax.

I was also wondering that, but then figured that when ALTER TABLE SET
UNLOGGED is invoked on temp tables, the error message is not
permanent was correct while the apparent opposite is unlogged is
wrong.

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:

 Re: Thom Brown 2014-08-20 CAA-aLv7TeF8iM=
7u7tsgl4s5jh1a+shq_ny7gorzc_g_yj7...@mail.gmail.com
  ERROR:  table test is not permanent
 
  Perhaps this would be better as table test is unlogged as permanent
  doesn't match the term used in the DDL syntax.

 I was also wondering that, but then figured that when ALTER TABLE SET
 UNLOGGED is invoked on temp tables, the error message is not
 permanent was correct while the apparent opposite is unlogged is
 wrong.

 Christoph
 --
 c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Thom,

Christoph is right... make no sense the message... see the example:

fabrizio=# create temp table foo();
CREATE TABLE
fabrizio=# alter table foo set unlogged;
ERROR:  table foo is unlogged

The previous message is better:

fabrizio=# create temp table foo();
CREATE TABLE
fabrizio=# alter table foo set unlogged;
ERROR:  table foo is not permanent
fabrizio=#
fabrizio=# create unlogged table foo2();
CREATE TABLE
fabrizio=# alter table foo2 set unlogged;
ERROR:  table foo2 is not permanent

Patch attached.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..397b4e6 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -59,16 +59,17 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
 SET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = replaceable class=PARAMETERvalue/replaceable [, ... ] )
+SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 RESET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable [, ... ] )
 INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 NO INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
 NOT OF
 OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
-SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 REPLICA IDENTITY {DEFAULT | USING INDEX replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable | FULL | NOTHING}
 
 phraseand replaceable class=PARAMETERtable_constraint_using_index/replaceable is:/phrase
@@ -447,6 +448,20 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
/varlistentry
 
varlistentry
+termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
+listitem
+ para
+  This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent or
+  from permanent to unlogged (see xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).
+ /para
+ para
+  Changing the table persistence type acquires an literalACCESS EXCLUSIVE/literal lock
+  and rewrites the table contents and associated indexes into new disk files.
+ /para
+/listitem
+   /varlistentry
+
+   varlistentry
 termliteralSET WITH OIDS/literal/term
 listitem
  para
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index b1c411a..7f497c7 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
@@ -574,7 +574,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
 	heap_close(OldHeap, NoLock);
 
 	/* Create the transient table that will receive the re-ordered data */
-	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace, false,
+	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace,
+			   OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence,
 			   AccessExclusiveLock);
 
 	/* Copy the heap data into the new table in the desired order */
@@ -601,7 +602,7 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
  * data, then call finish_heap_swap to complete the operation.
  */
 Oid
-make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
+make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, char relpersistence,
 			  LOCKMODE lockmode)
 {
 	TupleDesc	OldHeapDesc;
@@ -613,7 +614,6 @@ make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
 	Datum		reloptions;
 	bool		isNull;
 	Oid			namespaceid;
-	char		relpersistence;
 
 	OldHeap = heap_open(OIDOldHeap, lockmode);
 	OldHeapDesc = RelationGetDescr(OldHeap);
@@ -636,16 +636,10 @@ make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
 	if (isNull)
 		reloptions = (Datum) 0;
 
-	if (forcetemp)
-	{
+	if (relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP)
 		namespaceid = LookupCreationNamespace(pg_temp);
-		relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP;
-	}
 	else
-	{
 		namespaceid = 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Thom Brown
On 21 August 2014 14:45, Fabrízio de Royes Mello fabriziome...@gmail.com
wrote:


 On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
 
  Re: Thom Brown 2014-08-20 CAA-aLv7TeF8iM=
 7u7tsgl4s5jh1a+shq_ny7gorzc_g_yj7...@mail.gmail.com
   ERROR:  table test is not permanent
  
   Perhaps this would be better as table test is unlogged as permanent
   doesn't match the term used in the DDL syntax.
 
  I was also wondering that, but then figured that when ALTER TABLE SET
  UNLOGGED is invoked on temp tables, the error message is not
  permanent was correct while the apparent opposite is unlogged is
  wrong.
 
  Christoph
  --
  c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

 Thom,

 Christoph is right... make no sense the message... see the example:

 fabrizio=# create temp table foo();
 CREATE TABLE
 fabrizio=# alter table foo set unlogged;
 ERROR:  table foo is unlogged

 The previous message is better:

 fabrizio=# create temp table foo();
 CREATE TABLE
 fabrizio=# alter table foo set unlogged;
 ERROR:  table foo is not permanent
 fabrizio=#
 fabrizio=# create unlogged table foo2();
 CREATE TABLE
 fabrizio=# alter table foo2 set unlogged;
 ERROR:  table foo2 is not permanent


To me, that's even more confusing:

CREATE TEMP TABLE test();
CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE test2();

# ALTER TABLE test SET LOGGED;
ERROR:  table test is not unlogged

# ALTER TABLE test SET UNLOGGED;
ERROR:  table test is not permanent

# ALTER TABLE test2 SET UNLOGGED;
ERROR:  table test2 is not permanent

They're being rejected for different reasons but the error message is
identical.  Permanent suggests the opposite of temporary, and unlogged
tables aren't temporary.

-- 
Thom


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Heikki Linnakangas

On 08/21/2014 05:04 PM, Thom Brown wrote:

On 21 August 2014 14:45, Fabrízio de Royes Mello fabriziome...@gmail.com
wrote:


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:


Re: Thom Brown 2014-08-20 CAA-aLv7TeF8iM=

7u7tsgl4s5jh1a+shq_ny7gorzc_g_yj7...@mail.gmail.com

ERROR:  table test is not permanent

Perhaps this would be better as table test is unlogged as permanent
doesn't match the term used in the DDL syntax.


I was also wondering that, but then figured that when ALTER TABLE SET
UNLOGGED is invoked on temp tables, the error message is not
permanent was correct while the apparent opposite is unlogged is
wrong.


Thom,

Christoph is right... make no sense the message... see the example:

fabrizio=# create temp table foo();
CREATE TABLE
fabrizio=# alter table foo set unlogged;
ERROR:  table foo is unlogged

The previous message is better:

fabrizio=# create temp table foo();
CREATE TABLE
fabrizio=# alter table foo set unlogged;
ERROR:  table foo is not permanent
fabrizio=#
fabrizio=# create unlogged table foo2();
CREATE TABLE
fabrizio=# alter table foo2 set unlogged;
ERROR:  table foo2 is not permanent



To me, that's even more confusing:

CREATE TEMP TABLE test();
CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE test2();

# ALTER TABLE test SET LOGGED;
ERROR:  table test is not unlogged

# ALTER TABLE test SET UNLOGGED;
ERROR:  table test is not permanent

# ALTER TABLE test2 SET UNLOGGED;
ERROR:  table test2 is not permanent

They're being rejected for different reasons but the error message is
identical.  Permanent suggests the opposite of temporary, and unlogged
tables aren't temporary.


In Postgres internals slang, non-permanent means temporary or unlogged. 
But I agree we shouldn't expose users to that term; we use it in the 
docs, and it's not used in command names either.


I wonder if throwing an error is correct behavior anyway. Other ALTER 
TABLE commands just silently do nothing in similar situations, e.g:


lowerdb=# CREATE TABLE foo () WITH OIDS;
CREATE TABLE
lowerdb=# ALTER TABLE foo SET WITH OIDS;
ALTER TABLE

But if we want to throw an error anyway, I'd suggest phrasing it table 
foo is already unlogged


- Heikki



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

 In Postgres internals slang, non-permanent means temporary or
 unlogged. But I agree we shouldn't expose users to that term; we use
 it in the docs, and it's not used in command names either.

Agreed.  I am going over this patch, and the last bit I need to sort out
is the wording of these messages.  I have temporarily settled on this:

ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
 errmsg(cannot change logged status of table %s to 
logged,
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
 errdetail(Table %s references unlogged table %s.,
   RelationGetRelationName(rel),
   RelationGetRelationName(relfk;

Note the term logged status to talk about whether a table is logged or
not.  I thought about loggedness but I'm not sure english speakers are
going to love me for that.  Any other ideas there?

 I wonder if throwing an error is correct behavior anyway. Other
 ALTER TABLE commands just silently do nothing in similar situations,
 e.g:
 
 lowerdb=# CREATE TABLE foo () WITH OIDS;
 CREATE TABLE
 lowerdb=# ALTER TABLE foo SET WITH OIDS;
 ALTER TABLE
 
 But if we want to throw an error anyway, I'd suggest phrasing it
 table foo is already unlogged

Yeah, there is precedent for silently doing nothing.  We previously
threw warnings or notices, but nowadays even that is gone.  Throwing an
error definitely seems the wrong thing.  In the patch I have it's like
this:

ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
 errmsg(cannot change logged status of table %s to 
unlogged,
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
 errdetail(Table %s is already unlogged.,
   RelationGetRelationName(rel;

but I think I will just take that out as a whole and set a flag to
indicate nothing is to be done.

