Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-28 Thread Richard Quadling
2009/4/27 9el le...@phpxperts.net: Thanks for the clarification, Mike. In my ignorance, I was under the impression that the right side of the equation was only for the use of the left part. How stupid of me. So what I should have been doing was $Count1 = $Count + 1; right? $Count1 =

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-28 Thread 9el
Thats why I used a (?) after exactly. PJ didn't have a need for the value. ;)

RE: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-28 Thread Ford, Mike
On 27 April 2009 14:21, PJ advised: Ford, Mike wrote: On 26 April 2009 22:59, PJ advised: kranthi wrote: if $Count1 is never referenced after this, then certainly this assignment operation is redundent. but assignment is not the ONLY operation of this statement. if u hav not noticed a

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-28 Thread PJ
Ford, Mike wrote: On 27 April 2009 14:21, PJ advised: Ford, Mike wrote: On 26 April 2009 22:59, PJ advised: kranthi wrote: if $Count1 is never referenced after this, then certainly this assignment operation is redundent. but assignment is not the ONLY

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-28 Thread 9el
$Count = $Count + 1; is *exactly(?)* same as $Count++; Â or ++$Count But not exactly same. Â PostFix notation adds the value after assigning . PreFix notation adds the value right away. But optimized programming argues about how machine is coded nowadays. Thanks Mike for clarifying this

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-28 Thread PJ
Richard Quadling wrote: 2009/4/27 9el le...@phpxperts.net: Thanks for the clarification, Mike. In my ignorance, I was under the impression that the right side of the equation was only for the use of the left part. How stupid of me. So what I should have been doing was $Count1 = $Count +

RE: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-27 Thread Ford, Mike
On 26 April 2009 22:59, PJ advised: kranthi wrote: if $Count1 is never referenced after this, then certainly this assignment operation is redundent. but assignment is not the ONLY operation of this statement. if u hav not noticed a post increment operator has been used which will affect the

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-27 Thread PJ
Ford, Mike wrote: On 26 April 2009 22:59, PJ advised: kranthi wrote: if $Count1 is never referenced after this, then certainly this assignment operation is redundent. but assignment is not the ONLY operation of this statement. if u hav not noticed a post increment operator has

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-27 Thread 9el
Thanks for the clarification, Mike. In my ignorance, I was under the impression that the right side of the equation was only for the use of the left part. How stupid of me. So what I should have been doing was $Count1 = $Count + 1; right? $Count = $Count + 1; is exactly(?) same as $Count++;

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-26 Thread 9el
I have pagination set up and the number for pages next has a link but the next does not. I have experimented with all sorts of configurations of the code but the only thing that works (and this is totally off the wall) is to do this *$Count* = *mysql_num_rows($results);* $Count1=*$Count++;* //

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-26 Thread Phpster
What parameters are you pasing in the link? That will be the telling point of what you are doing wrong. You could pass the search params ( though these are best kept in a session or cookie ) and the offset counter to get the next block of results. Sorry for top posting. Bastien Sent from

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-26 Thread PJ
9el wrote: I have pagination set up and the number for pages next has a link but the next does not. I have experimented with all sorts of configurations of the code but the only thing that works (and this is totally off the wall) is to do this *$Count* = *mysql_num_rows($results);*

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour SOLVED

2009-04-26 Thread PJ
kranthi wrote: if $Count1 is never referenced after this, then certainly this assignment operation is redundent. but assignment is not the ONLY operation of this statement. if u hav not noticed a post increment operator has been used which will affect the value of $Count as well, and this

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-26 Thread PJ
Look for Pagination with PHP + MySQL and watchit http://www.google.com/url?sa=tsource=webct=rescd=10url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bestechvideos.com%2F2008%2F07%2F02%2Fsampsonvideos-php-pagination-part-2ei=ohn0SdnlL8KLkAWQrNTbCgusg=AFQjCNEGKOIG3791BpgeVqCiiq5-cikbRA Dont miss this SampsonVideos .

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-26 Thread PJ
Phpster wrote: What parameters are you pasing in the link? That will be the telling point of what you are doing wrong. You could pass the search params ( though these are best kept in a session or cookie ) and the offset counter to get the next block of results. Actually, I am trying to use

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-25 Thread PJ
Oh, the code works ok. Without the $Count1 = $Count++; it does not work. If you are saying it should be $Count+; it does not matter. That's what's weird. I think it would work no matter what I put in it could be $Count1 = $Countmeoutandcrap; and I think it would still work. The similar behaviour

Re: RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-25 Thread kranthi
if $Count1 is never referenced after this, then certainly this assignment operation is redundent. but assignment is not the ONLY operation of this statement. if u hav not noticed a post increment operator has been used which will affect the value of $Count as well, and this operation is required

RES: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour

2009-04-24 Thread Jônatas Zechim
Is the $Count++.. -Mensagem original- De: PJ [mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 24 de abril de 2009 21:14 Para: php-general@lists.php.net Assunto: [PHP] inexplicable behaviour Frankly, I don't know what to look for or why something so weird would happen: I have