Sat, 06 May 2006 20:38:48 +0300, Bruce Momjian :
I still do not know why we can't do some kind of runtime test in python
and disable this feature for 2.4 builds that have debugging enabled.
Can we do a dynamic function load test from plpython? There must be
some function that is only visible in
Sun, 07 May 2006 12:36:59 +0300, Sven Suursoho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Btw, we developed returning compose types further. Basically did same as
for SETOF functions -- allow to return any Python object that conforms
to mapping protocol. Currently only dict as previously, though. But
still, read
Sven Suursoho wrote:
> Sat, 06 May 2006 20:38:48 +0300, Bruce Momjian :
>
> > I still do not know why we can't do some kind of runtime test in python
> > and disable this feature for 2.4 builds that have debugging enabled.
> > Can we do a dynamic function load test from plpython? There must be
>
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> This was not ready to be applied, was it?
> >
> > > I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered.
> >
> > How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure?
> >
> > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wasp&dt=2006
> -04
While we have installed a Win32-specific semaphore implementation for
CVS HEAD, what do we want do apply for the back branches, 8.0.X and
8.1.X. Is this the patch that should be applied?
---
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
>
> "Qingq
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I
> didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did
> yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet.
It's an intermittent failure; the fact you don't see any at this instan
Bruce Momjian writes:
> While we have installed a Win32-specific semaphore implementation for
> CVS HEAD, what do we want do apply for the back branches, 8.0.X and
> 8.1.X. Is this the patch that should be applied?
Leave 'em alone. That code has zero field validation, and should
certainly not g
Sun, 07 May 2006 15:58:49 +0300, Bruce Momjian :
Unfortunately, this is not case for Fedora Core 4, where assertions are
used unconditionally. And to make things worse, there is no runtime
symbol
at all to indicate whether Python is compiled with debugging/assertions
enabled (Py_DEBUG & NDEBU
This implements a proposal made last november:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00578.php
Basically, it tries to catch people loading modules which belong to the
wrong version or have had certain constants changed, or architechture
mismatches. It's a bit more fine grained t
I've committed a rewritten version of this patch.
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 5 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> btbulkdelete arrives at a page, it need take no special action unless the
>> page is newly split *and* its right-link points to a lower physical
>> address. If
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> This implements a proposal made last november:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00578.php
Ah, good, I'd been meaning to do this.
> changes in any of the following:
> PG_VERSION_NUM
> CATALOG_VERSION_NO
> the size of 8 basic C types
> BLC
Patch applied to HEAD, 8.1.X and 8.0.X.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > It turns out the problem is that port/pipe.c is compiled with
> > > -DFRONTEND and include/port/win32.h wraps the recv to
> >
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > While we have installed a Win32-specific semaphore implementation for
> > CVS HEAD, what do we want do apply for the back branches, 8.0.X and
> > 8.1.X. Is this the patch that should be applied?
>
> Leave 'em alone. That code has zero field validation
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I
> > didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did
> > yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet.
>
> It's an intermittent failure; the fact you
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Have we seen any such failures since the first day they appeared?
agouti blew up about the same time you typed that, so yes it's still
a problem.
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=agouti&dt=2006-05-08%2003:15:01
regards, tom lane
15 matches
Mail list logo
