Because many developers of postgres work over dialup modems at speeds of
32k. 500KB over a 32Kb line is a problem. Especially if you aren't
even planning on using jdbc, you still pay the price when doing a CVS
checkout.
--Barry
Rene Pijlman wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:22:19 -0400, Tom
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:22:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable
>amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution.
Why? 500K can easily fit on a floppy, and that's technology from
the 1980's.
Regards,
René Pijlman <[EMAIL PROTEC
Title: RE: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!
Why is this such a big issue? Shipping the Ant binary would be like shipping the make binary, which seems silly to me. However, I would far prefer to use Ant to build the JDBC driver. So, is it not possible to simply maintain a
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:22 AM
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!
> Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that
works
> > nic
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works
| > nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the
| > best solution here.
|
| 500k of
> Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works
> > nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the
> > best solution here.
>
> 500k of binaries? You just lost the argument.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-Oct-2001 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> A more important point is that we are not a java-only codebase. If we
> were, I could see a stronger argument for Ant. As it is now, we have to
> weigh using a Java-standard Ant vs. a PostgreSQL/C-standard make
Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works
> nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the
> best solution here.
500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not a
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 03:54:12PM +0200, Per-Olof Norén wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have been listening to the discussions about Ant and the build system.
> I think that the discussion is missing a point, which I will try to make here :-)
[ points for using Ant ]
I would describe current JDBC build to
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| Per-Olof Norén writes:
|
| > The Ant build system is making its way to be a "de facto" standard for building
|java applications as
| > it is built for the purpose.
|
| Make as been the standard for building any application for about 30 years.
|
> Per-Olof Nor?n writes:
>
> > The Ant build system is making its way to be a "de facto" standard for building
>java applications as
> > it is built for the purpose.
>
> Make as been the standard for building any application for about 30 years.
> GNU-style configure has been the standard for co
Per-Olof Norén wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been listening to the discussions about Ant and the build system.
>
> I think that the discussion is missing a point, which I will try to make
> here :-)
>
>
>
> 1. Standard
>
> The Ant build system is making its way to be a "de facto" standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21-Oct-2001 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Per-Olof Norén writes:
>> The Ant build system is making its way to be a "de facto" standard for
>> building java applications as it is built for the purpose.
>
> Make as been the standard for building any ap
Per-Olof Norén writes:
> The Ant build system is making its way to be a "de facto" standard for building java
>applications as
> it is built for the purpose.
Make as been the standard for building any application for about 30 years.
GNU-style configure has been the standard for configuration ma
If you want to avoid compiling the driver you can get the binaries for
postgres at
http://jdbc.fastcrypt.com
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "rjtalbo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 1
On Sat, 26 May 2001, rjtalbo wrote:
>
> What is it and where can I get it??
> And can I still use VAJ 3.0 after compile and install.
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html
Please read the Ant's installation instruction before to try compile
postgres-jdbc. Otherwice you will be in stuck.
16 matches
Mail list logo
