On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:26:53AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The preproc code doesn't need to be thread-safe does it?
You're right of cause.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 179140304
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
---
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Keep the thread hacking on the client side, please. Isn't there one of
>> the ecpg/include/ files that would be suitable?
> Yes, there is. Better make that there are. There is a file called
> extern.h both in preproc as well as in lib and each file in
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:30:50AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - Is it neccessary to patch c.h for ecpg?
>
> If you commit that part, it will be reverted forthwith (especially the
> hardwired #define HAVE_PTHREAD_H ;-)).
>
> Keep the thread hacking on t
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:26PM +, Lee Kindness wrote:
> > - Not sure with the version numbering but I can fix that later.
>
> As discussed on pgsql-hackers after the 7.3 release any "binary
> incompatible" library change needs a major version number increase.
Sorry, I was not precise eno
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Is it neccessary to patch c.h for ecpg?
If you commit that part, it will be reverted forthwith (especially the
hardwired #define HAVE_PTHREAD_H ;-)).
Keep the thread hacking on the client side, please. Isn't there one of
the ecpg/include/ files that
Shridhar Daithankar writes:
> On 27 Jan 2003 at 14:06, Lee Kindness wrote:
> > Michael Meskes writes:
> > > Thanks a lot. I have no experience in multithreaded software development
> > > so I cannot completely check your patch but it surely looks good. Shall
> > > I commit it, or will you?
On 27 Jan 2003 at 14:06, Lee Kindness wrote:
> Michael Meskes writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:52:18AM +, Lee Kindness wrote:
> > > I've spent a bit of time on making ecpg thread safe over Christmas,
> > > while it's not finished i'm sure the attached patch is at least useful
> > > a
Michael Meskes writes:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:52:18AM +, Lee Kindness wrote:
> > I've spent a bit of time on making ecpg thread safe over Christmas,
> > while it's not finished i'm sure the attached patch is at least useful
> > and a step in the right direction.
> Thanks a lot. I hav
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:52:18AM +, Lee Kindness wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> Michael,
> ...
> I've spent a bit of time on making ecpg thread safe over Christmas,
> while it's not finished i'm sure the attached patch is at least useful
> and a step in the right direction.
Michael,
Michael Meskes writes:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:40:33PM +0530, Shridhar
>Daithankar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to use ECPG as it is relatively easy to code. However my
> > application is multithreaded and also uses connecion pools.
>
> I'm afraid it needs some
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:58:24PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Well, when using libpq, I create a pool of PGconn*. What pool I create with
> ecpg? Looking at ecpglib.h, it seems that I need to create a pool of char *
Yes. You use it as EXEC SQL AT :connection_var SELECT ...
> That is cor
On Thursday 23 January 2003 08:40 pm, you wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:40:33PM +0530, Shridhar
Daithankar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to know if ECPG is thread safe and I can use an arbitrary
> > PGconn* object pulled from a connection pool.
> Not sure what you mean with this
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:40:33PM +0530, Shridhar
Daithankar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to use ECPG as it is relatively easy to code. However my
> application is multithreaded and also uses connecion pools.
I'm afraid it needs some work to be thread-safe. sqlca is defined
statical
Hi all,
I would like to use ECPG as it is relatively easy to code. However my
application is multithreaded and also uses connecion pools.
I would like to know if ECPG is thread safe and I can use an arbitrary PGconn*
object pulled from a connection pool.
Do I need to use connection name? I mea
14 matches
Mail list logo
