I am posting this to both Phonolist and Phono-L – the two listserves I
subscribe to.
Those of you who belong to the Antique Phonograph Sovciety (formerly known
as the Calif. APS) should have received a letter in the mail this week (or
will shortly – mine came yesterday) detailing
Hi everyone,
I'm selling my VV-240 for $300 or best offer. Pictures can be seen on the
craigslist ad:
http://oregoncoast.craigslist.org/atq/3928037034.html
Thanks and I'm in Tillamook, Oregon.
Nicholas J. Williams
--
Nicholas J. Williams
ASUP Senator: Class of 2014, Tech Sub-Committee
OK, I'll step up to be the first person to disagree with Steve.
When the improvements were being made to the former CAPS publication, The
Sound Box, concurrent with the name change to the organization, we wanted a
name for the publication that would speak to the stature of its quality.
Names like
Disagree!!! Nothing wrong with a good cliche (IF it even is one),
historically significant, recognized world-wide and makes a good acronym.
Paul Christenzen, simple-minded collector
Bruce wrote:
OK, I'll step up to be the first person to disagree with Steve.
When the improvements were being
I've never thought that In the Groove meant anything specific about our
hobby, and is not a good way to recruit members. For instance, use Google to
search for The Antique Phonograph, and you get our website on the 1st page of
results. If you do a Google search on In the Groove, you don't get
If it's to be considered a new organization, I'd imagine it makes sense to give
it a new name, let's say something like the American Antique Phonograph
Society, just for talking purposes.
Then it's a no-brainer to name the periodical The AAPS Journal.
As others have said, keeping things simple
I also disagree with the merger. Each organization is unique in it's own way.
Both publications are great. ITG focuses on all phonographs, even ones from the
1950's, and The Sound Box covers the earlier ones. I know Steve already said
that. I like ITG because it has different writers than the
Just my humble opinion, but I have always liked the name In the Groove and
will be sorry to see it go if it is voted down. I also really like the current
format and design of the publication. I hope that will not change.
Melissa
From: Peter Fraser
I agree, 'In The Groove' always seemed like a upbeat and positive name. It's
not stuffy or too academic and conveys that it's about records, music and
phonographs.
Bill
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Melissa Ricci riccib...@yahoo.com wrote:
Just my humble opinion, but I
http://www.ebay.com/itm/EDISON-PHONOGRAPH-MODEL-O-2-4-MINUTE-REPRODUCER-REBUILT-PLAYS-GREAT-/200940043348
Here is a model O reproducer serial number 491.
1. What year was the reproducer in the photo made?
2. What is unusual about the reproducer in the photo?
3. When did the first pot
Steve,
Here are my best guesses!
1. I don't know
2. The serial number is too low for an O reproducer to have a pot metal top. My
guess is that the ebay O reproducer has a Model R top on it.
3. I don't know
4.:
The O had both a 2 in diameter 1 piece domed top and a flat top. The early
flat
Any name probably beats Pumpkin Center Quarterly... ☺
From: b...@taney.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:06:47 -0500
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Proposed Merger of MAPS and APS and
successorpublication name
I agree, 'In The Groove' always seemed like a upbeat and
In case they disappear from the eeBae lisitng, I put the photos in a Box
folder: https://app.box.com/s/74v9cwv2nq3u8z7mz5i3
- Original Message -
From: Steven Medved steve_nor...@msn.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org; phonol...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 7:00 PM
13 matches
Mail list logo