On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Guys,
Unless somebody strongly objects, I suggest we drop the discussion about
how horrible it would be to import libxml2 into our CVS. I believe it's
well established that it's a Bad Thing to do, there's no point hashing it.
yep :)
I believe the
At 12:45 PM 6/1/2002, Christian Stocker wrote:
I believe that bundling at the makedist level makes the most sense,
because:
(a) Synchronization is trivial
(b) We get to choose what libxml we use, so our libxml-dependent code
doesn't have to support the zillion different libxml's out
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 12:45 PM 6/1/2002, Christian Stocker wrote:
I believe that bundling at the makedist level makes the most sense,
because:
(a) Synchronization is trivial
(b) We get to choose what libxml we use, so our libxml-dependent code
doesn't have to
At 02:23 PM 6/1/2002, Christian Stocker wrote:
If not - I see no problem in always using the bundled library,
regardless of what's already installed - on the contrary, I see a fairly
big advantage.
I see really no advantage in this approach (more memory needed for
example, maybe symbol
Zeev:
I believe there's at least one company that effectively proved that the
opposite is true, there are probably many others. I don't see a problem in
having core technologies enabled by default. Purists can turn them off,
but there are a hell of a lot more average users than there are
Marko Karppinen wrote:
It seems to me that PHP is increasingly being modeled for a largely
imaginary audience of purists. I say imaginary because I just can't
see how droves of purists would've become involved with PHP in the
first place.
I don't want to see changes (like those you
At 05:05 PM 6/1/2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Marko Karppinen wrote:
It seems to me that PHP is increasingly being modeled for a largely
imaginary audience of purists. I say imaginary because I just can't
see how droves of purists would've become involved with PHP in the
first place.
Zeev Suraski wrote:
It may come to you as a surprise, but there are lots of advanced users
who don't enjoy downloading and building, and prefer to see stuff
working out of the box.
I was not adressing the issue this thread is about (bundling 3rd party
libraries), but rather
Marko
I am not sure if this is the right place to ask this naive question.
I got a simple form addform.html and add.php look like the following.
But everytime I got empty value from firstname and lastname. It seems like
the input value in the html page was not passed on to the php variable $firstname
I am not sure if this is the right place to ask this naive question.
I got a simple form addform.html and add.php look like the following.
But everytime I got empty value from firstname and lastname. It seems like
the input value in the html page was not passed on to the php variable $firstname
* Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
I don't want to see changes (like those you mention later in your
posting) in PHP to attract new users, but more to bind people that
already use PHP, but are about to outgrow it.
If you (and others) want PHP to stay at the BASIC for the Web level
This is not the right place to ask support questions. Ask them on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] See http://php.net/support for a complete
list of places where you can ask support.
Anyway, read http://www.php.net/release_4_2_0.php to see what you're
doing wrong (especially, read the part about External
Hello,
When did isset() allow for multiple arguments, was
it 4.1.0? The closed feature request is here:
http://bugs.php.net/12978
Neither NEWS or it mentions when this feature
was implemented.
Regards,
Philip Olson
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe,
The change was made in revision 1.7 of zend_language_parser.y.
The tags show that the change made it into PHP 4.0.6.
See http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/Zend/zend_language_parser.y for more.
Sander
On 2002.06.01 19:14 Philip Olson wrote:
Hello,
When did isset() allow for multiple arguments, was
How do I get a clients IP address displayed on my PHP page?
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
please to not ask this question on this list.
print($REMOTE_ADDR);
Regards,
Vergoz Michael
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:30 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Getting a remote IP address
How do I get a clients IP
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I believe there's at least one company that effectively proved that the
opposite is true, there are probably many others. I don't see a problem in
having core technologies enabled by default. Purists can turn them off,
but there are a hell of a lot
At 01.06.2002 21:44 +0200, Vergoz Michael wrote:
please to not ask this question on this list.
print($REMOTE_ADDR);
Bad idea, won't work with register_globals=off.
