On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Jouni, I think you are the one with the insight into how to install this
> stuff on toye. I am afraid to touch it. Could you update it?
First thing tomorrow morning. Already quite late here and it's been a long
day.
> If we need to move the kr/ t
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
> jimw Wed Jan 10 20:15:08 2001 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /phpdoc Makefile.in configure.in manual.xml.in
> Log:
> clean up building from seperate directory
>
> Index: phpdoc/configure.in
> diff -u phpdoc/configure.in:
jah Sat Jan 13 13:54:07 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc configure.in manual.xml.in
Log:
- Fixed broken configure.in
- Hack around the fact that DSSSL stylesheets refer to korean language as 'ko',
not 'kr'. It actually builds, if you have recent e
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:33:44PM -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > > > Jouni, I think you are the one with the insight into how to install this
> > > > stuff on toye. I am afraid to touch it. Could you update it?
> > >
> > > First thing tomorrow
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Jim has been screwing around with it. Not sure what the status is.
I fixed it yesterday. Logged just into toye and saw that the nightly build
was just running, the japanese version was already done and fine.
-- Jouni
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Rui Hi
On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Sean Bright wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Can someone help me out with building the docs from CVS? I ran autoconf
> in the directory which generated configure, however, I am getting alot
> of errors that look like this:
>
> jade:/usr/lib/sgml/stylesheets/nwalsh-modular/html/../
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > >Are you sure if cs is Czech. Create first a directory in the phpdoc tree
> > >on your local hard disk and then:
> > >
> > >cvs add cz
> > >
> > >You don't need an commit afterwards.
> >
> > yes, I'm sure. ISO codes for Czech language are ces/cze
>
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Egon Schmid (@work) wrote:
> Jim Winstead wrote:
>
> > it is in some character set other than utf-8. it needs to be in utf-8.
> > (the html output will be whatever is appropriate for the language, but
> > the xml needs to be in utf-8.)
>
> There is no need for utf-8. It's
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Cynic wrote:
> But I didn't--and still don't--know of a tool for win1250 <-> iso8859-2
> conversion. I just wanted to start committing to see some progress, and
> convert it later, ASA I find something.
On the Windows side, I don't know of anything. But you could install
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Cynic wrote:
> I've already found a commandline tool that seems to be perfect.
> Right now I'm configuring it, will try.
> Could you please try and build the cs docs when I convert them?
Ok. I'll try to check the traffic on this list a few times during the
workday, but do
jah Thu Jan 25 23:36:38 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc configure.in
Log:
Czech language support.
Index: phpdoc/configure.in
diff -u phpdoc/configure.in:1.49 phpdoc/configure.in:1.50
--- phpdoc/configure.in:1.49Sat Jan 20 18:03:26 2001
+++ ph
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Cynic wrote:
> thanks, I forgot to do it. :\
Couldn't test without it. See http://snaps.php.net/~jah/cs/. I think it's
ok (with the exception of '=Úvod', which I think is typo...).
-- Jouni
jah Fri Jan 26 00:36:00 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/cs/functionsinfo.xml
Log:
Fixed a typo.
Index: phpdoc/cs/functions/info.xml
diff -u phpdoc/cs/functions/info.xml:1.2 phpdoc/cs/functions/info.xml:1.3
--- phpdoc/cs/functions/info.xml:1.2
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> David, your CVS account is active. Please coordinate with Shachar Kaufman
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to see if he is still interested in helping with
> the translation.
>
> Specific questions on how to get start should be sent to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Elrom wrote:
> every thing in hebrew is exactly the oppisite than in english (hebrew is a
> stupid language !) any way, do we have to use dsssl-stylesheets ?
Yes. The documentation is in XML and then transformed to several different
formats with jade using dsssl-st
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
> In article <00dd01c0892d$1d296680$cd0110ac@shuttle>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> Which also introduces the questions:
> >>
> >> 1. What would it take to get the PDF versions into other languages
> >> besides english?
> >
> > I h
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 07:51:43PM -0500, David Elrom wrote:
> >
> > Why r we using TeX ?
> >
> > why not some other XML format ?
>
> If you want a printed manual, DocBook uses a TeX backend. TeX is better than every
>XML
> style shit.
