Hi Sean,
Le 3 juin 2015 à 22:29, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
If you have a config with e.g.:
spec package: 'MyPackage' with: [ spec repository: aString ];
And then save it with Versionner, it gets truncated to:
spec package: 'MyPackage';
Should I file a bug? Ideally, Versionner would
If you have a config with e.g.:
spec package: 'MyPackage' with: [ spec repository: aString ];
And then save it with Versionner, it gets truncated to:
spec package: 'MyPackage';
Should I file a bug? Ideally, Versionner would support Metacello's full API,
but in the mean time, at least leaving
Le 3 juin 2015 à 19:32, p...@highoctane.be a écrit :
Le 3 juin 2015 17:45, Christophe Demarey christophe.dema...@inria.fr a
écrit :
Hello,
I would like to use set operators defined in mongo but it looks like there
is no support for the aggregation framework in the mongo driver.
demarey wrote
I find very strange to have packages of a project in different
repositories. When I saw this kind of things, it was in configurations
using packages from another project without declaring this external
project in the config... Could you tell me more about your use case?
Hee hee,
Not using 4.0 yet.
Phil
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com
wrote:
I tried to load it from the Configuration Browser, and was notified that
there was no stable version for the platform. I declared the stable version
for Pharo 3.0 as that for Pharo 4.0 and
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Christophe Demarey
christophe.dema...@inria.fr wrote:
Le 3 juin 2015 à 19:32, p...@highoctane.be a écrit :
Le 3 juin 2015 17:45, Christophe Demarey christophe.dema...@inria.fr
a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to use set operators defined in mongo but
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
there was no stable version for the platform
Oops! I apparently had switched to MetaRepoForPharo30. Sorry for the
noise...
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/TWM-in-Pharo-4-0-tp4830313p4830314.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk
2015-06-03 11:41 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de:
2015-06-03 8:22 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
Indeed... this has to do something with caching: when looking a .mcz the
system just takes the one it finds, which might be
one with the same name but different.
On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:52, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-06-03 8:22 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr
mailto:marcus.den...@inria.fr:
Indeed… this has to do something with caching: when looking a .mcz the system
just takes the one it finds, which
On 3 June 2015 at 02:16, Peter Uhnák i.uh...@gmail.com wrote:
But I would like them to be defined like this:
[ inc: x | x + 1 ].
(inc: 3) = 4
[add: x to: y | x + y ].
(add: 3 to: 4) = 7.
What do you think? Is it feasible?
But you still need to have the block saved in a variable. You
2015-06-03 9:56 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:52, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-06-03 8:22 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
Indeed... this has to do something with caching: when looking a .mcz the
system just
Marcus,
I hope I’ve done this right: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15680
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15680
thanks
Johan
On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:34, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:28, Johan Brichau jo...@inceptive.be
Indeed… this has to do something with caching: when looking a .mcz the system
just takes the one it finds, which might be
one with the same name but different.
Maybe we could for real put (part of) the UID in the filename?
In a disconnected system the case that the filename is the same for
2015-06-03 8:56 GMT+02:00 Matthieu Lacaton matthieu.laca...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone,
When I try to comment a whole method, if I only put one quote at the
beginning of the method, a window opens telling me that there is a syntax
error : unmatched in comment.
For some reasons it does not
Yes!
On 03 Jun 2015, at 10:07, Johan Brichau jo...@inceptive.be wrote:
Marcus,
I hope I’ve done this right: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15680
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15680
thanks
Johan
On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:34, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr
On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:28, Johan Brichau jo...@inceptive.be wrote:
Hi,
What is the procedure to get fixes backported in 4.0?
For example, the fix to this one [1] is really needed for us (it breaks
development and also gettext tools).
Is there anything you guys do “automatically” or
my impression is that we can focus on better improvements with larger
impact,.
Le 3/6/15 02:17, Francisco Garau a écrit :
Hello,
I'd like to make some syntax changes that would make block evaluation
more legible.
Currently we define and evaluate blocks like this:
inc := [ : x | x + 1
Hello,
This seems to be a bug with the AST syntax highlighting.
I will try to reproduce and add an issue (there was a bug similar that I fixed
already).
You can turn it off in the preferences and use the old parser for highlighting
if you are too disturbed.
On 03 Jun 2015, at 08:56,
Sure, here it is :
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15679/Writing-only-one-quote-at-the-beginning-of-a-method-produces-a-syntax-error
I did not really know where to put it though :/
2015-06-03 9:17 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de:
2015-06-03 8:56 GMT+02:00 Matthieu Lacaton
2015-06-03 8:22 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
Indeed… this has to do something with caching: when looking a .mcz the
system just takes the one it finds, which might be
one with the same name but different.
here is a minimal change to the way it uses the cache, or omitting
Hi,
What is the procedure to get fixes backported in 4.0?