(This also means that setting tab-rewrite while analyzing the command
is the wrong thing to do.  Instead, the test for tab-rewrite should
have an || tab-chgLoggedness test, and we set chgLoggedness off if we
see that it's a no-op.  That way we avoid a pointless table rewrite and
a pointless error in a multi-command ALTER TABLE that has a no-op SET
LOGGED subcommand among other things.)


I changed the doc item in ALTER TABLE,

   varlistentry
termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
listitem
 para
  This form changes the table from unlogged to logged or vice-versa
  (see xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).  It cannot be applied
  to a temporary table.
 /para
/listitem
   /varlistentry

I removed the fact that it needs ACCESS EXCLUSIVE because that's already
mentioned in the introductory paragraph.  I also removed the phrase that
it requires a table rewrite, because on reading existing text I noticed
that we don't document which forms cause rewrites.  Perhaps we should
document that somehow, but adding it to only one item seems wrong.

I will post an updated patch as soon as I fix a bug I introduced in the
check for FKs.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
 Agreed.  I am going over this patch, and the last bit I need to sort out
 is the wording of these messages.  I have temporarily settled on this:

   ereport(ERROR,
   (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
errmsg(cannot change logged status of table %s to 
 logged,
   RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail(Table %s references unlogged table %s.,
  RelationGetRelationName(rel),
  RelationGetRelationName(relfk;

 Note the term logged status to talk about whether a table is logged or
 not.  I thought about loggedness but I'm not sure english speakers are
 going to love me for that.  Any other ideas there?

Just say cannot change status of table %s to logged.

 Yeah, there is precedent for silently doing nothing.  We previously
 threw warnings or notices, but nowadays even that is gone.  Throwing an
 error definitely seems the wrong thing.

Agreed, just do nothing if it's already the right setting.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-08-21 16:59:17 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
 
  In Postgres internals slang, non-permanent means temporary or
  unlogged. But I agree we shouldn't expose users to that term; we use
  it in the docs, and it's not used in command names either.
 
 Agreed.  I am going over this patch, and the last bit I need to sort out
 is the wording of these messages.  I have temporarily settled on this:
 
   ereport(ERROR,
   (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
errmsg(cannot change logged status of table %s to 
 logged,
   RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail(Table %s references unlogged table %s.,
  RelationGetRelationName(rel),
  RelationGetRelationName(relfk;

Maybe 'cannot change persistency of table .. from unlogged to logged'; possibly 
with
s/persistency/durability/?


Have you looked at the correctness of the patch itself? Last time I'd
looked it has fundamental correctness issues. I'd outlined a possible
solution, but I haven't looked since.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote:
 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
  Agreed.  I am going over this patch, and the last bit I need to sort out
  is the wording of these messages.  I have temporarily settled on this:
 
  ereport(ERROR,
  (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
   errmsg(cannot change logged status of table %s to 
  logged,
  RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
   errdetail(Table %s references unlogged table %s.,
 RelationGetRelationName(rel),
 RelationGetRelationName(relfk;
 
  Note the term logged status to talk about whether a table is logged or
  not.  I thought about loggedness but I'm not sure english speakers are
  going to love me for that.  Any other ideas there?
 
 Just say cannot change status of table %s to logged.

I like this one, thanks.

  Yeah, there is precedent for silently doing nothing.  We previously
  threw warnings or notices, but nowadays even that is gone.  Throwing an
  error definitely seems the wrong thing.
 
 Agreed, just do nothing if it's already the right setting.

Done that way.

Andres Freund wrote:

 Have you looked at the correctness of the patch itself? Last time I'd
 looked it has fundamental correctness issues. I'd outlined a possible
 solution, but I haven't looked since.

Yeah, Fabrizio had it passing the relpersistence down to make_new_heap,
so the transient table is created with the right setting.  AFAICS it's
good now.  I'm a bit uneasy about the way it changes indexes: it just
updates pg_class for them just before invoking the reindex in
finish_heap_swap.  I think it's correct as it stands though; at least,
the rewrite phase happens with the right setting, so that if there are
constraints being checked and these invoke index scans, such accesses
would not leave buffers with the wrong setting in shared_buffers.

Another option would be to pass the new relpersistence down to
finish_heap_swap, but that would be hugely complicated AFAICS.

Here's the updated patch.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services
*** a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
***
*** 61,66  ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
--- 61,68 
  SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
  SET WITH OIDS
  SET WITHOUT OIDS
+ SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
+ SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
  SET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = replaceable class=PARAMETERvalue/replaceable [, ... ] )
  RESET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable [, ... ] )
  INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
***
*** 68,74  ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
  OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
  NOT OF
  OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
- SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
  REPLICA IDENTITY {DEFAULT | USING INDEX replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable | FULL | NOTHING}
  
  phraseand replaceable class=PARAMETERtable_constraint_using_index/replaceable is:/phrase
--- 70,75 
***
*** 477,482  ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
--- 478,508 
 /varlistentry
  
 varlistentry
+ termliteralSET TABLESPACE/literal/term
+ listitem
+  para
+   This form changes the table's tablespace to the specified tablespace and
+   moves the data file(s) associated with the table to the new tablespace.
+   Indexes on the table, if any, are not moved; but they can be moved
+   separately with additional literalSET TABLESPACE/literal commands.
+   See also
+   xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLESPACE.
+  /para
+ /listitem
+/varlistentry
+ 
+varlistentry
+ termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
+ listitem
+  para
+   This form changes the table from unlogged to logged or vice-versa
+   (see xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).  It cannot be applied
+   to a temporary table.
+  /para
+ /listitem
+/varlistentry
+ 
+varlistentry
  termliteralSET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = replaceable class=PARAMETERvalue/replaceable [, ... ] )/literal/term
  listitem
   para
***
*** 589,608  ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
  /listitem
 /varlistentry
  
-varlistentry
- termliteralSET TABLESPACE/literal/term
- listitem
-  para
-   This form changes the table's tablespace to the specified tablespace and
-   moves the data file(s) associated with the table to the new 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
 Andres Freund wrote:

  Have you looked at the correctness of the patch itself? Last time I'd
  looked it has fundamental correctness issues. I'd outlined a possible
  solution, but I haven't looked since.

 Yeah, Fabrizio had it passing the relpersistence down to make_new_heap,
 so the transient table is created with the right setting.  AFAICS it's
 good now.  I'm a bit uneasy about the way it changes indexes: it just
 updates pg_class for them just before invoking the reindex in
 finish_heap_swap.  I think it's correct as it stands though; at least,
 the rewrite phase happens with the right setting, so that if there are
 constraints being checked and these invoke index scans, such accesses
 would not leave buffers with the wrong setting in shared_buffers.


Ok.

 Another option would be to pass the new relpersistence down to
 finish_heap_swap, but that would be hugely complicated AFAICS.


I think isn't so complicated to do it, but will this improve something ?
Maybe I didn't understand it very well. IMHO it just complicate a
simple thing.


 Here's the updated patch.


Thanks Alvaro!

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
  Andres Freund wrote:
 
   Have you looked at the correctness of the patch itself? Last time I'd
   looked it has fundamental correctness issues. I'd outlined a possible
   solution, but I haven't looked since.
 
  Yeah, Fabrizio had it passing the relpersistence down to make_new_heap,
  so the transient table is created with the right setting.  AFAICS it's
  good now.  I'm a bit uneasy about the way it changes indexes: it just
  updates pg_class for them just before invoking the reindex in
  finish_heap_swap.  I think it's correct as it stands though; at least,
  the rewrite phase happens with the right setting, so that if there are
  constraints being checked and these invoke index scans, such accesses
  would not leave buffers with the wrong setting in shared_buffers.
 

 Ok.


  Another option would be to pass the new relpersistence down to
  finish_heap_swap, but that would be hugely complicated AFAICS.
 

 I think isn't so complicated to do it, but will this improve something ?
 Maybe I didn't understand it very well. IMHO it just complicate a
 simple thing.



  Here's the updated patch.
 

 Thanks Alvaro!


I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
- slaves async
- slaves sync
- cascade slaves

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:

 I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
 replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
 - slaves async
 - slaves sync
 - cascade slaves

On v13 you mean?

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-21 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Em sexta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2014, Alvaro Herrera 
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com escreveu:

 Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:

  I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
  replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
  - slaves async
  - slaves sync
  - cascade slaves

 On v13 you mean?


Exactly!

Fabrízio Mello




-- 
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-20 Thread Thom Brown
On 17 August 2014 21:45, Fabrízio de Royes Mello fabriziome...@gmail.com
wrote:


 On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
 fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
  On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
  
   Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-28
 CAFcNs+pctx4Q2UYsLOvVFWaznO3U0XhPpkMx5DRhR=jw8w3...@mail.gmail.com
There are something that should I do on this patch yet?
  
   I haven't got around to have a look at the newest incarnation yet, but
   I plan to do that soonish. (Of course that shouldn't stop others from
   doing that as well if they wish.)
  
 
  Thanks!
 

 Updated version.


