Re: [pkg-go] gcsfuse -- fuse file system for Google Cloud Storage

wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: The Debian policy is to not ship copies of libraries in packages. For C, that works quite well, since library authors are generally aware of SONAMEs and when they need to bump them. For Go, package

Re: [pkg-go] gcsfuse -- fuse file system for Google Cloud Storage

I take that back — actually, building even the leaf packages with tests enabled requires having x/net :). I’ve pinged tincho who last touched that repository. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: I’ve spent a bit of time analyzing the dependencies

Re: [pkg-go] Packaging a Go binary

to release a Debian package for this project or should I just give up? 1: https://github.com/gogits/gogs 2: https://github.com/gogits/gogs/blob/master/.gopmfile On 2015-06-02, Michael Stapelberg wrote: For the record: I’ll be replying on the thread to pkg-go-maintainers: http

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: Update for golang-go-systemd

and transitional packages? See https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-go.net.git/commit/?id=189085288e608ca2720b32d551227d330a561123 for an example. Thanks, Tim. On 13 Aug 2015, at 3:11 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: I think before uploading, we should

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: Update for golang-go-systemd

(which is what makes me think they're worth at least poking before we go head-first into a snapshot). ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 On 8 June 2015 at 12:52, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: That sure would be nice. Depending

[pkg-go] Bug#796400: Bug#796400: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests

Aaron, could you take a look at this problem please? It seems to me like this is a shortcoming of your tests, unrelated to Debian. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Chris Lamb la...@debian.org wrote: Source: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit Version: 0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1 Severity: serious

[pkg-go] Bug#793518: Bug#793518: Bug#793518: FTBFS: TestString fails: ini_test.go:167: Dict cannot be stringified as expected.

be great. On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) timothy.pot...@hp.com wrote: On 28 Jul 2015, at 6:35 am, solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:26:10PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: control: tags -1 + unreproducible Chris

Re: [pkg-go] gcsfuse -- fuse file system for Google Cloud Storage

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Aaron Jacobs jaco...@google.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: As I tried to explain before, we cannot use your vendored copies, and the tarballs we’ll create of your source code will not even contain

Re: [pkg-go] Changing dh-golang to work with Go shared libraries

Sorry for the late reply. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote: On 19 June 2015 at 08:24, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Thanks. The overall approach looks good to me, Very glad to hear that :-) but the patches still

Re: [pkg-go] dh-golang : DH_GOLANG_INSTALL_EXTRA_EXTENSIONS option

, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alexandre Viau alexan...@alexandreviau.net wrote: Hi, On 31/07/15 03:59 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: Your patch still adds an extra option. Can you remove that part please? Also, while you’re at it, install .s files as well? :) This one should work like you wanted

Re: [pkg-go] dh-golang : DH_GOLANG_INSTALL_EXTRA_EXTENSIONS option

Thanks for confirming. I uploaded dh-golang 1.9. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Viau alexan...@alexandreviau.net wrote: Hello Michael, On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Can you confirm that this works as expected for you? Once I hear

[pkg-go] Bug#793518: Bug#793518: Bug#793518: FTBFS: TestString fails: ini_test.go:167: Dict cannot be stringified as expected.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) timothy.pot...@hp.com wrote: On 28 Jul 2015, at 5:14 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: So, yes, if you could work with upstream on a proper solution and then we could just package a new upstream snapshot

Re: [pkg-go] gcsfuse -- fuse file system for Google Cloud Storage

I get exactly the same build failure when trying to package gcsfuse v0.5.0. On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Aaron Jacobs jaco...@google.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Indeed. Currently, when building, I get: # github.com

Re: [pkg-go] dh-golang : DH_GOLANG_INSTALL_EXTRA_EXTENSIONS option

Instead of adding this via a new setting, why not make dh-golang install these files by default? I think installing everything one can legitimately call program source code is fair game. The tricky part is identifying files which are necessary for test cases. The reason why dh-golang doesn’t

