: picolisp@software-lab.de
> Sent: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:44
> Subject: Re: PicoLisp on NuttX
>
> Thanks for the details...
> for 8KLisp , Z80 won't be helpful on ARM MCU ..
> I should try to make some tests , but I don't have the dev kits yet ...
>
> Kind re
ehind Gambit, so there's
probably something to it (I haven't used it myself).
-Original Message-
From: jerome moliere
To: picolisp@software-lab.de
Sent: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:44
Subject: Re: PicoLisp on NuttX
Thanks for the details...
for 8KLisp , Z80 won't be helpful on AR
Thanks for the details...
for 8KLisp , Z80 won't be helpful on ARM MCU ..
I should try to make some tests , but I don't have the dev kits yet ...
Kind regards
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> > Is it possible/adviseable to slim down the PicoLisp to drop
Hi Jerome,
> Is it possible/adviseable to slim down the PicoLisp to drop all unused
> libraries (XML/JSON) to have a miniPicoLisp superset ?
This will not help much, I'm afraid. XML or JSON are separate libraries
anyway, not part of the base system.
> The system running NuttX is a 120Mhz MCU wi
Thanks Alex for your answer.
Is it possible/adviseable to slim down the PicoLisp to drop all unused
libraries (XML/JSON) to have a miniPicoLisp superset ?
The system running NuttX is a 120Mhz MCU with 128Ko RAM + 1 Mo Flash
PicoLisp reduced in size on disk (with database options) + one AMQP broker
Hi Jerome,
> I am working on a connected watch project running on a very tiny hardware
> (MCU running a Cortex ARM 3 from ST microelectronics). I'd like to know if
> you have experience running PicoLisp in such environment ?
> ...
> I have seen that PicoLisp may be too heavyweight in the standard