Hi Fabrizio,

+  This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to
permanent or
+  from unlogged to permanent (see xref
linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).

Shouldn't this read unlogged to permanent or from permanent to unlogged?


ERROR:  table test is not permanent

Perhaps this would be better as table test is unlogged as permanent
doesn't match the term used in the DDL syntax.


Gave the patch a quick test-drive on a replicated instance, and it appears
to operate as described.
-- 
Thom


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-20 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:

 Hi Fabrizio,

 +  This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to
permanent or
 +  from unlogged to permanent (see xref
linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).

 Shouldn't this read unlogged to permanent or from permanent to unlogged?


Fixed.


 ERROR:  table test is not permanent

 Perhaps this would be better as table test is unlogged as permanent
doesn't match the term used in the DDL syntax.


Fixed.


 Gave the patch a quick test-drive on a replicated instance, and it
appears to operate as described.


Thanks for your review.

Att,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
 Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
 Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..397b4e6 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -59,16 +59,17 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
 SET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = replaceable class=PARAMETERvalue/replaceable [, ... ] )
+SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 RESET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable [, ... ] )
 INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 NO INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
 NOT OF
 OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
-SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 REPLICA IDENTITY {DEFAULT | USING INDEX replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable | FULL | NOTHING}
 
 phraseand replaceable class=PARAMETERtable_constraint_using_index/replaceable is:/phrase
@@ -447,6 +448,20 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
/varlistentry
 
varlistentry
+termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
+listitem
+ para
+  This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent or
+  from permanent to unlogged (see xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).
+ /para
+ para
+  Changing the table persistence type acquires an literalACCESS EXCLUSIVE/literal lock
+  and rewrites the table contents and associated indexes into new disk files.
+ /para
+/listitem
+   /varlistentry
+
+   varlistentry
 termliteralSET WITH OIDS/literal/term
 listitem
  para
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index b1c411a..7f497c7 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
@@ -574,7 +574,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
 	heap_close(OldHeap, NoLock);
 
 	/* Create the transient table that will receive the re-ordered data */
-	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace, false,
+	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace,
+			   OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence,
 			   AccessExclusiveLock);
 
 	/* Copy the heap data into the new table in the desired order */
@@ -601,7 +602,7 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
  * data, then call finish_heap_swap to complete the operation.
  */
 Oid
-make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
+make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, char relpersistence,
 			  LOCKMODE lockmode)
 {
 	TupleDesc	OldHeapDesc;
@@ -613,7 +614,6 @@ make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
 	Datum		reloptions;
 	bool		isNull;
 	Oid			namespaceid;
-	char		relpersistence;
 
 	OldHeap = heap_open(OIDOldHeap, lockmode);
 	OldHeapDesc = RelationGetDescr(OldHeap);
@@ -636,16 +636,10 @@ make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
 	if (isNull)
 		reloptions = (Datum) 0;
 
-	if (forcetemp)
-	{
+	if (relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP)
 		namespaceid = LookupCreationNamespace(pg_temp);
-		relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP;
-	}
 	else
-	{
 		namespaceid = RelationGetNamespace(OldHeap);
-		relpersistence = OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Create the new heap, using a temporary name in the same namespace as
@@ -1146,6 +1140,7 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool target_is_pg_class,
 	Oid			relfilenode1,
 relfilenode2;
 	Oid			swaptemp;
+	char		swaprelpersistence;
 	CatalogIndexState indstate;
 
 	/* We need writable copies of both pg_class tuples. */
@@ -1177,6 +1172,10 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-08-17 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
 
  Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-28
CAFcNs+pctx4Q2UYsLOvVFWaznO3U0XhPpkMx5DRhR=jw8w3...@mail.gmail.com
   There are something that should I do on this patch yet?
 
  I haven't got around to have a look at the newest incarnation yet, but
  I plan to do that soonish. (Of course that shouldn't stop others from
  doing that as well if they wish.)
 

 Thanks!


Updated version.

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..2d131df 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -59,16 +59,17 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
 SET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = replaceable class=PARAMETERvalue/replaceable [, ... ] )
+SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 RESET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable [, ... ] )
 INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 NO INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
 NOT OF
 OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
-SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 REPLICA IDENTITY {DEFAULT | USING INDEX replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable | FULL | NOTHING}
 
 phraseand replaceable class=PARAMETERtable_constraint_using_index/replaceable is:/phrase
@@ -447,6 +448,20 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
/varlistentry
 
varlistentry
+termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
+listitem
+ para
+  This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent or
+  from unlogged to permanent (see xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).
+ /para
+ para
+  Changing the table persistence type acquires an literalACCESS EXCLUSIVE/literal lock
+  and rewrites the table contents and associated indexes into new disk files.
+ /para
+/listitem
+   /varlistentry
+
+   varlistentry
 termliteralSET WITH OIDS/literal/term
 listitem
  para
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index b1c411a..7f497c7 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
@@ -574,7 +574,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
 	heap_close(OldHeap, NoLock);
 
 	/* Create the transient table that will receive the re-ordered data */
-	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace, false,
+	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace,
+			   OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence,
 			   AccessExclusiveLock);
 
 	/* Copy the heap data into the new table in the desired order */
@@ -601,7 +602,7 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
  * data, then call finish_heap_swap to complete the operation.
  */
 Oid
-make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
+make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, char relpersistence,
 			  LOCKMODE lockmode)
 {
 	TupleDesc	OldHeapDesc;
@@ -613,7 +614,6 @@ make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
 	Datum		reloptions;
 	bool		isNull;
 	Oid			namespaceid;
-	char		relpersistence;
 
 	OldHeap = heap_open(OIDOldHeap, lockmode);
 	OldHeapDesc = RelationGetDescr(OldHeap);
@@ -636,16 +636,10 @@ make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
 	if (isNull)
 		reloptions = (Datum) 0;
 
-	if (forcetemp)
-	{
+	if (relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP)
 		namespaceid = LookupCreationNamespace(pg_temp);
-		relpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP;
-	}
 	else
-	{
 		namespaceid = RelationGetNamespace(OldHeap);
-		relpersistence = OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Create the new heap, using a temporary name in the same namespace as
@@ -1146,6 +1140,7 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool target_is_pg_class,
 	Oid			relfilenode1,
 relfilenode2;
 	Oid			swaptemp;
+	char		swaprelpersistence;
 	CatalogIndexState indstate;
 
 	/* We need writable copies of both pg_class tuples. */
@@ -1177,6 +1172,10 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool target_is_pg_class,
 		relform1-reltablespace = relform2-reltablespace;
 		relform2-reltablespace = swaptemp;
 
+		

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-28 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
  
   On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
   
 That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
 relpersistence?
   
I don't think that'd help. I think what this means that you simply
cannot change the relpersistence of the old relation before the heap
swap is successful. So I guess it has to be something like
(pseudocode):
   
OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(..);
newrel = heap_open(OIDNewHeap, AEL);
   
/*
 * Change the temporary relation to be unlogged/logged. We have to
do
 * that here so buffers for the new relfilenode will have the right
 * persistency set while the original filenode's buffers won't get
read
 * in with the wrong (i.e. new) persistency setting. Otherwise a
 * rollback after the rewrite would possibly result with buffers
for the
 * original filenode having the wrong persistency setting.
 *
 * NB: This relies on swap_relation_files() also swapping the
 * persistency. That wouldn't work for pg_class, but that can't be
 * unlogged anyway.
 */
AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged(newrel);
FlushRelationBuffers(newrel);
/* copy heap data into newrel */
finish_heap_swap();
   
And then in swap_relation_files() also copy the persistency.
   
   
That's the best I can come up right now at least.
   
  
   Isn't better if we can set the relpersistence as an argument to
make_new_heap ?
  
   I'm thinking to change the make_new_heap:
  
   From:
  
make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
  LOCKMODE lockmode)
  
   To:
  
make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, char relpersistence,
  LOCKMODE lockmode)
  
   That way we can create the new heap with the appropriate
relpersistence, so in the swap_relation_files also copy the persistency, of
course.
  
   And after copy the heap data to the new table (ATRewriteTable) change
relpersistence of the OldHeap's indexes, because in the finish_heap_swap
they'll be rebuild.
  
   Thoughts?
  
 
  The attached patch implement my previous idea based on Andres thoughts.
 

 I don't liked the last version of the patch, especially this part:

 +/* check if SetUnlogged or SetLogged exists in subcmds */
 +for(pass = 0; pass  AT_NUM_PASSES; pass++)
 +{
 +List *subcmds = tab-subcmds[pass];
 +ListCell*lcmd;
 +
 +if (subcmds == NIL)
 +continue;
 +
 +foreach(lcmd, subcmds)
 +{
 +AlterTableCmd *cmd = (AlterTableCmd *) lfirst(lcmd);
 +
 +if (cmd-subtype == AT_SetUnLogged || cmd-subtype
== AT_SetLogged)
 +{
 +/*
 + * Change the temporary relation to be
unlogged/logged. We have to do
 + * that here so buffers for the new relfilenode
will have the right
 + * persistency set while the original filenode's
buffers won't get read
 + * in with the wrong (i.e. new) persistency
setting. Otherwise a
 + * rollback after the rewrite would possibly
result with buffers for the
 + * original filenode having the wrong
persistency setting.
 + *
 + * NB: This relies on swap_relation_files() also
swapping the
 + * persistency. That wouldn't work for pg_class,
but that can't be
 + * unlogged anyway.
 + */
 +if (cmd-subtype == AT_SetUnLogged)
 +newrelpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
 +
 +isSetLoggedUnlogged = true;
 +}
 +}
 +}


 So I did a refactoring adding new items to AlteredTableInfo to pass the
information through the phases.


