Wrong list. You're looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a
list for the development of the language itself, not with it.
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:44 AM, Ted Conn wrote:
Hi well maybe this isnt the right place to put a beginners post but I
will
find out soon if its not I guess!
--
Look at apc. It tracks per-file function and class tables.
http://apc.communityconnect.com/ (v2.0)
pear/PECL/apc (v1.x)
Both versions do the thing you wish for.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Both of these examples could be realized using fork() or
socket_select(), though the first is not portable and the latter
produces unnecessary overhead.
Just to nit-pick: non-blocking io is much more efficient than threads,
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe,
Essentially, I want to be able to produce a sort of serialized
representation of the opcodes, but as they are executed, not all in
one big
chunk after they are compiled.
This isn't for any actually useful production code, just some
debugging/messing around/exploring engine internals.
There's no
Interesting.
I don't know what the ISO standard say, but mathematically a a % b will
always return you an integer 0 = a%b b (since there are no negative
numbers in canonical representation of Z/bZ). I guess perl/python/tcl
ddecided to adhere to the mathematical definition.
On Tuesday, March
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 10:33 AM, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Interesting.
I don't know what the ISO standard say, but mathematically a a % b
will
always return you an integer 0 = a%b b (since there are no negative
numbers in canonical
Having this sort of functionaility in general would be great. I know
you can affect this with objects via overload, but it is useful for
scalars and arrays and streams as well. It is pretty 'magical' though.
George
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 11:26 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
I
Any feelings on a patch to the session extension so that if
session_set_save_handler is passed a class or namespace as it's sole
argument, it auto-registers class::open, class::close, class::read,
class::write, class::destory and class::gc?
George
--
PHP Development Mailing List http
Can anybody tell me if such features are available in PHP (I failed to
find
them myself).
Look at __destruct method for classes in ZE2. They wopn't tell you the
reference count, but the do get called when the ref count goes to 0.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
#php.bugs seems to be invite only now. How do I go about getting
myself invited?
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Using __destruct method (thanks to George) it may be possible to
implement
what I need, but only if object cache is implemented in C (and so is
not visible for PHP garbage collector). So no pure PHP solution exits.
Unfortunately I didn't fins any reference to __destruct method in PHP
manual
userland functions.
george
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
It's the job of an optimizer, not of a compiler. And because PHP
doesn't
have an internal optimizer, this is not optimized out. You can either
check the ZendOptimiser (I can't show you the opcodes that that
generates) or PEAR::Optimizer, which is in Pecl (which might not do
this
optimization yet
Interesting, I get the same hang when I do this on OSX with head
php 'foo.php?a=b'
Foo is any php script (including an empty file).
This returns no such file foo.php?a=b on linux.
Will open a bug.
George
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 05:31 PM, Lindsey Simon wrote:
Hey Chris, sorry - I
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 05:22 PM, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Sterling Hughes wrote:
I'll be adding it into PECL in a little bit
Why PECL and not add it to ext/rpc?
ext/rpc should be able to load rpc backend modules, or PECL is the
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 03:20 PM, Harald Radi wrote:
Hrmfpsd,
while commiting a new functions the parameter parsing API i appearently
brought up a discussion about the meaning of life and stuff :) As
asked by
Andi i'm bringing the discussion to php5-dev with a short summary:
can already set up your
system so that you can do mandatory locks from within php (on systems
supporting it), but it is close to impossible to have php do all the
setup work for you (remounting a file system -o mand should be out of
the scope of php, imho).
George
--
PHP Development Mailing
Aside from this being on the wrong list (this should go to
php-general), it's worth noting that mandatory locking support is
pretty inconsistently implemented across most OSs.
George
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:59 AM, J Smith wrote:
Try the direct I/O extension, specifically
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 07:11 PM, Marcus Börger wrote:
The real question is why you need mandatory locks and not advisory
locks. If everyone is playing on the same team, advisory locks
should provide all the semantics you need (and are very portable).
Mandatory locks (on
I like this solution.
