RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Object Overloading

> -Original Message- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 August 2002 18:59 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Object Overloading > > > At 17:09 23/08/2002, Sam Liddicott wrote: > >Or am I mi

[PHP-DEV] help, C property get/set object overloading

swig wraps C++ objects as zend overloaded objects, the property getters and setters fall back to storing things in the Z_OBJPROP_P(property_reference->object) hash but I'm not doing it properly and I can't work out what I'm doing wrong. The propget functions are generated like this: static pval

[PHP-DEV] Object Overloading

Zeev I just wanted to make you aware that not just the Java module, but also all SWIG generated php modules also use the object overloading propget and propset way of accessing properties of the wrapped objects. I hear this was being revamped for zend 2.0 and thought I should let you know. SWIG-

[PHP-DEV] Only one CXX_SUFFIX

Is there a great reason why rules_common.mk can't be modified so the suffix rules work on .cxx as well as .cpp ? Sam _ Samuel Liddicott Support Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)113 367 4523 Fax: +44 (0)113 367 4680 Switchboard: +44 (0)113 367 4600 O

[PHP-DEV] INTERNAL FEATURE request

Please can we have a magic "cookie" resource value or zval associated with PHP objects accessable via the C API? This would be used when the PHP class it wrapping a C++ class (such as one linked in via swig ( www.swig.org )) so there was a cheap way to find which C++ object

RE: [PHP-DEV]

> -Original Message- > From: Brinkman, Theodore > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 April 2002 14:55 > To: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] > > Sure, and its only an extra 4 character, really. But that's > not the issue > at hand. The issue at hand is tha

[PHP-DEV] RE: phpize writes config.m4

Sorry; wrong list, I get boths lists in the same mailbox and I just replied to a message already there. > -Original Message- > From: Sam Liddicott > Sent: 26 April 2002 12:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: phpize writes config.m4 > > > I'm making

[PHP-DEV] Proposal! Destructor notification

Some know I'm working to improve swig-php to make module generation easy and satisfying. The final hurdle remains in handling and generating callbacks from the module to PHP. Or rather from the library the module wraps to PHP. This requires some kind of callback wrapper that can convert from a

RE: [PHP-DEV] Persistent overloaded class registration problem,

> -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 April 2002 23:14 > To: Sam Liddicott; Sam Liddicott; 'Rasmus Lerdorf' > Cc: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Persistent overloaded class > reg

[PHP-DEV] Thanks! RE: [PHP-DEV] Persistent overloaded class registration problem,

> -Original Message- > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 April 2002 11:24 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: 'Rasmus Lerdorf'; 'PHP Developers Mailing List' > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Persistent overloaded class > registration p

[PHP-DEV] Persistent overloaded class registration problem,

My overloaded classes are now registered in MINIT with: INIT_OVERLOADED_CLASS_ENTRY() zend_register_internal_class() ..zend_register_list_destructors_ex And all seems mostly fine; except the second time apache serves a request, one of the classes (!!) has been de-registered! As shown by get_de

RE: [PHP-DEV] MINIT or RINIT

OK, I just noticed class_entry->builtin_functions which I can probably use. Sam > -Original Message- > From: Sam Liddicott > Sent: 23 April 2002 16:19 > To: Sam Liddicott; 'Rasmus Lerdorf' > Cc: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [PHP-

RE: [PHP-DEV] MINIT or RINIT

LASS instead of ZEND_USER_CLASS? Perhaps it will be safer to register as ZEND_USER_CLASS in RINIT instead of ZEND_INTERNAL_CLASS in MINIT? Sam > -Original Message- > From: Sam Liddicott > Sent: 23 April 2002 15:50 > To: Rasmus Lerdorf; Sam Liddicott > Cc: PHP Developers Mailin

RE: [PHP-DEV] MINIT or RINIT

> -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 April 2002 11:30 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] MINIT or RINIT > > > Well, where are you storing them? Make sure they are n

RE: [PHP-DEV] MINIT or RINIT

> -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 April 2002 11:30 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] MINIT or RINIT > > > Well, where are you storing them? Make sure they are n

