fix sapi/servlet in php4.3 branch
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
on the last week's iSeminar Zeev said that in ZE2(php5) there will be new
interesting function
for implementing in userland. Its name will be __autoload(). It will be
called in case the code
wants to instantiate a class that is unknown. The function should
require/include the file where
the
At 08:26 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
A patch for naming it libphp5 or a patch that enables them to work
together in the same webserver? The latter is quite hard and 'cookie a
patch' for that will almost certainly not work.
Wouldn't --enable-versioning work just fine?
Zeev
--
PHP
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 08:26 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
A patch for naming it libphp5 or a patch that enables them to work
together in the same webserver? The latter is quite hard and 'cookie a
patch' for that will almost certainly not work.
Wouldn't
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:30:53 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It didn't even work fine with php3/php4 last time I tried it.
that works for the core and for ie, mysql, as far as I remember :).
Also, why would we need it for php4/php5?
If it s not too much work to make it
At 12:30 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 08:26 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
A patch for naming it libphp5 or a patch that enables them to work
together in the same webserver? The latter is quite hard and 'cookie a
patch' for that will almost
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 12:30 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
Also, why would we need it for php4/php5?
Because it'll probably not be 100.0% downwards compatible...
hmm, I think a nice thing to do is to make a list of those things then,
and how they can be solved.
At 12:40 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 12:30 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
Also, why would we need it for php4/php5?
Because it'll probably not be 100.0% downwards compatible...
hmm, I think a nice thing to do is to make a list of those
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 12:40 14/01/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
hmm, I think a nice thing to do is to make a list of those things then,
and how they can be solved. It's easier to start on that now then do
that at the end, when we already forgot about it.
Where's the
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:59:27 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't always have fun, but it has to do with responsibility to
users. :)
Oh ? really ? *sick* ;-)
pierre
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hi, I'm already a contributor to the PHP Manual Translation to Portuguese (BR). I'd
like to have my cvs handle changed from 'phaser' to 'anderson' if it's not taken yet,
for this would make things easier when I'm using my scripts. Thank you.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
Hi,
I've got some suggestions for zendengine2 (hopefully not too late).
What about an identificator for destrucotrs in a class like in c++?
I mean something like this :
?php
class Foo
{
function Foo
{
// Constructor
}
function ~Foo
{
// Destructor
}
}
Hey,
you're passing dangerous grounds with this email :), and most of these
points were brought up before.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Stephan Seidt wrote:
I've got some suggestions for zendengine2 (hopefully not too late).
What about an identificator for destrucotrs in a class like in c++?
I mean
Hmm forget the first one, i just finished ZEND_CHANGES file..
(and sorry for bad english sometimes)
Stephan Seidt wrote:
Hi,
I've got some suggestions for zendengine2 (hopefully not too late).
What about an identificator for destrucotrs in a class like in c++?
I mean something like this :
?php
Hm :( Ok, was a try ;)
Derick Rethans wrote:
Hey,
you're passing dangerous grounds with this email :), and most of these
points were brought up before.
Hehe how did I know that ;)
Then let's just stop this discussion now :(
Don't want to end in php 2003 summary as mail waster ;)
On Tue, 14
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Stephan Seidt wrote:
Hehe how did I know that ;)
Then let's just stop this discussion now :(
Don't want to end in php 2003 summary as mail waster ;)
hehe, don't be afraid :) Actually, I think it's a good idea to make a
summary of all those discussions so that we can
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote:
it's called compatibility Nicos. having libphp4.so, libphp5.so,
libphp6.so... and so on means that they can work together. Once
libphp5.so
gets building properly and we have moved onto that track completely, i
intend to build a latest stable of
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:46:45 -0500
Mike Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if it will be possible to build and use both PHP4
and PHP5 as apache modules on the same webserver, similar to the
way we could use both PHP3 and
hmm..
What about an always available discussion documentation on php.net ?
something like whatever.php.net ? or does it already exist,
just hiding somewhere in the deep of the nameserver of php.net ;)
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Stephan Seidt wrote:
Hehe how did I know that ;)
At 12:42 14-1-2003, you wrote:
You will need bison
... if you want to regenerate the PHP parsers ...
is what the configure *warning* message actually says. Which is when exactly?
(not yacc), just install the bison RPM from the
RedHat cd and it should work.
