> It HAS to be time for a big tidy up, as it is clearly impossible to 'do
the
> right thing' under current circumstances.
Problem is, what you see as "untidy" programmers with a background in other
languages and software packages see as "convenient". :-)
For every "newbie" it helps to have consi
Maybe I'm just a Luddite, but...
Does *any* browser actually compose URLs with ; yet?
If nobody's using the standard, why rush to implement?
--
Visit the Zend Store at http://www.zend.com/store/
Wanna help me out? Like Music? Buy a CD: http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
Volunteer a little time: htt
> The question is, if you think people will actually download the RC in
order
> to test it (as opposed to using it) - why won't they join the QA team?
Because they have enough time to make sure their software still works with
the RC, but not enough time to wade through all the QA emails. :-)
Mos
How exactly would you define success/failure of the RC?...
I mean, if it crashes, you can probably catch that, but what if the output
is just incorrect?
You're back to the problem of only a pre-determined (and very limited)
validation suite can really use this, I think...
Or am I just being obt
> On Thu, 03 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > Yeah but I'm afraid it'll make scripts be written on behavior which
> > shouldn't be counted on.
> > Maybe in future versions of Zend $array['foo'] won't be defined. There
are
> > certain situations where I think it was impossible to not define it so
> >I think PWS on 95/98 looks in the registry...
> Agreed - PWS on these platforms is fundamentally a cut down version of
IIS3.
> I suspect it is possible to have this on NTWS as well, but PWS4 which
comes
> with the NT option pack (same CD as IIS4) certainly looks in the
Metabase -
> though I don
PHP is in contention for an XML/RPC server/client system for the
configuration panel of IPCop (http://ipcop.org) a stand-alone
firewall project running on stock hardware with a stripped-down
RedHat Linux.
This project is a fork from the more infamous SmoothWall, without
the, ahem, project man
First, apologies for two (2!) queries in the past couple weeks from a
guy who barely can find time to lurk on a thread or two anymore...
Hope I haven't used up all my brownie points...
Second, I want to thank everybody for their help on the "PHP
Security" query -- While IPCop (http://ipcop.org
Any Wild Guesses about release dates for PHP 5 and/or Zend Engine 2???
A publisher is worried that the book will be hopelessly obsolete
before it hits the shelves, rather than the usual obsoleteness... :-^
Thanks in advance, and please cc me.
--
Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
My har
Hey there!
I'm hearing rumors that ZE2 release will happen Fall 2002 and that will make
it PHP 5.0, not 4.x...
Any comment, on or off record?...
A book publisher I'm working with kinda needs to know whether to change the
project requirements and release later, or push release "soon" and worry
a
> environment, and win32 mod_php4 happens to be rock solid (when
Is PHP ISAPI rock-solid now?...
That's not the general impression I've received: If it depends on which
other modules/technoligies you use, that needs to be documented pretty
heavily before one could really call it rock-solid. An
Relying on initialization by the system instead of doing it by hand is bad.
What if somebody then includes your file into something else, but has used
that variable, but their final value is usually 0, except when it's not...
Then, your code works for a while and then inexplicably breaks.
Alway
12 matches
Mail list logo
