Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

I just rolled back to the 4.0.5 version of DOM/XML but can't test it. Can you please check out the 4.0.6 branch (cvs update -r PHP_4_0_6 in the php4/Zend/TSRM directories) and let me know if the rollback worked? Thanks, Andi At 11:14 AM 5/24/2001 +, Christian Stocker wrote: >On 23 May 2001

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On Tue, 22 May 2001, David Shafer wrote: > Unless someone has changed something, the current snapshots now don't compile > at _all_ on AIX (using either IBM compilers or IBM-provided gcc). Whether > that's enough of > a problem to hold it up, I can't say. See bug #4630 for more info. Please

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On 23 May 2001 09:58:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote: >At 12:23 PM 5/23/2001 +0200, Christian Stocker wrote: >>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andi >>Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Guys, >> > >> > I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 1

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 12:23 PM 5/23/2001 +0200, Christian Stocker wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andi >Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 12 > > hours) as I mentioned a couple of days ago. I think we can also send it >

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On Tue, 22 May 2001, David Shafer wrote: > Unless someone has changed something, the current snapshots now don't compile > at _all_ on AIX (using either IBM compilers or IBM-provided gcc). Whether > that's enough of > a problem to hold it up, I can't say. See bug #4630 for more info. Snapsho

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 12 > hours) as I mentioned a couple of days ago. I think we can also send it > with a "good" explanation of what it is and what it isn't to >

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

--- From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:24 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2 > Guys, > > I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 12 > hours) as I mentioned a couple of days ago. &

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

Guys, I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 12 hours) as I mentioned a couple of days ago. I think we can also send it with a "good" explanation of what it is and what it isn't to php-general@ and get some more testing done and hopefully release 4.0.6 ASAP. Andi

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

[Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > At 07:05 PM 5/21/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > >Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Well it sounds like a bug in domxml to me. > > > > Damn. The first time I need this extension it turns out that it's > >broken :-/ > > > > > Maybe yesterday's patch unveiled t

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

> >>Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? > >> > > (http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) > > > > Getting make errors with CURL (which I never got before): > > upgrade to cURL 7.7.3 Thanks, Sterling ... that fixed the cURL problems. Well, it looks like my scripts all seem to work without any ch

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 03:53 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: >Andi Gutmans wrote: > >>At 03:43 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: >> >>>Colin Viebrock wrote: >>> >Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? (http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) Getting make errors with CURL (which I ne

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 03:43 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: > >> Colin Viebrock wrote: >> Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? >>> >>> (http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) >>> Getting make errors with CURL (which I never got before): >> >> >> >> upgrade to cURL 7.7.3 > >

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 03:43 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: >Colin Viebrock wrote: > >>>Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? >>(http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) >>Getting make errors with CURL (which I never got before): > > >upgrade to cURL 7.7.3 What about a configure msg? It's probably worth it

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

Colin Viebrock wrote: >>Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? >> > (http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) > > Getting make errors with CURL (which I never got before): > upgrade to cURL 7.7.3 -Sterling -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

> Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? (http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) Getting make errors with CURL (which I never got before): ... curl.c: In function `php_minit_curl': curl.c:175: `CURLOPT_FILETIME' undeclared (first use in this function) curl.c:175: (Each undeclared identifier is re

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On Mon, 21 May 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote: > > No, we'll revert it to 4.0.5 version, not 4.0.4. > > Is this the version that includes the "complete rewrite of the DOMXML > module"? > > Basically, which will work now: > $rootname = $XML_TREE->root->name; > or > $rootname = {$XML_TREE->chi

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Well as I don't use domxml nor did I know where the bugs were introduced I > couldn't know where it broke. I didn't know it broke in the "complete > rewrite of domxml module" version. I thought it broke much more recently. > With Colin saying that the l

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 03:13 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, Colin Viebrock wrote: > > > Do you know what to revert to? Apparently it didn't work in 4.0.5 >either. > > > > Huh? Revision 1.29 says "complete rewrite of domxml module", and 1.28 is > > where 4.0.5 was branched so that's what you'd revert back to. > >I'm sorry but I'

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On Mon, 21 May 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote: > I'm sorry but I'll be a wee bit annoyed if all the code I rewrote for the > 4.0.5 "version" of the DOMXML functions needs to be rewritten to go back to > the 4.0.4 version. :( > > FWIW, I've been using the 4.0.5 and CVS version flawlessly" no core dum

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 01:42 PM 5/21/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: >On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > Do you know what to revert to? Apparently it didn't work in 4.0.5 either. > >Huh? Revision 1.29 says "complete rewrite of domxml module", and 1.28 is >where 4.0.5 was branched so that's what you'd rev

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

> No, we'll revert it to 4.0.5 version, not 4.0.4. Is this the version that includes the "complete rewrite of the DOMXML module"? Basically, which will work now: $rootname = $XML_TREE->root->name; or $rootname = {$XML_TREE->children[1]}->tagname; ? Please say the second one. - Colin

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

> > Do you know what to revert to? Apparently it didn't work in 4.0.5 either. > > Huh? Revision 1.29 says "complete rewrite of domxml module", and 1.28 is > where 4.0.5 was branched so that's what you'd revert back to. I'm sorry but I'll be a wee bit annoyed if all the code I rewrote for the 4.0.

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Do you know what to revert to? Apparently it didn't work in 4.0.5 either. Huh? Revision 1.29 says "complete rewrite of domxml module", and 1.28 is where 4.0.5 was branched so that's what you'd revert back to. -Andrei "Computers are useless. They can o

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 01:37 PM 5/21/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: >On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > Well php-dev, wake up! :) What do we do with this one? I don't think 4.0.6 > > should linger forever because of it. > >My vote is to revert the changes made to it. Do you know what to revert to? Appa

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Well php-dev, wake up! :) What do we do with this one? I don't think 4.0.6 > should linger forever because of it. My vote is to revert the changes made to it. -Andrei * "UNIX, isn't that some archaic form of DOS?" - our job applicant * -- PHP Develop

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 07:56 PM 5/21/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >Andi Gutmans wrote: > > a) the SAP extension. I want to nuke it from the CVS repository > > completely and have Uwe return it when he has time to continue the > > work. > > s/Uwe/Hartmut Yep. > > b) Has DOM XML been reverted to the 4.0.5

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

Andi Gutmans wrote: > a) the SAP extension. I want to nuke it from the CVS repository > completely and have Uwe return it when he has time to continue the > work. s/Uwe/Hartmut > b) Has DOM XML been reverted to the 4.0.5 version? Apparently it's > pretty broken. Dunno. -- sebastian be

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

At 07:05 PM 5/21/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >Andi Gutmans wrote: > > Well it sounds like a bug in domxml to me. > > Damn. The first time I need this extension it turns out that it's >broken :-/ > > > Maybe yesterday's patch unveiled this bug because there is no reason > > I can think