Re: [pkg-go] dh-golang : DH_GOLANG_INSTALL_EXTRA_EXTENSIONS option

that there are DepsErrors fields in the json -- the command still completes and gives the needed information afaics. Cheers, mwh On 30 July 2015 at 19:10, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Instead of adding this via a new setting, why not make dh-golang install these files

[pkg-go] Bug#793518: Bug#793518: FTBFS: TestString fails: ini_test.go:167: Dict cannot be stringified as expected.

control: tags -1 + unreproducible I can’t reproduce this. Using gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder, the package builds fine. Additionally, clicking “build2” on https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/golang-github-glacjay-goini.html (which your bug report pointed me to) results in a

[pkg-go] Bug#793518: Bug#793518: FTBFS: TestString fails: ini_test.go:167: Dict cannot be stringified as expected.

: info: unpacking golang-github-glacjay-goini_0.0~git20141123-1.debian.tar.xz dpkg-source: info: applying 0001-fix-test-nondeterminism.patch I: Building the package On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Turns out that test is flaky. The problem

[pkg-go] Bug#793518: Bug#793518: FTBFS: TestString fails: ini_test.go:167: Dict cannot be stringified as expected.

Turns out that test is flaky. The problem was fixed upstream in https://github.com/glacjay/goini/commit/5352bdc2ac2ddf2b5d27447c95bfe9588a8e09e9, I’ll package a new snapshot. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:35 PM, solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:26:10PM +0200, Michael

Re: [pkg-go] gcsfuse -- fuse file system for Google Cloud Storage

As I tried to explain before, we cannot use your vendored copies, and the tarballs we’ll create of your source code will not even contain the vendor/ directory. FWIW, the only blocker currently to get gcsfuse uploaded is https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcsfuse/issues/93 On Mon, Jul 27,

Re: [pkg-go] golang-golang-x-tools_0.0~git20150716.0.87156cb+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Thanks for the quick reply! I copypasted this from http://sources.debian.net/src/gnome-user-docs/3.16.1-1/debian/copyright/?hl=6#L6, perhaps you want to file a bug against that package, then :). I’ll reupload golang-golang-x-tools in a minute with the fixed debian/copyright. On Fri, Jul 24,

[pkg-go] Bug#792704: Bug#792704: etcd: Allow etcd configuration with systemd unit file

Why is not good enough to use systemd’s ways to override specific keys of a service file? I.e., use “systemctl edit etcd” and specify e.g. Environment= ETCD_DATA_DIR=/my/path/to/etcd On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Eric Paris debianb...@parisplace.org wrote: Package: etcd Version: 2.0.8-2

Re: [pkg-go] Need review - InfluxDB dependencies

I took a look at all of them and updated the whiteboard with the current status. Comments are on the #debian-golang IRC channel. On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Alexandre Viau alexan...@alexandreviau.net wrote: Hello, pkg-go! I have been working on packaging InfluxDB dependencies and I am

Re: [pkg-go] Fixed golang-x-text package for go 1.5

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Martin Packman < martin.pack...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 19/10/2015, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > > This looks good to me. Can you push it to > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-x-tex

Re: [pkg-go] Fixed golang-x-text package for go 1.5

Packman < martin.pack...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 22/10/2015, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Can you create an alioth account please? You can get a guest account > > without any trouble. Afterwards, please send a request to join

Re: [pkg-go] Usage of -git_revision option on dh-make-golang

Thanks for the feedback. The problem with the repository at hand is that it’s using a light-weight tag instead of an annotated tag: $ cat .git/packed-refs # pack-refs with: peeled fully-peeled c7477ad8e330bef55bf1ebe300cf8aa67c492d1b refs/remotes/origin/master

Re: [pkg-go] Building golang-github-google-btree from its git repo

standardized on a format yet I think. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > On Monday 19 October 2015 08:15:37 Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Dmitry, note that the pkg-go team policy states that packages must be > > buildable using git-buildpac

[pkg-go] Bug#801593: Bug#801593: Bug#801593: ratt does not find all reverse build dependencies

control: tags -1 + pending Thanks. Committed https://github.com/Debian/ratt/commit/20731fa3f65b04e4e030221f95d524baf83aa42d On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Michael Stapelberg (2015-10-19 09:03:40) > > Thanks

