Le 16/10/2014 01:30, David T. Lewis a écrit :
So in summary: The enhancement to PipeableOSProcess relies on an aio
event driven reader, and if the AIO plugin is missing, the fallback code
relies on polling, and is horribly inefficient.
More to follow, and thank you again for identifying the
Le 16 oct. 2014 23:04, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Le 16/10/2014 01:30, David T. Lewis a écrit :
So in summary: The enhancement to PipeableOSProcess relies on an aio
event driven reader, and if the AIO plugin is missing, the fallback code
relies on polling, and is
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:35:44PM +0200, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Le 14/10/2014 14:15, David T. Lewis a ?crit :
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:19:10AM +0200, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Hi Dave,
took me a while to do some testing. It seems there is an issue, but I
couldn't find out where. First,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:19:10AM +0200, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Hi Dave,
took me a while to do some testing. It seems there is an issue, but I
couldn't find out where. First, the data:
Loading a package from a local gitfiletree repository (get from the
command a zipped git archive
Le 14/10/2014 14:15, David T. Lewis a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:19:10AM +0200, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Hi Dave,
took me a while to do some testing. It seems there is an issue, but I
couldn't find out where. First, the data:
Loading a package from a local gitfiletree repository (get
Hi Dave,
took me a while to do some testing. It seems there is an issue, but I
couldn't find out where. First, the data:
Loading a package from a local gitfiletree repository (get from the
command a zipped git archive containing the package) :
4.5.11, 4.6.8: 2132 msec.
4.5.12, 4.6.9: 50847
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 01:32:27PM -0400, David T. Lewis wrote:
Le 10/10/2014 17:52, David T. Lewis a ?crit :
2014-10-10 14:09 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
Right. But please do test it in your applications to be sure, I really
only
did simple testing and I am sure
Le 9 oct. 2014 23:15, David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com a écrit :
Darn, I think we must have both done our updates on the same day. The last
update I did was this (time stamp is GMT -4 hours) :
CommandShell-dtl.76 Dave Lewis, 5 October 2014 5:29:32 pm
CommandShell 4.6.9
Improve pipe
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:00:29AM +0200, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
Le 9 oct. 2014 23:15, David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com a ??crit :
Darn, I think we must have both done our updates on the same day. The last
update I did was this (time stamp is GMT -4 hours) :
CommandShell-dtl.76
Ok, I'll update the configurations.
Thanks,
Thierry
2014-10-09 23:15 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
Darn, I think we must have both done our updates on the same day. The last
update I did was this (time stamp is GMT -4 hours) :
CommandShell-dtl.76 Dave Lewis, 5 October 2014
2014-10-10 14:09 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
Right. But please do test it in your applications to be sure, I really only
did simple testing and I am sure there may still chances for problems in
this area.
Hi Dave,
Would it has a chance of slowing down things a lot?
There
2014-10-10 14:09 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
Right. But please do test it in your applications to be sure, I really
only
did simple testing and I am sure there may still chances for problems in
this area.
Hi Dave,
Would it has a chance of slowing down things a lot?
Le 10/10/2014 17:52, David T. Lewis a écrit :
2014-10-10 14:09 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
Right. But please do test it in your applications to be sure, I really
only
did simple testing and I am sure there may still chances for problems in
this area.
Hi Dave,
Would it
Le 10/10/2014 17:52, David T. Lewis a écrit :
2014-10-10 14:09 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
Right. But please do test it in your applications to be sure, I really
only
did simple testing and I am sure there may still chances for problems
in
this area.
Hi Dave,
Would
Hi,
Just tried to install the stable version of OSProcess using the configuration
browser on a 3.0.
I noticed it is still on http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcess.
Does it mean it is dead? if yes, what is the alternative?
Thanx
Noury
Hi Noury,
no, OSProcess on Squeaksource is not dead and is integrating all the
changes needed for all the platforms it is running on.
And as you can see, I very recently updated the configuration to make
sure it was pointing to the very latest version.
Regards,
Thierry
Le 09/10/2014
Hi,
Just tried to install the stable version of OSProcess using the
configuration browser on a 3.0.
I noticed it is still on http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcess.
Does it mean it is dead? if yes, what is the alternative?
Hi Noury,
OSProcess is alive and well. Let me know if you have any
Thierry,
Thanks for doing those configuration updates, I hit send before I saw
your reply.
Dave
Hi Noury,
no, OSProcess on Squeaksource is not dead and is integrating all the
changes needed for all the platforms it is running on.
And as you can see, I very recently updated the
Hi Dave,
thanks to you. I updated OSProcess to 4.5.11 and CommandShell to 4.6.8;
are those the latest? I did it last Sunday.
Thierry
Le 09/10/2014 22:42, David T. Lewis a écrit :
Thierry,
Thanks for doing those configuration updates, I hit send before I saw
your reply.
Dave
Hi Noury,
Darn, I think we must have both done our updates on the same day. The last
update I did was this (time stamp is GMT -4 hours) :
CommandShell-dtl.76 Dave Lewis, 5 October 2014 5:29:32 pm
CommandShell 4.6.9
Improve pipe closing for PipeableOSProcess classcommand: and related
methods to support
20 matches
Mail list logo
