Matthew,
Thanks for the response but my problem is not yet solved:
Fatal error: Uncaught SCA_RuntimeException: SDO_Exception in
setWSDLTypes : SDO_DAS_XML::create - Unable to parse the supplied xsd
file 2 parse error(s) occurred when parsing the file 'C:\wamp\www
\webservices\test_3\helloworld.w
Hi Stefaan,
I see, you are presumably getting nothing back when you ask for the
wsdl with something like
$wsdl = file_get_contents('http://barabas.hogent.be/kariboe/
helloworld.php?wsdl');
What we need to know is what appears in the apache error log on the
server machine barabas.hogent.be (or wha
Ouch, I have just seen that I made an error. It is the use of
trigger_error on its own that is losing precision when I print the
SDO.
If I use trigger_error(print_r($response_object, true)) then I see
that the precision is still there in the SDO:
[Wed Jun 18 16:20:39 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0
OK, this testcase is enough to demonstrate the problem (using
Sample.wsdl from the defect that Silvano raised). The problem is not
that the sdo does not have the precision; it's in the serialisation to
xml which treats the value like 'print' does and not 'print_r'. Still
needs further investigatio
I am using a wsdl that has a xsd:anyType parameter in a method call.
The resulting SOAP request generates xml that looks like this:
testing
I need someway to make it output this instead:
13.219
How can I inject an attribute or specify a type in this situation?
Here is a code snippet.
$metada
Matthew Peters wrote:
> OK, this testcase is enough to demonstrate the problem (using
> Sample.wsdl from the defect that Silvano raised). The problem is not
> that the sdo does not have the precision; it's in the serialisation to
> xml which treats the value like 'print' does and not 'print_r'.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Matthew Peters wrote:
> > OK, this testcase is enough to demonstrate the problem (using
> > Sample.wsdl from the defect that Silvano raised). The problem is not
> > that the sdo does not have the precision; it's i
