Lester Caine wrote:
Lukas Smith wrote:
mysql:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-devm=108239153527834w=2
ibase:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-devm=108240351804395w=2
there are other interesting points being discussed through out this
thread but with a noteably focus on the pear
Lester Caine wrote:
Ed Lazor wrote:
Has any performance testing been done between ADOdb and PEARdb?
Not recently. Personally I am still trying to benchmark engines within
ADOdb against the latest Firebird.
This is an area where any results would be useful. There are speed
comparisons on the
Lukas Smith wrote:
mysql:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-devm=108239153527834w=2
ibase:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-devm=108240351804395w=2
there are other interesting points being discussed through out this
thread but with a noteably focus on the pear abstraction layers.
Hi Hans,
The case-changing code for postgresql is in the postgres7 driver.
Regards, John
Hans Lellelid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi John,
John Lim wrote:
/abstract/ stuff. For example, ADOdb would completely fail to be
portable accross databases where the
Hi John,
John Lim wrote:
/abstract/ stuff. For example, ADOdb would completely fail to be portable
accross databases where the case of the column names in result array
changes (e.g. postgres always returns lowercase col names, Oracle always
uppercase, MySQL returns mixed case, SQLite is
Hello,
On 09/11/2004 11:11 PM, Hans Lellelid wrote:
/abstract/ stuff. For example, ADOdb would completely fail to be
portable accross databases where the case of the column names in
result array changes (e.g. postgres always returns lowercase col
names, Oracle always uppercase, MySQL returns
Hans Lellelid wrote:
No, that's true; no Firebird yet. Drivers needed :) It's basically a
slightly modified version of the JDBC API for PHP.
Now THAT might be the correct way forward. I already use the
Firebird-Jaybird interface when running plug-ins on Eclipse without any
problems, but I
Lester Caine wrote:
No, that's true; no Firebird yet. Drivers needed :) It's basically a
slightly modified version of the JDBC API for PHP.
Now THAT might be the correct way forward. I already use the
Firebird-Jaybird interface when running plug-ins on Eclipse without any
problems, but I
Hans Lellelid wrote:
You definitely should do your own benchmarks. Bear in mind that the
ADOdb benchmarks test a certain type of behavior -- namely repeated
select statements. Also bear in mind that the speeds of the different
layers are going to be inversely proportional to how well they
Jeffrey Moss wrote:
Doesn't do Firebird yet ;) - but it looks interesting. As long as it has
not made the mistake of using MySQL as the SQL standard. Many other
packages are simply MySQL wrappers with cobbled support for a couple of
other engines.
I was curious about Firebird as I've heard it
Lester Caine wrote:
snip
So you start with ADOdb datadict and build the database from that -
works well when adding any supported engine. Reserved words which differ
between engines are another problem area though.
Yeah, but not just reserved words -- but even what is allowable in a
query.
John Holmes wrote:
I'd personally recommend ADOdb for no other reason than that's what I
use and it's effective.
Seconded.
John Lim who wrote ADOdb is always updating it with input from users.
PEARdb does seem to have caught up, but lots of third party applications
are already available that use
Has any performance testing been done between ADOdb and PEARdb?
-Original Message-
PEARdb does seem to have caught up, but lots of third party applications
are already available that use ADOdb or have moved to it (or are moving)
in later updates.
--
PHP Database Mailing List
Ed Lazor wrote:
Has any performance testing been done between ADOdb and PEARdb?
Not recently. Personally I am still trying to benchmark engines within
ADOdb against the latest Firebird.
This is an area where any results would be useful. There are speed
comparisons on the ADOdb site, but they
John,
I thought the point of such discussion lists as php-db was to be able to
maturely discuss these questions.
I understand that people have different opinions and that's exactly what I'm
looking for. I'm hoping to receive pointers in one or the other direction and
then I can make an educated
From: Jean-Philippe Côté [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought the point of such discussion lists as php-db was to be able to
maturely discuss these questions.
I understand that people have different opinions and that's exactly what
I'm
looking for. I'm hoping to receive pointers in one or the other
Jean-Philippe Côtê wrote:
I thought the point of such discussion lists as php-db was to be able to
maturely discuss these questions.
I understand that people have different opinions and that's exactly what I'm
looking for. I'm hoping to receive pointers in one or the other direction and
then I can
Quoting Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am sure if I started again now I would probably be using something
other than ADOdb. But at the time it fitted the bill and where there
were problems they were quickly cleared. Unlike some of the other
options I tried.
May I ask which other ones you
Jean-Philippe Côtê wrote:
Quoting Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am sure if I started again now I would probably be using something
other than ADOdb. But at the time it fitted the bill and where there
were problems they were quickly cleared. Unlike some of the other
options I tried.
May I ask
Hi,
I'm trying to choose a database abstraction layer for a project and I'm
having difficulty making up my mind. The two I'm currently looking at
are: ADOdb and MDB2 (from PEAR).
I was recommended to use MDB2 but its still a beta version and the
documentation is weak. ADOdb seems to have a
Jean-Philippe Ct wrote:
I'm trying to choose a database abstraction layer for a project and I'm
having difficulty making up my mind. The two I'm currently looking at
are: ADOdb and MDB2 (from PEAR).
I was recommended to use MDB2 but its still a beta version and the
documentation is weak. ADOdb
21 matches
Mail list logo