Hi all,

There are something that should I do on this patch yet?

Regards

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-28 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-28 
CAFcNs+pctx4Q2UYsLOvVFWaznO3U0XhPpkMx5DRhR=jw8w3...@mail.gmail.com
 There are something that should I do on this patch yet?

I haven't got around to have a look at the newest incarnation yet, but
I plan to do that soonish. (Of course that shouldn't stop others from
doing that as well if they wish.)

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-28 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:

 Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-28
CAFcNs+pctx4Q2UYsLOvVFWaznO3U0XhPpkMx5DRhR=jw8w3...@mail.gmail.com
  There are something that should I do on this patch yet?

 I haven't got around to have a look at the newest incarnation yet, but
 I plan to do that soonish. (Of course that shouldn't stop others from
 doing that as well if they wish.)


Thanks!

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-23 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
  On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
  
That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
relpersistence?
  
   I don't think that'd help. I think what this means that you simply
   cannot change the relpersistence of the old relation before the heap
   swap is successful. So I guess it has to be something like
(pseudocode):
  
   OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(..);
   newrel = heap_open(OIDNewHeap, AEL);
  
   /*
* Change the temporary relation to be unlogged/logged. We have to do
* that here so buffers for the new relfilenode will have the right
* persistency set while the original filenode's buffers won't get
read
* in with the wrong (i.e. new) persistency setting. Otherwise a
* rollback after the rewrite would possibly result with buffers for
the
* original filenode having the wrong persistency setting.
*
* NB: This relies on swap_relation_files() also swapping the
* persistency. That wouldn't work for pg_class, but that can't be
* unlogged anyway.
*/
   AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged(newrel);
   FlushRelationBuffers(newrel);
   /* copy heap data into newrel */
   finish_heap_swap();
  
   And then in swap_relation_files() also copy the persistency.
  
  
   That's the best I can come up right now at least.
  
 
  Isn't better if we can set the relpersistence as an argument to
make_new_heap ?
 
  I'm thinking to change the make_new_heap:
 
  From:
 
   make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
 LOCKMODE lockmode)
 
  To:
 
   make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, char relpersistence,
 LOCKMODE lockmode)
 
  That way we can create the new heap with the appropriate
relpersistence, so in the swap_relation_files also copy the persistency, of
course.
 
  And after copy the heap data to the new table (ATRewriteTable) change
relpersistence of the OldHeap's indexes, because in the finish_heap_swap
they'll be rebuild.
 
  Thoughts?
 

 The attached patch implement my previous idea based on Andres thoughts.


I don't liked the last version of the patch, especially this part:

+/* check if SetUnlogged or SetLogged exists in subcmds */
+for(pass = 0; pass  AT_NUM_PASSES; pass++)
+{
+List *subcmds = tab-subcmds[pass];
+ListCell*lcmd;
+
+if (subcmds == NIL)
+continue;
+
+foreach(lcmd, subcmds)
+{
+AlterTableCmd *cmd = (AlterTableCmd *) lfirst(lcmd);
+
+if (cmd-subtype == AT_SetUnLogged || cmd-subtype ==
AT_SetLogged)
+{
+/*
+ * Change the temporary relation to be
unlogged/logged. We have to do
+ * that here so buffers for the new relfilenode
will have the right
+ * persistency set while the original filenode's
buffers won't get read
+ * in with the wrong (i.e. new) persistency
setting. Otherwise a
+ * rollback after the rewrite would possibly
result with buffers for the
+ * original filenode having the wrong persistency
setting.
+ *
+ * NB: This relies on swap_relation_files() also
swapping the
+ * persistency. That wouldn't work for pg_class,
but that can't be
+ * unlogged anyway.
+ */
+if (cmd-subtype == AT_SetUnLogged)
+newrelpersistence = RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED;
+
+isSetLoggedUnlogged = true;
+}
+}
+}


So I did a refactoring adding new items to AlteredTableInfo to pass the
information through the phases.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..2d131df 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -59,16 +59,17 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
 SET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-22 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

  That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
  relpersistence?

 I don't think that'd help. I think what this means that you simply
 cannot change the relpersistence of the old relation before the heap
 swap is successful. So I guess it has to be something like (pseudocode):

 OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(..);
 newrel = heap_open(OIDNewHeap, AEL);

 /*
  * Change the temporary relation to be unlogged/logged. We have to do
  * that here so buffers for the new relfilenode will have the right
  * persistency set while the original filenode's buffers won't get read
  * in with the wrong (i.e. new) persistency setting. Otherwise a
  * rollback after the rewrite would possibly result with buffers for the
  * original filenode having the wrong persistency setting.
  *
  * NB: This relies on swap_relation_files() also swapping the
  * persistency. That wouldn't work for pg_class, but that can't be
  * unlogged anyway.
  */
 AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged(newrel);
 FlushRelationBuffers(newrel);
 /* copy heap data into newrel */
 finish_heap_swap();

 And then in swap_relation_files() also copy the persistency.


 That's the best I can come up right now at least.


Isn't better if we can set the relpersistence as an argument to
make_new_heap ?

I'm thinking to change the make_new_heap:

From:

 make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
   LOCKMODE lockmode)

To:

 make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, char relpersistence,
   LOCKMODE lockmode)

That way we can create the new heap with the appropriate relpersistence, so
in the swap_relation_files also copy the persistency, of course.

And after copy the heap data to the new table (ATRewriteTable) change
relpersistence of the OldHeap's indexes, because in the finish_heap_swap
they'll be rebuild.

Thoughts?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-22 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
 
   That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
   relpersistence?
 
  I don't think that'd help. I think what this means that you simply
  cannot change the relpersistence of the old relation before the heap
  swap is successful. So I guess it has to be something like (pseudocode):
 
  OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(..);
  newrel = heap_open(OIDNewHeap, AEL);
 
  /*
   * Change the temporary relation to be unlogged/logged. We have to do
   * that here so buffers for the new relfilenode will have the right
   * persistency set while the original filenode's buffers won't get read
   * in with the wrong (i.e. new) persistency setting. Otherwise a
   * rollback after the rewrite would possibly result with buffers for the
   * original filenode having the wrong persistency setting.
   *
   * NB: This relies on swap_relation_files() also swapping the
   * persistency. That wouldn't work for pg_class, but that can't be
   * unlogged anyway.
   */
  AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged(newrel);
  FlushRelationBuffers(newrel);
  /* copy heap data into newrel */
  finish_heap_swap();
 
  And then in swap_relation_files() also copy the persistency.
 
 
  That's the best I can come up right now at least.
 

 Isn't better if we can set the relpersistence as an argument to
make_new_heap ?

 I'm thinking to change the make_new_heap:

 From:

  make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, bool forcetemp,
LOCKMODE lockmode)

 To:

  make_new_heap(Oid OIDOldHeap, Oid NewTableSpace, char relpersistence,
LOCKMODE lockmode)

 That way we can create the new heap with the appropriate relpersistence,
so in the swap_relation_files also copy the persistency, of course.

 And after copy the heap data to the new table (ATRewriteTable) change
relpersistence of the OldHeap's indexes, because in the finish_heap_swap
they'll be rebuild.

 Thoughts?


The attached patch implement my previous idea based on Andres thoughts.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..2d131df 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -59,16 +59,17 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
 SET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = replaceable class=PARAMETERvalue/replaceable [, ... ] )
+SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 RESET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable [, ... ] )
 INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 NO INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
 NOT OF
 OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
-SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 REPLICA IDENTITY {DEFAULT | USING INDEX replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable | FULL | NOTHING}
 
 phraseand replaceable class=PARAMETERtable_constraint_using_index/replaceable is:/phrase
@@ -447,6 +448,20 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
/varlistentry
 
varlistentry
+termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
+listitem
+ para
+  This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent or
+  from unlogged to permanent (see xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).
+ /para
+ para
+  Changing the table persistence type acquires an literalACCESS EXCLUSIVE/literal lock
+  and rewrites the table contents and associated indexes into new disk files.
+ /para
+/listitem
+   /varlistentry
+
+   varlistentry
 termliteralSET WITH OIDS/literal/term
 listitem
  para
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
index b1c411a..7f497c7 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c
@@ -574,7 +574,8 @@ rebuild_relation(Relation OldHeap, Oid indexOid, bool verbose)
 	heap_close(OldHeap, NoLock);
 
 	/* Create the transient table that will receive the re-ordered data */
-	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace, false,
+	OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(tableOid, tableSpace,
+			   OldHeap-rd_rel-relpersistence,
 			   

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-21 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-16 
cafcns+r_lmddxjrabwnj3rmy0qegwa-vv6v2smdescofb2d...@mail.gmail.com
 Anyway I think all is ok now. Is this ok for you?

