php-general Digest 31 Dec 2008 15:52:25 - Issue 5875
Topics (messages 285265 through 285285):
Re: Webhotel structure
285265 by: Dotan Cohen
285269 by: Peter Sorensen
285271 by: paragasu
285272 by: Dotan Cohen
285277 by: tedd
Re: PHP telnet server
php-general Digest 1 Jan 2009 04:07:37 - Issue 5876
Topics (messages 285286 through 285324):
Re: IE Problem Detecting Post Variables
285286 by: Phpster
285294 by: ceo.l-i-e.com
285316 by: L. Herbert
285317 by: L. Herbert
285318 by: Micah Gersten
Luke Slater wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to rewrite an old MUD in PHP; the reasons for this are that
the original is written in C and most files in the codebase run over
2000 lines with at least 20 of them, which makes it very hard to
change anything.
Plus, the web interface is also
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
I often thought PHP would be a nice language for a MUD, if one could
get the performance out of it...
Design your code such that you can just throw more hardware at it
whenever you need more performance.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
PHP General Mailing List
Hi,
...
You should also take into account how crucial your data is. If it's
nuclear launch codes I would say that you can't get enough security.
Howver if it's an admin system for Bobs local grocery store, then as
Phpster suggested, a salted hash may well be enough. For example,
you could use
Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:880dece00812301337m1cca395cxcb1ef500d8c10...@mail.gmail.com...
2008/12/30 Nordstjernealle 10 nordstjerneall...@gmail.com:
Hi Dotan
I am glad I can at least be funny.
I must admit I am a bit lazy when it comes to write perfect english in
[snip = Daniel Brown]
And as a side note (some of you already know): for my wife and I
closing out the year, we heard the heartbeat of our first child for
the first time today in the ultrasound. Nothing else will ever again
matter as much to me as what I am about to embark upon. I don't
uh.. nice flash website grandpa =)
On 12/31/08, Peter Sorensen nordstjerneall...@gmail.com wrote:
Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:880dece00812301337m1cca395cxcb1ef500d8c10...@mail.gmail.com...
2008/12/30 Nordstjernealle 10 nordstjerneall...@gmail.com:
Hi Dotan
I am
2008/12/31 Peter Sorensen nordstjerneall...@gmail.com:
Hi again
Sorry for cutting your name card short Dotan, but I get tired reading the
entire alfabet every time.
I put that there to catch badly-encoded messages so that I can improve
http://gibberish.co.il
So long as your mail client
And as a side note (some of you already know): for my wife and I
closing out the year, we heard the heartbeat of our first child for
the first time today in the ultrasound. Nothing else will ever again
matter as much to me as what I am about to embark upon. I don't think
any song or
2008/12/30 Bastien Koert phps...@gmail.com:
Congrats on the new critter to be...they are a lot of fun after the first
year of eating sleeping and pooping ;-)
Sleeping? Why don't mine do that? I am of the opinion that the first
year they are little more than a crying digestive system :)
To the
[top-posting]
Congratulations guys, take good care of those new little persons!
This has been a great year, probably the best year for me.
Learnt a lot with you here and I hope I helped giving something back
to the community.
Keep up the good work, it's been great!
I wish I'll get married
Hi,
That's true.
It provides a message digest of 128 bits. It's strong collision resistance is
2^64. So finding a collision is hard even though it is proved less secure than
SHA-384 and SHA-512.
A rule of thumb in technology is utilizing what is needed. If MD5 is
sufficient, utilizing more
At 9:47 AM +0200 12/31/08, Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/12/31 tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com:
Everythink about getin' a job?
There's that word again! You keep using that word. I do not think that
it means what you think it means.
--
Dotan Cohen
Dotan:
And perhaps nether of us understand what
On Dec 30, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
To hell with being on-topic, since this list is generally never
on-topic for an entire thread anyway.
This has been a roller-coaster year for some of us --- certainly
myself included --- but the year has come to a close. I want to take
On Dec 31, 2008, at 5:36 AM, Richard Heyes wrote:
Hi,
...