[PHP-DEV] MINIT or RINIT

Swig generated code registers some overloaded classes to wrap C classes. I think it should do this in PHP_MINIT but when I do it here they are only available as registered for the first apache request. If I register them in PHP_RINIT then they are always available. Why would this be so? Which

[PHP-DEV] NOTICE: Wise volunteer needed for PHP module review

generated code would be appreciated. regards Sam Liddicott -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Refcount question

If I'm writing a C++ extension module and I want return_value to be the same as this_ptr do I need to increase the ref count of the zval this_ptr? Or is it safe just to do as the last line: return_Value=this_ptr; or *return_value=*this_ptr; or what ?? Sam -- PHP Development Mailing Li

RE: [PHP-DEV] call_user_function()

What happened with this in the end. I have a case where call_user_function needs to call a class function without me having to instantiate a dummy object first. Sam > -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 February 2002 17:13 > To: brad lafountain;

[PHP-DEV] call_user_func_array bug

call_user_func_array and family support methods and functions but not class methods. I'm using swig to generate the php module for xapian (was OpenMuscat) and want to patch swig so that methods shadow classes can take variable numbers of arguments. The shadow methods need to pass on the same num

[PHP-DEV] Autoconf 2.52 and Open Muscat

Yes!! The good news is that what was open muscat but that is now xapian (www.xapian.org) is having it's php module finished this week! [The muscat module will expire and be replaced by Xapian, a much more comprehensive module] The trouble is Xapian prefers autoconf 2.52 as it provides large-file-

RE: [PHP-DEV] NEW PHP standalone compiler (was Re: [PHP-DEV] Here we try again)

> -Original Message- > From: Hartmut Holzgraefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 February 2002 11:20 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: Stig S. Bakken; Manuel Lemos; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP

RE: [PHP-DEV] NEW PHP standalone compiler (was Re: [PHP-DEV] Here we try again)

> -Original Message- > From: Hartmut Holzgraefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 31 January 2002 10:15 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: Stig S. Bakken; Manuel Lemos; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP

RE: [PHP-DEV] NEW PHP standalone compiler (was Re: [PHP-DEV] Here we try again)

> -Original Message- > From: Stig S. Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 31 January 2002 08:49 > To: Manuel Lemos > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] NEW PHP standalone compiler (was Re: [PHP-DEV] > Here we try

RE: [PHP-DEV] maybe serious error in RC3 memory manager

> -Original Message- > From: Stig Venaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 November 2001 10:22 > To: Oleg Khimich > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] maybe serious error in RC3 memory manager > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Oleg Khimich wrote: > > On my

RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup

> -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 November 2001 01:21 > To: Sam Liddicott; Sam Liddicott; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup > > > The problem you are experiencing is due to the

RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup

> -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 November 2001 01:21 > To: Sam Liddicott; Sam Liddicott; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup > > > The problem you are experiencing is due to the

RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup

Here's a sample script that does most of the sorts of stuff I was doing apart from database work. Note how long it takes to exit after finishing. #! /usr/bin/php -q 0) $this->ref=&new thingy($c-1); } } $stash=array(); $max=50; $start=time(); for($i=0;$i<$max;$i++) { $r=rand(0,300);

RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup

> -Original Message- > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 November 2001 11:16 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 11:01:03AM -, Sa

RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup

> -Original Message- > From: Teodor Cimpoesu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 November 2001 10:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup > > > Hi Edin! > On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Edin Kadribasic wrote: > > > I have noticed the same problem with a scipt tha

RE: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup

I should add that without the kill -5 it takes longer for the script to finally exit than it took to execute! Sam > -Original Message- > From: Sam Liddicott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 November 2001 10:35 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] CGI quick cl

[PHP-DEV] CGI quick cleanup

I am using PHP for a system script to import TV listings to a database. It works well but creates 20,000 to 30,000 hash elements with various relationships and it *seems* to take exponentially longer for the script to actually stop running after it reaches the "exit" statement the more items the

RE: [PHP-DEV] german umlauts!