Hi Fabrízio,

it's ok for me now, though Andres' concerns seem valid.

   +SET TABLESPACE replaceable
 class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
RESET ( replaceable
 class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable [, ... ] )
INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
NO INHERIT replaceable
 class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
NOT OF
OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
   -SET TABLESPACE replaceable
 class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 
  That should get a footnote in the final commit message.
 
 
 Sorry, I didn't understand what you meant.

I meant to say that when this patch gets committed, the commit message
might want to explain that while we are at editing this doc part, we
moved SET TABLESPACE to the place where it really should be.

  I think we are almost there :)
 
 Yeah... thanks a lot for your help.

Welcome. I'll look forward to use this in production :)

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-07-16 20:45:15 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
  The rewrite will read in the 'old' contents - but because it's done
  after the pg_class.relpersistence is changed they'll all not be marked
  as BM_PERMANENT in memory. Then the ALTER TABLE is rolled back,
  including the relpersistence setting. Which will unfortunately leave
  pages with the wrong persistency setting in memory, right?
 
 
 That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
 relpersistence?

Did my explanation clarify the problem + possible solution sufficiently?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-21 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 On 2014-07-16 20:45:15 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
   The rewrite will read in the 'old' contents - but because it's done
   after the pg_class.relpersistence is changed they'll all not be marked
   as BM_PERMANENT in memory. Then the ALTER TABLE is rolled back,
   including the relpersistence setting. Which will unfortunately leave
   pages with the wrong persistency setting in memory, right?
  
 
  That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
  relpersistence?

 Did my explanation clarify the problem + possible solution sufficiently?


Yes, your explanation was enough. I didn't had time to working on it yet.
But I hope  working on it today or tomorrow at least.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-17 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-07-16 20:45:15 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
 wrote:
 
  On 2014-07-16 20:53:06 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
   On 2014-07-16 20:25:42 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
   
I quickly looked at this patch and I think there's major missing
 pieces
around buffer management and wal logging.
   
a) Currently buffers that are in memory marked as
   permanent/non-permanent aren't forced out to disk/pruned from
 cache,
   not even when they're dirty.
b) When converting from a unlogged to a logged table the relation
 needs
   to be fsynced.
c) Currently a unlogged table changed into a logged one will be
   corrupted on a standby because its contents won't ever be WAL
 logged.
  
   Forget that, didn't notice that you're setting tab-rewrite = true.
 
  So, while that danger luckily isn't there I think there's something
  similar. Consider:
 
  CREATE TABLE blub(...);
  INSERT INTO blub ...;
 
  BEGIN;
  ALTER TABLE blub SET UNLOGGED;
  ROLLBACK;
 
  The rewrite will read in the 'old' contents - but because it's done
  after the pg_class.relpersistence is changed they'll all not be marked
  as BM_PERMANENT in memory. Then the ALTER TABLE is rolled back,
  including the relpersistence setting. Which will unfortunately leave
  pages with the wrong persistency setting in memory, right?
 
 
 That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
 relpersistence?

I don't think that'd help. I think what this means that you simply
cannot change the relpersistence of the old relation before the heap
swap is successful. So I guess it has to be something like (pseudocode):

OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(..);
newrel = heap_open(OIDNewHeap, AEL);

/*
 * Change the temporary relation to be unlogged/logged. We have to do
 * that here so buffers for the new relfilenode will have the right
 * persistency set while the original filenode's buffers won't get read
 * in with the wrong (i.e. new) persistency setting. Otherwise a
 * rollback after the rewrite would possibly result with buffers for the
 * original filenode having the wrong persistency setting.
 *
 * NB: This relies on swap_relation_files() also swapping the
 * persistency. That wouldn't work for pg_class, but that can't be
 * unlogged anyway.
 */
AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged(newrel);
FlushRelationBuffers(newrel);
/* copy heap data into newrel */
finish_heap_swap();

And then in swap_relation_files() also copy the persistency.


That's the best I can come up right now at least.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-16 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-15 
CAFcNs+pXpmfwi_rKF-cSBOHWC+E=xtsrnxicrgay6bcmthb...@mail.gmail.com
  What about the wqueue mechanism, though? Isn't that made exactly for
  the kind of catalog updates you are doing?
 
 
 Works, but this mechanism create a new entry in pg_class for toast, so it's
 a little different than use the cluster_rel that generate a new
 relfilenode. The important is both mechanisms create new datafiles.

Ok, I had thought that any catalog changes in AT should be queued
using this mechanism to be executed later by ATExecCmd(). The queueing
only seems to be used for the cases that recurse into child tables,
which we don't.

 Merged both to a single ATPrepSetLoggedOrUnlogged(Relation rel, bool
 toLogged);

Thanks.

 But they aren't duplicated... the first opens con-confrelid and the
 other opens con-conrelid according toLogged branch.

Oh sorry. I had looked for that, but still missed it.

 I removed because they are not so useful than I was thinking before.
 Actually they just bloated our test cases.

Nod.

  I think the tests could also use a bit more comments, notably the
  commands that are expected to fail. So far I haven't tried to read
  them but trusted that they did the right thing. (Though with the
  SELECTs removed, it's pretty readable now.)
 
 
 Added some comments.

Thanks, looks nice now.

 +SET TABLESPACE replaceable 
 class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
  RESET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable 
 [, ... ] )
  INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
  NO INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
  OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
  NOT OF
  OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
 -SET TABLESPACE replaceable 
 class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable

That should get a footnote in the final commit message.

 @@ -2857,6 +2860,8 @@ AlterTableGetLockLevel(List *cmds)
   case AT_AddIndexConstraint:
   case AT_ReplicaIdentity:
   case AT_SetNotNull:
 + case AT_SetLogged:
 + case AT_SetUnLogged:
   cmd_lockmode = AccessExclusiveLock;
   break;
  
 @@ -3248,6 +3253,13 @@ ATPrepCmd(List **wqueue, Relation rel, AlterTableCmd 
 *cmd,
   /* No command-specific prep needed */
   pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
   break;
 + case AT_SetLogged:
 + case AT_SetUnLogged:
 + ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE);
 + ATPrepSetLoggedOrUnlogged(rel, (cmd-subtype == 
 AT_SetLogged)); /* SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED} */
 + pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
 + tab-rewrite = true;
 + break;
   default:/* oops */
   elog(ERROR, unrecognized alter table type: %d,
(int) cmd-subtype);
 @@ -3529,6 +3541,12 @@ ATExecCmd(List **wqueue, AlteredTableInfo *tab, 
 Relation rel,
   case AT_GenericOptions:
   ATExecGenericOptions(rel, (List *) cmd-def);
   break;
 + case AT_SetLogged:
 + AlterTableSetLoggedOrUnlogged(rel, true);
 + break;
 + case AT_SetUnLogged:
 + AlterTableSetLoggedOrUnlogged(rel, false);
 + break;
   default:/* oops */
   elog(ERROR, unrecognized alter table type: %d,
(int) cmd-subtype);

I'd move all these next to the AT_DropCluster things like in all the
other lists.

  
  /*
 + * ALTER TABLE name SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 + *
 + * Change the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent by
 + * rewriting the entire contents of the table and associated indexes
 + * into new disk files.
 + *
 + * The ATPrepSetLoggedOrUnlogged function check all precondictions 

preconditions (without trailing space :)

 + * to perform the operation:
 + * - check if the target table is unlogged/permanente

permanent

 + * - check if not exists a foreign key to/from other unlogged/permanent

if no ... exists

 + */
 +static void
 +ATPrepSetLoggedOrUnlogged(Relation rel, bool toLogged)
 +{
 + charrelpersistence;
 +
 + relpersistence = (toLogged) ? RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED :
 + RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT;
 +
 + /* check if is an unlogged or permanent relation */
 + if (rel-rd_rel-relpersistence != relpersistence)
 + ereport(ERROR,
 + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
 +  errmsg(table %s is not %s,
 +  RelationGetRelationName(rel),
 +  

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-16 Thread Andres Freund
Hi,

I quickly looked at this patch and I think there's major missing pieces
around buffer management and wal logging.

a) Currently buffers that are in memory marked as
   permanent/non-permanent aren't forced out to disk/pruned from cache,
   not even when they're dirty.
b) When converting from a unlogged to a logged table the relation needs
   to be fsynced.
c) Currently a unlogged table changed into a logged one will be
   corrupted on a standby because its contents won't ever be WAL logged.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-16 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-07-16 20:25:42 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I quickly looked at this patch and I think there's major missing pieces
 around buffer management and wal logging.
 
 a) Currently buffers that are in memory marked as
permanent/non-permanent aren't forced out to disk/pruned from cache,
not even when they're dirty.
 b) When converting from a unlogged to a logged table the relation needs
to be fsynced.
 c) Currently a unlogged table changed into a logged one will be
corrupted on a standby because its contents won't ever be WAL logged.