[pkg-go] Bug#801595: Bug#801595: Bug#801595: ratt calls sbuild in a way that uses the user's sbuildrc

t; > On 14 October 2015 at 10:06, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > I’m a bit hesitant to do this. If a user specified custom settings in > their > > > ~/.sbuildrc, they are probably there for a reason and should be > considered > > &

[pkg-go] Bug#801593: Bug#801593: ratt does not find all reverse build dependencies

index files. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Quoting Michael Stapelberg (2015-10-14 19:24:34) > > dh-make-golang actually does build-depend on golang-golang-x-tools-dev: > > > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/pa

Re: [pkg-go] Fixed golang-x-text package for go 1.5

This looks good to me. Can you push it to https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-x-text.git/ as well please? On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Martin Packman < martin.pack...@canonical.com> wrote: > I've pushed up packaging changes to fix golang-x-text for golang 1.5 > in

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Tianon Gravi wrote: > On 13 October 2015 at 16:43, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) > wrote: > > Hi tianon. I was curious what your plans were for uploading Go 1.5 to > unstable. Is there anything you can share? > > Go

[pkg-go] Bug#801596: Bug#801596: ratt hardcodes --dist=sid as sbuild argument

This was also reported as https://github.com/Debian/ratt/issues/1. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Package: ratt > Version: 0.0~git20150816.0.b060319-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > ratt currently seems to unconditionally pass --dist=sid to

[pkg-go] Bug#801596: Bug#801596: ratt hardcodes --dist=sid as sbuild argument

control: tags -1 + pending Fixed with https://github.com/Debian/ratt/commit/7b424109b0bea76eb6b5d2b0be6ae770391ed98b On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Quoting Michael Stapelberg (2015-10-12 20:59:10) > > > Maybe ratt should: &

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: a clutch of small go packages

Thanks for your work on these packages! On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) timothy.pot...@hpe.com wrote: Hi everyone. I’ve put together a couple of packages for review. Hopefully these are ready to go as they’re quite small. Could someone please review and

Re: [pkg-go] May I upgrade golang-blackfriday, golang-testify, etc. to latest versions?

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Anthony Fok wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to package Hugo ( http://gohugo.io/ ) for Debian, > and I am starting to package the various Go packages that > Hugo depends on. > > One of the packages that need updating is golang-blackfriday >

Re: [pkg-go] May I upgrade golang-blackfriday, golang-testify, etc. to latest versions?

Yeah, https://github.com/Debian/ratt should be ready to use. Please let me know of any issues you encounter. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:00:34AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >> > 1. ... just g

Re: [pkg-go] gbp: how to import upstream tarball without tag?

I just use dh-make-golang to produce new upstream tarballs. See also https://github.com/Debian/dh-make-golang/issues/14 On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Wednesday 02 September 2015 12:52:56 Martín Ferrari wrote: >> There is a very well documented and

[pkg-go] Bug#796806: Bug#796806: golang-check.v1: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests

Bug #796400 was similar. lamby, can you explain how I can reproduce this failure locally? I’d like to better understand how you are testing this before I can do anything about fixing the issue. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Chris Lamb la...@debian.org wrote: Source: golang-check.v1 Version:

Re: [pkg-go] Various problems with packages in the group

As a meta-point: I think we should change dh-make-golang to do the right thing once we agree on these suggestions. At least the first point you mention (repository creation) is already properly handled, i.e. dh-make-golang gives you a setup-repository command to run. On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:54

Re: [pkg-go] Usage of Built-Using for dev packages

I’ve updated the policy in commit https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/website.git/commit/?id=98531f7af530cbb571429a680e86a57ab936e86f On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Alexandre Viau <alexan...@alexandreviau.net> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > On 11/09/15 03:57 PM, Michael S

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

• debian/* is licensed under GPL-2+, but upstream is MIT. Consider using the same license to avoid headaches when shipping patches. • The package does not build with gbp: /tmp/golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson master $ gbp buildpackage --git-builder='sbuild -v -As --dist=unstable' gbp:error:

[pkg-go] Bug#798649: Bug#798649: golang-golang-x-net-dev: new upstream release?

