Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV]Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-27 Thread Manuel Lemos
"Stig S. Bakken" wrote: > > Joao Prado Maia wrote: > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST), Joao Prado Maia wrote: > > > > > > >If PEAR::DB is not abstracting the database what is the purpose of such a > > > >library ? > > > > > > To ea

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV]Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-24 Thread Stig S. Bakken
Joao Prado Maia wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST), Joao Prado Maia wrote: > > > > >If PEAR::DB is not abstracting the database what is the purpose of such a > > >library ? > > > > To ease the life of lot's of programmers. > > > >

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-21 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
> I probably used a bad choice of words. What I really meant was: What is > the objective of PEAR::DB as a database abstraction library ? To abstract > as much as possible like Metabase already does, or to provide a unified > API to databases and leave the implementation related to database specif

[PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV]Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-21 Thread Joao Prado Maia
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST), Joao Prado Maia wrote: > > >If PEAR::DB is not abstracting the database what is the purpose of such a > >library ? > > To ease the life of lot's of programmers. > I probably used a bad choice of words. What I

[PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-21 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
> Well I strongly need thoses $15 000 $ so > > What is the purpose ? > As a "average php user/developper" I don_t really care about the "pure cross > plateform/database issue" but I do care about a standard, clean, secure ("my- > bugs-free") and easy way to use a database, and PEAR::BD + T

[PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-21 Thread Alexander Merz
>Now for the $15,000 question: does anyone else agree with this ? If >PEAR::DB is not abstracting the database what is the purpose of such a >library ? a) unifed API You havn't to think about the name of the command to send a query, connecting... b) it offers helpful functionality I.e. don't care

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-21 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST) Joao Prado Maia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Manuel Lemos wrote: > > > > If we fixed these problems and more, we could talk about having > > > a unified API. Otherwise for the Oracle OCI_ASSOC, I would prefer > > > not to change it

[PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-21 Thread Martin Jansen
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST), Joao Prado Maia wrote: >If PEAR::DB is not abstracting the database what is the purpose of such a >library ? To ease the life of lot's of programmers. - Martin -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

[PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Common DB Abstraction Layer: Re: [PEAR-DEV]Adoption of Metabase

2001-11-21 Thread Joao Prado Maia
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Manuel Lemos wrote: > > If we fixed these problems and more, we could talk about having > > a unified API. Otherwise for the Oracle OCI_ASSOC, I would prefer > > not to change it for speed, Manuel would want to provide an emulation > > layer, i would object because it's slow