To be m
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> I had another look at the teTeX patches, and got it to work and build
> the PDF manual 'out of the box', both with and without the 'treesaving'
> option.
>
> I put the manual up here:
>
> http://brick.recoil.org/~avsm/php/
>
> I'll mail out the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David Elrom wrote:
> So why in gods name r we using this crapy docbook and TeX ?
> why do we have to be limited to one language and one language only ?!
We aren't.
> Q. any one here want the pdf in a language other than english ?
> A. i dunno what about u guys, but i do..
jah Wed Jan 31 10:51:16 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc configure.in print.dsl.in
Log:
Redefine tree-saving -mode to be even more compact but still slightly better
looking.
Index: phpdoc/configure.in
diff -u phpdoc/configure.in:1.50 phpdoc/conf
jah Wed Jan 31 11:15:28 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc configure.in
Log:
This is a necessity when creating PDF for non-ISO-8859-1 languages and
doesn't seem to harm creating HTML in any way.
Index: phpdoc/configure.in
diff -u phpdoc/configure.
jah Wed Jan 31 12:20:41 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc Makefile.in
Log:
Added specific rule to create manual.pdf.
Index: phpdoc/Makefile.in
diff -u phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.51 phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.52
--- phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.51 Tue Jan 23 15:49:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:48:17PM -, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> >"hu"=> "0x40e Hungarian",
> >"il"=> "0x410 Italian (Italy)",
> > + "ja"=> "0x411 Japanese",
> >"kr"=> "0x412 Korean",
>
> "il" is Israel, "
jah Sat Feb 3 13:51:07 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc Makefile.in
Log:
Must ignore errors from jadetex, it always complains about something.
Index: phpdoc/Makefile.in
diff -u phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.52 phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.53
--- phpdoc/Makefile.i
jah Sat Feb 3 13:51:52 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc configure.in
Log:
Missed setting papersize option for PDF.
Index: phpdoc/configure.in
diff -u phpdoc/configure.in:1.53 phpdoc/configure.in:1.54
--- phpdoc/configure.in:1.53Thu Feb 1 06:
jah Sat Feb 3 13:54:43 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc configure.in
Log:
Prefer OpenJade over the older Jade.
Index: phpdoc/configure.in
diff -u phpdoc/configure.in:1.54 phpdoc/configure.in:1.55
--- phpdoc/configure.in:1.54Sat Feb 3 13:51:5
jah Sat Feb 3 13:55:57 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc Makefile.in
Log:
Ignore more errors from jadetex.
Index: phpdoc/Makefile.in
diff -u phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.53 phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.54
--- phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.53 Sat Feb 3 13:51:07 2001
+
jah Sat Feb 3 16:33:29 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc global.ent
/phpdoc/fr/functionsimage.xml info.xml misc.xml pcre.xml
session.xml strings.xml var.xml xml.xml
/phpdoc/fr/language variables.xml
Log:
jah Sun Feb 4 07:17:58 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc global.ent
Log:
Oops. This was a leftover after testing some strange things...
Index: phpdoc/global.ent
diff -u phpdoc/global.ent:1.71 phpdoc/global.ent:1.72
--- phpdoc/global.ent:1.71
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Egon Schmid wrote:
> eschmid Mon Feb 5 14:55:59 2001 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /phpdoc/en/functions mail.xml
> Log:
> Tested only with the older Jade. Jouni, I need some help from you with Openjade.
Help is, of course, granted.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > The error here is that //f/phpcvs type of paths are generated
> > by cygwin, and jade.exe can't deal with this. So we need
> > to put here f:/phpcvs/dsssl/html/docbook.dsl. Do anybody
> > know an elegant way to do this?
>
> Well, cygwin understands f
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:58:32PM -0600, Daniel Beckham wrote:
> > Yes, it would be a bit harder to read, but I think it might be worth it to
> > correct readability issues with the PDF version of the manual.
>
> Please wait for Jouni. The proble
jah Sun Feb 25 06:08:55 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsurl.xml
Log:
Fixed a typo.