You should also take into account how crucial your data is. If it's
nuclear launch codes I would say that you can't get enough security.
Howver if it's an admin system for Bobs local grocery store, then as
Phpster suggested, a
Well, the idea would be to allow the person downloading and implementing the
application to choose their own salt value. That way, in theory, each
implementation of the application will be salting the hash algorithm with a
different value.
I guess, if you really wanted to get tricky, you could
In reading the license I believe it refers to the gnupg itself, not
the application it may be embedded in. You are completely free to use
gnupg as you choose including modifying it to meet your needs.
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Dec 30, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Edward Diener
Hello all,
Anyone have insight to share on the following issue:
I have a simple theme switcher script that functions as expected in
FF, Safari, etc. but does not work in IE 6 or 7. It appears that the
posted form variables are not detected in IE. I am using the
following check within
Hi,
Correst me if I'm wrong... but assuming that your salt string is hard coded
into the program, with a MD5 a password + salt is no more secure then a
simple password?
Well if you store the hash by itself, if an attacker gets hold of your
hashes they could be brute forced. However with the
?
$credithold = 100;
for($i=1;$i=1000;$i++){
$credithold -= 0.1;
echo $creditholdbr /;
}
//i don't know why, when run this code, on 91.3 after expect is 91.2,
however..91.2001
//who can help me ? and tell me why ?
//Thank You.
?
--
PHP General Mailing List
LKSunny wrote:
?
$credithold = 100;
for($i=1;$i=1000;$i++){
$credithold -= 0.1;
echo $creditholdbr /;
}
//i don't know why, when run this code, on 91.3 after expect is 91.2,
however..91.2001
//who can help me ? and tell me why ?
It's a floating point rounding error. If you
Try checking to see if the value was passed with var_dump($_REQUEST)
Also try (!empty($_REQUEST['style']))
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Dec 31, 2008, at 10:24 AM, L. Herbert lherb...@iluvmydesign.com
wrote:
Hello all,
Anyone have insight to share on the following issue:
I have a
For a bank? No, MD5 would not be acceptable.
For you gramma's blog? Sure, MD5 for passwords is fine.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
2008/12/31 tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com:
At 9:47 AM +0200 12/31/08, Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/12/31 tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com:
Everythink about getin' a job?
There's that word again! You keep using that word. I do not think that
it means what you think it means.
--
Dotan Cohen
i need accuracy, how to ?
Thank You.
Per Jessen p...@computer.org ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó·s»D:gjg4fk$58...@saturn.local.net...
LKSunny wrote:
?
$credithold = 100;
for($i=1;$i=1000;$i++){
$credithold -= 0.1;
echo $creditholdbr /;
}
//i don't know why, when run this code, on 91.3 after expect is 91.2,
As I understand it:
You can LINK your commercial binary with GPL binaries, and keep closed source.
You cannot co-mingle the two C source codes together and keep it closed.
I am fairly certain you can find commercial C++ offerings to generate PGP key
pairs, instead of using the GnuPG OSS
I often thought PHP would be a nice language for a MUD, if one could
get the performance out of it...
Design your code such that you can just throw more hardware at it
whenever you need more performance.
That's easily said, but a MUD means all the users have to share a significant
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.number-format.php
Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
http://www.onshore.com
LKSunny wrote:
i need accuracy, how to ?
Thank You.
Per Jessen p...@computer.org
¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó·s»D:gjg4fk$58...@saturn.local.net...
LKSunny wrote:
If it's money, store everything in pennies INTEGER, and format as dollars on
output.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Whatever is SENDING the request data is broken, almost for sure.
PHP doesn't *do* much to the HTTP Request data except urldecode it for you.
There's not much that can go wrong there.
If your theme switcher, presumably in JS, isn't sending the data properly,
there's not much PHP can do
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
I often thought PHP would be a nice language for a MUD, if one could
get the performance out of it...
Design your code such that you can just throw more hardware at it
whenever you need more performance.
