Here's a tiny update:
- A rel="nofollow" has been added to all links
- User comment voting is under way, online in a week or three
Regards,
Philip
On 24 May 2008, at 06:26, Nuno Lopes wrote:
The manual notes are usually used for SPAMing. The problem with
[snip]/whatever SPAM is mostly fixed, but there's another
increasing problem. Many are using the php manual notes as a SEO
technique. The PHP website (and the mirrors) have a high PageRan
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Salah Faya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Salah Faya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I -myself- will try to contribute some of my time for the notes from now
>> on and will invite my friends to do so.
>>
>
>
> I would like to know i
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Salah Faya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I -myself- will try to contribute some of my time for the notes from now on
> and will invite my friends to do so.
>
>
I would like to know if there're any guidelines for moderating the notes, or
should we just follow common
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Michael Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you know what that's like. Hannes' stars paint great big bulls-eyes
> on the gems _and_ the shyte. If they become easier to moderate, more
> people will do it and less people will consider it a waste of time.
Just to be
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Daniel Convissor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>
>> Many are
>> using the php manual notes as a SEO technique. The PHP website (and the
>> mirrors) have a high PageRank
>
> Oh, guess I should add some notes.
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Many are
> using the php manual notes as a SEO technique. The PHP website (and the
> mirrors) have a high PageRank
Oh, guess I should add some notes... :)
Well, we could add rel="nofollow" to the links in the notes.
--Dan
--
T
Philip Olson wrote:
>I would prefer we change it instead of removing outright. The user notes is
what made the PHP Manual famous initially, and it's still >talked about
today. In the past people contributed plenty of ideas for a note overhaul
but without any code (me included!) so I wonder, >maybe
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> We have a patch for rating already (see recent post to
> php-webmaster@), I just haven't had the time to commit it yet.
>
> In theory the community would help us by staring (1-5stars) notes,
> especially the "sucks" and "awesome" notes so moderators can quickly
> delete/
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Michael Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any note that is submitted has an expiration date assigned, say 90 days
> thereafter, at which time the note is automatically removed unless someone
> with karma marks it a "keeper". Perhaps, in addition, user ratings ca
Can we end with manual notes?
Nobody seems interested in moderating the notes, so I think we should
kill them once and forever! (bugs should be reported to the
bugtracker..)
Wow!
Yes, I wanted to hear a wow! Everybody seems to want to have the notes, but
without wanting to waste time moderati
Philip Olson writes:
> > Can we end with manual notes?
> > Nobody seems interested in moderating the notes, so I think we
> > should kill them once and forever! (bugs should be reported to the
> > bugtracker..)
>
> Wow!
Wow indeed.
[snip]
> Regardless, we must ask ourselves "What is the purpose
Can we end with manual notes?
Nobody seems interested in moderating the notes, so I think we
should kill them once and forever! (bugs should be reported to the
bugtracker..)
Wow!
I would prefer we change it instead of removing outright. The user
notes is what made the PHP Manual famous in
Em Sáb, 2008-05-24 às 00:07 +0100, Nuno Lopes escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Can we end with manual notes?
> Nobody seems interested in moderating the notes, so I think we should kill
> them once and forever! (bugs should be reported to the bugtracker..)
>
> Nuno
>
I think important to keep the user not
Hi,
Can we end with manual notes?
Nobody seems interested in moderating the notes, so I think we should kill
them once and forever! (bugs should be reported to the bugtracker..)
Nuno
Seems to take a little bit before it is posted.
Best Regards,
Kenneth Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:22:04 -0500
Kenneth Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've missed quite a bit on the php-doc scene.
>
> I attempted to update a note in the manual, said 'note xxx was up
I've missed quite a bit on the php-doc scene.
I attempted to update a note in the manual, said 'note xxx was updated'.
I refreshed the manual page, but the note was not updated. Are they
updated when the manual is re-built? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Kenneth Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that is the idea. I ended up having to
> unsubcribe from the php-notes
> list in order to try to cut down on my mail volume.
> But if I could only
> get a partial set of note notices by signing up to
> only receive notes for
> certain chapter
> Ctaching up would be nice. :-) But even a flock of guru's might
> not add the errata back in...
When signing up to help maintain this stuff there would be a little HOWTO
telling people how to do it and explaining that if they are not prepared
to roll good suggestions into the manual they should
On Saturday, July 28, 2001, at 01:02 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> I agree allowing the public to manage notes would work pretty
>> well but for
>> the record, I don't feel the "problem" sits with unmoderated
>> new notes but
>> rather, the old ones ... Spreading the love would help this
>> to
On Friday, July 27, 2001, at 05:16 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
> Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
>> Now [EMAIL PROTECTED] people are maitaining the manual
>> notes. This change would be good IMHO, as there are not
>> too many people there
> I'm new here but it appears that new notes are looked at pretty quic
On Thursday, July 26, 2001, at 02:53 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> The notes in the online manual are piling up again.
My apologies, for a while I was cleaning at a much faster rate,
but then my consulting business became viable. :-) (A cleaner
can take out about a third of the notes, it just ta
> Yes, that is the idea. I ended up having to unsubcribe from the php-notes
> list in order to try to cut down on my mail volume. But if I could only
> get a partial set of note notices by signing up to only receive notes for
> certain chapters that interest me, or individual manual pages it wou
> > Now [EMAIL PROTECTED] people are maitaining the manual
> > notes. This change would be good IMHO, as there are not
> > too many people there
>
> I'm new here but it appears that new notes are looked at pretty quickly
> these days. Usually minutes after a "bad" new note is posted, someone
Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> Now [EMAIL PROTECTED] people are maitaining the manual
> notes. This change would be good IMHO, as there are not
> too many people there
I'm new here but it appears that new notes are looked at pretty quickly
these days. Usually minutes after a "bad" new note is post
> The notes in the online manual are piling up again. The job
> of managing these things is much much too big for a small
> group of people. What do you guys think of the idea of making
> it possible for individuals to register themselves as
> maintainers of individual manual pages?
Now [EMAIL P
The notes in the online manual are piling up again. The job of managing
these things is much much too big for a small group of people. What do
you guys think of the idea of making it possible for individuals to
register themselves as maintainers of individual manual pages?
That is, I might deci
27 matches
Mail list logo
