On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:36 -0400, Jason Pruim wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Stut wrote:
>
> > On 16 Sep 2008, at 23:54, tedd wrote:
> >> At 7:40 PM +0100 9/16/08, Stut wrote:
> >>> On 16 Sep 2008, at 15:59, tedd wrote:
>
> >
> > Snail-mail spam relies upon the same basic fact that el
On Sep 17, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Stut wrote:
On 16 Sep 2008, at 23:54, tedd wrote:
At 7:40 PM +0100 9/16/08, Stut wrote:
On 16 Sep 2008, at 15:59, tedd wrote:
Snail-mail spam relies upon the same basic fact that electronic spam
does... everyone hates it until it offers them something they w
On 16 Sep 2008, at 23:54, tedd wrote:
At 7:40 PM +0100 9/16/08, Stut wrote:
On 16 Sep 2008, at 15:59, tedd wrote:
Then one day, M$ sent out notice that they would no longer support
QuickBasic and that was the end of that. All of our current, and
past work, was on a dead-end street. We were l
On Sep 16, 2008, at 6:26 PM, tedd wrote:
At 8:11 PM +0100 9/16/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Would it be totally off topic if everyone were to say what their
favourite OS was and why? I'm just a little curious as to what OS's
people use in this field.
Obviously, mine is Mac and OSX 10.4.11. M
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 20:11 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> Would it be totally off topic if everyone were to say what their
> favourite OS was and why? I'm just a little curious as to what OS's
> people use in this field.
I originally started using Linux 8 years ago at my first job out of
schoo
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Would it be totally off topic if everyone were to say what their
favourite OS was and why? I'm just a little curious as to what OS's
people use in this field.
Well I've been using various flavours of Linux since uni where it was
used in most to the labs. It was a RH vers
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:11:22 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>Would it be totally off topic if everyone were to say what their
>favourite OS was and why? I'm just a little curious as to what OS's
>people use in this field.
Likely yes, but: Fedora 9 works nicely for me and SWMBO. Essentially
though,
At 8:11 PM +0100 9/16/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Would it be totally off topic if everyone were to say what their
favourite OS was and why? I'm just a little curious as to what OS's
people use in this field.
Obviously, mine is Mac and OSX 10.4.11. My next one will be whatever
is the top of th
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 18:54 -0400, tedd wrote:
>
> I realize that you take the high-road on things like this -- I
> respect that -- that used to be my practice as well. It's very
> predicable from a business perspective. But times change and I kind
> of like telling people what I really think --
At 7:40 PM +0100 9/16/08, Stut wrote:
On 16 Sep 2008, at 15:59, tedd wrote:
Then one day, M$ sent out notice that they would no longer support
QuickBasic and that was the end of that. All of our current, and
past work, was on a dead-end street. We were left to fend for
ourselves.
I don't mea
> -Original Message-
> From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:06 AM
> To: Stut; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Philip Thompson; PHP General list
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Why MS Won't Retire Browsers -- was: Interntet
> Explorer 8
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 16:50 -0400, Bastien Koert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:04 -0400, Eric Butera wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ashley Sheridan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:04 -0400, Eric Butera wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:26 -0400, tedd wrote:
> > >> At 11:57 PM +0100 9/1
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:04 -0400, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:26 -0400, tedd wrote:
> >> At 11:57 PM +0100 9/15/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >> >I agree on your point about trying before bashing. I
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Ashley Sheridan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:26 -0400, tedd wrote:
>> At 11:57 PM +0100 9/15/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> >I agree on your point about trying before bashing. I've tried Vista.
>> >Hell, I had to use it for 2 months solid whi
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:26 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 11:57 PM +0100 9/15/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >I agree on your point about trying before bashing. I've tried Vista.
> >Hell, I had to use it for 2 months solid while I was working in India,
> >so I really got to test it out. I had more crashes
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:59 -0400, tedd wrote:
> Similarly, I had a run-in with American Express over 30 years ago and
> even to this day I return all their sales promotion in their
> self-addressed no-postage envelope they provide. Over the years, I
> suspect they have paid postage for over 10
On 16 Sep 2008, at 15:59, tedd wrote:
At 9:53 PM +0100 9/15/08, Stut wrote:
As for Microsoft (will people please stop screwing with their name,
it's impolite), they've certainly made some bad choices over the
years and Windows has suffered for it.
I screw with the M$ name because I don't li
On 16 Sep 2008, at 16:06, tedd wrote:
At 11:30 PM +0100 9/15/08, Stut wrote:
Wow, talk about hitting the nail on the head. When Microsoft pick
the hardware their OS runs on and the software it runs with it
works perfectly.
Not exactly.
I seem to remember when Gates gave a presentation at M
At 4:41 PM +0100 9/16/08, Colin Guthrie wrote:
tedd wrote:
Imagine if PHP suddenly stopped development and you had to find a
different language (i.e., ruby). Sure we could all do it, but we
picked this language for a reason and now we have to choose again
-- and perhaps that choice was our sec
At 8:42 AM +0100 9/16/08, Colin Guthrie wrote:
tedd wrote:
3. wasn't something I was going to work on -- not because I refused
to do it for her but rather because I refuse to work with windozes
-- period.
