ID: 14750
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Feedback
Status: Open
Bug Type: Reproducible crash
Operating System: FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
This works, if it's alone on the page.
exit((string)0.1);
and this one works
At 08:20 AM 12/29/2001 +0800, Alan Knowles wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
As I mentioned on the ZE2 mailing list there general rule of thumb is:
a) Objects should be passed by reference.
b) Everything else including arrays should be used by value whenever
possible semantically.
In the ZE2 objects
ID: 14750
Updated by: mfischer
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Feedback
Bug Type: Reproducible crash
Operating System: FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
And what about CGI (command line)?
Previous Comments:
ID: 14750
Updated by: mfischer
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Feedback
Bug Type: Reproducible crash
Operating System: FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
No matter what I did, I can't reproduce this. Either with apache 1.3.22 mod_php nor
command line version.
Sascha Schumann wrote:
Problem is in loading *.so file at start up.
Session module is designed to provide globals
for sub modules, if session module is not compiled
in and user load sub module, it spits undefined
symbol error at start up.
Runtime undefined symbol error for perfectly valid
ID: 14072
Updated by: lobbin
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Feedback
Status: Closed
Bug Type: ODBC related
Operating System: FreeBSD 4.3
PHP Version: 4.0.6
Assigned To: ahill
New Comment:
No feedback. Closing.
Previous Comments:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: redhat 7.1 glibc2.2.4 kernel2.4
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: Apache related
Bug description: [critical!] mozilla downloads source of .php files
I don't exactly understand how this happens, but with a Apache+mod_ssl
server,
In case someone missed it (ok, I just stumbled by accident
over it), here's an language shootout (including PHP of course):
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/
--
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
ID: 14751
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: Apache related
Operating System: redhat 7.1 glibc2.2.4 kernel2.4
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
seems resolved for us.
This phenomenon occurs if the SSL-VirtualHost entry's ServerName differs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: N/A
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: Documentation problem
Bug description: missing changelog item
On the php 4.1.0 changelog page on php.net, there's no mention of the
(correctly) fixed return values of strtok(). This is, on the
ID: 14740
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: Sockets related
Operating System: Win98 and Win2k
PHP Version: 4.1.0
New Comment:
ok to clarify.. seems like this is a common mistake
fsockopen() times out ok if the server doesn't exist. The
Martin Jansen wrote:
The following patch changes the version number in the output
of phpinfo() from 4.0 to 4. Could anyone with enough karma
please commit it or give me the karma to do it myself?
Done.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Win2000AdvServer
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: Unknown/Other Function
Bug description: a bug about Ora_pLogon
run at pl/sql developer:
/++/
SQL select * from
It should be noted that the shootout reflects rather poorly on PHP. Ranks
second to last on the overall scorecard, partly because it is missing some
tests. On the tests it does perform on a quick check shows it generally uses
significantly more CPU time to do various computations then many of the
Can someone run a few of these tests on a machine with --disable-debug.
I'd be curious to know how much of a difference that might make.
-AZ
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
This is not really surprising, and the test is not really fair, the
PHP code is not written by an experienced php programmer, and thus,
would naturally be slower, on person benchmarks like this are simply
too dependent on the person writing the code.
-Sterling
Give me a
This is not really surprising, and the test is not really fair, the
PHP code is not written by an experienced php programmer, and thus,
would naturally be slower, on person benchmarks like this are simply
too dependent on the person writing the code.
-Sterling
Give me a
This is not really surprising, and the test is not really fair, the
PHP code is not written by an experienced php programmer, and thus,
would naturally be slower, on person benchmarks like this are simply
too dependent on the person writing the code.
-Sterling
Give me a
Could you specify which $n you were using, and also provide the equivalent
Perl script that you used?
Zeev
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, August Zajonc wrote:
This is not really surprising, and the test is not really fair, the
PHP code is not written by an experienced php programmer, and
Sure,
These are not my tests but Doug's. He compiled default so --debug
and --inline-optimization not kicking in. Startup cost also counted, but he
tried to run long enough to amortize that.
n was 16.
perl code was something like this.
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
# $Id: nestedloop.perl,v 1.2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Windows 2000 SP2 / Apache 1.3.22
PHP version: 4.1.0
PHP Bug Type: Dynamic loading
Bug description: java.* configuration values from php.ini lost on subsequent
executions
This is similar to bug#6990, but since I could no longer
Taking that code and coupling the Zend Optimizer, PHP and Perl were
approximately the same speed (Perl was 8% faster, but that probably varies
across platforms).