I tried looking into this, but it’s not trivial. https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10904 required a revert of some commits (see https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-go.net.git/commit/?h=upstream=316f04ccdf09acb3d65aff39abb11ef287859815), but is still unfixed. I think we’d need

Re: [pkg-go] Usage of Built-Using for dev packages

I agree that setting Built-Using on the -dev packages does not make sense as long as they don’t contain binaries. golang-gogoprotobuf-dev is an example where the -dev package does contain binaries. As the vast majority of -dev packages does not actually contain binaries, I’m happy to accept a

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: a clutch of small go packages

) >> <timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: >> >> n 27 Aug 2015, at 2:26 am, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for your work on these packages! >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Service

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#798725: golang-github-vbatts-tar-split: FTBFS: B-D favors nonexistent packages over real ones

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: golang-github-vbatts-tar-split > Version: 0.9.7-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > Automatic builds of golang-github-vbatts-tar-split have been failing > because its build

[pkg-go] Bug#800930: ITP: ratt -- Rebuild All The Things!

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> * Package name: ratt Version : 0.0~git20150816.0.b060319-1 Upstream Author : Michael Stapelberg * URL : https://github.com/debian/ratt * License : MIT Programming La

Re: [pkg-go] Fwd: Updating the pkg-go Team Maintenance policy

library packages? On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:51:22 AM Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Dmitry, can you please outline what it is that you dislike about the > > suggestion? > > Too much freedom to upl

Re: [pkg-go] Fwd: Updating the pkg-go Team Maintenance policy

, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 04/02/16 18:57, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > I’m also in support of it. > > > > In case nobody else chimes in with an objection, I’ll commit it this > > weekend. > > Sorry I am this late to the discussion, you p

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest: Bug#803320: TestGoldenFiles fails with Go 1.5

Dmitry, can you do the upload please? On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:51:59 PM Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > > Confirmed and pre-existing upstream bug referenced. > > Guys could someone please re-upload "jacobsa-ogletest"

Re: [pkg-go] [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

Hi Alexandre, Alexandre Viau writes: > This was discussed in dh-make-golang's issue tracker (adding Michael to > CC as he has expressed a friend of his would like to code this): > - https://github.com/Debian/dh-make-golang/issues/8 I’ve checked back with said friend, and his

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

I’m not opposed, please feel free to push your changes. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Since nobody has voiced strong concerns about this, I will merge this > change later today or tomorrow and upload. > > I wanted to wait for Michael S. to chime in,

[pkg-go] Bug#819472: Bug#819472: dh-make-golang: diff for NMU version 0.0~git20150913.0.1221041-1.1

I didn’t see this before pushing a new version. Why did you not commit your changes to the collab-maint git repository? :( On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Control: tags 819472 + patch > Control: tags 819472 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've

[pkg-go] Bug#819472: Bug#819472: dh-make-golang: diff for NMU version 0.0~git20150913.0.1221041-1.1

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > I didn’t see this before pushing a new version. > > What new version? The new version looks like my changes only. > I pa

Re: [pkg-go] [pkg-golang-devel] Security support for packages written in Go

Thanks for the patch, it’s now merged and uploaded. I’d prefer if you could send such patches in a bug report instead of to mailing lists which I don’t actively read :). In fact, I’d say it’s long overdue to make this package team-maintained. The repository is already in collab-maint, so if you

Re: [pkg-go] Fwd: Updating the pkg-go Team Maintenance policy

Thank you for your patience with this, the last few weeks have been very busy for me. I’ve applied the patch and updated the website, so the changes are live now. Thanks! On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 13/02/16 10:34 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > >

Re: [pkg-go] Future of Packer in Debian

[+cc stender, who maintains this package] Thanks for the offer to help. I think the best way to make others aware that you’re willing to help would be to add you as an uploader. Daniel, what do you think? Would you be amenable to Emmanuel helping out with the package? If yes, could you add him