In this case I would have blitzed windows and slapped on distro of choice> instread (see
tedd wrote:
Imagine if PHP suddenly stopped development and you had to find a
different language (i.e., ruby). Sure we could all do it, but we picked
this language for a reason and now we have to choose again -- and
perhaps that choice was our second choice. I don't like being forced to
settle
At 11:57 PM +0100 9/15/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I agree on your point about trying before bashing. I've tried Vista.
Hell, I had to use it for 2 months solid while I was working in India,
so I really got to test it out. I had more crashes on that in the 2
months I was using it than I had on Fed
At 11:30 PM +0100 9/15/08, Stut wrote:
Wow, talk about hitting the nail on the head. When Microsoft pick
the hardware their OS runs on and the software it runs with it works
perfectly.
Not exactly.
I seem to remember when Gates gave a presentation at Mac World and
his slide show locked up. I
At 9:53 PM +0100 9/15/08, Stut wrote:
As for Microsoft (will people please stop screwing with their name,
it's impolite), they've certainly made some bad choices over the
years and Windows has suffered for it.
I screw with the M$ name because I don't like them!
It's not due to their questiona
At 10:35 PM +0100 9/15/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Ah I'd heard of this story. What you've forgotten to mention was that
the computers were all set up on hardware chosen by Microsoft, and all
running software especially picked by Microsoft. Now, I'd hazard a guess
that even Microsoft is smart enou
At 4:27 PM -0500 9/15/08, Philip Thompson wrote:
Has anyone seen the new M$ commercial where they are asking these
people to review the next version of their OS. Some of the responses
of the people were that they really thought this new OS was
cool/neat/whatever. Then afterwards, M$ told them i
.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Why MS Won't Retire Browsers -- was: Interntet
Explorer 8 beater 2
Because,
M$ earning money from Win GUI. No WinGUI no money.
From the begining, M$ try to broke web compatibilty in every way...
Sure M$ has bad records about software quality. But even ask
yo
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 09:18 -0500, Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
>
>
> Okay... here it goes. I'm sick and tired of people talking trash on
> Windows Vista. It came pre-installed on my laptop (Home Premium... not
> Business Pro, sadly) and I haven't had any issues with it whatsoever.
> Some of my WinXP pro
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 09:18 -0500, Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
>
>
> Okay... here it goes. I'm sick and tired of people talking trash on
> Windows Vista. It came pre-installed on my laptop (Home Premium... not
> Business Pro, sadly) and I haven't had any issues with it whatsoever.
> Some of my WinXP pro
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin Guthrie
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 9:44 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Re: Why MS Won't Retire Browsers -- was: Interntet
> Explorer 8 beater 2
&
Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
Okay... here it goes. I'm sick and tired of people talking trash on Windows
Vista. It came pre-installed on my laptop (Home Premium... not Business Pro,
sadly) and I haven't had any issues with it whatsoever. Some of my WinXP
programs don't show up in the start menu when
On Sep 12, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:15 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Why MS Won't Retire Browsers -- was: Interntet
Explorer 8 beater 2
Be
> -Original Message-
> From: Sancar Saran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:15 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Why MS Won't Retire Browsers -- was: Interntet
> Explorer 8 beater 2
>
> Because,
>
On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Sancar Saran wrote:
Don't expect anything good from M$...
Oh I don't expect anything good from them, never have, never will,
[snip!]
Ok, let's not forget about the Xbox! ;)
~Philip
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To uns
Lester Caine wrote:
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Sancar Saran wrote:
Don't expect anything good from M$...
Oh I don't expect anything good from them, never have, never will, but
that still doesn't change my point that sunset dates would probably be
better for them in the long run... looking for a r
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Sancar Saran wrote:
Don't expect anything good from M$...
Oh I don't expect anything good from them, never have, never will, but
that still doesn't change my point that sunset dates would probably be
better for them in the long run... looking for a reason up upgrade a
s
I wouldn't say Microsoft are strictly anti-web, anymore.
They appear to be changing the model of their next operating system to cater
for 'the cloud.'
I think they finally see that they missed the Internet, and they need it?
2008/9/12 Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sancar Saran wrote:
>
>>
Sancar Saran wrote:
Don't expect anything good from M$...
Oh I don't expect anything good from them, never have, never will, but
that still doesn't change my point that sunset dates would probably be
better for them in the long run... looking for a reason up upgrade a
subborn user who wont d
Because,
M$ earning money from Win GUI. No WinGUI no money.
From the begining, M$ try to broke web compatibilty in every way...
Sure M$ has bad records about software quality. But even ask yourself. WHY IE
(especially 5 and 6) SO buggy even M$ standards.
M$ isn't mr nice guy and they wont get
Micah Gersten wrote:
The problem is that if you're running on older hardware, IE7 might be
too CPU intensive to run correctly. That's why MS won't set Sunset
Dates for an old browser. They instead set the Sunset Dates for the OS
and that's how they make things out of date. They say upgrade the
41 matches
Mail list logo