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 09:08 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
I think the best solution to this problem, without breaking
functionality, is to use a cache for realpath() in virtual_file_ex().
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe,
Perhaps make it configurable because on Linux there already is a dcache
right in the kernel which is likely to be faster than anything we can
do.
On linux you still have to make all those stat calls (they just return
fast). A hashlookup inside TSRM will almost certainly return much
faster.
' optimization?
George
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
realized the
reason why you (in general) want to resolve the path to a canonical
path is that you can seriously break include_once and require_once if
you dont. Otherwise require_once wont correctly work if you do
?
require_once(/home/george/foo.php);
require_once(/home/george/../george
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 12:17 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Is PECL ready for this stuff?
Yes.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
You consider running the apache_hooks code? This should be simple
there.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
You could have your custom C extension be called as one of the hooks.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 09:42 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
You consider running the apache_hooks code? This should be simple
there.
You mean do the filtering
Have you looked on netlib?
http://www.netlib.org/
I am now thinking perhaps the best way to go is to implement the C
library of statistical recipes that I need in a library that would be
compatible with the PHP license. Anyone know of an existing lib that
is already available? Ideally this
be that any extension that would die if it was moved
out of core should be moved out of core for just that reason.
George
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Wow... top 10. And to think my guidance counselor said I would never
amount to anything
.
And the top 10 again (messages with a ratio = 3):
...
George Schlossnagleavg of 11.78 in 4 postings
...
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http
Guess I should add visible sarcasm/sarcasm tokens in the future, eh?
And if it has not been obvious, the top 10 should be taken
with a grain of salt.
- Sascha
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Then my hopes for also being on the top 10 list of correct users of
nomenclature are shot.
Those are called tags, remember the importance of effective
communication!
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
qmail devs == djb, right?
If his support doesn't suffice (and you cant find it in the enormous
un-merged patch contributions that seem to litter the qmail community
websites), might I suggest a new MTA? Exim works quite nicely.
George
On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 10:49 AM, Ari Pollak
+0.
Or as Zeev might prefer: I like this idea. I also find it a hassle to
have to put start tags at the beginning of cli scripts. It does pose
some problems though with using includes between cli and web scripts,
no?
On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 02:11 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
We've
I'm with Shane, that sounds like a really poor idea.
On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 04:38 PM, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Robin Thellend wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
[...]
I didn't say that it should be changed from php to php-cgi, as I do
think that would be bad.
Derick
the archives for ZEND_ADD_STRING.
George
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 11:35 AM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
See this :
http://phpxpath.sourceforge.net/benchmark/phpBench.php
And show it to the guy.
Andrey
- Original Message -
From: Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Oops, contrary to my earlier statement, the lexer patch for this
problem seems to be in 4.3.0rc2 and 4.3.0rc3.
George
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 11:43 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
I am using 4.2.2-dev. Must be a stable build from snaps.php.net. I
will
read the archives.
Brian Moon
Why do the (cheap) checks implemented in debug_backtrace not work for
this?
George
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 04:11 PM, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
It won't be different in ZE2. This is not a bug though, but a tricky
design issue. The problem is figuring out at runtime when to set
J Smith wrote:
That's what I was thinking. The new patch updates skeleton.c a bit and fixes
ext_skel to either add extern C stuff to skeleton.c or get rid of it. I
think it would be simpler for extension first-timers to not worry about
what __cplusplus means, or why extern C is there in the
How does searching the freelist work in this? How is this faster than
say a 3-level page table implementation?
That said, I do think that if we can get very fast code to pre-allocate
zval's it would be a good idea (hopefully we could get more than 5%
increase).
I already have an idea for how I
The problem I see with an array approach from an api perspective is
simply when a bucket
is free'd, in order to have efficient memory usage, we'd need a second
level array scan
for every ALLOC_ZVAL().
Perhaps a linked list would be a better choice for this, as we can
just be smart about bucket
A little off-list discussion has sold me on the linked list
implementation. Seems very fast and very simple.
George
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 07:53 PM, Daniel Cowgill wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
The problem I see with an array
Or use the overload extension in ZE1. The real question is why you
really need/want to do this.