Instead do it this way:
echo $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
or
echo $HTTP_SERVER_VARS['REMOTE_ADDR'];
regards,
Hans Spath
--
PHP
Hi All,
I wanted to ask, how far it'll be away to have a stable
socket-extension. As far as I can remember, Jason said, he wanted it to
be ready for 4.3.0 . Is it still so or will there be mayor Api-Changes
(again ;) )? I wanted to translate the Socket part of the manual into
German and for me,
At 07:12 PM 6/1/2002, Björn Schotte wrote:
* Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
I don't want to see changes (like those you mention later in your
posting) in PHP to attract new users, but more to bind people that
already use PHP, but are about to outgrow it.
If you (and others) want PHP
exactly.
- Original Message -
From: Hans Spath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hugo Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Getting a remote IP address
At 01.06.2002 21:44 +0200, Vergoz Michael wrote:
please to not ask this
Why not have a --bare (or equivalent) switch of that kind, to disable
literally EVERYTHING that's not mandatory? I believe the issue is that for
every 'purist' that cares about bloat, it's safe to say there's more than
one user (*) that prefers stuff to 'just work', and not mess with
Hi list,
i would like to make a libnet (raw socket) interface for php.
any ideas/suggests ?
c.f: http://www.phrack.org/show.php?p=55a=6
regards
Vergoz Michael
The PHP project does not exist to create the perfect incarnation of a
computer language on the planet, for CS majors to drool over and utter
'Wow!' at. It exists as a quick, powerful platform for creating web
sites, in use by hundreds of thousands of people around the world. For
Hi!
I wrote a function that will spellcheck $var.
My problem is that if $var contain ' it will
report that it's wronly spelled like this:
Possible spelling for I\'ve : I've Ive...
Regards
Magnus Määttä
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
I agree with every word.
Zeev
At 12:25 AM 6/2/2002, Shane Caraveo wrote:
I think PHP can be both powerful and easy to use, and I think I have an
example of that in my own experience. I've got code I wrote on PHP 2
years ago, that has gone through a couple face lifts and modifications to
Hi,
The current API is the one targeted being marked stable in
4.3. If I would not be sure about it, I wouldn't have started
documenting the most important socket functions. IMHO it's
pretty save to translate the functions I've documented so
far (but I can't/won't speak
Hi,
The following functions are available within the sapi/apache
extension:
php_apache.c:PHP_FUNCTION(virtual);
php_apache.c:PHP_FUNCTION(apache_request_headers);
php_apache.c:PHP_FUNCTION(apache_response_headers);
php_apache.c:PHP_FUNCTION(apachelog);
With the latest cvs, if you turn on chargen (port 19 tcp) and run this:
?
$sock1 = socket_create (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if($sock1 0) die(socket_strerror($sock1));
$res1 = socket_connect($sock1, '127.0.0.1', 19);
if($res1 0) die(socket_strerror($sock1));
$sock2 =
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 07:12 PM 6/1/2002, Björn Schotte wrote:
The ease of PHP - one of its biggest advantages is also
one of its biggest disadvantages. IMHO.
Do you mind elaborating on that??
While I shouldn't speak for others, I can share my take on this.
PHP's ease
I only get [0], never [1]. Did about 40 tries.
latest CVS
./configure --enable-sockets
If you need more info, let me know.
Regards,
Philip Olson
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Andrei solved it. It is because socket_select() mangles the passed arrays
so when you re-enter the call with the mangled $read array you are now
only checking the sockets that happened to trigger the first time through.
It means you actually have to do:
$read = array($sock1,$sock2);
Zeev Suraski wrote:
The ease of PHP - one of its biggest advantages is also
one of its biggest disadvantages. IMHO.
Do you mind elaborating on that??
PHP has become as popular as it is today because it is easy to learn.
It is very attractive for HTML programmers who want to mix their
33 matches
Mail list logo