W/o the optimizer PHP was 2 times slower, but again, that's only because
this is not a very real-world piece of code, at least for our
Hi,
this one goes out to you Coder!
My wishes for the next year are simple and easy to understand -
PLEASE DOCCUMENT YOUR CODE!
Ask yourself, for who you are coding. You give your sparetime to code
things for PHP, and i think you do this, because you will bring it on.
Do you
August Zajonc wrote:
These are not my tests but Doug's. He compiled default so --debug
and --inline-optimization not kicking in. Startup cost also counted,
but he tried to run long enough to amortize that.
By default, PHP is built without debugging. By the way, what happened
to the plan
pre
?php
preg_match_all('/\php:([^]]+)\/\/im',
'php:foo var1=value1 var2=value2 /',
$pi
);
print_r($pi);
?
/pre
prints
Array
(
[0] = Array
(
[0] =
)
Hi,
preg_match_all('/\php:([^]]+)\/\/im',
'php:foo var1=value1 var2=value2 /',
shouldn't this be
[^]+ instead of [^]]+
Kind Regards,
Daniel Lorch
--
if(empty($a) == true ? true : false)
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
preg_match_all('/\php:([^]]+)\/\/im',
'php:foo var1=value1 var2=value2 /',
shouldn't this be
[^]+ instead of [^]]+
Kind Regards,
Daniel Lorch
--
if(empty($a) == true ? true : false)
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ID: 12223
Updated by: venaas
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Analyzed
Bug Type: LDAP related
Operating System: any
PHP Version: 4.0.6
Old Assigned To:
Assigned To: venaas
New Comment:
There is now an experimental implementation. Please test it.
It currently requires you
ID: 14754
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: Dynamic loading
Operating System: Windows 2000 SP2 / Apache 1.3.22
PHP Version: 4.1.0
New Comment:
Another note. Users with Linux systems experiencing the same bug reported receiving
errors and
Sucks when you need to use a proprietary extension to a language to make
it benchmark well.
George
On Saturday, December 29, 2001, at 12:27 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Taking that code and coupling the Zend Optimizer, PHP and Perl were
approximately the same speed (Perl was 8% faster, but that
Interesting...
There are a couple of other tests that PHP does poorly on.
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/lang/php/ might be worth looking
at. --enable-inline-optimization only made a small difference for me.
Generally my results matched up pretty closely with Dougs for the few tests
I did
Another question, what CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS were used during the compliation of
the test programs for languages that allow compilation? As well as what
cflags were used to compile the intepreters for languages that do not compile
individual programs such as PHP AWK.
In my experience even
Hi,
$Id: nestedloop.php,v 1.1 2001/05/06 06:13:21 doug Exp $
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/
these benchmarks aren't significant, anyway. java code will run faster
on a native java CPU, so basically it's also architecture-dependant.
but nice work, nevertheless! really interesting to
Hi,
Sucks when you need to use a proprietary extension to a language to make
it benchmark well.
it would be nice to see PHP w and w/o ZEND competing against each
other.
but I don't think the raw cpu usage can be taken as a indicator for
judging a language. there are many other bottlenecks
Contribute to the PHP documentation. Documentate missing functions und translate
documentation into german.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: ALL
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: InterBase related
Bug description: 105.05$ becomes 105.5$ !!! - I found the fix.
Hello. I found a nasty bug in interbase extension, and I
have the solution here. You have only to put it in the
I want to help translating the Manual into german and/or documenting new extensions.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
but I don't think the raw cpu usage can be taken as a indicator for
judging a language. there are many other bottlenecks which play a much
more important role: database speed, file access latency (whatever you
need for storage).
just wanted to add something:
java is quite successful in
Brad House [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written an extension to php for the MCVE engine. It can be
loaded as a module or compiled into the code base, and would like to
have it distributed with PHP. I would need commit access in order to
maintain the module. The product, MCVE is a credit
Daniel Lorch wrote:
it would be nice to see PHP w and w/o ZEND competing against each
other.
Zend what?
I'd like to see it with/without ZendAccelerator.
absolutely *no* reasonable
programmer will ever use PHP to calculate prime numbers or fractals
(maybe with mathematical extensions, but
Hi,
it would be nice to see PHP w and w/o ZEND competing against each
other.
