Hi Mike
Thanks for letting me know. Glad you were successful. It's nice to
get feedback so keep asking the questions when you feel the need :-)
Regards
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"php
> To: phpsoa@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: Representing Associative Arrays in SCA Result
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> With infinite skill and knowledge, I figured out that you can dump the
> contents of the SDO_DataObject with print_r :) Turns out the object
> is being populate
Michael
> Sent: May 8, 2007 8:34 AM
> To: phpsoa@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: Representing Associative Arrays in SCA Result
>
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I tried populating as you recommended with the
> same result. Forgive my ignorance, is th
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: May 8, 2007 5:59 AM
> To: phpsoa
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: Representing Associative Arrays in SCA Result
>
>
>
> Hi Mike
>
> It's possible that the way that the SDO is being populated is causing
>
Hi Mike
It's possible that the way that the SDO is being populated is causing
problems here. I tend to create each layer in the complex type
hierarchy separately. So, for example, the code would look something
like...
// create the top level object
$restorations = SCA::createDat
t; -Original Message-
> From: phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Caplan, Michael
> Sent: May 7, 2007 12:38 PM
> To: phpsoa@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: Representing Associative Arrays in SCA Result
>
>
> Hi Simon,
>
>
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the detailed response. I'm slowly working through the
intricacies of SDO. With your pointers, I was able to make good
progress, but I'm stuck on one point -- populating SDO so that my result
set gets properly translated to the SOAP client caller.
On the associate array iss
On 4 May, 19:10, Michael Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Maybe this is off topic, and I apologize if it is. I'm trying to get
> my head around how to represent complex return types for a SCA
> service. The result type is to be a associative array. I think I am
> on the right