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/url.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/url.xml:1.10 phpdoc/en/functions/url.xml:1.11
--- phpdoc/en/functions/url.xml:1.10
jah Sun Feb 25 06:11:06 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/fr/functionspdf.xml
Log:
Fixed a typo.
Index: phpdoc/fr/functions/pdf.xml
diff -u phpdoc/fr/functions/pdf.xml:1.9 phpdoc/fr/functions/pdf.xml:1.10
--- phpdoc/fr/functions/pdf.xml:1.9
nsgmls:./fr/chapters/install.xml:3882:36:E: non SGML character number 142
nsgmls:./fr/features/file-upload.xml:219:29:E: non SGML character number
142
nsgmls:./fr/functions/cpdf.xml:491:44:E: non SGML character number 142
I must write it down somewhere how you fix these ones, so I can do it
mysel
jah Tue Feb 27 02:04:34 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/fr/chapters install.xml
Log:
Removed some (probably) left-over chars.
Index: phpdoc/fr/chapters/install.xml
diff -u phpdoc/fr/chapters/install.xml:1.16 phpdoc/fr/chapters/install.xml:1.17
--- ph
jah Sun Mar 18 03:11:58 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/fr/appendices resources.xml
/phpdoc/fr/functionsxslt.xml
/phpdoc/fr/language oop.xml
Log:
French version compiles ok again. Damien, please check the changes, I don't
actually
jah Sun Mar 18 03:16:01 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/es/language oop.xml
Log:
Fixed id, spanish version compiles now.
Index: phpdoc/es/language/oop.xml
diff -u phpdoc/es/language/oop.xml:1.2 phpdoc/es/language/oop.xml:1.3
--- phpdoc/es/language/oo
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Egon Schmid wrote:
> eschmid Mon Mar 19 09:18:07 2001 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /phpdoc/fr/functions session.xml
> Log:
> Added two missing paras.
In general, should we be using ...,
or the simpler form ...? Both are valid.
--
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Egon Schmid (@work) wrote:
> Jouni Ahto wrote:
> >
> > In general, should we be using ...,
> > or the simpler form ...? Both are valid.
>
> I don't know but I think the appearance could be different. Compare the
> PDF or PostScrip
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Rui Hirokawa wrote:
>
> There is some corrupted characters in japanese PHP manual.
> It is caused by typos in some older versions of stylesheets
> in common/dbl1ja.ent.
>
> Please modify some definitions in stylesheet as follows,
> or update to the newest versions of styl
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Rui Hirokawa wrote:
> In this case,
>
> should be
>
> Please modify it.
Ok. Done.
> Is the script producing html version of manual available
> from CVS ?
Don't think so.
-- Jouni
jah Sun Apr 1 09:44:57 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/it/functionsoci8.xml
Log:
Fixed incorrect closing tag.
Index: phpdoc/it/functions/oci8.xml
diff -u phpdoc/it/functions/oci8.xml:1.6 phpdoc/it/functions/oci8.xml:1.7
--- phpdoc/it/functio
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
> i haven't been able to set up the pdf generation on the current
> rsync.php.net, because it is running an older version of redhat, and
> all the jvm's i tried to install wanted a newer glibc.
>
> (the pdf generation was using saxon and passivetex, righ
jah Wed Jul 18 13:13:24 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsdomxml.xml
Log:
Removed some stray chars...
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/domxml.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/domxml.xml:1.17 phpdoc/en/functions/domxml.xml:1.18
--- phpdoc/e
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Damien Seguy wrote:
> Finally, all the FAQ entries are now in documentation, en tree,
> and commited some esthetics updates. Wait for the next build to
> see it all new.