Not a bug - bogus
Previous
Joining the swedish translation of the PHP-docs
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
From: James Cox wrote:
Mike Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if it will be possible to build and use
both PHP4 and PHP5 as apache modules on the same webserver,
similar to the way we could use both PHP3 and PHP4.
[snip]
the patch for naming everything php5 and not php4
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Mike Robinson wrote:
I'm assuming PHP5 will use _only_ ZE2 once it's forked?
s/will/does/
s/once/now/
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 07:48, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote:
Hello,
What do you think about the idea of Martin that would use
libphp.so
and not libphp5.so ?
it's called compatibility Nicos. having libphp4.so, libphp5.so,
libphp6.so...
Il mar, 2003-01-07 alle 20:15, J Smith ha scritto:
You can still use constructors that have the same name as the class, at
least for the time being. Just tested it with 4.4.0-dev HEAD and ZE2. If
you have both a method with the same name as the class and a method called
__construct(), the
Il mar, 2003-01-07 alle 20:15, J Smith ha scritto:
You can still use constructors that have the same name as the class, at
least for the time being. Just tested it with 4.4.0-dev HEAD and ZE2. If
you have both a method with the same name as the class and a method called
__construct(), the
On 14 Jan 2003, michel 'ziobudda' morelli wrote:
Il mar, 2003-01-07 alle 20:15, J Smith ha scritto:
You can still use constructors that have the same name as the class, at
least for the time being. Just tested it with 4.4.0-dev HEAD and ZE2. If
you have both a method with the same
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Wouldn't --enable-versioning work just fine?
It didn't even work fine with php3/php4 last time I tried it.
I was under the impression it works well...
on some systems (Solaris ...) it will disable extension loading
as there it does not only hide symbols towards the
Actually, I think it's a good idea to make a
summary of all those discussions
What about an always available discussion documentation on php.net ?
Avi Lewin writes an excellent weekly column that summarizes discussions on
this list.
http://www.zend.com/zend/week/index.php
Leon
--
PHP
Hi,
I wonder which is the better way to store data into database?
1. stor the data after we call htmlspecialchars with the data (means we
store as quote; in database)
2. stor the data in non encoded form and call htmlspecialchars whenever we
want to display it.
Foong
--
PHP Development
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Leon Atkinson wrote:
Actually, I think it's a good idea to make a
summary of all those discussions
What about an always available discussion documentation on php.net ?
Avi Lewin writes an excellent weekly column that summarizes discussions on
this list.
Hello,
please forward user questions to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinglist, this list is for development _OF_ PHP, not development
_with_ PHP.
Derick
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Foong wrote:
Hi,
I wonder which is the better way to store data into database?
1. stor the data after we call
Hi,
as promised I've created a patch which adds some functionality to the
SNMP module. It's controlled with a new function named
snmp_set_valuemethod(int method) which changes the way how SNMP values
are returned by snmpget(), snmpwalk() and snmpwalkoid(). The following
(new) constants can
Hi,
based on an off-list response to my query of NSAPI SAPI module status
(Subject: [PHP-DEV] Status of NSAPI and Servlet SAPIs?, 2002-01-02) I am
willing to put up a server to provide an environment for further testing
and development of the NSAPI module.
Before I spend my CFT on setting up
I have recenlty posted on this topic but got no response, probably because
I didn't phrase it well.
I would like to implement this proposed feature if I can get some feedback
to know if it would be accepted for inclusion.
Here is the proposal:
* Add a '-M' option to sapi/cli/php that would
Check out this bug report:
http://bugs.php.net/16155
Ah thanks, that's where I remember the discussion from. I do disagree
with one part:
(c) It shouldn't be possible to prevent $_GET, $_POST,
$_COOKIE, and $_FILES from being populated.
Why in the world not? I explicitly need
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:48:04AM +0100, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:46:45 -0500
Mike Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya,
I'm wondering if it will be possible to build and use both PHP4
and PHP5 as apache modules on the same webserver, similar to the
way we
I don't intend to start a flame war concerning coding style here (I'm sure
you've had hundreds of them already). I was just curious as to why you guys
chose to separate words in functions/variables with an underscore. It's not
a coding standard you run into everyday. I'm not saying I don't like
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 09:06 PM, Rickard Andersson wrote:
I don't intend to start a flame war concerning coding style here (I'm
sure
you've had hundreds of them already). I was just curious as to why you
guys
chose to separate words in functions/variables with an underscore.
It's
39 matches
Mail list logo