Re: [pkg-go] "use of internal package not allowed" running dh-make-golang

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > Michael, > > On 17/11/16 08:20, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Instead of creating additional scripts/tools, could we try to centralize > > that functionality into either gbp import-ori

Re: [pkg-go] "use of internal package not allowed" running dh-make-golang

Glad to hear it’s useful :). On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) < timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: > On 17 Nov 2016, at 6:20 PM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> > wrote > > > As for the issue itself, could you please file a

Re: [pkg-go] Upload of dh-make-golang

No objections, no special tests necessary. If things break, we get a good signal on what tests we need to add :). Thanks for your work on this! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > Am 22.11.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: > >> Hi all, >>

[pkg-go] Bug#855922: Bug#855922: containerd: 0.2.3 ds1-1 breaks docker 1.11 - unable to start containerd

With runc 1.0.0~rc2+git20161109.131.5137186-2, things indeed work again. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Potter, Tim <timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: > On 30 Mar 2017, at 3:54 AM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi Tim, >

[pkg-go] Bug#857025: Bug#857025: golang-golang-x-tools FRBFS on armhf: golang.org/x/tools/refactor/satisfy [no test files]

control: owner -1 ! Hi, Michael Hudson-Doyle writes: > and the failure is this: > > === RUN TestImportSymlinks > --- FAIL: TestImportSymlinks (0.03s) > Which, frankly, is a very bizarre test to be arch dependent. It’s not arch-dependent, it’s “just” flaky :).

[pkg-go] Bug#857291: ITP: golang-golang-x-debug -- debugging tools

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> * Package name: golang-golang-x-debug Version : 0.0~git20160621.0.fb50892-1 Upstream Author : The Go Authors * URL : https://golang.org/x/debug * License : BSD-3-

[pkg-go] Bug#857282: ITP: golang-github-golang-geo -- S2 geometry library in Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> * Package name: golang-github-golang-geo Version : 0.0~git20170112.0.f819552-1 Upstream Author : Google Inc. * URL : https://github.com/golang/geo * License : Apac

[pkg-go] Bug#857656: [PATCH] c/binaries: amend go whitelist to cover all errors

00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:30:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] c/binaries: amend go whitelist to cover all errors --- checks/binaries.pm | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/checks/binaries.pm b/checks/binaries

[pkg-go] Bug#857655: [PATCH] c/binaries: fix go whitelist by moving variable

00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:30:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] c/binaries: fix go whitelist by moving variable --- checks/binaries.pm | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/checks/bina

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#811565: [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

Hi Osamu, Sorry for the late reply, and thanks for looking into this! Replies inline: Osamu Aoki writes: > How should we explicitly specify such variables, I guess it should be > through "opts=..." such as: > > opts="mode=git, pretty=0.0~git%cd.%h, date=%Y%m%d%H%M"

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#811565: [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > (I switched my ISP. No more osamua...@e01.itscom.net Thanks for the > reminder) > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 06:44:43PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Hi Osamu, > > >

Re: [pkg-go] heads-up: dh-golang will trim $GOPATH/src from paths for reproducibility

28, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > Hey, > > I just committed https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/dh- > golang.git/commit/?id=254c2ad, which works fine in local tests. I intend > to upload a new dh-golang version with th

Re: [pkg-go] Minutes for the DebConf17 BoF

Thanks for sending these out. Comments inline: On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Pkg-go BoF meeting minutes > == > > On Tuesday, we had the first in-person meeting of the team. We met for 2 > hours to discuss our current issues

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#811565: [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Shengjing Zhu <i...@zhsj.me> wrote: > Thanks for the comment. > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Michael Stapelberg > <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > > 1. I think that infrastructure which the pkg-go team critically and very

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#811565: Bug#811565: [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 07:54:05AM -0700, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Thanks for sharing your tool! > > Thank you but I don't use go nor perl regulary :-( I wish uscan was in > P

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#811565: Bug#811565: [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 08:19:20AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > The functionality