Oops, some missing entities broke the build... :( I'm committing a new
version of faqurls.ent after sen
jah Fri Jul 20 15:46:48 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc faqurls.ent
Log:
Added missing entities, though mostly still empty :(
Index: phpdoc/faqurls.ent
diff -u phpdoc/faqurls.ent:1.5 phpdoc/faqurls.ent:1.6
--- phpdoc/faqurls.ent:1.5 Fri Jul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 16:13:07 +0300 (EEST)
From: Jouni Ahto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jim Winstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: pdf manuals
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:25:16
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > Just a suggestion: I got a cable modem home last Wednesday and am once
> > again connected to the net (with enough speed :). And I've already got a
> > fully working TeX setup, especially hacked and tuned to produce PHP
> > PDF-manuals. So, why to wa
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> NO no. Derick made an autogeneration script for the chm
> files on windows. Although we can't see the new manuals
> at php.net now... :((
What do you mean? http://www.php.net/docs.php has links to chm versions,
and the files really are there. (But why
On 23 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Today I have gotten already two or three emails from PHPDOC containing
> > something very likely to be email virus (at least, my filters say so and
> > they rarely are mistaken). Maybe it worth to set up
As the PDF manuals should be coming back really soon now, I'm thinking
about compressing them, because the file size is is quite big (approx. 11M
per language). What do you think, should they be offered as .gz, .bz2 and
.zip versions like the HTML version (in many files), or would .gz suffice?
AFA
jah Wed Jul 25 16:26:56 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/fr/functionsmath.xml
Log:
Fixed last illegal chars. French version compiles now.
Index: phpdoc/fr/functions/math.xml
diff -u phpdoc/fr/functions/math.xml:1.11 phpdoc/fr/functions/math.xm
jah Wed Jul 25 16:41:26 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/cs/language constants.xml
Log:
Added id so that it compiles again.
Index: phpdoc/cs/language/constants.xml
diff -u phpdoc/cs/language/constants.xml:1.4 phpdoc/cs/language/constants.xml:1.5
--- p
; >viewer. With the dvi files we can build PostScript and PDF
> >versions. Look at the Makefile. For PDF and PostScript versions
> >we have to wait for Jouni Ahto.
>
> OK, but we are not hosting any TeX or RTF versions now online.
> There was a text that one can download the RTF
jah Fri Jul 27 02:13:31 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc global.ent
Log:
Not available on old site anymore.
Index: phpdoc/global.ent
diff -u phpdoc/global.ent:1.101 phpdoc/global.ent:1.102
--- phpdoc/global.ent:1.101 Thu Jul 26 14:04:11 2001
+
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > Hi... i noticed that PDF editions of the PHP docs are temporarily
> > unavailable.
> >
> > I dunno whether this is due to a no-interest in having PDF versions
> > available or maybe just the sheer cost of a copy of Acrobat being the
> issue.
> >
> >
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > A question for manual maintainers; is it enough to get a CVS account for
> > /phpdoc/tr and put our translations in them, or we must also work on Jade
> > and Docbook/DSSSL to help make different versions of manual?
>
> You need to somewhat know Doc
Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
>> The first thing to do is to make DocBook/DSSSL to support turkish. It
>> doesn't yet. But it's not very hard to get that support in. It didn't
>> support hungarian a year ago. It does now. The hungarian translation of
>> PHP manual had something to do with it...
>>
>> Go
jah Mon Jul 30 10:48:48 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc configure.in
Log:
Preparing for the turkish translation (I saw that Serdar got his CVS account).
Index: phpdoc/configure.in
diff -u phpdoc/configure.in:1.70 phpdoc/configure.in:1.71
--- phpdoc/
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gábor wrote:
> >If Damien use his French ENTITY's, there is nothing wrong to
> >put them into global.ent.
>
> globals.ent should contain global entities, as the name suggest.
> Language only entities should go IMHO to language-defs.ent
> (see hu dir). We started f
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:41:48AM +0200, Hojtsy Gábor wrote:
> > >I talked about global.ent, not de/language-defs.ent. We have sometimes
> > >errors if someone makes a reference to the install chapter. If this
> > >chapter is not uptodate in this l
Hojtsy Gábor wrote:
> I tried to understand this paragraph in connection with the DE language
> entities file. But nothing helped me to understand. These two new entities
> are not there for "quite many years"... Why are those guys are crazy?
It's best if you don't even try to understand, that
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > Jouni Ahto genererated the PDFs, and uploaded them to
> > rsync.php.net, but noone had some minutes, to give some
> > rights to Jouni, or just move the files to the webspace
> > to let it spread across mirrors, and be dow
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> If the PDFs are generated and uploaded automatically, please
> coordinate with us to set up a proper cron-job which moves
> the files into the right place automatically.