Zend what?
I'd like to see it with/without ZendAccelerator.
yes, that's what I meant :)
Perl and the like are used a lot in bio-informatics, and they are
scripting-languages.
Even in CPU-intensive areas, ease
Daniel Lorch wrote:
shouldn't this be
[^]+ instead of [^]]+
This yields the same result.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/
--
PHP Development Mailing
Daniel Lorch wrote:
just wanted to add something:
java is quite successful in commercial applications. not because it's
fast, but because you have an excellent ability for code reusage. you
can compile java beans into both applets and servlets. people are
ready to pay the loss of
- Original Message -
From: Sterling Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The point, if you'd really like to know is that PHP is *not*
optimized to do matrix operations (which is one of the examples), or
infinitely recursive loops (I'm not even addressing the code at this
point)
Mmmm :)
I suggest you check out php-gtk. People are writing mail clients in PHP (and
they are actually *suprisingly* good).
The strengths of PHP (and time spent learning it) in one area carry over to
others. We'll have to be wondering about misuse when a CS student writes an
operating system in
need for storage). absolutely *no* reasonable programmer will ever use
PHP to calculate prime numbers or fractals (maybe with mathematical
extensions, but not with raw PHP code).
Hey I have a little PHP-GTK app that does simple fractals... whats wrong
with that??? :P
- James
--
PHP
August Zajonc wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sterling Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The point, if you'd really like to know is that PHP is *not*
optimized to do matrix operations (which is one of the examples), or
infinitely recursive loops (I'm not even addressing
I have written an extension to php for the MCVE engine. It can be
loaded as a module or compiled into the code base, and would like to
have it distributed with PHP. I would need commit access in order to
maintain the module. The product, MCVE is a credit card processing
engine
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Linux (Debian 2.2)
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: Math related
Bug description: pow(0,[broken power]) gives wrong result
The pow() function returns incorrect results when raising zero to a broken
power.
pow(0,0.5) (the square
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Windows 2000
PHP version: 4.1.0
PHP Bug Type: Apache related
Bug description: Apache 1.3.22 can't load the PHP4Apache module
I installed PHP to the default Path and putted in the httpd.conf file
folowed code:
LoadModule
ID: 14757
Updated by: cmk
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Feedback
Bug Type: Apache related
Operating System: Windows 2000
PHP Version: 4.1.0
New Comment:
Have you copied your php4ts.dll to the %SystemRoot%\system32 directory?
Previous Comments:
At 09:06 PM 12/29/2001 +, Jim Winstead wrote:
Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
- Added extra parameter to count() that recursively counts elements in an
array and added is_array_multidimensional(). (patch by Vlad Bosinceanu
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
do we really want to
ID: 14747
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Suspended
Bug Type: Feature/Change Request
Old Operating System:
Operating System: Windows 2000 with mks-tools
Old PHP Version: 4.1.1
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
Sorry,
I just tried your suggestion under
I sent this out to the engine 2 mailing list yesterday. I didn't want to
receive too many bug reports at once so I decided to wait a day before I
send it to php-dev (although most of you are probably on that list too).
Please try and mess around with it.
An example script of features is
ID: 14757
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Feedback
Status: Closed
Bug Type: Apache related
Operating System: Windows 2000
PHP Version: 4.1.0
New Comment:
Yeah I have found the problem. I've fergotten to copy the zip-package.
thx for help.
PS: I
ID: 14757
Updated by: mfischer
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Closed
Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Apache related
Operating System: Windows 2000
PHP Version: 4.1.0
New Comment:
It's bogus anyway.
Previous Comments:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:13:11PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I agree with Jim. Arrays can contain things. Things can also be other
arrays. You can have an array which contains two other arrays and four
integers. I don't think we should add these functions because they are
wrong
At 10:42 PM 12/29/2001 +0100, Stig Venaas wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:13:11PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I agree with Jim. Arrays can contain things. Things can also be other
arrays. You can have an array which contains two other arrays and four
integers. I don't think we should add
From: Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no?
If we get no information there will be no documentation. I see the
faqt, that extension authors aren´t able or will not write correct
prototype folding hooks. Please read yourself
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:43:32PM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote :
From: Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no?
If we get no information there will be no documentation. I see the
faqt, that extension authors aren´t able or will not
August Zajonc continues with ...
I continue to see these stupid trivial benchmarks as useful.