[pkg-go] Bug#868937: ITP: golang-github-kurin-blazer -- A Golang library for Backblaze's B2.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> * Package name: golang-github-kurin-blazer Version : 0.0~git20170711.0.612082e-1 Upstream Author : Toby Burress * URL : https://github.com/kurin/blazer * License : Apac

[pkg-go] Bug#869376: Bug#869376: FTBFS: newer golang-github-stretchr-testify breaks tests

An upstream fix is now available at https://github.com/ncw/rclone/commit/db6009126df98a0a35975ca2fb7271a8493e1e30 Do you want to apply it, or shall I go ahead? On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > Source: rclone > Version: 1.36-

[pkg-go] Bug#869800: Bug#869800: Bug#869800: golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go: Please update to >= 1.4.13

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 27/07/17 14:05, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > It does break the API, as evinced by one build failure. > > > > I’m not aware of situations in the past where we created a new binary.

[pkg-go] Bug#869800: golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go: Please update to >= 1.4.13

rari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > > On 27/07/17 14:05, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > >> It does break the API, as evinced by one build failure. > >> > >> I’m not aware of situations in the past where we created a new binary. > >> How would we name them? Is it wo

[pkg-go] Bug#869800: Bug#869800: Bug#869800: golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go: Please update to >= 1.4.13

It does break the API, as evinced by one build failure. I’m not aware of situations in the past where we created a new binary. How would we name them? Is it worth the trouble? Personally, I would just update the new version + the fixed affected packages in one go, to reduce the breakage to a

[pkg-go] heads-up: dh-golang will trim $GOPATH/src from paths for reproducibility

Hey, I just committed https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/dh-golang.git/commit/?id=254c2ad, which works fine in local tests. I intend to upload a new dh-golang version with that commit later today. In case something breaks, please let me know. I know that this isn’t sufficient to

Re: [pkg-go] pkg-go bof at debconf

Hangouts indeed no longer requires a plugin, it uses WebRTC. I’d love to join, but can’t make the time: tomorrow evening is our local Go meetup’s Go 1.9 release party. Please circulate meeting minutes of significant discussion topics, I’ll read up on it. Thanks! On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:21 AM,

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#811565: [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

Thanks for sharing your tool! I also considered implementing such a tool, but ultimately decided against it for a number of reasons: 1. I think that infrastructure which the pkg-go team critically and very visibly depends on should eventually be hosted by DSA under debian.org. I don’t see them

Re: [pkg-go] Minutes for the DebConf17 BoF

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > Hi Mickael, > > I haven't yet got the time to write down properly my workflow, but I > will still reply to some points. :) > > On 15/08/17 23:02, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > >> 1.

Re: [pkg-go] Minutes for the DebConf17 BoF

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > On 20/08/17 17:35, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> So, my turn to describe workflows. > > Some things I forgot in my previous email: > > * I am not married to the idea of dch + debcommit, specially when I have > merge conflicts.

Re: [pkg-go] Minutes for the DebConf17 BoF

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 20/08/17 18:46, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > >> Side note, not meant to persuade anyone one way or the other: I just >> realized why I never saw any appeal in that argument: I find git >>

Re: [pkg-go] Minutes for the DebConf17 BoF

While we’re on the topic: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859867 discusses making sbuild easier to install/use :) On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 20/08/17 18:36, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >> I use gbp with sbuil

[pkg-go] Bug#862612: RM: golang-github-gosexy-gettext -- ROM; no rdeps, no update since 2013

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Working on Debian bug #860608, I stumbled upon golang-github-gosexy-gettext. I considered fixing that package, but realized that it has been last updated in 2013 and has no reverse dependencies. As Go libraries are only packaged in Debian to enable

[pkg-go] Bug#862608: unblock: golang-github-hashicorp-go-msgpack/0.0~git20150518.0.fa3f638-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package golang-github-hashicorp-go-msgpack This is part of the fix for Debian bug #860608: Go library packages should not use the Built-Using tag at all, and a few packages

[pkg-go] Bug#862610: unblock: golang-pty/0.0~git20151007.0.f7ee69f-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package golang-pty This is part of the fix for Debian bug #860608: Go library packages should not use the Built-Using tag at all, and a few packages are still referencing a

[pkg-go] Bug#862686: unblock: golang-github-armon-go-metrics/0.0~git20160307.0.f303b03-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package golang-github-armon-go-metrics This is part of the fix for Debian bug #860608: Go library packages should not use the Built-Using tag at all, and a few packages are

[pkg-go] Bug#839108: Bug#839108: dh-golang: Please document behavior and variables used

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 06:28 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 09:49:26 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > > > Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.