That's easily said, but a MUD means all the users have to
Ok.. so I know about CVS and SVN and unfortunately haven't had as much
experience with them as I'd like. I've used them, but always in a really
basic sense and always on systems that have already been set up. A friend
recently mentioned GIT ( http://git.or.cz/ ) too.
But here's my
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 16:19 +, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
I often thought PHP would be a nice language for a MUD, if one could
get the performance out of it...
Design your code such that you can just throw more hardware at it
whenever you need more performance.
That's easily said, but
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 17:35 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
I often thought PHP would be a nice language for a MUD, if one could
get the performance out of it...
Design your code such that you can just throw more hardware at it
whenever you need more performance.
TG wrote:
Ok.. so I know about CVS and SVN and unfortunately haven't had as much
experience with them as I'd like. I've used them, but always in a really
basic sense and always on systems that have already been set up. A friend
recently mentioned GIT ( http://git.or.cz/ ) too.
But here's
What I'd ideally like to do is be able to use a CVS type system to keep
incremental backups of the code.
Space is so cheap these days I don't think is particularly useful to
do incremental backups unless you have a hell of a lot of data. I
simply do full backups daily. Now...
So instead of
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:15, LKSunny a...@pc86.com wrote:
i need accuracy, how to ?
No you don't. Not the level of accuracy Per was mentioning. His
suggestion to round() is what you need. Just adjust the [optional]
second parameter to the number of decimal places you wish to round:
We have code like this:
try
{
$details = $this-__client-getData($email); //Line 274
}
catch (SoapFault $sf)
{
//do stuff
}
catch (Exception $e)
{
//do more general stuff
}
SoapFault: No data found in C:\classes\Client.php on line 274
Hello?
What is the point of all
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:41 PM, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
We have code like this:
try
{
$details = $this-__client-getData($email); //Line 274
}
catch (SoapFault $sf)
{
//do stuff
}
catch (Exception $e)
{
//do more general stuff
}
SoapFault: No data found in C:\classes\Client.php
I'm afraid I wasn't clear enough.
I thought the catch block was not actually 'catching' anything, since I'm
seeing an error message with the line of code that is causing the Fault.
Turns out, XDebug is kindly splatting out the exception even though it's being
caught.
Which I'm sure it
On Dec 31, 2008, at 2:12 PM, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
Sorry for the noise. Now that I know what is happening, I'm feeling
silly for asking.
For me, hitting the the Send button often suddenly opens my eyes.
Too bad there is no un-Send button.
Ken
--
PHP General Mailing List
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:12 PM, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
I'm afraid I wasn't clear enough.
I thought the catch block was not actually 'catching' anything, since I'm
seeing an error message with the line of code that is causing the Fault.
oic. yeah xdebug will do things like that, you may
Short: Is it possible to see the PHP code that is going to be
processed in whole?
Long: I love to see things visually, and while programming i create
all kinds of debugging variables i keep on the side for each
page/request.
I know this is possibly not possible since this has to be done from
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 20:41 +, Ólafur Waage wrote:
Short: Is it possible to see the PHP code that is going to be
processed in whole?
Long: I love to see things visually, and while programming i create
all kinds of debugging variables i keep on the side for each
page/request.
I know
Here's a weird thing. I have a new Redhat machine, with PHP 5.2.6 and
IM 6.4.8. The following works beautifully on the command line:
convert original.pdf new.jpg
But from PHP, it only works beautifully if I specify complete
pathnames for convert, the original file, and the new file (that's
My typo skipping the '/html/' in the pathname, the paths are correct
in my actual code.
On Dec 31, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Brian Dunning wrote:
/var/www/html/original.pdf /var/www/html/new.jpg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
But from PHP, it only works beautifully if I specify complete pathnames for
convert
/usr/local/imagemagick/ is not in apache's $PATH, so you need to
specify the full location.
As soon as I try to convert a PDF
image, it fails:
?php
$command_line = /usr/local/imagemagick/bin/convert
Interesting. When I try this, $return_output gives an empty array, and
$return_code gives 1.