The benchmark code is pre-alpha and incomplete as the author
states expressly. 'Useful' does not imply reliable, factual, or
scientific. In my view, what I've seen and read is neither useful,
nor
At 00:11 30/12/2001, August Zajonc wrote:
Does the Zend Cache or APC Cache do things I wasn't aware of? Did you run
these examples under these caches and see PHP start smoking? Sterling,
generally these products just cache the result of an intermediate
compilation step, they do not speed up the
Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and
ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the
function calls by Hartmut (thx!) but yet they aren't really
documented. Gread idea, no?
You should read my mail carefully before getting funny. What i wrote
Do not
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:42 PM 12/29/2001 +0100, Stig Venaas wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:13:11PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I agree with Jim. Arrays can contain things. Things can also be other
arrays. You can have an array which contains two other arrays and four
integers. I
Obviously, you shouldn't have taken this mail too seriously.
Did you!? ;-)
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:17:11PM +0100, Wolfgang Drews wrote :
Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and
ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the
function calls by
Mike,
I would suggest you look at the totally bogus mindcraft benchmarks of
linux/apache. Those were orders of magnitude more bogus than anything here,
yet ended up being useful.
Further, many posters seem to confuse a discussion of PHP's performance with
a dicusion of its quality as a language
- Original Message -
From: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you use caching software, chances are PHP will be faster than Perl even
without the optimizer.
Interestingly, Perl is getting bytecode caching soon, RFC 301 I think.
Probably about time.
And it does that without any hassle
At 04:07 30/12/2001, August Zajonc wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you use caching software, chances are PHP will be faster than Perl even
without the optimizer.
Interestingly, Perl is getting bytecode caching soon, RFC 301 I think.
Probably about
- Original Message -
From: Sterling Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manuel,
(I get all the trolls confused, one name makes it easier)
These trolls happen to use PHP on a daily basis, and have for years.
Always good to see the name calling start early :)
Thanks! I wasn't aware
- Original Message -
From: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That RFC is from over a year ago, what makes you think it's going to
happen
soon..? It still remains to be seen if they do it in a nice, clean
transparent way, or the Perl way :) Anyway, the other problems plaguing
Perl
Hello,
I thought that this thread was over. Anyway, I finally made time to ban
the functions that you broke from my site code. Since it gave me a lot
of work and I feel that others could also benefit of the workarounds
functions that I had to develop, I have just released a a class and some
From: Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obviously, you shouldn't have taken this mail too seriously.
Did you!? ;-)
We expect on serious postings only serious responses. The best thing
we can do is to do nothing.
-Egon
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
So? Anybody worth their salt as a programmer would consider the
Zend Optimizer if they needed to speed up their production website.
Not if they can't afford the (old) Zend Accelerator pricing and it
didn't
have a trial option and are using a free alternative which is
Zeev Suraski writes:
Well, I think that benchmarking PHP like that out of any context
is *bound* to result in many people getting the wrong ideas. So, a big
disclaimer
reading This may not necessarily have any real world meaning was due.
You betcha, wrong ideas
I was about to activate
I have to say that taking a look at his site again - he does have
disclaimers. Even though none is as strong as 'This may have nothing to do
with reality', it's not that bad...
At 01:49 30/12/2001, Mike Robinson wrote:
Zeev Suraski writes:
Well, I think that benchmarking PHP like that out
Just to be clear I'll list a few for the record. He's got them there to
avoid the flames and claims of unfair.
- All artificial language performance benchmarks, mine included, *do not
measure real-world performance*. One should not choose a language based only
on its benchmark ranking, even if
PostgreSQL has one real behavior problem. Updates act as if you do a
delete then an insert, i.e. for transactional isolation, an updated row
is added new, and the old one is marked as deleted. Sessions are all
about updates, and any really active server cluster will expose
PostgreSQL's worst
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Linux 2.4 (Mandrake 6.1)
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: *General Issues
Bug description: $HTTP_GET_VARS Improper NAME scrambling
? if (!sizeof($HTTP_GET_VARS) ) { ?
FORM ACTION=?=$PHP_SELF? METHOD=GET
INPUT TYPE=TEXT
ID: 14758
Updated by: mfischer
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Bogus
Bug Type: *General Issues
Operating System: Linux 2.4 (Mandrake 6.1)
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
Since spaces aren't allowed in variable names (obviously) they're converted to
underscores. Bo bug -
79 matches
Mail list logo