Forget that, didn't notice that you're setting tab-rewrite = true.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-16 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 On 2014-07-16 20:25:42 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I quickly looked at this patch and I think there's major missing pieces
  around buffer management and wal logging.
 
  a) Currently buffers that are in memory marked as
 permanent/non-permanent aren't forced out to disk/pruned from cache,
 not even when they're dirty.
  b) When converting from a unlogged to a logged table the relation needs
 to be fsynced.
  c) Currently a unlogged table changed into a logged one will be
 corrupted on a standby because its contents won't ever be WAL logged.

 Forget that, didn't notice that you're setting tab-rewrite = true.


:-)

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-16 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-07-16 20:53:06 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
 On 2014-07-16 20:25:42 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I quickly looked at this patch and I think there's major missing pieces
  around buffer management and wal logging.
  
  a) Currently buffers that are in memory marked as
 permanent/non-permanent aren't forced out to disk/pruned from cache,
 not even when they're dirty.
  b) When converting from a unlogged to a logged table the relation needs
 to be fsynced.
  c) Currently a unlogged table changed into a logged one will be
 corrupted on a standby because its contents won't ever be WAL logged.
 
 Forget that, didn't notice that you're setting tab-rewrite = true.

So, while that danger luckily isn't there I think there's something
similar. Consider:

CREATE TABLE blub(...);
INSERT INTO blub ...;

BEGIN;
ALTER TABLE blub SET UNLOGGED;
ROLLBACK;

The rewrite will read in the 'old' contents - but because it's done
after the pg_class.relpersistence is changed they'll all not be marked
as BM_PERMANENT in memory. Then the ALTER TABLE is rolled back,
including the relpersistence setting. Which will unfortunately leave
pages with the wrong persistency setting in memory, right?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-16 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:

 On 2014-07-16 20:53:06 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
  On 2014-07-16 20:25:42 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
   Hi,
  
   I quickly looked at this patch and I think there's major missing
pieces
   around buffer management and wal logging.
  
   a) Currently buffers that are in memory marked as
  permanent/non-permanent aren't forced out to disk/pruned from
cache,
  not even when they're dirty.
   b) When converting from a unlogged to a logged table the relation
needs
  to be fsynced.
   c) Currently a unlogged table changed into a logged one will be
  corrupted on a standby because its contents won't ever be WAL
logged.
 
  Forget that, didn't notice that you're setting tab-rewrite = true.

 So, while that danger luckily isn't there I think there's something
 similar. Consider:

 CREATE TABLE blub(...);
 INSERT INTO blub ...;

 BEGIN;
 ALTER TABLE blub SET UNLOGGED;
 ROLLBACK;

 The rewrite will read in the 'old' contents - but because it's done
 after the pg_class.relpersistence is changed they'll all not be marked
 as BM_PERMANENT in memory. Then the ALTER TABLE is rolled back,
 including the relpersistence setting. Which will unfortunately leave
 pages with the wrong persistency setting in memory, right?


That means should I FlushRelationBuffers(rel) before change the
relpersistence?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-15 Thread Christoph Berg
Hi Fabrízio,

thanks for the speedy new version.

Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-15 
cafcns+opbuhjuo1soathv8zqcowqp-yerjfoo15v1xpxspc...@mail.gmail.com
 +
 + if (pass == AT_PASS_SET_LOGGED_UNLOGGED)
 +
   ATPostAlterSetLoggedUnlogged(RelationGetRelid(rel));
   
This must be done before relation_close() which releases all locks.
 
  You didn't address that. I'm not sure about it, but either way, this
  deserves a comment on the lock level necessary.
 
 
 Actually relation_close(rel, NoLock) don't release the locks.
 
 See src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c:1167

Oh there was one not too much for me, sorry. Anyway, this isn't
relevant anymore. :)

  I've just tried some SET (UN)LOGGED operations with altering column
  types in the same operation, that works. But:
 
  Yes, you should use the existing table rewriting machinery, or at
  least clearly document (in comments) why it doesn't work for you.
 
  Also looking at ATController, there's a wqueue mechanism to queue
  catalog updates. You should probably use this, too, or again document
  why it doesn't work for you.
 
 
 This works... fixed!

Thanks.

What about the wqueue mechanism, though? Isn't that made exactly for
the kind of catalog updates you are doing?

  You miss the symmetric case the other way round. When changing a table
  to unlogged, you need to make sure no other permanent table is
  referencing our table.
 
 
 Ohh yeas... sorry... you're completely correct... fixed!

Can you move ATPrepSetUnLogged next to ATPrepSetLogged as both
reference AlterTableSetLoggedCheckForeignConstraints now, and fix the
comment on ATPrepSetUnLogged to also mention FKs? I'd also reiterate
my proposal to merge these into one function, given they are now doing
the same checks.

In AlterTableSetLoggedCheckForeignConstraints, move relfk =
relation_open... out of the if because it's duplicated, and also for
symmetry with relation_close().

The function needs comments. It is somewhat clear that
self-referencing FKs will be skipped, but the two if (toLogged)
branches should be annotated to say which case they are really about.

Instead of just switching the argument order in the errmsg arguments,
the error text should be updated to read table %s is referenced
by permanent table %s. At the moment the error text is wrong because
the table logged1 is not yet unlogged:

+ALTER TABLE logged1 SET UNLOGGED;
+ERROR:  table logged2 references unlogged table logged1

- table logged1 is referenced by permanent table logged2

The comment on heap_open() suggests that you could directly invoke
relation_open() because you know this is a toast table, similarly for
index_open(). (I can't say which is better style.)
   
  
   I don't know which is better style too... other opinions??
 
  Both are used several times in tablecmds.c, so both are probably fine.
  (Didn't check the contexts, though.)
 
 
 Then we can leave that way. Is ok for you?

Yes. It was just a minor nitpick anyway.


Compared to v3, you've removed a lot of SELECT t.relpersistence...
from the regression tests, was that intended?

I think the tests could also use a bit more comments, notably the
commands that are expected to fail. So far I haven't tried to read
them but trusted that they did the right thing. (Though with the
SELECTs removed, it's pretty readable now.)

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-15 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:

 Hi Fabrízio,

 thanks for the speedy new version.


You're welcome... If all happen ok I would like to have this patch commited
before the GSoC2014 ends.

   I've just tried some SET (UN)LOGGED operations with altering column
   types in the same operation, that works. But:
  
   Yes, you should use the existing table rewriting machinery, or at
   least clearly document (in comments) why it doesn't work for you.
  
   Also looking at ATController, there's a wqueue mechanism to queue
   catalog updates. You should probably use this, too, or again document
   why it doesn't work for you.
  
 
  This works... fixed!

 Thanks.

 What about the wqueue mechanism, though? Isn't that made exactly for
 the kind of catalog updates you are doing?


Works, but this mechanism create a new entry in pg_class for toast, so it's
a little different than use the cluster_rel that generate a new
relfilenode. The important is both mechanisms create new datafiles.


   You miss the symmetric case the other way round. When changing a table
   to unlogged, you need to make sure no other permanent table is
   referencing our table.
  
 
  Ohh yeas... sorry... you're completely correct... fixed!

 Can you move ATPrepSetUnLogged next to ATPrepSetLogged as both
 reference AlterTableSetLoggedCheckForeignConstraints now, and fix the
 comment on ATPrepSetUnLogged to also mention FKs? I'd also reiterate
 my proposal to merge these into one function, given they are now doing
 the same checks.


Merged both to a single ATPrepSetLoggedOrUnlogged(Relation rel, bool
toLogged);


 In AlterTableSetLoggedCheckForeignConstraints, move relfk =
 relation_open... out of the if because it's duplicated, and also for
 symmetry with relation_close().


But they aren't duplicated... the first opens con-confrelid and the
other opens con-conrelid according toLogged branch.


 The function needs comments. It is somewhat clear that
 self-referencing FKs will be skipped, but the two if (toLogged)
 branches should be annotated to say which case they are really about.


Fixed.


 Instead of just switching the argument order in the errmsg arguments,
 the error text should be updated to read table %s is referenced
 by permanent table %s. At the moment the error text is wrong because
 the table logged1 is not yet unlogged:

 +ALTER TABLE logged1 SET UNLOGGED;
 +ERROR:  table logged2 references unlogged table logged1

 - table logged1 is referenced by permanent table logged2


Sorry... my mistake... fixed


 Compared to v3, you've removed a lot of SELECT t.relpersistence...
 from the regression tests, was that intended?


I removed because they are not so useful than I was thinking before.
Actually they just bloated our test cases.


 I think the tests could also use a bit more comments, notably the
 commands that are expected to fail. So far I haven't tried to read
 them but trusted that they did the right thing. (Though with the
 SELECTs removed, it's pretty readable now.)


Added some comments.


Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..2d131df 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -59,16 +59,17 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
 SET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable = replaceable class=PARAMETERvalue/replaceable [, ... ] )
+SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 RESET ( replaceable class=PARAMETERstorage_parameter/replaceable [, ... ] )
 INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 NO INHERIT replaceable class=PARAMETERparent_table/replaceable
 OF replaceable class=PARAMETERtype_name/replaceable
 NOT OF
 OWNER TO replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_owner/replaceable
-SET TABLESPACE replaceable class=PARAMETERnew_tablespace/replaceable
 REPLICA IDENTITY {DEFAULT | USING INDEX replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable | FULL | NOTHING}
 
 phraseand replaceable class=PARAMETERtable_constraint_using_index/replaceable is:/phrase
@@ -447,6 +448,20 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
/varlistentry
 
varlistentry
+termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
+listitem
+ para
+  This form changes the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent or
+  from unlogged to permanent (see 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-14 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-07-12 
cafcns+qf5fukkp9vdjwokiabn_rrm4+hjqxeevpd_7-to0l...@mail.gmail.com
  ... that being the non-WAL-logging with wal_level=minimal, or more?
 
 This is the first of additional goals,  but we have others. Please see [1].

Oh I wasn't aware of the wiki page, I had just read the old thread.
Thanks for the pointer.

   diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
 b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
   index 69a1e14..424f2e9 100644
   --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
   +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
   @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable
 class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
ENABLE REPLICA RULE replaceable
 class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable
 class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
   +SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
SET WITH OIDS
SET WITHOUT OIDS
 
  This must not be between the two CLUSTER lines. I think the best spot
  would just be one line down, before SET WITH OIDS.
 
 Fixed.

The (long) SET LOGGED paragraph is still between CLUSTER and SET
WITHOUT CLUSTER.

  This grammar bug pops up consistently: This form *changes*...
 
 
 Fixed.

Two more:

+ * The AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged function perform the 
+ * The AlterTableChangeIndexesToLoggedOrUnlogged function scan all indexes

  This unnecessarily rewrites all the tabs, but see below.
 
 
 I did that because the new constant AT_PASS_SET_LOGGED_UNLOGGED is larger
 than others.

Ah, ok then.

  I'm wondering if you shouldn't make a single ATPrepSetLogged function
  that takes and additional toLogged argument. Or alternatively get rid
  of the if() by putting the code also into case AT_SetLogged.
 
 
 Actually I started that way... with just one ATPrep function we have some
 additional complexity to check relpersistence, define the error message and
 to run AlterTableSetLoggedCheckForeignConstraints(rel) function. So to
 simplify the code I decided split in two small functions.

Nod.

 relation_close(rel, NoLock);
   +
   + if (pass == AT_PASS_SET_LOGGED_UNLOGGED)
   +
 ATPostAlterSetLoggedUnlogged(RelationGetRelid(rel));
 
  This must be done before relation_close() which releases all locks.

You didn't address that. I'm not sure about it, but either way, this
deserves a comment on the lock level necessary.

  Moreover, I think you can get rid of that extra PASS here.
  AT_PASS_ALTER_TYPE has its own pass because you can alter several
  columns in a single ALTER TABLE statement, but you can have only one
  SET (UN)LOGGED, so you can to the cluster_rel() directly in
  AlterTableSetLoggedOrUnlogged() (unless cluster_rel() is too intrusive
  and would interfere with other ALTER TABLE operations in this command,
  no idea).
 
 
 I had some troubles here so I decided to do in that way, but I confess I'm
 not comfortable with this implementation. Looking more carefully on
 tablecmds.c code, at the ATController we have three phases and the third is
 'scan/rewrite tables as needed' so my doubt is if can I use it instead of
 call 'cluster_rel'?

I've just tried some SET (UN)LOGGED operations with altering column
types in the same operation, that works. But:

Yes, you should use the existing table rewriting machinery, or at
least clearly document (in comments) why it doesn't work for you.

Also looking at ATController, there's a wqueue mechanism to queue
catalog updates. You should probably use this, too, or again document
why it doesn't work for you.

  Here's the big gotcha: Just like SET LOGGED must check for outgoing
  FKs to unlogged tables, SET UNLOGGED must check for incoming FKs from
  permanent tables. This is missing.
 
 
 I don't think so... we can create an unlogged table with a FK referring to
 a regular table...
 ... but is not possible create a FK from a regular table referring to an
 unlogged table:
 ... and a FK from an unlogged table referring other unlogged table works:
 So we must take carefull just when changing an unlogged table to a regular
 table.
 
 Am I correct or I miss something?

You miss the symmetric case the other way round. When changing a table
to unlogged, you need to make sure no other permanent table is
referencing our table.

   +AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged(Relation rel, Relation
 relrelation, bool toLogged)

You are using relrelation and relrel. I'd change all occurrences
to relrelation because that's also used elsewhere.

  The comment on heap_open() suggests that you could directly invoke
  relation_open() because you know this is a toast table, similarly for
  index_open(). (I can't say which is better style.)
 
 
 I don't know which is better style too... other opinions??

Both are used several times in tablecmds.c, so both are probably fine.
(Didn't check the contexts, though.)

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-14 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:

 Oh I wasn't aware of the wiki page, I had just read the old thread.
 Thanks for the pointer.


:-)

Thanks again for your review!


diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
  b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..424f2e9 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable
  class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE REPLICA RULE replaceable
  class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable
  class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable
class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
  
   This must not be between the two CLUSTER lines. I think the best spot
   would just be one line down, before SET WITH OIDS.
 
  Fixed.

 The (long) SET LOGGED paragraph is still between CLUSTER and SET
 WITHOUT CLUSTER.


Fixed.


   This grammar bug pops up consistently: This form *changes*...
  
 
  Fixed.

 Two more:

 + * The AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged function perform the
 + * The AlterTableChangeIndexesToLoggedOrUnlogged function scan all
indexes


Fixed.


  relation_close(rel, NoLock);
+
+ if (pass == AT_PASS_SET_LOGGED_UNLOGGED)
+
  ATPostAlterSetLoggedUnlogged(RelationGetRelid(rel));
  
   This must be done before relation_close() which releases all locks.

 You didn't address that. I'm not sure about it, but either way, this
 deserves a comment on the lock level necessary.


Actually relation_close(rel, NoLock) don't release the locks.

See src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c:1167


   Moreover, I think you can get rid of that extra PASS here.
   AT_PASS_ALTER_TYPE has its own pass because you can alter several
   columns in a single ALTER TABLE statement, but you can have only one
   SET (UN)LOGGED, so you can to the cluster_rel() directly in
   AlterTableSetLoggedOrUnlogged() (unless cluster_rel() is too intrusive
   and would interfere with other ALTER TABLE operations in this command,
   no idea).
  
 
  I had some troubles here so I decided to do in that way, but I confess
I'm
  not comfortable with this implementation. Looking more carefully on
  tablecmds.c code, at the ATController we have three phases and the
third is
  'scan/rewrite tables as needed' so my doubt is if can I use it instead
of
  call 'cluster_rel'?

 I've just tried some SET (UN)LOGGED operations with altering column
 types in the same operation, that works. But:

 Yes, you should use the existing table rewriting machinery, or at
 least clearly document (in comments) why it doesn't work for you.

 Also looking at ATController, there's a wqueue mechanism to queue
 catalog updates. You should probably use this, too, or again document
 why it doesn't work for you.


This works... fixed!



   Here's the big gotcha: Just like SET LOGGED must check for outgoing
   FKs to unlogged tables, SET UNLOGGED must check for incoming FKs from
   permanent tables. This is missing.
  
 
  I don't think so... we can create an unlogged table with a FK referring
to
  a regular table...
  ... but is not possible create a FK from a regular table referring to an
  unlogged table:
  ... and a FK from an unlogged table referring other unlogged table
works:
  So we must take carefull just when changing an unlogged table to a
regular
  table.
 
  Am I correct or I miss something?

 You miss the symmetric case the other way round. When changing a table
 to unlogged, you need to make sure no other permanent table is
 referencing our table.


Ohh yeas... sorry... you're completely correct... fixed!


+AlterTableChangeCatalogToLoggedOrUnlogged(Relation rel, Relation
  relrelation, bool toLogged)

 You are using relrelation and relrel. I'd change all occurrences
 to relrelation because that's also used elsewhere.


Fixed.


   The comment on heap_open() suggests that you could directly invoke
   relation_open() because you know this is a toast table, similarly for
   index_open(). (I can't say which is better style.)
  
 
  I don't know which is better style too... other opinions??

 Both are used several times in tablecmds.c, so both are probably fine.
 (Didn't check the contexts, though.)


Then we can leave that way. Is ok for you?

Greetings,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..2d131df 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -59,16 +59,17 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-07-08 Thread Christoph Berg
Hi,

here's my review for this patch.

Generally, the patch addresses a real need, tables often only turn
out to be desired as unlogged if there are performance problems in
practice, and the other way round changing an unlogged table to logged
is way more involved manually than it could be with this patch. So
yes, we want the feature.

I've tried the patch, and it works as desired, including tab
completion in psql. There are a few issues to be resolved, though.

Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-06-26 
cafcns+pyv0pbjlo97osyqv1yqoc7s+jgvwxc8uny5jsrdwy...@mail.gmail.com
 As part of GSoC2014 and with agreement of my mentor and reviewer (Stephen
 Frost) I've send a complement of the first patch to add the capability to
 change a regular table to unlogged.

(Fwiw, I believe this direction is the more interesting one.)

 With this patch we finish the main goals of the GSoC2014 and now we'll work
 in the additional goals.

... that being the non-WAL-logging with wal_level=minimal, or more?


 diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml 
 b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
 index 69a1e14..424f2e9 100644
 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
 +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
 @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable 
 class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
  ENABLE REPLICA RULE replaceable 
 class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
  ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable 
 class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
  CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
 +SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
  SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
  SET WITH OIDS
  SET WITHOUT OIDS

This must not be between the two CLUSTER lines. I think the best spot
would just be one line down, before SET WITH OIDS.

(While we are at it, SET TABLESPACE should probably be moved up to the
other SET options...)

 @@ -432,6 +433,20 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable 
 class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 /varlistentry
  
 varlistentry
 +termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
 +listitem
 + para
 +  This form change the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent 
 or 

This grammar bug pops up consistently: This form *changes*...

There's trailing whitespace.

 +  from unlogged to permanent by rewriting the entire contents of the 
 table 
 +  and associated indexes into new disk files.
 + /para
 + para
 +  Changing the table persistence type acquires an literalACCESS 
 EXCLUSIVE/literal lock.
 + /para

I'd rewrite that and add a reference:

... from unlogged to permanent (see xref linkend=SQL-CREATETABLE-UNLOGGED).
/para
para
Changing the table persistence type acquires an literalACCESS 
EXCLUSIVE/literal lock
and rewrites the table contents and associated indexes into new disk files.
/para


 diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c 
 b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
 index 60d387a..9dfdca2 100644
 --- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
 +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
 @@ -125,18 +125,19 @@ static List *on_commits = NIL;
   * a pass determined by subcommand type.
   */
  
 -#define AT_PASS_UNSET-1  /* UNSET will 
 cause ERROR */
 -#define AT_PASS_DROP 0   /* DROP (all flavors) */
 -#define AT_PASS_ALTER_TYPE   1   /* ALTER COLUMN TYPE */
 -#define AT_PASS_OLD_INDEX2   /* re-add existing 
 indexes */
 -#define AT_PASS_OLD_CONSTR   3   /* re-add existing 
 constraints */
 -#define AT_PASS_COL_ATTRS4   /* set other column 
 attributes */
 +#define AT_PASS_UNSET-1  /* 
 UNSET will cause ERROR */
 +#define AT_PASS_DROP 0   /* DROP (all 
 flavors) */
 +#define AT_PASS_ALTER_TYPE   1   /* ALTER COLUMN 
 TYPE */
 +#define AT_PASS_OLD_INDEX2   /* re-add 
 existing indexes */
 +#define AT_PASS_OLD_CONSTR   3   /* re-add 
 existing constraints */
 +#define AT_PASS_COL_ATTRS4   /* set other 
 column attributes */
  /* We could support a RENAME COLUMN pass here, but not currently used */
 -#define AT_PASS_ADD_COL  5   /* ADD COLUMN */
 -#define AT_PASS_ADD_INDEX6   /* ADD indexes */
 -#define AT_PASS_ADD_CONSTR   7   /* ADD constraints, 
 defaults */
 -#define AT_PASS_MISC 8   /* other stuff */
 -#define AT_NUM_PASSES9
 +#define AT_PASS_ADD_COL  5   /* ADD 
 COLUMN */
 +#define AT_PASS_ADD_INDEX6   /* ADD indexes 
 */
 +#define AT_PASS_ADD_CONSTR   7   /* ADD 
 constraints, defaults */
 +#define AT_PASS_MISC 8   /* other stuff 
 */
 

Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

2014-06-26 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello 
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 As part of GSoC2014 I'm sending a patch to add the capability of change an
 unlogged table to logged [1].


Hi all,

As part of GSoC2014 and with agreement of my mentor and reviewer (Stephen
Frost) I've send a complement of the first patch to add the capability to
change a regular table to unlogged.

With this patch we finish the main goals of the GSoC2014 and now we'll work
in the additional goals.

Regards,


[1]
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Allow_an_unlogged_table_to_be_changed_to_logged_GSoC_2014

-- 
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
 Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
 Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
 Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 69a1e14..424f2e9 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
 ENABLE REPLICA RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 ENABLE ALWAYS RULE replaceable class=PARAMETERrewrite_rule_name/replaceable
 CLUSTER ON replaceable class=PARAMETERindex_name/replaceable
+SET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}
 SET WITHOUT CLUSTER
 SET WITH OIDS
 SET WITHOUT OIDS
@@ -432,6 +433,20 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] replaceable class=PARAMETERname/replaceable
/varlistentry
 
varlistentry
+termliteralSET {LOGGED | UNLOGGED}/literal/term
+listitem
+ para
+  This form change the table persistence type from unlogged to permanent or 
+  from unlogged to permanent by rewriting the entire contents of the table 
+  and associated indexes into new disk files.
+ /para
+ para
+  Changing the table persistence type acquires an literalACCESS EXCLUSIVE/literal lock.
+ /para
+/listitem
+   /varlistentry
+
+   varlistentry
 termliteralSET WITHOUT CLUSTER/literal/term
 listitem
  para
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
index 60d387a..9dfdca2 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
@@ -125,18 +125,19 @@ static List *on_commits = NIL;
  * a pass determined by subcommand type.
  */
 
-#define AT_PASS_UNSET			-1		/* UNSET will cause ERROR */
-#define AT_PASS_DROP			0		/* DROP (all flavors) */
-#define AT_PASS_ALTER_TYPE		1		/* ALTER COLUMN TYPE */
-#define AT_PASS_OLD_INDEX		2		/* re-add existing indexes */
-#define AT_PASS_OLD_CONSTR		3		/* re-add existing constraints */
-#define AT_PASS_COL_ATTRS		4		/* set other column attributes */
+#define AT_PASS_UNSET-1		/* UNSET will cause ERROR */
+#define AT_PASS_DROP0		/* DROP (all flavors) */
+#define AT_PASS_ALTER_TYPE			1		/* ALTER COLUMN TYPE */
+#define AT_PASS_OLD_INDEX			2		/* re-add existing indexes */
+#define AT_PASS_OLD_CONSTR			3		/* re-add existing constraints */
+#define AT_PASS_COL_ATTRS			4		/* set other column attributes */
 /* We could support a RENAME COLUMN pass here, but not currently used */
-#define AT_PASS_ADD_COL			5		/* ADD COLUMN */
-#define AT_PASS_ADD_INDEX		6		/* ADD indexes */
-#define AT_PASS_ADD_CONSTR		7		/* ADD constraints, defaults */
-#define AT_PASS_MISC			8		/* other stuff */
-#define AT_NUM_PASSES			9
+#define AT_PASS_ADD_COL5		/* ADD COLUMN */
+#define AT_PASS_ADD_INDEX			6		/* ADD indexes */
+#define AT_PASS_ADD_CONSTR			7		/* ADD constraints, defaults */
+#define AT_PASS_MISC8		/* other stuff */
+#define AT_PASS_SET_LOGGED_UNLOGGED	9		/* SET LOGGED and UNLOGGED */
+#define AT_NUM_PASSES10
 
 typedef struct AlteredTableInfo
 {
@@ -376,6 +377,7 @@ static void ATPostAlterTypeCleanup(List **wqueue, AlteredTableInfo *tab, LOCKMOD
 static void ATPostAlterTypeParse(Oid oldId, Oid oldRelId, Oid refRelId,
 	 char *cmd, List **wqueue, LOCKMODE lockmode,
 	 bool rewrite);
+static void ATPostAlterSetLoggedUnlogged(Oid relid);
 static void TryReuseIndex(Oid oldId, IndexStmt *stmt);
 static void TryReuseForeignKey(Oid oldId, Constraint *con);
 static void change_owner_fix_column_acls(Oid relationOid,
@@ -402,6 +404,13 @@ static void ATExecAddOf(Relation rel, const TypeName *ofTypename, LOCKMODE lockm
 static void ATExecDropOf(Relation rel, LOCKMODE lockmode);
 static void ATExecReplicaIdentity(Relation rel, ReplicaIdentityStmt *stmt, LOCKMODE lockmode);
 static void ATExecGenericOptions(Relation rel, List *options);
+static void ATPrepSetLogged(Relation rel);
+static void ATPrepSetUnLogged(Relation rel);
+static void ATExecSetLogged(Relation rel);
+static void ATExecSetUnLogged(Relation rel);
+
+static void AlterTableSetLoggedCheckForeignConstraints(Relation rel);
+static void AlterTableSetLoggedOrUnlogged(Relation rel, bool toLogged);
 
 static void copy_relation_data(SMgrRelation rel, SMgrRelation dst,