That's the plan, at least until the new toye is up and able to
auto
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > Cannot anybody realize, that we are stating that the PDFs
> > are temporary unavailable, but this is the case for months
> > now
>
> Sure
>
> > Jouni Ahto genererated the PDFs, and uploaded them to
>
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> > Hojtsy gábor wrote:
>
> > Jouni, maybe you could contact the people who
> > generated the XML documentations PDF format at
> > W3C. They used some html2ps utility, and the links
> > are fine ;)
>
> Easiest, but not free way how to get PDF file with l
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> And you can read README.xsl in the phpdoc root to get some info
> how you can build the docs using XSLT.
Did it. Somehow I have missed realizing that there's already so much work
done... I'll start playing with this. Don't expect immediate results.
--
jah Sun Aug 5 04:47:50 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc README.xsl
Log:
Found out that saxons' homepage has moved.
Index: phpdoc/README.xsl
diff -u phpdoc/README.xsl:1.2 phpdoc/README.xsl:1.3
--- phpdoc/README.xsl:1.2 Mon Feb 19 06:52:11 2001
jah Sun Aug 5 05:24:09 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc README.xsl
Log:
Another changed link...
Index: phpdoc/README.xsl
diff -u phpdoc/README.xsl:1.3 phpdoc/README.xsl:1.4
--- phpdoc/README.xsl:1.3 Sun Aug 5 04:47:50 2001
+++ phpdoc/README.x
jah Sun Aug 5 06:51:48 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en bookinfo.xml
/phpdoc/en/chapters security.xml
/phpdoc/en/faq languages.xml obtaining.xml using.xml
/phpdoc/en/functionscom.xml info.xml mbstring.xml ming.xml
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Jouni Ahto wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
>
> > And you can read README.xsl in the phpdoc root to get some info
> > how you can build the docs using XSLT.
>
> Did it. Somehow I have missed realizing that there's
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> Maybe Jirka Kosek can say something positive about the PDF version.
> He is involved closely in DocBook XSL stylesheets IMHO.
Let's hope so.
-- Jouni
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> The problem of generating PDFs with XSL stylesheet isn't in stylesheets
> but in FO processors. All current free implementations of XSL FO
> (PassiveTeX, FOP) have some serious limitations. IMHO for these days, it
> is better to use XSL for getting HTML
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Serdar Soydemir wrote:
> +Alfabetik Sýrada Tercüme yapanlar
^
dotless i?
It shows as an y with acute with most peoples mail programs on this list,
I'd guess, and it could show that way on peoples browsers too, unle
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I try to test that XML->PDF generation but get the folowing error:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/tools/ant/Main
>
> What do I need to install to make this class be defined???
You shouldn't ne
New versions should be available within a few hours, for those languages
that compiled: cs, en, fr, it & nl. If your language is missing from the
list and you want the update too, please make sure it passes 'make test'
before 17:00 GMT. I'm a bit in hurry today, haven't time to fix anything,
and l
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, [ISO-8859-2] Hojtsy Gábor wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to change these now to be
>
> distributions/manual/pdf/...
> distributions/manual/chm/...
>
> As in the near future (I hope so), the folowing formats
> will also be there:
>
> distributions/manual/html/...
> d
jah Sun Aug 26 07:52:47 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/tr language-snippets.ent
/phpdoc/tr/faq general.xml
Log:
Fixed problems 'make test' complained about (so I can found what the next ones
are, especially concerning PDF version...).
Inde
jah Sun Aug 26 08:42:35 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc Makefile.in configure.in
Log:
Starting the move to the naming convention suggested by Goba. Now only for
PDF version, let's wait for possible reactions before continuing.
Index: phpdoc/Makefi
jah Sun Aug 26 10:00:31 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc print.dsl.in
Log:
Added link generation from function name to the target.
Index: phpdoc/print.dsl.in
diff -u phpdoc/print.dsl.in:1.15 phpdoc/print.dsl.in:1.16
--- phpdoc/print.dsl.in:1.15We
This topic has popped up a few times before on the list, and I think I've
seen even bug report(s?) claiming that the current function reference
part makes it hard to find information, because it has grown so big. But I
don't remember that we would haver ever deciced either to do it or not do
it...