[pkg-go] Bug#822743: dh-golang: should assist in calculating -dev packages Depends:

Hi, currently going through the bugs of dh-golang. Is there anything that remains to be done here? If so, could someone please summarize the discussion and explain what it is? Thanks! -- Best regards, Michael ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

[pkg-go] Bug#839108: dh-golang: Please document behavior and variables used

Hi Guillem, Thanks for your report! Guillem Jover writes: > Please document at least the variables from the environment that > directly affect the behavior such as GOPATH, DH_GOPKG, > DH_GOLANG_INSTALL_ALL, DH_GOLANG_INSTALL_EXTRA, DH_GOLANG_BUILDPKG, >

[pkg-go] Bug#822668: Processed: cloning 822386, reassign -1 to dh-golang ..., severity of -1 is important

control: severity -1 wishlist control: retitle -1 Make dh_golang work without --buildsystem golang Hi, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> writes: > On 27 April 2016 at 19:22, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: >> Can you please explain why dh

[pkg-go] Bug#841074: dh-golang: Do not emit misc:Built-Using substvar for arch:all packages

control: tags -1 pending Hi Guillem, Guillem Jover writes: > This helper generates a misc:Built-Using substvar for all involved > packages, but that seems wrong for packages that do not statically > embed any Go modules when building, in case they are -dev packages > that

[pkg-go] Bug#876106: lists.debian.org: please create debian-go mailing list

Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist Name: debian-go Rationale: replacement for our current list on alioth Category: Developers Subscription Policy: open Post Policy: open Web Archive: yes Short description: Debian Go Packaging Team Long description: We, the Debian Go Packaging Team,

[pkg-go] Bug#839108: Bug#839108: dh-golang: Please document behavior and variables used

Thanks for the hint, I wasn’t aware of that! I’ll document the variables and upload a new version. On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Shengjing Zhu <i...@zhsj.me> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:26 +0200 Michael Stapelberg > <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: >> Hi Guille

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#811565: [uscan] git mode: allow for scanning repositories without tags

Almost a month has passed. What’s the current status? The pkg-go group is still eagerly waiting for this. If there is any way we can help, please let us know. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 01:20:22PM +0800, Shengjing

[pkg-go] [PATCH] dakweb: add /golang/import_paths query

ce.source, +source_metadata.value; +""") +out = [{'binary': res[0], 'source': res[1], 'importpath': res[2]} for res in res] +s.close() + +return json.dumps(out) + +QueryRegister().register_path('/golang/import_paths', import_paths) -- 2.14.2 From 50470f6ba177058fb

[pkg-go] Bug#879550: ITP: golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig -- Pure Go implementation of XML Digital Signatures

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> * Package name: golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig Version : 0.0~git20170911.b7efc62-1 Upstream Author : Russell Haering * URL : https://github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig * L

[pkg-go] Bug#879547: ITP: golang-github-cockroachdb-cockroach-go -- Packages for go clients.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> * Package name: golang-github-cockroachdb-cockroach-go Version : 0.0~git20170808.c806b48-1 Upstream Author : CockroachDB * URL : https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach-go * L

[pkg-go] Bug#879549: ITP: golang-github-beevik-etree -- parse and generate XML easily in go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> * Package name: golang-github-beevik-etree Version : 1.0.0+git20171015.af219c0-1 Upstream Author : Brett Vickers * URL : https://github.com/beevik/etree * License : BSD-2-

  1   2   3   4   >