> -Original Message- > From: Andre Lacour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 03 September 2001 09:28 > To: Php-Dev > Subject: [PHP-DEV] german umlauts! > > > strtoupper() & strtoulower() does not work with german > umlauts (äöü/ÄÖÜ). Perhaps it depends on what your php locale is (as

RE: [PHP-DEV] SLEEP and MAXEXECUTIONTIME and NAUGHTY modules

> -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 08:03 > To: Sam Liddicott; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SLEEP and MAXEXECUTIONTIME and NAUGHTY modules > > > At 12:11 PM 2/26/2001 +, S

[PHP-DEV] SLEEP and MAXEXECUTIONTIME and NAUGHTY modules

I notice that usleep and sleep both clash on solaris with Max-execution-time. 1) I notice various modules using sleep: db, hyperwave, mysql, oci8, satellite which seems to break max execution time. 2) Could we not use: #include #define sleep (n) \ { struct timeval tv; \ tv.tv_sec=n; \ t

[PHP-DEV] gawk at awk

./configure selects gawk over awk if present (very nice) but buildconf does not, it uses awk over gawk, but on solaris awk has serious line-length limits which prevent buildconf from working. Is there any reason not to try and use gawk first for buildconf? Has anybody replaced solaris awk with

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: PHP 4.0 Bug #9064 Updated: Functions inside functions cause errors if the outer function is called twice.

> -Original Message- > From: Lars Torben Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 09:49 > To: Christopher Kings-Lynne > Cc: Bug Database > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: PHP 4.0 Bug #9064 Updated: Functions inside > functions cause errors if the outer function is c

RE: [PHP-DEV] Destruct order/What is reference counted?

> -Original Message- > From: Sam Liddicott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 05:22 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Destruct order/What is reference counted? > > > Are resources refence counted, or variables? > > I

[PHP-DEV] Destruct order/What is reference counted?

Are resources refence counted, or variables? I have a muscat_module method I wrote which is of the form: $new_resource=make_new_object($old_resource); each resource is a C++ object, and I have to stop $old_resource being disposed of until $new_resource has also been disposed of. This is a stri

[PHP-DEV] le_ why static?

Why are le_* garbage destructor handles declared static? As far as I can tell this means other c files in the same module can't "extern" it but as it is static in file scope it has none of the other benefits of being static? Is it to do with threading? What? Sam -- PHP Development Mailing Li

[PHP-DEV] le_ why static?

Why are le_* garbage destructor handles declared static? As far as I can tell this means other c files in the same module can't "extern" it but as it is static in file scope it has none of the other benefits of being static? Is it to do with threading? What? Sam -- PHP Development Mailing Li

RE: [PHP-DEV] php eating carriage returns?

> -Original Message- > From: Monte Ohrt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 03:17 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] php eating carriage returns? > > > example: > > > This is a test > > > > > > When I run this from the command line (4.0.

[PHP-DEV] bug? RE: linux c++ __rethrow link error

g? > -Original Message- > From: Sam Liddicott > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 01:11 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: fixed now, RE: linux c++ __rethrow link error > > > I avoid the __rethrow error by adding: > > > AC

[PHP-DEV] fixed now, RE: linux c++ __rethrow link error

I avoid the __rethrow error by adding: AC_ADD_LIBRARY_WITH_PATH(gcc,/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96) to my config.m4 so that libgcc.a which contains __rethrow gets linked in. Of course I should only add this line for the relavent platforms and I don't know what they will be. Should I

[PHP-DEV] linux c++ __rethrow link error

I get this error when compiling my muscat module for php on linux but no solaris: /tmp/muscat-php.1.1/1.1.C010/10/php-4.0.4/ext/muscat/muscatapi.cpp:107: undefined reference to `__rethrow' Needless to say I don't refer to __rethrow anywhere; the actual line is: muscatapi = new MuscatAPIl

[PHP-DEV] __rethrow RE: [PHP-DEV] c++ files as module

that. Sam > -Original Message----- > From: Sam Liddicott > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 04:20 > To: Sascha Schumann; Sam Liddicott > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] c++ files as module > > > Yes, the 3rd example worked - but then so did taking it all > o

