php-general Digest 3 Apr 2012 06:13:26 -0000 Issue 7758

2012-04-03 Thread php-general-digest-help
php-general Digest 3 Apr 2012 06:13:26 - Issue 7758 Topics (messages 317428 through 317435): Re: Thinking out loud - a continuation... 317428 by: Jay Blanchard 317429 by: Matijn Woudt 317430 by: Robert Cummings Re: Could apc_fetch return a pointer to data in shared

php-general Digest 3 Apr 2012 19:16:36 -0000 Issue 7759

2012-04-03 Thread php-general-digest-help
php-general Digest 3 Apr 2012 19:16:36 - Issue 7759 Topics (messages 317436 through 317437): Re: learning resources for PHP 317436 by: Daniel Brown Re: Node.PHP 317437 by: Joseph Moniz Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:

Re: [PHP] Could apc_fetch return a pointer to data in shared memory ?

2012-04-03 Thread Simon
On 2 April 2012 22:25, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote: On 2 Apr 2012, at 15:37, Simon wrote: On 2 April 2012 14:27, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote: On 2 Apr 2012, at 14:12, Simon wrote: Thanks Maciek On 2 April 2012 10:37, Maciek Sokolewicz maciek.sokolew...@gmail.com

[PHP] Re: learning resources for PHP

2012-04-03 Thread Daniel Brown
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 23:53, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list,  I am quite sure that you've heard this question at least a few times before. :) But I have been dabbling a bit in PHP for years and I've decided that its' high time that became serious about getting a solid

Re: [PHP] Node.PHP

2012-04-03 Thread Joseph Moniz
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:56 PM, German Geek geek...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe stupid question, but is node.php really necessary? If you can program PHP and it performs better than node.js, why would you need to have another wrapper around things. Why not just program normal PHP? This is normal

Re: [PHP] Node.PHP

2012-04-03 Thread Joseph Moniz
*bad link in last post http://luvit.io/ -Joseph Moniz On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Joseph Moniz joseph.mo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:56 PM, German Geek geek...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe stupid question, but is node.php really necessary? If you can program PHP and it

[PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Tedd Sperling
Hi gang: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with ? or not? After years of never having a problem with ending any of my scripts with ?, I found that several students in my class had scripts that did not produce the desired result even after they were given the scripts

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Stuart Dallas
On 3 Apr 2012, at 22:29, Tedd Sperling wrote: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with ? or not? After years of never having a problem with ending any of my scripts with ?, I found that several students in my class had scripts that did not produce the desired

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Mari Masuda
On Apr 3, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote: Hi gang: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with ? or not? After years of never having a problem with ending any of my scripts with ?, I found that several students in my class had scripts that did not produce

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Robert Cummings
On 12-04-03 05:29 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote: Hi gang: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with ? or not? After years of never having a problem with ending any of my scripts with ?, I found that several students in my class had scripts that did not produce the desired

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Joshua Kehn
I leave them off of any non-view PHP file. It doesn't have any downsides, and leaving them in can cause problems. Just like short tags! Regards, –Josh Joshua Kehn | @joshkehn http://joshuakehn.com On Apr 3, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote: Hi

[PHP] Re: To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Ross McKay
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:33 -0400, Tedd Sperling wrote: [...] Does anyone have more examples of where scripts will fail IF they end with ? (note the additional space)? +1 on everyone's call to omit on an included file due to the potential for sending headers. [... rearranged for ease of reply

[PHP] learning resources for PHP

2012-04-03 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hello list,  I am quite sure that you've heard this question at least a few times before. :) But I have been dabbling a bit in PHP for years and I've decided that its' high time that became serious about getting a solid grounding in it. Currently I work as a Sysadmin and have modest but reliable

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Donovan Brooke
Stuart Dallas wrote: [snip] Usually when setting headers after such a script has been included when output buffering is turned off. Personally I never put the closing ? in if it's at the end of the file because it's unnecessary and can cause issues if it's present, but it's personal

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Robert Cummings
On 12-04-03 11:39 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: Stuart Dallas wrote: [snip] Usually when setting headers after such a script has been included when output buffering is turned off. Personally I never put the closing ? in if it's at the end of the file because it's unnecessary and can cause

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread Donovan Brooke
Robert Cummings wrote: [snip] Could using ob_start and ob_end_flush eliminate the ambiguity of whether or not to use '?'? In the generally recommended case of don't use them at the end of your file... where's the ambiguity? http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.include.php

Re: [PHP] To ? or not to ?

2012-04-03 Thread shiplu
I keep my closing tag. Earlier I started removing closing tag. Then I search for the standardness of this practice and found its not standard. Some frameworks/cms intentionally do this. Besides a signle `\n` character is allowed after the closing tag which does not cause Can not send Header error.

[PHP] RSS Standardness

2012-04-03 Thread shiplu
Dealing RSS Version. I am going to write an RSS parser. Its a very simple parser which just grabs the latest items date and title. SimpleXML and DomDocument is my friend here. The problem here is there are too many standards for RSS. RSS 2.0, 0.92 and 0.91. What do you think which version should