It’s best if others can come up with the ideas for improvement. For the most of
the summer I will be concentrating on some JavaScript/TypeScript project of
mine, when not enjoying outdoors activity.
Have a nice, safe summer!
/Jon
> On 29 Jun 2020, at 16:07, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> On
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:08:53AM -0400, r cs wrote:
> Sure Alex, I would be happy to do that.
Great! Thanks a lot! :)
It would be really nice if you, Jon, and perhaps others, could improve that
page. It is very bad as it is currently. Any ideas are welcome!
☺/ A!ex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
es every half year, I also fix every time the "latest
> release
> version" and "latest release date" in the PicoLisp page in Wikipedia
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picolisp
>
>
> However, since quite sime time, Wikipedia complains:
>
> A
latest release date" in the PicoLisp page in Wikipedia
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picolisp
>
>
> However, since quite sime time, Wikipedia complains:
>
>A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection
> with
>its subject. It
Hi Jon,
cool, thanks a lot!
> I can edit that page, if you tell me when and what to write. I see that the
> “Stable release 20.6” is now in the box on the right.
Yes, indeed, so it is adjusted already:
| latest release version = 20.6
| latest release date = {{Start date and
Hi all,
today I released picoLisp-20.6.
During those releases every half year, I also fix every time the "latest release
version" and "latest release date" in the PicoLisp page in Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picolisp
However, since quite sime time,
On 2019-01-09 07:58, Mattias Sundblad wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> "IA-32" is not explicitly supported. It would rather be "C" for pil32
>> and "emu"
>> on pil64. But this is probably too confusing for a Wikipedia article ;)
>
> Yes, most li
Hi,
>"IA-32" is not explicitly supported. It would rather be "C" for pil32
>and "emu"
>on pil64. But this is probably too confusing for a Wikipedia article ;)
Yes, most likely :)
>Other supported architectures (besides "x86-64") are "
org/wiki/ARM_architecture#AArch64 ?
"IA-32" is not explicitly supported. It would rather be "C" for pil32 and "emu"
on pil64. But this is probably too confusing for a Wikipedia article ;)
Other supported architectures (besides "x86-64") are "arm64" and "ppc64" I would
say.
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:58:33AM +0100, Jon Kleiser wrote:
> I have now added a PilBox paragraph under “History”, and two PilBox links
> under "External links”. Maybe the first PilBox link should have been under
> “References”, but I didn’t know how to do that.
>
Hi Alex,
> Better not. I was hoping that Geo (George Orais) would comment, he is still
> working on it.
Thanks!! Actually I did comment on this last Jan 2. :)
> Should we perhaps also mention that PicoLisp is available as a package
> on Termux (terminal app on Android)?
>
> ...
>
>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 09:57:30AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
> You could also check https://picolisp.com/wiki/?pilbox
As this is only a community-internal link, we should also link to the Google
Play Store page
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.software_lab.pilbox
☺/ A!ex
Am 2019-01-03 10:14, schrieb Alexander Burger:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Jon Kleiser wrote:
Is there a milestone or two we (eg. I) could add in the History
section?
Should we perhaps also mention that PicoLisp is available as a package
on Termux (terminal app on Android)?
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Jon Kleiser wrote:
> Is there a milestone or two we (eg. I) could add in the History section?
Should we perhaps also mention that PicoLisp is available as a package
on Termux (terminal app on Android)?
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
Hi Jon,
> Could you give me a complete sentence/paragraph describing the PilBox thing,
> including month and year, and maybe a link?
Something like this?
PilBox ("PicoLisp Box") - a generic Android App allowing to write Apps in
pure PicoLisp
You could also check
Hi Alex,
Could you give me a complete sentence/paragraph describing the PilBox thing,
including month and year, and maybe a link?
Shall I delete the paragraph that mentions the PilMCU project?
/Jon
> On 3. Jan, 2019, at 07:59, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
>> Happy New Year!
>
>
Hi Jon,
> Happy New Year!
Happy New Year, to you and all! o/
> I did add a link “Software Preservation Group – PicoLisp and Other Lisps” to
> the “External links” sections,
Very good idea!
> but that didn’t make the warning go away (not unexpected).
I'm not sure if we have the permission to
t;
> On 28 Dec 2018, at 08:35, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>
>> I think the issue with the Wikipedia message is that not much is said of
>> Picolisp outside of the Picolisp community :) Hence, if we can have a few
>> articles about *anything* related to Picolisp then we c
). Give me the text
and I shall put it in.