RE: [PHP-DEV] c++ files as module

ms. So for now, I don't seem to explicilty mention stdc++ at all and it all links fine I'll get back if I discover something else. THanks Sam > -Original Message- > From: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 03:52 > To:

RE: [PHP-DEV] c++ files as module

> -Original Message- > From: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 03:13 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] c++ files as module > > > > Is: > > AC_ADD_LIBRARY(stdc++) > &g

RE: [PHP-DEV] c++ files as module

> -Original Message- > From: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 05:10 > To: Sam Liddicott > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] c++ files as module > > > > > /bin/sh: I.: command not found >

[PHP-DEV] c++ files as module

I'm trying to add some .cpp files to the muscat module, the hard part is getting them compiled! My Makefile.in is: LTLIBRARY_NAME= libmuscat.la LTLIBRARY_SOURCES = muscat.c muscat_net.c LTLIBRARY_SOURCES_CPP = muscatapi.cpp LTLIBRARY_SHARED_NAME = muscat.la LTLIBRARY_SHARED_LIBADD =

[PHP-DEV] CVS build, PEAR install fails

Any idea why? I checked out Zend and TSRM this time... Sam # make install for prog in phpextdist; do \ /usr/share/src/php/build/shtool install -c -m 755 /usr/share/src/php/pear/scripts/$prog /usr/local/bin/$prog; \ done cp: cannot access /usr/share/src/php/pear/scripts/phpextdist make

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8778: Cannot load libphp4.so

You might need to run ldconfig Sam > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:16 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8778: Cannot load libphp4.so > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Opera

[PHP-DEV] buildconf fails on linux and solaris

Just done a cvs checkout a few seconds ago, and ./buildconf fails with: [root@rhodes php4]# ./buildconf make[1]: *** [Zend/Makefile.am] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 This: make -s -f build/build.mk AMFLAGS= is as far as my "make" skills allow me to trace the problem. Sam -- PHP Develo

RE: [PHP-DEV] More OOP

> -Original Message- > From: Cynic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 01:41 > To: Sam Liddicott; Thomas Watson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] More OOP > > > At 14:27 18.1. 2001, Sam Liddi

RE: [PHP-DEV] More OOP

> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:35 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] More OOP > > 1: If you are overriding an existing method in a class, it is then not > possible to call the original method. Its a v

[PHP-DEV] midgard, was RE: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline

Midgard, soon to use php4 is to be released GPL (according to their website www.midgard-project.org). How will this work; will it just be the patch to php4 that makes it INTO migard that will be GPL, or midgard+PHP that will be GPL. Either way it seems using this means EITHER a) anyone could re

RE: [PHP-DEV] Octal numbers and automatic conversions

I remember this showing up years ago in an online java mortgage calculator giving embarrasingly far-out results. Only there the bug was the "other way round". In this case my opinion is that it is behaving as expected and no error. If the programmer writes 070 he probably means octal, but that d

[PHP-DEV] HAVE_FLOCK on solaris survey

Could Solaris users please make me the output of: grep HAVE_FLOCK main/php_config.h after running their ./configure please. For some reason our system always does: #define HAVE_FLOCK 1 when we need #undef HAVE_FLOCK in order to compile and I'm trying to get to the bottom of it. thanks Sam

RE: [PHP-DEV] License Choice: RE: [PHP-DEV] readline extension status?

> -Original Message- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 06:23 > To: Rasmus Lerdorf > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] License Choice: RE: [PHP-DEV] readline > extension > status? > > Licensing the same piece of software und

[PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline

If I were to write a proxy library which could integrate with various read-line style libraries - lets say just the GNU one for now to save time, and er... released this proxy under LGPL, surely PHP could use my proxy and thus make use of GNU's GPL'd readline. It would be a quick task for some s

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

> -Original Message- > From: Cynic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 05:40 > To: Sam Liddicott; Zeev Suraski > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled > > Although, actually, I > gues

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

I think it is more of (my guess, blame me if I'm wrong) there aren't enough active PHP developers for whom windows is the most important platform so that window problems don't get noticed as quickly as other problems and so don't get fixed as quickly and it ends up being the one system that appear