On Dec 31, 2008, at 3:38 PM, chris smith wrote:
Try using exec() so you get the whole return message, might be
something useful in there.
exec($command_line, $return_output, $return_code);
--
OMG. I had not set the permissions properly on the destination
directory. It works now.
Sorry for wasting the list's time, and thanks to Chris for your help.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I use Apple Mail, and subscribe to many lists but PHP-General is the
only one I have this problem with. People tell me that my replies are
not properly threaded to the original post. When I hit Reply or Reply
All in Mail, it wants to reply directly to the poster, and only CC's
the list. So
Phpster wrote:
In reading the license I believe it refers to the gnupg itself, not the
application it may be embedded in. You are completely free to use gnupg
as you choose including modifying it to meet your needs.
I always thought the GNU public license demanded that any non-free
modules,
Bastien,
Thanks for your response. The curious thing is that the value is
passed when using FF, but not passed when using IE.
Here is the relevant form html:
div id=switch-theme
form action= method=post
I agree with your supposition. The problem is that the variable is
passed in one instance with FF and not with IE. Thus my quandary.
Here's the form html:
div id=switch-theme
form action= method=post
labelFlip It!/label
input name=style type=image
L. Herbert wrote:
The problem is that the variable is passed in one instance with FF and
not with IE. Thus my quandary.
Here's the form html:
div id=switch-theme
form action= method=post
labelFlip It!/label
input name=style type=image
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Micah Gersten mi...@onshore.com
mailto:mi...@onshore.com wrote:
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
good point dan, and just to add further clarification, thats b/c the
function specifies $return_var is passed by reference in the formal
Richard Heyes wrote:
The other issue is that I run Windows. So if there's something nice and
WinGUI, that'd be nice. Please no you should be running linux
You should be running linux. Muhaha.
responses. I don't have anything against Linux or Mac, they're great
systems. But I
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Micah Gersten mi...@onshore.com wrote:
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Micah Gersten mi...@onshore.com
mailto:mi...@onshore.com wrote:
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
good point dan, and just to add further clarification, thats b/c
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:40 AM, TG tg-...@gryffyndevelopment.com wrote:
Ok.. so I know about CVS and SVN and unfortunately haven't had as much
experience with them as I'd like. I've used them, but always in a really
basic sense and always on systems that have already been set up. A friend
Each input is a submit button.
On Dec 31, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Micah Gersten wrote:
L. Herbert wrote:
The problem is that the variable is passed in one instance with FF
and
not with IE. Thus my quandary.
Here's the form html:
div id=switch-theme
form action= method=post
labelFlip
L. Herbert a écrit :
Each input is a submit button.
MSIE pushes input_name.x and input_name.y to the server, when the
input is an image.
--
Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis
http://lupusmic.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
L. Herbert wrote:
I agree with your supposition. The problem is that the variable is
passed in one instance with FF and not with IE. Thus my quandary.
Here's the form html:
div id=switch-theme
form action= method=post
labelFlip It!/label
input name=style type=image
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 21:29, Nathan Nobbe quickshif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Micah Gersten mi...@onshore.com wrote:
I think I was confused here about your response. After re-reading a few
times, I see that you were enhancing Dan's response by explaining what
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 21:29, Nathan Nobbe quickshif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Micah Gersten mi...@onshore.com wrote:
I think I was confused here about your response. After re-reading a few
times, I see that you were enhancing Dan's response by
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 01:57, Jim Lucas li...@cmsws.com wrote:
Getting in some practice for new little one? :)
Damn kids ;-P
Happy New Year to all, and to all a safe night!
To you as well, Mr. Lucas! And now that I am done with work (for
the most part), this is my official
I'm a bit stuck.. I'm using the PEAR http_Request to send files and data as
HTTP POST, which is working fine if I in fact have the files on disk on the
server. Just using the method addFile..
But what if the file data is only in a variable? It feels like overkill to
first save to disk, and then
66 matches
Mail list logo
