Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! Please Help!

2001-08-17 Thread Elias Santiago
Me too, I've never had any problems with PHP running it with or without the %s %s. I guess that IIS 3 required that, but IIS 4./5 not necessarily require it (a useful bug??). Nevertheless, it work without them anyways. I only wish that the PHP ISAPI module is FINALLY made stable (production qua

[PHP] FW: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed !Please Help!

2001-08-17 Thread Angie Tollerson
essage- > From: Powell, Jim (EER) > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:45 PM > To: 'Angie Tollerson' > Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! > Please Help! > > > OK, pretty straight forward, I went through my list of > fai

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! Please Help!

2001-08-17 Thread Phil Driscoll
On Thursday 16 August 2001 7:35 pm, Elias Santiago wrote: > I believe that IIS passes the script name to php.exe with the first %s. I > think IIS replaces the first %s with the script name. From the second > article, I suppose that if the %s is changed to %S, the name passed to > php.exe would be

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! Please Help!

2001-08-16 Thread Elias Santiago
Found MS explanation! (at least the only place I've found the reason WHY %s %s must be used) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q276/4/94.ASP I know, this is a KB article for Python, but look closely at the line that says: "(The two "%s" after the executable are required for conso

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! Please Help!

2001-08-16 Thread Elias Santiago
I've had PHP 3 to 4.01 and now 4.06 running under NT4 SP6a and now with W2K & IIS 5. From my experience, the %s %s is a requirement of IIS (not PHP). This according to Microsoft rules (apparently %s %s is CASE SENSITIVE): http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q245/2/25.ASP The %s %s h

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! Please Help!

2001-08-16 Thread Phil Driscoll
On Thursday 16 August 2001 4:45 pm, Powell, Jim (EER) wrote: > > Second, make the application extensions point to php.exe (you > > don't need the > > %s %s stuff). > > This I have to disagree with. Without the %s %s, you are rolling dice as > to whether the page will work or not. I never had th

RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! Please Help!

2001-08-16 Thread Powell, Jim (EER)
> First of all, the ISAPI module is not stable. It will just > cause you grief so > remove it from your filters list. Now this is a true statement, especially with IIS, it just don't work. > > Second, make the application extensions point to php.exe (you > don't need the > %s %s stuff). Thi

[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! Please Help!

2001-08-16 Thread Phil Driscoll
> I had read a book which it ask me to point both ISAPI and APP Extension to > "php4isapi.dll", but when i read some article from internet, some of them > say that the Application Extension should point to "php.exe", so could > anyone tell me which is the truth! and pls help me with that, because