On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that if we go my way with aggregation we can add the ability to add
> aggregated classes at run-time too and answer your needs.
Fine with me.
> However, I think that if we continue on much longer with trying to put all
> possible OOP
Hi,
I think that if we go my way with aggregation we can add the ability to add
aggregated classes at run-time too and answer your needs.
However, I think that if we continue on much longer with trying to put all
possible OOP features into Engine 2 it will never become a reality.
I would like t
Redirecting bugs to -qa is excellent. -dev is no fun to actually subscribe
to with the number of support requests alone coming in. I imagine folks have
gotten pretty good at ignoring em but... Let's do it.
Be nice to see the possibility of third party comments to bugs as well for
confirms, worksf
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> I have no idea who have tested the latest RC. Does anyone have?
At least, you and I do :)
> After the latest RC there have been a LOT of fixes in the release
> branch and also several fixes in the HEAD (which weren't MFH'd)
> and there hasn't been any new RCs after those
Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> o If the first argument is an array, we assume that:
> - the first element of the array is the command to be executed,
> - and all other elements are command-line parameters
> - if PHP is in safe mode, quote each parameter separately
wouldn't it be be
> >accept_globals("GPC", 'user', 'password', 'value_*', 'more');
> I think that this is a clear example of "the enemy of good is
> the even better" (I'm not sure how well this translates to
> English :).
Good enough to get your point :-)
> behavior only prefixed, use import_globals("GPC", "
At 01:07 30/07/2001, Marc Boeren wrote:
>Hi,
>
> > force a prefix onto the variable name. I.e.,
> > import_globals("GPC", "form_");
>
>I like this idea (the whole idea of import_globals is good, I think, but I'd
>rather call it accept_globals, but more on that later :), only this would
>make it
UNSUBSCRIBE ME PLEASE!!
"Jeffrey A.Stuart" schrieb:
I like this proposal a LOT! See, what I and
a few of my friends have recently
been doing is starting to teach PHP to website owners. And they
have all been
taking to it VERY WELL!!! (Actually Rasmus, you may remember
this. You we
Hi,
> force a prefix onto the variable name. I.e.,
> import_globals("GPC", "form_");
I like this idea (the whole idea of import_globals is good, I think, but I'd
rather call it accept_globals, but more on that later :), only this would
make it difficult to actually differentiate between get, p
Note again that we should not see this change for what it isn't - it *is*
going to be a painful move for those who actually do it. The reason for
this is that register_globals=on silently encouraged writing of faulty
code. In turn, this means that people would have to go over their code in
o
I like this proposal a LOT! See, what I and a few of my friends have recently
been doing is starting to teach PHP to website owners. And they have all been
taking to it VERY WELL!!! (Actually Rasmus, you may remember this. You were
interviewed by TDavid of Scriptschool about 8 months or so ago
11 matches
Mail list logo