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Egon Schmid wrote:
> It would be nice, if someone could make a first draft about the
> names of new chapters and which sections could be within sections.
Something very near to the list of bug types bugs.php.net. I think there
actually was a draft some time ago, but I'll h
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > - New subtitles must be agreed on and added to each language-defs.ent.
>
> This is what needs to be the same for the bug system. So if it is
> not right, we should collect the functions and make a new category
> system, and start to use it in the bu
jah Sat Sep 1 08:53:45 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsmysql.xml
Log:
Fixed closing tag.
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/mysql.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/mysql.xml:1.63 phpdoc/en/functions/mysql.xml:1.64
--- phpdoc/en/functions/mysq
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Marco Cucinato wrote:
> Since the PHP version numbers related to every function
> (/version.xml) are applied to the doc every time they are generated,
> the old docs are not updated:
> Look at the array_walk function over the different translations.
> EN: (PHP 3>= 3.0.3,
jah Sat Sep 1 19:49:36 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/hu/functionsimage.xml
Log:
Fixed tags.
Index: phpdoc/hu/functions/image.xml
diff -u phpdoc/hu/functions/image.xml:1.9 phpdoc/hu/functions/image.xml:1.10
--- phpdoc/hu/functions/image.xml:1.
On 2 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jouni Ahto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This way, the documentation will be generated even if parts of the
> > translation are a bit old and don't yet have those IDs needed, but 'make
> > test' still cat
jah Sun Sep 2 09:16:42 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc Makefile.in
Log:
- Added -wno-idref option to jade arguments, so the manuals will be
generated even if the are missing IDs.
- New target 'test_man_gen' that checks if its possible to generate t
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Egon Schmid wrote:
> From: Hojtsy Gabor
>
> > Hope this helps to start a discussion about the usefullness
> > of this revision comment syntax...
>
> It may be working in the hu tree, there is only one maintainer :)
> This would not work in the German manual, because we hav
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> As I wrote down in my last long letter (titled:
> "Re: [PHP-DOC] Revision longer example"), we can
> think of the Revision comments as a splitup of
> translators and the script generated revheck.html
> as a HTML version of Translators with much extra
>
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> If you think there will be too much extra processor time,
> the script will take on the server, doing nothing, because
> the commit changes no Revision number, we can introduce
> a flag in CVS commit messages, so eg:
No, I was just thinking about a sce
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Egon Schmid wrote:
> It would be nice, if someone could make a first draft about the
> names of new chapters and which sections could be within sections.
Ok, here it is. And it's really a very rough draft... based on bug types
in bug reporting system, but not exactly the s
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> What do you think about these additional groups?
>
> Variables, types and function handling
> Array
> Class-object
> Function handling
> Variable
> Session handling
>
> Miscellaneous:
> Apache-specific
> Error handling and logging
> GNU readli
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I would merge "string/character" and "Variables,types and function
> handling", and name it:
> "basic functions", since they are very general-purpose, do NOT have external
> depencies (like mysql, etc), and are quite close to the language.
> Er
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Egon Schmid wrote:
> To make the story short. German translators don´t need a revision
> number or a revision comment. We need the diffs up to that date,
> when the original translator or maintainer leaved the project. It is
> impossible to make a script which tells a new tr
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> There is no problem though when there is an english typo-fix. The report
> will show that the translation is a bit behind, but then you can simply
> 'update' it. (by only modifying the infoline). This doesn't break anything.
Besides, when a tr
jah Sun Sep 2 19:46:39 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc Makefile.in
Log:
Added an empty line for clarity.
Index: phpdoc/Makefile.in
diff -u phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.64 phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.65
--- phpdoc/Makefile.in:1.64 Sun Sep 2 09:16:42 2001
+++
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Jouni Ahto wrote:
>
> >because he finds the exactly same things extremely useful. And if I would
> >start a Finnish translation, I too would find them useful, so I side with
>
> Would you? :)
>
>
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Jouni Ahto wrote:
>
> >A pity. Maybe he sent an example of his work and nobody in the group did
> >understand a word about it, which in itself would have been a good reason
> >to give that account...
>
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