George
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 04:37 PM, l0t3k wrote:
if you have the option of using ZE2, make the thing an object and use
the
property get/set handlers to take care of things
I concur, that would be cool. Patches should be against HEAD.
George
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 05:33 PM, Shane Caraveo wrote:
I think that would be quite cool, save me from having to do it manualy.
Shane
J Smith wrote:
A couple of times a month, I get questions about from people
debug_backtrace was backported into ze1. 4.3 will sstill use ze1.
George
Phil Dier wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:41:25 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
Hi!
I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
I'll do it, if you want.
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 07:23 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
debug_backtrace() will be available in PHP 4.3.0 and
Hmmm any hints on how to get the variable name out of the stack?
The code in debug_backtrace seems to only extract the value.
George
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I'd probably go for class::function($arg1, $arg2).
Also take into consideration that the args aren't always available.
Andi
At 02:58
Ok... but that looks nasty when you are passed an array or an object.
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:13 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Hmmm any hints on how to get the variable name out of the stack?
The code in debug_backtrace seems to only extract the value.
There's
Here's first shot at a patch. The output it generates is ugly as sin if
you use objects though. I though about flattening them out, but that
gets long and nasty (and requires specialized print functions which
while easy seem to be of marginal use elsewhere.)
George
Index: Zend
And here is a version which flattens the calling args onto a single line
(similar to sebastians usersapce script). Longer, but a bit prettier
output.
Index: Zend/zend.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend.c,v
retrieving revision
I'm not really arguing for or against this, but since when did speaking
english become a corollary of being intelligent? And even if we accept
the rather ridiculous hypotheis that all php developers can comprehend
english, what if they don't want to, or are more confident using their
native
Is your claim that db2 has no international error messages? It does, or
did last I checked. Or was it that SQLServer doesn't either (it does
as well).
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:24 PM, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 25, 2002 08:15 pm, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:30:55
MySQL also supports error message internationalization - one more RDBMS
to annoy Sterling, I guess.
George
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:47 PM, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
It was to say that these three (Oracle, SQL and DB2) do have
internationalized error reporting. I meant them
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were going off-topic to pick at
parts of Maxim's argument. My mistake.
George
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:52 PM, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 25, 2002 08:44 pm, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Is your claim that db2 has no international error messages
By the way, could you please advise by how much I will need to
increase the
power of my server(s) to maintain the same level of performance?
Why would this need to kill your performance if you're not throwing
errors?
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
actually printing errors, a slight overhead seems acceptable (to
me, ymmv)
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 25, 2002 09:59 pm, George Schlossnagle wrote:
By the way, could you please advise by how much I will need to
increase the
power of my server(s
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 10:43 PM, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 25, 2002 10:30 pm, George Schlossnagle wrote:
There is no proposed patch to affect all these changes. There are
fine
ways to print errors that don't necessitate having them loaded at run
time. They could be in a dbm file
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 11:29 PM, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 25, 2002 10:57 pm, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 10:43 PM, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 25, 2002 10:30 pm, George Schlossnagle wrote:
There is no proposed patch to affect all these changes
What are you trying to accomplish?
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:40 PM, David Brown wrote:
Hi:
Architecturally speaking, is there any simple way to modify an sapi
backend to return HTTP headers through the output buffering mechanism?
As far as I can tell, headers are managed seperately
.
George
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 06:06 PM, David Brown wrote:
Hi George:
It's something that's probably better solved in user-space, but I
figured I'd poke around anyway. :)
I'm attempting to write a little prefork HTTP server entirely in PHP.
The script instansiates an 'application
. Is there a reason why? I'm
sticking that in this patch again, in case you merged my last change by
hand and missed that accidentally.