For example, the fix to this one [1] is really needed for us (it breaks
development and also gettext tools).
Is there anything you guys do “automatically” or do I need to make a fix for
4.0 based on the one for 5.0 ?
[1]
Hello everyone,
When I try to comment a whole method, if I only put one quote at the
beginning of the method, a window opens telling me that there is a syntax
error : unmatched in comment.
For some reasons it does not appear all the time.
One way to reproduce this is to create a new method ,
2015-06-03 8:22 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
Indeed... this has to do something with caching: when looking a .mcz the
system just takes the one it finds, which might be
one with the same name but different.
Unless the mcz searched for is a dependency, in which case it
Hi
I would like to do the following: recompile the method category into a
method name group without removing for now the method category. I have
to do that 125 times :)
so I did
RBLintRule
addSelector: #group
withMethod: ((RBLintRule methodDictionary at: #category) ast
On 3 June 2015 at 05:56, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I think that would confuse me, and maybe break syntax highlighting.
It *looks* like a message send to nothing.
That might be a good thing as there is no object needed to resolve the
method lookup. You already have the method to
Nice :)
That is funny because I am currently doing something similar. I need to
recompile all the methods of all classes of a package to change a word in
the methods.
I have 237 classes and a hell lot of methods in each :p
So I did :
(RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed: 'MyPackage')
stepharo wrote
my impression is that we can focus on better improvements with larger
impact.
+1,000,000. What makes Smalltalk as a language interesting is that, like
Lisp, it's one of the few languages where you can fit the entire language on
a napkin. I would think extrmely hard about the
I did the change. the DNS should now point to
128.93.162.72
On 03 Jun 2015, at 14:56, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi,
16:30 local time we will do some DNS related config change for
files.pharo.org http://files.pharo.org/
Nothing should change due to that normally.
On 03 Jun 2015, at 15:31, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:
stepharo wrote
my impression is that we can focus on better improvements with larger
impact.
+1,000,000. What makes Smalltalk as a language interesting is that, like
Lisp, it's one of the few languages where you can
Dear Marcus,
I am following your progresses on Reflectivity and I’d like to start with a
big: THANK YOU!
Having said that, I am wondering whether this is a good point in which I can
try (as an alpha tester :) to use it.
What I need to achieve is something similar to a method wrapper, i.e.,
2015-06-03 14:19 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de:
2015-06-03 13:22 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com:
2015-06-03 11:41 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de:
2015-06-03 8:22 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
Indeed... this has to do
2015-06-03 13:22 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com:
2015-06-03 11:41 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de:
2015-06-03 8:22 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
Indeed… this has to do something with caching: when looking a .mcz the
system just takes the
On 03 Jun 2015, at 15:04, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote:
On 03/06/15 14:56, Marcus Denker wrote:
16:30 local time we will do some DNS related config change for
files.pharo.org http://files.pharo.org
Nothing should change due to that normally.
Because it is not reachable at
Hi,
16:30 local time we will do some DNS related config change for files.pharo.org
http://files.pharo.org/
Nothing should change due to that normally.
Marcus
Branch: refs/heads/5.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 89d233dbc63c2e36a09e6a49f51ca52b59e127b4
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/89d233dbc63c2e36a09e6a49f51ca52b59e127b4
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
Branch: refs/tags/50086
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
On 03 Jun 2015, at 16:33, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
I did the change. the DNS should now point to
128.93.162.72
Confirmed.
On 03 Jun 2015, at 14:56, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr
mailto:marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi,
16:30 local time we will do some
Branch: refs/heads/5.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 993e3c026a07bb79e82d842f880ea05d5f630430
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/993e3c026a07bb79e82d842f880ea05d5f630430
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:12, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Francisco Garau
francisco.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 05:56, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I think that would confuse me, and maybe break syntax highlighting.
It
Branch: refs/tags/50087
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Francisco Garau
francisco.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 05:56, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I think that would confuse me, and maybe break syntax highlighting.
It *looks* like a message send to nothing.
That might be a good thing as there
Hello,
I would like to use set operators defined in mongo but it looks like there is
no support for the aggregation framework in the mongo driver.
Does anyone has information about this?
Thanks,
Christophe
Hi,
Indeed. We already had a similar discussion in the context of XMLParser.
The current idea is to package GT extensions directly in the project, and
not in GT.
In the case of Magritte this is a bit more elaborate because it implies
packaging the MagrittePresentation there as well, but that
Le 3 juin 2015 17:45, Christophe Demarey christophe.dema...@inria.fr a
écrit :
Hello,
I would like to use set operators defined in mongo but it looks like
there is no support for the aggregation framework in the mongo driver.
Does anyone has information about this?
Search the list as I
Is Coral using the Opal compiler for its syntax extensions?
- Francisco
On 3 Jun 2015, at 16:21, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:12, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Francisco Garau
francisco.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
45 matches
Mail list logo
