RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-11 Thread Sam Liddicott
> -Original Message- > From: Cynic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 05:40 > To: Sam Liddicott; Zeev Suraski > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled > > Although, actually, I > gues

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Shane Caraveo
> > > > While I think PHP ISAPI is important, perhaps even critical, I > > don't want a > > billion Windows users to download it because we said it was solid and find > > out differently for the technology they need to use it with. > > They'll never > > come back. > > I wouldnt say rock solid bu

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread James Moore
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 January 2001 20:51 > To: Zeev Suraski; Cynic > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled > > > > environment, and win

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Richard Lynch
> environment, and win32 mod_php4 happens to be rock solid (when Is PHP ISAPI rock-solid now?... That's not the general impression I've received: If it depends on which other modules/technoligies you use, that needs to be documented pretty heavily before one could really call it rock-solid. An

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Daniel Beulshausen
At 20:38 10.01.2001 +0100, Cynic wrote: >Is it? Where? for 4.0.4, www.php.net/downloads.php lists only >source code and two win32 binaries: > >* 3.79 Mb CGI binary and ISAPI module included, MySQL support > built-in, many extensions included, packaged as zip >* 732 Kb CGI only, MySQL support bui

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Cynic
At 20:20 10.1. 2001, Daniel Beulshausen wrote the following: -- >At 15:19 10.01.2001 +0100, Cynic wrote: >>Anyway, it really seems like win32 mod_php4 has the lowest >>priority of these, I think it would be otherwise available >>from www

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Daniel Beulshausen
At 15:19 10.01.2001 +0100, Cynic wrote: >Anyway, it really seems like win32 mod_php4 has the lowest >priority of these, I think it would be otherwise available >from www.php.net next to the ISAPI binaries... (I'm aware of >php4win.de.) it's available in the php.net releases as well. >I think win

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Cynic
At 18:39 10.1. 2001, Cynic wrote the following: -- >I at least point out build failures >when I encounter them. But it's quite frustrating to see a report (which, as >it turned out, required one #ifdef to solve) unnoticed for - how lon

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Cynic
At 18:39 10.1. 2001, Cynic wrote the following: -- >I at least point out build failures >when I encounter them. But it's quite frustrating to see a report (which, as >it turned out, required one #ifdef to solve) unnoticed for - how lon

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Cynic
;t have access to. >I think just just an unforunate thing, once more developers value windows it >will solve itself. I'm trying to help make it happen. >Sam > >> -Original Message- >> From: Cynic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, Januar

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Sam Liddicott
> -Original Message- > From: Cynic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 02:19 > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled > > > Ok. I don't wanna be anyone's PITA, b

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Cynic
Ok. I don't wanna be anyone's PITA, but is there something like a list of priorities when it comes to this kind of stuff? something like this: 1) CGI on Linux must build no matter what 2) mod_php4 on Linux must build no matter what 3) CGI on other Unices should build ... x) win32 CGI should buil

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Zeev Suraski
I don't think it's crucial for 4.0.4pl1... Zeev At 15:46 10/1/2001, Cynic wrote: >4.0.4pl1 RC2 doesn't build as win32 mod_php4, so probably >the patch I bugged you in should be there as well? > >Linking... >Creating library ..\..\Release_TS_inline/php4apache.lib and object > ..\..\Release_T

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Cynic
4.0.4pl1 RC2 doesn't build as win32 mod_php4, so probably the patch I bugged you in should be there as well? Linking... Creating library ..\..\Release_TS_inline/php4apache.lib and object ..\..\Release_TS_inline/php4apache.exp mod_php4.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _zend_in

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Phil Driscoll
>The lists are fine. Sorry - there must be some hiccup between the lists and Demon in the UK then. I'm sure the messages will come flooding through soon. Cheers -- Phil Driscoll Dial Solutions +44 (0)113 294 5112 http://www.dialsolutions.com http://www.dtonline.org -- PHP Development Mailing

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Zak Greant
The lists seem to be up. I am just working a messed up schedule right now - I will grab the RC and build it shortly. --zak Phil Driscoll wrote: > Built on NT4 SP6. Tested with all my php stuff plus phorum + phpmyadmin on > IIS4 and Apache 1.3.12. > NB not tested anything to do with PDF! > > No

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
> Given the lack of emails in the last couple of hours, I suspect that the > lists are down. I suggest delaying a release until we are sure they are back > up and we can all communicate! The lists are fine. -Rasmus -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

2001-01-10 Thread Phil Driscoll
Built on NT4 SP6. Tested with all my php stuff plus phorum + phpmyadmin on IIS4 and Apache 1.3.12. NB not tested anything to do with PDF! No functional problems found, but the version number still reports itself as 4.0.4pl1RC1 Given the lack of emails in the last couple of hours, I suspect that