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 06:48 PM, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Much sexier indeed. There are some flaws with it:
o Tokenizes heredocs
Here's the patch. Looks like everything but the heredoc part is in cvs
now.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'm a tool. I sent the wrong patch to the list. Thanks to Andrei for
pointing it out. Here is the _right_ patch (finally).
diff -u -3 -r1.53 zend_language_scanner.l
--- zend_language_scanner.l8 Nov 2002 13:40:54 -1.53
+++ zend_language_scanner.l15
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Try it out and let me know how the results are. Also *please* send
diffs also as attachments so that when people apply them we won't get
bad whitespace in our sources.
php-dev seems to eat my attachments
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Much sexier indeed. There are some flaws with it:
o Tokenizes heredocs on whitespace
o Doesn't count lines correctly for debug (since strings now have
newlines in them)
Here's a revised patch to yours that fixes those (heredocs are tokenized
on newlines - I think that is best case)
Andi
So I will take this course of action after 4.3.0 is branched. Any
objections?
George
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 09:40 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Hrm.. That's not a bad idea. An ApacheHooks SAPI module sounds like
the
right approach to me.
-R
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, George Schlossnagle
How do people feel about adding the pretty name as $_SERVER['SAPI']?
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Andi,
The last patch I submitted was broken as well. Following that, I had
the bright idea to run the prospective changes through the unit-tester
to ensure correct performance. Here's a patch which achieves that. It
does not work for heredocs (i.e. they are tokenized as before, but
The patch I submitted included BACKQUOTES in the token matching as
well. I'm not convinced that is bad, but I will try to thoroughly test
it tomorrow, and if it's broken, I'll just case it for and heredocs.
George
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
OH I missed
At 03:06 AM 11/11/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
The patch I submitted included BACKQUOTES in the token matching as
well. I'm not convinced that is bad, but I will try to thoroughly
test
it tomorrow, and if it's broken, I'll just case it for and heredocs.
George
On Monday, November 11
Funny, it's in the message my mua said it sent (the 2nd time). How is
this?
It's also in pear/PECL/optimizer/zend.patch
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 06:11 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Hehe. I should attach the patch, eh?
Yes, you
.
George
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 05:06 PM, George Schlossnagle wrote:
For those who came to Dan my or Derick's talk at the Int. PHP
Conference, we both covered the bad inefficiency in the parser that
results in strings with variables in them being tokenized on
whitespace. This results
I got the second attachment mail ok but I'll just inline it here:
--- Zend/zend_language_scanner.l2002-11-10 16:53:27.0
-0500
+++ /Users/george/src/php4/Zend/zend_language_scanner.l 2002-11-10
16:39:11.0 -0500
@@ -686,7 +686,6 @@
HNUM 0x[0-9a-fA-F]+
LABEL
05:16 pm, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:
For those who came to Dan my or Derick's talk at the Int. PHP
Conference, we both covered the bad inefficiency in the parser that
results in strings with variables in them being tokenized on
whitespace. This results
wrote:
Well, since 99% of the code is the same, I'd be worried about people
remembering to merge fixes across. At least if it is ifdef'ed people
see
the code. But yes, I agree, that's not pretty either.
-R
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Either way works for me
, George Schlossnagle wrote:
that would be my debugging from my 'clean' cvs copy. :)
You don't want that. Sorry. Here's a better patch:
Index: zend_language_scanner.l
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_language_scanner.l,v
retrieving
code for execute part and parcel into their own
zend_execute() just to add a new opcodes. This is useful both for
optimizers (like the one now in PECL/optimizer), as well as for
implementing custom opcodes like what you want here without a huge
engine patch.
George
On Friday, November 8
Hehe. I should attach the patch, eh?
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 09:15 PM, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Here's the patch that Dan and I put together for the optimizer we
talked about at the conference. It basically provides a
defaulted-to-null function pointer that is the default
.
George
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 05:58 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
What do you think would be the best way to make the apache_hooks code
more
accessible to people? A tarball with the relevant files that overwrites
the standard files, or perhaps it is time to #ifdef it into the main
branch
That was +1 for changing it to off. :)
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 09:37 PM, George Schlossnagle wrote:
+1 unless it is set as an INI_ANY, then +0.
George
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 09:05 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Thank you for the detailed explanation, I'm sure everybody understands
Indeed it appears to be... +0 then. :)
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 07:44 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 18:37 27/10/2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:
+1 unless it is set as an INI_ANY, then +0.