/Jon
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Dec 2018, at 08:35, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
I think the issue with the Wikipedia message is that not much is said of
Picolisp outside of the Picolisp community :) Hence, if we can have a few
articles about
the issue with the Wikipedia message is that not much is said of
> Picolisp outside of the Picolisp community :) Hence, if we can have a few
> articles about *anything* related to Picolisp then we can add a lot of
> "neutral" contents and that doesn't have to be you who does the st
I think the issue with the Wikipedia message is that not much is said of
Picolisp outside of the Picolisp community :) Hence, if we can have a few
articles about *anything* related to Picolisp then we can add a lot of
"neutral" contents and that doesn't have to be you who does the
Hi Jean-Christophe,
> Do you have a list of commercial applications that were developed in picolisp
> and can be mentioned there?
I could put together a list of all my projects during the last 30 years, but it
would not be helpful as these are all custom applications, not visible in
public.
>
a (late) Merry Christmas!
>
>
> Today I released PicoLisp 18.12, and when updating the Wikipedia page
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picolisp
>
> I got this note on top of the page:
>
> A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection wi
Thank you!
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 1:20 PM Alexander Burger
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> first of all, a (late) Merry Christmas!
>
>
> Today I released PicoLisp 18.12, and when updating the Wikipedia page
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picolisp
>
> I go
Hi all,
first of all, a (late) Merry Christmas!
Today I released PicoLisp 18.12, and when updating the Wikipedia page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picolisp
I got this note on top of the page:
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with
its subject
Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de writes:
Hi Alex,
recently the Wikipedia PicoLisp article was marked as lacking full
citations and/or inline citations.
I must say that I don't understand it. Reading the Wikipedia guidelines
doesn't enlight me at all. What exactly needs to be done? Does
Hi,
I ran the article through Wikipedia's reflinks tool (
https://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py?page=Picolispciteweb=onoverwrite=simplelimit=200),
which made a slight change to a url embedded in the page. I am not very
involved with wikipedia either, but I can try and read up
Hello,
I made some further edits to the wikipedia page, hope things look good.
best wishes,
Mattias
On 30 June 2013 16:42, Mattias Sundblad mattias@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran the article through Wikipedia's reflinks tool (
https://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py?page
involved with wikipedia either, but I can try and read up on what else
needs to be done.
Nice! I begin to understand what's meant, and I can see meaningful
'diff's in the WP page's history. Makes sense indeed!
Again, many thanks!
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject
. I'm sure it happens more frequently in
other areas that don't have pedants running the show, but I think it
is important for people to write the article like an encyclopedia
article.
Wikipedia can be annoying in this way because there are some editors
who are full of themselves
Hi Jon,
Have you tried discussing the issue nicely on the talk (Diskussion)
page? There hasn't been any talk in German, which is very strange for an
article that has been marked for deletion.
Well, there is one
Hi Henrik,
So in the spirit of promoting the language I made the reply into its own
post on my blog:
http://www.prodevtips.com/2010/01/09/on-picolisps-wikipedia-woes-and-the-process-of-promoting-a-language/
Thanks Henrik!
When it comes to secondary sources and references and such I propose
Sorry it took so long for me to reply in this thread, I've been extremely
busy.
So in the spirit of promoting the language I made the reply into its own
post on my blog:
http://www.prodevtips.com/2010/01/09/on-picolisps-wikipedia-woes-and-the-process-of-promoting-a-language/
Sometimes the lisp
Many thanks to all of you!
I'm all right again. Your comments and opinions helped me a lot. And:
Perhaps even the situation at the German site improved. At least there
seems to be some trend in the discussions in favor of the article.
Maybe it helped that Dexen pointed out the `reliable
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
My series starts here: http://www.prodevtips.com/2008/03/28/pico-lisp/
To be sure, I included them on the download page for a first step.
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
just wish it wasn't Picolisp, lowercase l.) Let's try
to make that article stick! If we succeed, I'll make another try at
donating some money to Wikipedia.
Keep up the good work! ;-)
/Jon
On 1/4/10 2:01 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:05:06PM +0100, dexen deVries wrote
I'm not donating a fucken cent to wikipedia after this.
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Robert Wörle wrote:
Cheers All
Here are my 5 cents to this.
First about the spelling:
The release version is named picoLisp. So i consider this the correct
spelling coming from Alex directly.
picolisp.org also uses
Hi friends,
a happy New Year!
Now it looks I need some help or advice. I'm having trouble with
Wikipedia.
I wrote an article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picolisp) around the
12th of November last year. Everything seemed all right, someone did
minor changes, added links etc
might lack, the code
examples work like expected at least but the explaining texts might be
wrong.
/Henrik
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi friends,
a happy New Year!
Now it looks I need some help or advice. I'm having trouble with
Wikipedia
Hello,
On Saturday 02 of January 2010 21:21:36 you wrote:
Well if you consider my series a reliable secondary source I would be
honored but I don't feel like they are.
I am afraid the `deletionists' on Wikipedia won't be pleased by a few blog=
=20
posts :( Their point is, Wikipedia ought
40 matches
Mail list logo
