Hello All,
thank you for your guidance, I have successfully completed my project
I used Andre Polykanine`s advice, as I was a starter in PHP. No frameworks,
used pure PHP but yes kept them under different directories based on their
context.
The project is looking good and I am excited
Thank you
Yes, I got it now.
Thanks Daniel
Thanks everyone!
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Daniel P. Brown
wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 17:02, MuFei wrote:
>> Hi Ashley,
>> Your way works also great, But I have some question thought:
>> When I only use the first half of the code you suggested:
>>
At 4:27 PM +0200 5/21/10, Anton Heuschen wrote:
So in the file it would look like (from the original file the user uploads
that is)
1
2
3
4
5
6
but when the file is saved to the server it must look like
1
2
3
4
5
6
If that is all (i.e., removing double linefeeds), then this will do it:
At 8:00 PM +0100 5/21/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
What sort of format is that date, English or American?
For example: dd-mm- or mm-dd-?
Thanks,
Ash
Ash:
I don't think it's called "English" or "American" -- as Churchill
once said "We are separated by a common language." Perhaps "Brit
tedd wrote:
At 4:27 PM +0200 5/21/10, Anton Heuschen wrote:
So in the file it would look like (from the original file the user uploads
that is)
1
2
3
4
5
6
but when the file is saved to the server it must look like
1
2
3
4
5
6
If that is all (i.e., removing double linefeeds), then thi
On May 22, 2010, at 12:07 PM, tedd wrote:
At 8:00 PM +0100 5/21/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
What sort of format is that date, English or American?
For example: dd-mm- or mm-dd-?
Thanks,
Ash
Ash:
I don't think it's called "English" or "American" -- as Churchill
once said "We are
On 5/22/2010 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 4:27 PM +0200 5/21/10, Anton Heuschen wrote:
So in the file it would look like (from the original file the user
uploads
that is)
1
2
3
4
5
6
but when the file is saved to the server it must look like
1
2
3
4
5
6
If that is
Yeah. Don't be concerned about which browser. Just set up an active
users table in your database that gets checked at login. Then it
doesn't matter which machine or browser. Unless you know that the
computers are giving the true ip, there is no way to keep a user from
logging in with two ac
Phpster wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 12:07 PM, tedd wrote:
At 8:00 PM +0100 5/21/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
What sort of format is that date, English or American?
For example: dd-mm- or mm-dd-?
Thanks,
Ash
Ash:
I don't think it's called "English" or "American" -- as Churchill
onc
Al wrote:
On 5/22/2010 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 4:27 PM +0200 5/21/10, Anton Heuschen wrote:
So in the file it would look like (from the original file the user
uploads
that is)
1
2
3
4
5
6
but when the file is saved to the server it must look like
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
This was beaten to death last week. The solution is not possible because
it's not about restricting a single user from logging over multiple
machines, it about restricting a single computer to only one session (so
running IE, Firefox, Opera, Safari on same computer with different users
would no
On 5/22/2010 4:34 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Al wrote:
On 5/22/2010 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 4:27 PM +0200 5/21/10, Anton Heuschen wrote:
So in the file it would look like (from the original file the user
uploads
that is)
1
2
3
4
5
6
but when the file is saved
On May 22, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
This was beaten to death last week. The solution is not possible
because it's not about restricting a single user from logging over
multiple machines, it about restricting a single computer to only
one session (so running IE, Firefox, Oper
Al wrote:
On 5/22/2010 4:34 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Al wrote:
On 5/22/2010 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 4:27 PM +0200 5/21/10, Anton Heuschen wrote:
So in the file it would look like (from the original file the user
uploads
that is)
1
2
3
4
5
6
but when the file
On May 22, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Brandon Rampersad wrote:
These third world internet providers are screwing up the IP address
system with their shared IPs which defeats the entire purpose of an
IP address.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Karl DeSaulniers
wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 3:37 PM
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
This was beaten to death last week. The solution is not possible
because it's not about restricting a single user from logging over
multiple machines, it about restricting a single computer to only
one session (so
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Duley noted, but the combo of tracking ips and cookies on computers
should still work.
If you are checking the ip against ALL users, if two users in the
active database have the same ip,
then whichever has the older timestamp stays and the new one gets
booted.
And i
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Brandon Rampersad wrote:
These third world internet providers are screwing up the IP address
system with their shared IPs which defeats the entire purpose of an
IP address.
I missed this bit... actually, this is less a third world issue
Well you could alway build it as an Adobe AIR app.
Then it would be its own application. Not viewed through a browser.
Karl
On May 22, 2010, at 8:46 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Yeah, but flash is proprietary and I for one hate hitting flash
websites.
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://de
But then I don't get to use worldwide accepted and open standards for
development.
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Well you could alway build it as an Adobe AIR app.
Then it would be its own application. Not viewed through a browser.
Karl
On May 22, 2010, at 8:46 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Yeah,
I'm a Front End Dev seeking to add that crucial server-side/database
knowledge to my understanding of end to end web dev.
I'm particularly interested in learning how to set up server side responses
to my AJAX and JSON/JSONP requests.
Also, I'm thinking of a "simple" finances management app (thoug
Wow. I'm going to stay away from that one. I'm just trying to help
this guy secure his learning API and that would be one way to insure
that two browsers were not logged in on the same system. Especially if
you weren't using a browser in the first place.
Have you ever programed in flash?
K
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Wow. I'm going to stay away from that one. I'm just trying to help
this guy secure his learning API and that would be one way to insure
that two browsers were not logged in on the same system. Especially if
you weren't using a browser in the first place.
Have you ev
Robert Cummings wrote:
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Wow. I'm going to stay away from that one. I'm just trying to help
this guy secure his learning API and that would be one way to insure
that two browsers were not logged in on the same system. Especially if
you weren't using a browser in the fi
I am going to ask my flash guru buddies.
Let me see if I can find anything out.
Karl
On May 22, 2010, at 10:10 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Wow. I'm going to stay away from that one. I'm just trying to
help this guy secure his learning API and
Hello,
I've got a custom app that interacts with a database. I want to use
something stronger than .htaccess to protect it and ssl is not
available as this is a shared host. There will be several user's
accessing this app and updating the database through it. What i was
thinking was giving each a u
David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
I've got a custom app that interacts with a database. I want to use
something stronger than .htaccess to protect it and ssl is not
available as this is a shared host. There will be several user's
accessing this app and updating the database through it. What i was
thinki
On 05/23/2010 10:51 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
I've got a custom app that interacts with a database. I want to use
something stronger than .htaccess to protect it and ssl is not
available as this is a shared host. There will be several user's
accessing this app and upd
28 matches
Mail list logo