It's already INI_ANY...
-- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe
I'm not a big fan of doing things the smart way. How hard is it to just
set ob_implicit_flush() on and off? If you want it off, just set it off
(or on, as the default ends up set) at the head of your script.
George
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 04:11 AM, Kristian Koehntopp wrote
Not to be snarky, but I for one would prefer PHP to behave like PHP. ;)
Without having to make everyone here sort through the commit messages,
can you briefly list out the proposed changes?
George
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 02:26 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
I thought it's obvious choice
That statement about character devices being line bufffered isn't quite
true, but otherwise I would say +0. Line buffering stdout and
unbuffering stderr seems to be the default of most languages.
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 02:45 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote
://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
// George Schlossnagle
// Principal Consultant
// OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com
// (c) 240.460.5234 (e
Can you give the source for that function and the arguments it's being
passed/context it is used in?
Jan Schneider wrote:
Zitat von Yasuo Ohgaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
0x4055778f in _efree (ptr=0x83476e4)
at /home/jan/software/php4/Zend/zend_alloc.c:229
229
how that product works.)
George
Andi Gutmans wrote:
If there's no concrete reason it is needed I think things should stay
as they are.
One reason - it's slower, probably not noticeable but it still is.
Andi
At 03:06 PM 10/14/2002 +0100, Nick Lindridge wrote:
why would one want to have
(although I
don't really know how that product works.)
Bingo! Well done George :) Nice to see someone thinking beyond their
bubble.
Thanks for the compliment.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
// George Schlossnagle
// Principal Consultant
// OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com
// (c) 240.460.5234 (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net
install
part
working.
Edin
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
// George Schlossnagle
// Principal Consultant
// OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com
// (c) 240.460.5234 (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// 1024D/1100A5A0
the on-the-fly-generated module) seems only to read from there. Is
there a good reason for taht, and if not, would a patch to allow dl() to
take absolute paths be looked upon favorably?
George
// George Schlossnagle
// Principal Consultant
// OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com
// (c
The apache_hooks stuff is about at the stage where people poking
holes/finding bugs/making suggestions would be very beneficial. Any
feedback would be appreciated.
// George Schlossnagle
// Principal Consultant
// OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com
// (c) 240.460.5234 (e) [EMAIL
for).
Hope that helps!
George
On Friday, August 30, 2002, at 03:31 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
The apache_hooks stuff is about at the stage where people poking
holes/finding bugs/making suggestions would be very beneficial. Any
feedback would be appreciated.
apache_hooks stuff sounds very
with the cli, as there are abundant reasons to have it
and one of the web-centric sapi's cohabitating on a system.
George
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
It sure does seem to, doesn't it. ;)
Mike Hall wrote:
I'm sure PHP 4.3.0 builds the CLI as well as any other SAPI you specify,
doesn't it?
- Original Message -
From: George Schlossnagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED
undesireable, please let me know and I will just
reimplement stacks for sapi.
George
Index: Zend/zend_stack.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_stack.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -3 -r1.11 zend_stack.c
--- Zend
and use that instead.
George
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Ok, this has all been added to the apache_hooks branch, which is now
up-to-date.
Very nice. IMHO this should be merged into HEAD as soon as PHP_4_3_0 is
branched off.
Edin
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net
passing them to other hooks or
into the main script. This is experimental and may break some of the
other sapi modules as-is (though that clearly wasn't the intention ;)
George
Lukas Schroeder wrote:
hi,
here's another shot of the current apache_hooks code.
there are some issues
All of this work was off HEAD. Should a new_apache_hooks branch be tagged?
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I say commit it. This stuff is very experimental as it is and lives in
its own branch. You are not going to destabilize anything.
(I just made sure you had enough karma for the commit)
-Rasmus
, 26 Aug 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:
All of this work was off HEAD. Should a new_apache_hooks branch be tagged?
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I say commit it. This stuff is very experimental as it is and lives in
its own branch. You are not going to destabilize anything.
(I just made sure you
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
